Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: Illinois,
FR, January 06, 1999 › Proposed rules › Environmental Protection Agency
Linked as:FR, January 06, 1999 › Proposed rules › Environmental Protection Agency
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: January 6, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 3)Proposed RulesPage 820-821From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr06ja99-23
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
IL178-1b, IL179-1b; FRL-6216-3Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The USEPA is proposing to approve two negative declarations submitted by the State of Illinois. The first indicates there is no need for regulations covering the industrial wastewater category in the Metro-East St. Louis (Metro-East) ozone nonattainment area. The Metro- East ozone nonattainment area includes Madison, Monroe and St. Clair Counties which are located in southwest Illinois, adjacent to St. Louis, Missouri. The second negative declaration indicates there is no need for regulations covering the industrial cleaning solvents category in the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area. The State's negative declarations regarding industrial wastewater category sources and industrial cleaning solvent sources were submitted to USEPA in two letters dated October 2, 1998. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the USEPA is approving the State's requests as a direct final rule without prior proposal because USEPA views this action as noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for approving the State's requests is set forth in the direct final rule. The direct final rule will become effective without further notice unless USEPA receives relevant adverse written comment. Should USEPA receive such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal informing the public that the direct final rule will not take effect and such public comment received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. If no adverse written comments are received, the direct final rule will take effect on the date stated in that rule, and no further action will be taken. USEPA does not plan to institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 5, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Region 5 at the address listed below.
[Page 821]
Copies of the materials submitted by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency may be examined during normal business hours at the following location: Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randolph O. Cano at (312) 886-6036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.
Dated: December 21, 1998. David A. Ullrich, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
FR Doc. 99-228Filed1-5-99; 8:45 amBILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
nightlife | obit - jones, ann elizabeth read | Food safety regulation in the United States an empirical and theoretical examination. | Mobile and Online Media Veteran Mark Connon Joins Umber Systems as Corporate Development and Chief Privacy Officer. | Resolución nº 48423, de Corte de Apelaciones de Valparaiso - Sala Primera, December 19, 2006 | Sentenza nº 11627 de Tribunali Amministrativi Regionali Campania T.A.R - Campania Napoli November 12 2007 | Resolución nº 68352 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Séptima June 01 2000 | sentencia de cour de cassation december 03 1974 caso cour de cassation chambre civile 1 d...