Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Reliant Energy Aurora, LP, et al.,
FR, November 07, 2001 › Notices › Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Linked as:FR, November 07, 2001 › Notices › Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: November 7, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 216)NoticesPage 56294From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr07no01-67
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Docket No. EC02-10-000Reliant Energy Aurora, LP, Reliant Energy Coolwater, LLC, Reliant Energy Desert Basin, LLC, Reliant Energy Ellwood, LLC, Reliant Energy Etiwanda, LLC, Reliant Energy Indian River, LLC, Reliant Energy Mandalay, LLC, Reliant Energy Maryland Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy New Jersey Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Ormond Beach, LLC, Reliant Energy Osceola, LLC, Reliant Energy Services, Inc., Reliant Energy Shelby County, LP, El Dorado Energy, LLC, Reliant Energy Aurora, L.P., et al.; Notice of Filing
October 30, 2001.
Take notice that on October 22, 2001, Reliant Energy Aurora, LP, Reliant Energy Coolwater, LLC, Reliant Energy Desert Basin, LLC, Reliant Energy Ellwood, LLC, Reliant Energy Etiwanda, LLC, Reliant Energy Indian River, LLC, Reliant Energy Mandalay, LLC, Reliant Energy Maryland Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy New Jersey Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Ormond Beach, LLC, Reliant Energy Osceola, LLC, Reliant Energy Services, Inc., Reliant Energy Shelby County and El Dorado Energy, LLC (collectively, the Applicants), submitted an application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power Act, seeking authorization for a proposed corporate reorganization that would result in the transfer of indirect control of Applicants and their jurisdictional facilities.
The Applicants state that, as a result of a proposed corporate restructuring of certain of Applicants' parent companies, there will be a transfer of indirect control of Applicants' jurisdictional facilities. The Applicants further state that the proposed transaction will have no effect on competition, rates or regulation and is in the public interest.
Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filedon or before November 12, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket#'' and follow the instructions (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
David P. Boergers, Secretary.
FR Doc. 01-27895Filed11-6-01; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
orono defeats stearns silk's td plays spark red riots | Family Dynamics Class On Marriage This Fall | Dover-Foxcroft Celebration to Include Parade, Music | huntington gets ready for 'we are marshall' premiere | Decisión de Corte de Apelaciones de Delta Amacuro de July 21 2008 | Decisión nº 041-04 de Corte de Apelaciones Sala 1 de Zulia, de February 21, 2005 | Sentencia nº 102 de Tribunal Supremo de Justicia - Sala Constitucional de February 12, 2009 | Sentencia nº 384 de Tribunal Supremo de Justicia Juzgado de Sustanciación Sala Político Administrativa de July 15 2009