Investigations, hearings, petitions, etc.: Empire United Lines Co., Inc.,
FR, August 15, 2002 › Notices › Federal Maritime Commission
Linked as:FR, August 15, 2002 › Notices › Federal Maritime Commission
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: August 15, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 158)NoticesPage 53353-53354From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr15au02-56
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Docket No. 02-11Empire United Lines Co., Inc.--Possible Violations of Sections 10(a)(1) and 10(b)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984, and Section 10(b)(2)(A) of the Shipping Act of 1984 as Amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, as Well as the Commission's Regulations at 46 CFR 515.31(e) as Amended; Order of Investigation and Hearing
Notice is given that on August 1, 2002, the Federal Maritime Commission served an Order of Investigation and Hearing on Empire United Lines Co., Inc. (``Empire'') an ocean transportation intermediary (``OTI'') operating as a non-vessel-operating common carrier. It appears that, with respect to thousands of shipments between April 2, 1997 and October 5, 1999, Empire knowingly and willfully provided false information by listing a freight forwarder on numerous bills of lading for Empire's shipments thereby allowing the freight forwarder to collect unwarranted compensation from several ocean common carriers. Also, between April 18, 1997 and December 15, 1998, it appears that on at least twenty-one occasions Empire collected a portion of the unwarranted compensation from the freight forwarder through invoices for various alleged services and products. It further appears that during the same approximate time period, Empire processed twenty shipments documented by invoices that indicate that the rates assessed and collected differ from those set forth in Empire's ATFI tariff.
This proceeding therefore seeks to determine (1) whether Empire violated section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (``1984 Act'') by knowingly and willfully obtaining transportation at less than the rates and charges otherwise applicable by the receipt of an unlawful rebate resulting from Empire's collection of a portion of unwarranted freight forwarder compensation from another OTI; whether Empire violated section 10(b)(1) of the 1984 Act and 10(b)(2)(A) of the 1984 Act as amended, by charging different compensation for the transportation of property than the rates set forth in its published tariff; whether Empire violated the Commission's regulations at 46 CFR 515.31(e) as amended, by knowingly and willfully providing false information to several ocean common carriers on documents concerning Empire's shipments; whether, in the event violations of sections 10(a)(1), 10(b), and 10(b)(2)(A) of the 1984 Act and/or 46 CFR 515.31(e) are found, civil penalties should be assessed against Empire and, if so, the amount of the penalties to be assessed; whether, in the event violations of sections 10(a)(1) and 10(b)(1) of the 1984 Act are found, the tariff of Empire should be suspended; whether the OTI license of Empire should be suspended or revoked; and whether, in the event violations are found, an appropriate cease and desist order should be issued.
The full text of the Order may be viewed on the Commission's home page at http//www.fmc.gov/ or at the Office of the Secretary, Room 1046, 800 N. Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC. Any person may file a petition for leave
[Page 53354]to intervene in accordance with
Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary.
FR Doc. 02-20673Filed8-14-02; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
New Jersey Briefs | La Iglesia de Jesucristo de Los Santos de Los Ùltimos Dìas No Contratarà Màs Empleados | Executive Order 13477-Settlement of Claims Against Libya | Your Letters | sentencia nº 2864 de consiglio di stato, may 28, 2008 | sentencia nº 5666 de consiglio di stato, december 13, 2010 | sentencia nº 1929 de consiglio di stato, april 28, 2010 | sentencia nº 4936 de consiglio di stato, october 01, 2009