Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India
FR, May 12, 2010 › Notices › International Trade Administration
Linked as:FR, May 12, 2010 › Notices › International Trade Administration
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: May 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 91)
Notices
Page 26716
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr12my10-32
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
C-533-839
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 12, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo or Elfi Blum, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371 or (202) 482-0197, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 7, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) from
India. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 977 (January 7, 2010). This administrative review covers the period January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. This review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise to the United States, Alpanil Industries Ltd.
(Alpanil).
On February 12, 2010, the Department issued a memorandum revising all case deadlines. As explained in the memorandum from the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, the Department exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the
Federal Government from February 5 through February 12, 2010. See
Memorandum to the Record from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS for Import
Administration, Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the
Government Closure During the Recent Snowstorm, dated February 12, 2010, a public document on file in the Department's Central Records
Unit (CRU) in Room 1117 of the main Department building. Thus, all deadlines in all proceedings were extended by seven days. Consequently, the deadline for the final results of this review was revised from May 7, 2010 to May 14, 2010.
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1), the Department shall issue final results in an administrative review of a countervailing duty order within 120 days after the date on which notice of the preliminary results was published in the Federal Register. However, if the
Department determines that it is not practicable to complete the review within the time limits, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) allow the Department to extend the 120-day period up to 180 days.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), we determine that it is not practicable to complete the results of this review within the original time limit. The Department had to request additional information from Alpanil after the preliminary results. Consequently, the Department needs additional time to analyze this information and to consider comments filed by the parties. In accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the
Department has decided to extend the time limit for the final results from 120 days to 145 days; the final results will now be due no later than June 8, 2010.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 6, 2010.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
FR Doc. 2010-11320 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
KITCHENS v. SMITH, Warden., 226 Ga. 667, 177 S.E.2.d 87 (1970) | STEWART v WALTON et al. 254 Ga 81 326 S.E.2.d 738 | Ihli vs McElveen 5th Cir 1998 | 7 CFR 4284.513 - Evaluation criteria and weights. | LEGGE 17 febbraio 2012 , n. 9 - Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 22 dicembre 2011, n. 211, recante interventi urgenti per il co... | sentencia nº 330 de consiglio di stato january 22 2008 | Sentencia nº 6652 de Consiglio di Stato December 12 2008 | Decisión de Juzgado Primero Primera Instancia en lo Civil, Mercantil y del Transito de Caracas, de March 05, 2012