Import investigations: Polychloroprene rubber from Japan,
FR, October 18, 2004 › Notices › International Trade Commission
Linked as:FR, October 18, 2004 › Notices › International Trade Commission
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: October 18, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 200)NoticesPage 61403From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr18oc04-86
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Investigation No. AA1921-129 (Second Review)Polychloroprene Rubber From Japan
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 4, 2004, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five- year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (69 FR 39905, July 1, 2004) was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response to its notice of institution was inadequate. The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review.\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.
\1\ Chairman Stephen Koplan dissenting.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to Sec. 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: October 12, 2004.
By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission.
FR Doc. 04-23203 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Class action v. Secretary of HHS re 'three day rule'. | Lakes Entertainment Inc to Host Conference Call and Webcast on Third Quarter 2007 Results. | petsmart chief financial officer to resign in 2007. | fortune interactive launches semlogic tm competitive intelligence solution for corporate search engine marke... | Decisión nº PJ0132010000331 de Sala Décimo Tercero de Juicio de Protección del Niño y Adole... | Decisión nº 3C-329-09 de Juzgado Tercero de Primera Instancia en lo Penal en Funciones de Control. Extensión San Fernando de Apure. de Apure (Extensión San Fernand... | Decisión nº 242-07 de Corte de Apelaciones 5 de Caracas, de December 18, 2007 | Decisión de Juzgado Undécimo De Primera Instancia De Sustanciación, Mediación Y Ejecución Del Trabajo de Caracas, de October 22, 2007