Railroad services abandonment: Northern Southern Railway Co.
FR, November 07, 2007 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:FR, November 07, 2007 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: November 7, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 215)
Notices
Page 62907
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr07no07-106
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
STB Docket No. AB-290 (Sub-No. 297X)
Norfolk Southern Railway Company--Discontinuance of Service
Exemption--in Chester County, PA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR part 1152 subpart F--Exempt Abandonments and
Discontinuances of Service to discontinue service over a 7.70 mile line of railroad between milepost PX 3.10 and milepost PX 10.80 in
Phoenixville, Chester County, PA. The line traverses United States
Postal Service Zip Codes 19453 and 19460, and includes the stations of
Phoenixville, Pickering, and Devault.
NSR has certified that: (1) No local traffic has moved over the line for at least 2 years; (2) that all overhead traffic, if any, has been rerouted over other lines; (3) no formal complaint filed by a user of rail service on the line (or by a state or local government entity acting on behalf of such user) regarding cessation of service over the line either is pending with the Board or with any U.S. District Court or has been decided in favor of complainant within the 2-year period; and (4) the requirements at 49 CFR 1105.12 (newspaper publication), and 49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental agencies) have been met.
As a condition to these exemptions, any employee adversely affected by the discontinuance of service shall be protected under Oregon Short
Line R. Co.--Abandonment--Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). To address whether this condition adequately protects affected employees, a petition for partial revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be effective on December 7, 2007, unless stayed pending reconsideration.
Petitions to stay that do not involve environmental issues and formal expressions of intent to file an OFA for continued rail service under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),\1\ must be filed by November 19, 2007.\2\
Petitions to reopen must be filed by November 27, 2007, with: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001.
\1\ Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, which currently is set at $1,300. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
\2\ Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and not an abandonment, trail use/rail banking and public use conditions are not appropriate. Likewise, no environmental or historical documentation is required here under 49 CFR 1105.6(c) and 1105.8(b), respectively.
A copy of any petition filed with the Board should be sent to NSR's representative: James R. Paschall, Senior General Attorney, Norfolk
Southern Railway Company, Three Commercial Place, Norfolk, VA 23510.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at: http://www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: October 30, 2007.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
FR Doc. E7-21832 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Sponsored links
This document cites
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
new inductees jones and siegel to be honored in n.y. | The Walt Disney Co. | earnings roundup. | Cord Blood Registry CBR Announces Patricia Ferrin Loucks as New Head of Consumer Marketing. | Decisión de Juzgado Superior en lo Civil, Mercantil, Transito y de Menores de Miranda, de August 10, 2010 | Decisión nº 36 de Tribunal de Protección del Niño y del Adolescente Extensión El Vigía de Merida (Extensión El Vigia), de August 09, 2010 | decisión nº 1 de tribunal primero de primera instancia de juicio de merida extensión mérida de... | Decisión nº 289-09 de Juzgado Decimo Cuarto de Primera Instancia de Sustanciación Mediación y Ejecución del Trabajo Extensión Maracaibo de Zulia Extensión Mar...