Requests under Blanket Authorization:
FR, October 21, 2011 › Notices › Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Linked as:FR, October 21, 2011 › Notices › Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Linked as:Text
Federal Register Volume 76, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2011)
Notices
Page 65508
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FR Doc No: 2011-27226
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Docket No. CP12-1-000
Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization; Northwest Pipeline
GP
Take notice that on October 3, 2011 Northwest Pipeline GP
(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, filed in
Docket No. CP12-1-000, a Prior Notice request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.208 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural
Gas Act for authorization to replace approximately 5.06 miles of certain pipeline facilities located in Spokane County, Washington.
Specifically, Northwest proposes to replace 5.06 miles of 16-inch diameter pipeline between mileposts 158.3 and 164.3 with approximately 4.9 miles of new 16-inch diameter pipeline on Northwest's Spokane
Lateral. The decrease in pipeline length is a result of minor reroutes requested by landowners and will have no effect on capacity, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call toll-free, (866) 208-3676 or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
Any questions regarding this Application should be directed to Pam
Barnes, Manager, Certificates and Tariffs, Northwest Pipeline GP, P.O.
Box 58900, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158, or call (801) 584-6857, or fax
(801) 584-7764, or by e-mail pam.j.barnes@williams.com.
Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission's staff may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenter's will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with he Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenter's will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentary, will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission's final order.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
Dated: October 13, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
FR Doc. 2011-27226 Filed 10-20-11; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Sodba nº II Ips 365/2002 de Civilni oddelek, April 24, 2003 | Bellefontaine v Miller Ohio 2009 | sodba nº viii ips 19/2007 de delovno-socialni oddelek, june 26, 2007 | Summit Cty Fiscal Officer v Estate of Barnett Ohio 2009 | Decisión de Tribunal Tercero de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Control de Sucre Extensión Cumaná de February 10 2009 | Decisión de Tribunal Segundo de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Juicio de Sucre Extensión Cumaná de January ... | sentencia nº 2416 de consiglio di stato, june 08, 2011 | Decisión nº 717-08 de Tribunal Séptimo de Ejecución de Zulia (Extensión Maracaibo), de Octob...