Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Central, Inc.,
FR, August 15, 2000 › Notices › Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Linked as:FR, August 15, 2000 › Notices › Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: August 15, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 158)NoticesPage 49797-49798From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr15au00-48
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Docket No. RP98-52-038Williams Gas Pipeline-Central, Inc.; Notice of Superseding Offer of Settlement
August 9, 2000.
Take notice that on August 7, 2000, the Missouri Public Services Commission, Williams Gas Pipelines-Central, Inc., formerly Williams Natural Gas Company, Missouri Gas Energy, a division of Southern Union Company, and forth-three working interest owners (collectively called Sponsoring Parties) fileda Superseding Offer of Settlement (Superseding Offer) under Rule 602 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure in the captioned docket. Sponsoring Parties state the purpose of the Superseding Offer is to facilitate settlement and mitigate administrative burdens resulting from the Commission's implementation of the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Public Service Company of Colorado.\1\ The Sponsoring Parties further state the Superseding Offer replaces and supersedes the Offer of Settlement filedin Docket No. RP98-52-000 on October 1, 1999. A copy of the Superseding Offer is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. The Offer of Settlement may be viewed on the web at http://
[Page 49798]www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
\1\ Public Service Co. of Colorado, et al., 80 FERC para. 61,264 (1997), reh'g denied, 82 FERC para. 61,058 (1998). Appeal pending. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation v. FERC, Case No. 98-1227 et al.
The Superseding Offer would increase the credit towards the Kansas ad valorem tax refund liability from $50,000 to $100,000 and apply the credit to 309 working interest owners identified by certain operators as well as to each operator that has not provided working interest owner information. Sponsoring Parties state that the Superseding Offer would eliminate the claimed refund obligation for 289 working interest owners and 27 operators who have not provided working interest owner data.
In accordance with section 385.602(f), initial comments on the Superseding Offer are due August 28, 2000, and any reply comments are due September 7, 2000.
David P. Boergers, Secretary.
FR Doc. 00-20663Filed8-14-00; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Scene@Militarism in High Schools | Giants Notes | holidays where dream jobs come true | Bold Moves Help Restaurateur Succeed in Life and Business | Decisión de Juzgado Primero de Primera Instancia en lo Civil Mercantil Agrario de Tr... | Decisión de Tribunal Primero de Primera Instancia de Sustanciación Mediación y Ejecución del Trabajo de Anzoategui Extensión Barcelona de April 30 2007 | Decisión de Tribunal Segundo de Primera Instancia en funciones de Control de Anzoategui (Extensión Barcelona), de November 01, 2... | Decisión de Juzgado Primero de Primera Instancia en lo Civil, Mercantil y Agrario de Carabobo (Extensión Valencia), de November 2...