North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel Reviews; Request for Panel Review
FR, January 28, 2009 › Notices › International Trade Administration
Linked as:FR, January 28, 2009 › Notices › International Trade Administration
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: January 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 17)
Notices
Page 4940
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr28ja09-14
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of First Request for Panel Review.
SUMMARY: On January 16, 2009, Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 L.P. and Sivaco
Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P. (collectively,
``Ivaco''), filed a First Request for Panel Review with the United
States Section of the NAFTA Secretariat pursuant to Article 1904 of the
North American Free Trade Agreement. Panel Review was requested of the
Final Results of the 2006-2007 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review made by the International Trade Administration, respecting Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada. The determination was published in the Federal Register (73 FR 77005) on December 18, 2008.
The NAFTA Secretariat has assigned Case Number USA-CDA-2009-1904-01 to this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Dees, United States Secretary,
NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230. (202) 482-5432.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (``Agreement'') established a mechanism to replace domestic judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of
Canada, and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was filed with the United States
Section of the NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article 1904 of the
Agreement, on January 16, 2009, requesting a panel review of the determination and order described above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance with Rule 39 within 30 days after the filing of the first Request for
Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is February 17, 2009);
(b) a Party, investigating authority or interested person that does not file a Complaint but that intends to appear in support of any reviewable portion of the final determination may participate in the panel review by filing a Notice of Appearance in accordance with Rule 40 within 45 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel
Review (the deadline for filing a Notice of Appearance is March 2, 2009); and
(c) the panel review shall be limited to the allegations of error of fact or law, including the jurisdiction of the investigating authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in panel review and the procedural and substantive defenses raised in the panel review.
Dated: January 23, 2009.
Valerie Dees,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
FR Doc. E9-1858 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Michigan Ranked One of Best-Managed States in Nation Recognized for Being Well-Managed During Crisis | The Importance of Knowing What's Really Profitable | lewis troutman sr. | mariners take cal pitcher morrow with first pick | Sentencia nº 6346 de Consiglio di Stato, December 21, 2009 | Sentencia nº 4060 de Consiglio di Stato, September 02, 2010 | Decisión nº DP31-L-2010-000071 de Tribunal Septimo de Primera Instancia de Sustanciación Mediación y Ejecución del Nuevo Régimen y Régimen Proc... | Decisión de Juzgado Superior Civil, Contencioso Administrativo y Agrario de Apure, de February 22, 2007