Railroad services abandonment: Canadian Pacific Railway,
FR, November 08, 2002 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:FR, November 08, 2002 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: November 8, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 217)NoticesPage 68226From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr08no02-151
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
STB Docket No. AB-156 (Sub-No. 22X)Delaware & Hudson Railway Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway--Discontinuance of Trackage Rights Exemption--in Niagara County, NY
Delaware & Hudson Railway Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway (D&H) has filed a notice of exemption under
\1\ D&H notes that the 0.15-mile trackage rights sought to be discontinued are overhead rights over trackage owned by CSR, for which CSR is seeking abandonment authority in Canada Southern Railway Company--Abandonment Exemption--in Niagara County, NY, STB Docket No. AB-584 (Sub-No. 1X) (STB served Oct. 22, 2002).
D&H has certified that: (1) No local traffic has moved over the line for at least 2 years; (2) any overhead traffic can be rerouted over other lines; (3) no formal complaint filed by a user of rail service on the line (or by a state or local government entity acting on behalf of such user) regarding cessation of service over the line either is pending with the Surface Transportation Board (Board) or with any U.S. District Court or has been decided in favor of complainant within the 2-year period; and (4) the requirements at 49 CFR 1105.11 (transmittal letter), 49 CFR 1105.12 (newspaper publication), and
As a condition to this exemption, any employee adversely affected by the discontinuance shall be protected under Oregon Short Line R. Co.--Abandonment--Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). To address whether this condition adequately protects affected employees, a petition for partial revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be effective on December 10, 2002, unless stayed pending reconsideration. Petitions to stay and formal expressions of intent to file an OFA under
\2\ Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, which currently is set at $1,100. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
\3\ Because this is a discontinuance proceeding, trail use/rail banking and public use conditions are not appropriate. This proceeding is exempt from environmental and historic reporting requirements. D&H only intends to discontinue service over the line. Because D&H's discontinuance of trackage rights will merely result in the cessation of service over the line, and has not sought abandonment authority, this proceeding is exempt from the reporting requirements listed above and no environmental documentation will be prepared. See 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(6) and 1105.8(a) and (b). Because CSR is seeking abandonment authority with respect to this line in STB Docket No. AB-584 (Sub-No. 1X), See supra note 1, environmental issues related to abandonment will be addressed in this proceeding.
A copy of any petition filed with the Board should be sent to D&H representative: Diane P. Gerth, Leonard, Street and Deinard Professional Association, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300, Minneapolis, MN 55402.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.
Decided: October 29, 2002.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. Vernon A. Williams, Secretary.
FR Doc. 02-28070 Filed 11-7-02; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Sponsored links
This document cites
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Letters | shrinking forests imperil climate, experts warn: ; world fells trees at 'alarming' rate | Weather Data | Major League Dreams | Sentencia nº 4886 de Consiglio di Stato, September 17, 2008 | Sentencia nº 1713 de Consiglio di Stato, March 31, 2008 | decisión de tribunal sexto de control de aragua, de january 13, 2006 | Decisión de Juzgado Segundo de Protección del Niño y del Adolescente de Barinas de April 24 2006