Motor vehicle safety standards; exemption petitions, etc.: Kia Motors America, Inc., et al.,

Federal Register, April 20, 2004 (Nbr. Vol. 69, No. 75)

Notices - National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Permanent Link: http://regulations.vlex.com/vid/22723984
Id. vLex: VLEX-22723984

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this disposition

Go to article

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:



Federal Register: April 20, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 76)NoticesPage 21188-21189From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr20ap04-128

[Page 21188]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Docket No. NHTSA-2004-17439; Notice 1Kia Motors America, Inc. and Kia Motors Corp., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

Kia Motors America, Inc. and Kia Motors Corp. (Kia), have determined that certain vehicles that Kia produced do not comply with provisions of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) Nos. 101, ``Controls and displays;'' 105, ``Hydraulic and electric brake systems;'' and 135, ``Passenger car brake systems.'' Kia has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, ``Defect and Noncompliance Reports.''

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Kia has petitioned for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.

This notice of receipt of Kia's petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

Affected are a total of approximately 496,058 vehicles that do not meet the letter height requirements for brake system warning lights for the abbreviation ``ABS'' and in some cases the word ``brake.'' FMVSS No. 101, ``Controls and displays,'' Table 2, Column 3, ``Identifying Words or Abbreviation,'' with regard to brake systems says, ``* * * see FMVSS 105 and 135.'' S5.3.5 of FMVSS No. 105, ``Hydraulic and electric brake systems,'' requires that ``Each indicator lamp shall display word, words or abbreviation * * * which shall have letters not less than \1/8\-inch high.'' S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135 requires that ``Each visual indicator shall display a word or words * * * [which] shall have letters not less than 3.2 mm (\1/8\ inch) high.''

A total of 460,792 vehicles do not meet the letter height requirements for the word ``brake'' and abbreviation ``ABS'' for brake warning systems. These noncompliant vehicles are 143,046 MY 2000-2001 Sephias with a ``brake'' letter height of 2.2 mm and an ``ABS'' letter height of 1.7 mm, 128,565 MY 2002-2004 Sedonas with a ``brake'' letter height of 1.9 mm and an ``ABS'' letter height of 1.9 mm, and 189,181 MY 2000-2004 Spectras with a ``brake'' letter height of 2.2 mm and an ``ABS'' letter height of 1.7 mm.

An additional 35,266 vehicles do not meet the letter height requirements for the abbreviation ``ABS.'' These noncompliant vehicles are 957 MY 1995-1999 Sephias with an ``ABS'' letter height of 2.8 mm, 33,023 MY 2003-2004 Sorentos with an ``ABS'' letter height of 1.9 mm, and 1286 MY 2001-2004 Rios with an ``ABS'' letter height of 2.0 mm.

Kia believes that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that no corrective action is warranted. Kia states that the brake and ABS system warning lights are positioned for ready viewing by the driver, and that they are illuminated in red (brake warning light) or yellow (ABS light), colors that are generally understood by vehicle users to be indicators of unsafe condition.

Kia says that NHTSA has acted on four petitions involving brake system warning lights that were in noncompliance with the labeling requirements of FMVSS No. 101, 105, or 135. Kia summarizes these actions as follows:

In 1982, NHTSA granted a Subaru of America, Inc. petition involving passenger vehicles which used the ISO symbol in conjunction with the word ``brake,'' but where the lettering of ``brake'' was only 2.2 mm high. NHTSA agreed that the positioning of the warning light, combined with the ISO symbol, was an easily identifiable and very readable display. (47 FR 31347, 7/19/82). In 1985, NHTSA denied a Volkswagen of America, Inc. petition involving passenger vehicles which also used the ISO symbol instead of the word ``brake.'' (50 FR 28678, 7/15/85). In 1986, recognizing the then growing use and acceptance of ISO symbols for vehicle controls and displays, NHTSA granted an Alfa Romeo, Inc. petition involving passenger vehicles which also used the ISO symbol instead of the word ``brake.'' (51 FR 36769, 10/15/86). In 1994, NHTSA granted a Ford Motor Company petition involving passenger vehicles which, instead of having the brake system warning light identified by the word ``brake,'' had it instead identified by the ISO symbol. (59 FR 40409, 8/8/94). In granting this petition, NHTSA commented that recognition of ISO symbols among the public had been increasing and was likely to increase still further over time.

Kia further states that the brake and antilock system warning lights in all the Kia vehicles involved in this petition include an ISO symbol combined with the word ``brake'' or the abbreviation ``ABS.'' Kia asserts that NHTSA has stated that recognition of ISO symbols among the public has steadily increased over recent years, and NHTSA has recently proposed the adoption of ISO symbols for controls and displays in motor vehicles, including the same ISO symbols utilized by Kia in the affected vehicles. Kia quotes from NHTSA's notice of proposed rulemaking as follows: ``The ISO symbol set has existed for many years. The great majority of vehicles manufactured for sale in the U.S. already use many of these symbols. As a result, U.S. drivers have become familiar with many of them through exposure in their current vehicles.''

Kia states that it believes the ISO symbols which it uses in conjunction with the word ``brake'' and abbreviation ``ABS'' are commonly understood by the driving public. Kia says that, although the ``brake'' or ``ABS'' lettering within the warning light is less than the minimum letter height standard of 3.2 mm, the combined height of the entire brake or ABS warning light symbol and lettering ranges from a low of 6 mm for the brake light in the Kia Sephia to a high of 6.8 mm for the ABS light in the Kia Sedona, which significantly exceeds the 3.2 mm standard of FMVSS Nos. 101, 105, and 135. Kia asserts that all these factors (positioning, color, use of the ISO symbol, and combined size of both the lettering and symbol) combine to assure an easily identifiable and very readable display.

Kia asserts that, for the above reasons, it is very unlikely that a vehicle user would either fail to see or fail to understand the meaning of the brake or ABS warning light in the affected vehicles. Nor, Kia says, has it received any complaints regarding the size or visibility of either light.

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on the petition described above. Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be submitted by any of the following methods. Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Nassif Building, Room PL- 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC. It is requested, but not required, that two copies of the comments be provided. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted electronically by logging onto the Docket Management System Web site at http://dms.dot.gov. Click on ``Help'' to obtain

instructions for filing the document electronically. Comments may be faxed to 1-202-493-2251, or may be submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online

instructions for submitting comments.

[Page 21189]

The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.

Comment closing date: May 20, 2004.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 501.8.)

Issued on: April 14, 2004. Kenneth N. Weinstein, Associate Administrator for Enforcement.

FR Doc. 04-8926 Filed 4-19-04; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 4910-59-P

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access