Antidumping: Melamine from Japan,
FR, September 01, 1999 › Notices › International Trade Administration
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: September 1, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 169)NoticesPage 47764-47765From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr01se99-65
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-588-056Continuation of Antidumping Finding: Melamine From Japan
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of continuation of antidumping finding: Melamine from Japan.
SUMMARY: On December 8, 1998, the Department of Commerce (``the Department''), pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), determined that revocation of the antidumping finding on melamine from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping (63 FR 67654 (December 8, 1998)). On July 28, 1999, the International Trade Commission (``the Commission''), pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, determined that revocation of the antidumping finding on melamine from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time (64 FR 40895 (July 28, 1999)). Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4), the Department is publishing notice of the continuation of the antidumping finding on melamine from Japan.
For Further Information Contact: Scott E. Smith or Melissa G. Skinner, Office of Policy for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6397 or (202) 482- 1560, respectively.
Effective Date: September 1, 1999.
Background
On August 3, 1998, the Department initiated, and the Commission instituted, a sunset review (63 FR 41227 and 63 FR 41282, respectively) of the antidumping finding on melamine from Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. As a result of this review, the Department found that revocation of the antidumping finding would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
[Page 47765]dumping and notified the Commission of the magnitude of the margin likely to prevail were the finding to be revoked. (See Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review: Melamine from Japan, 63 FR 67654 (December 8, 1998)).
On July 28, 1999, the Commission determined, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the antidumping finding on melamine from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. (See Melamine from Japan, 64 FR 40895 (July 28, 1999) and USITC Pub. 3209, Inv. No. AA1921-162 (Review) (July 1999)).
Scope
The merchandise covered by this antidumping finding is imports of melamine in crystal form from Japan, which is a fine white crystalline powder used to manufacture melamine formaldehyde resins, and is classifiable under item 425.1020 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States Annotated (TSUSA). This merchandise is currently classifiable under item number 2933.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). The HTS item number is provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description remains dispositive.
Determination
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the Commission that revocation of this antidumping finding would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping finding on melamine from Japan. The Department will instruct the U.S. Customs Service to continue to collect antidumping duty deposits at the rate in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. Pursuant to section 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, any subsequent five-year review of this finding will be initiated not later than the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation of this finding.
The effective date of continuation of a finding, order, or suspension agreement will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of the Notice of Continuation. As provided in 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4), the Department normally will issue its determination to continue a finding, order, or suspended investigation not later than seven days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of the Commission's determination concluding the sunset review and immediately thereafter will publish its notice of continuation in the Federal Register. Pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6)(A) of the Act, therefore the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this finding not later than thirty (30) days before the fifth anniversary of the effective date of this notice.
Dated: August 26, 1999. Bernard T. Carreau, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
FR Doc. 99-22791Filed8-31-99; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Sponsored links
