Operation Exemption: U S Rail Corporation, U S Rail Corporation of NJ
FR, November 27, 2009 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:FR, November 27, 2009 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: November 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 227)
Notices
Page 62385
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr27no09-123
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
STB Finance Docket No. 35317
U S Rail Corporation--Operation Exemption--U S Rail Corporation of New Jersey
U S Rail Corporation (USRP), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to operate approximately 17.24 miles of rail line between milepost 10.86 in
Swedesboro, NJ, and milepost 28.10 in Salem, NJ. The rail line is owned by the County of Salem, NJ (County), and is currently operated by
Southern Railroad Company of New Jersey. U S Rail Corporation of New
Jersey (U S RCNJ), USRP's affiliate, and USRP are entering into an agreement providing for USRP to operate the rail line, with U S RCNJ retaining a residual common carrier obligation.
This transaction is related to the concurrently filed verified notices of exemption in: (1) STB Finance Docket No. 35310, U S Rail
Corporation of New Jersey--Lease Exemption--County of Salem, NJ, whereby U S RCNJ has filed a verified notice of exemption to lease the line from the County; and (2) STB Finance Docket No. 35318, Gabriel D.
Hall--Continuance in Control--U S Rail Corporation of New Jersey, whereby Gabriel D. Hall has filed a verified notice of exemption to continue in control of U S RCNJ upon U S RCNJ becoming a Class III rail carrier.
USRP certifies that its projected revenues as a result of the transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or Class I rail carrier and that its projected annual revenues will not exceed $5 million.
The transaction is expected to be consummated on or after December 12, 2009, the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the exemption was filed).
Pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110-161, section 193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007), nothing in this decision authorizes the following activities at any solid waste rail transfer facility: Collecting, storing or transferring solid waste outside of its original shipping container; or separating or processing solid waste (including baling, crushing, compacting and shredding). The term
``solid waste'' is defined in section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, 42 U SC. 6903.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U SC. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than December 4, 2009 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB
Finance Docket No. 35317, must be filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on Eric M. Hocky, Thorp Reed &
Armstrong, LLP, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000,
Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at: http://www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: November 23, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
FR Doc. E9-28433 Filed 11-25-09; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
29 cfr 525.3 definitions. | 10 CFR 205.13 Where to file. | Rinehart v Brewer 4th Cir 1999 | Sexual Harassment and Racial Disparity The Mutual Construction of Gender and Race | sentencia nº 617 de consiglio di stato, february 05, 2008 | Sentencia nº 2758 de Consiglio di Stato, May 27, 2008 | Sentencia nº 906 de Consiglio di Stato, February 17, 2009 | Sentencia nº 632 de Consiglio di Stato February 05 2008