Revisions to California State Implementation Plan:
Federal Register Volume 76, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 1, 2011)
Rules and Regulations
Pages 67369-67370
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FR Doc No: 2011-28251
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52
EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0356; FRL-9479-3
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and Imperial County Air
Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) and Imperial
County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on June 3, 2011 and concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from Motor Vehicle Assembly, Metal
Parts and Products, Plastic Parts and Products and Pleasure Crafts,
Aerospace Operations and Automotive Refinishing Operations. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on December 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0356 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrianne Borgia, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3576, borgia.adrianne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
-
Proposed Action
-
Public Comments and EPA Responses
-
EPA Action
-
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
-
Proposed Action
On June 3, 2011 (FR 32113), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP.
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
Adopted
Submitted
SJVUAPCD.................................
4602 Motor Vehicle Assembly Coatings.
9/17/09
5/17/10
SJVUAPCD.................................
4603 Surface Coating of Metal Parts
9/17/09
5/17/10 and Products, Plastic Parts and
Products and Pleasure Crafts.
ICAPCD...................................
425 Aerospace Coating Operations....
2/23/10
7/20/10
ICAPCD...................................
427 Automotive Refinishing
2/23/10
7/20/10
Operations.
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
-
Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
-
EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP.
-
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is
Page 67370
not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 28, 2011.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(379)(i)(C)(3) and (4) and (c)(381)(i)(A)(3) and (4) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(379) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) Rule 4602, ``Motor Vehicle Assembly Coatings,'' amended on
September 17, 2009.
(4) Rule 4603, ``Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products,
Plastic Parts and Products and Pleasure Crafts,'' amended on September 17, 2009.
* * * * *
(381) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Rule 425, ``Aerospace Coating Operations,'' revised February 23, 2010.
(4) Rule 427, ``Automotive Refinishing Operations,'' revised
February 23, 2010.
* * * * *
FR Doc. 2011-28251 Filed 10-31-11; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
