Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan: South Coast Air Quality Management District

Federal Register: December 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 243)

Rules and Regulations

Page 67821-67823

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr21de09-9

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52

EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0818; FRL-9087-3

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South

Coast Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the

South Coast Air Quality Management District portion of the California

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the application of adhesives and sealants, cleaning and degassing of storage tanks and pipelines, and coating operations of metal containers, closures, and coils. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the

Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on February 19, 2010 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 20, 2010. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the

Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number [EPA-R09-OAR- 2009-0818], by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an

``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If

EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and

``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

1. The State's Submittal

   1. What Rules Did the State Submit?

      Page 67822

   2. Are There Other Versions of These Rules?

   3. What Is the Purpose of the Submitted Rules or Rule Revisions?

2. EPA's Evaluation and Action

   1. How Is EPA Evaluating the Rules?

   2. Do the Rules Meet the Evaluation Criteria?

   3. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

   4. Public Comment and Final Action

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

1. The State's Submittal

   1. What Rules Did the State Submit?

      Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California

      Air Resources Board.

      Table 1--Submitted Rules

      Local agency

      Rule No.

      Rule title

      Adopted

      Submitted

      SCAQMD............................

      1125 Metal Container, Closure,

      03/07/08

      04/06/09 and Coil Coating Operations.

      SCAQMD............................

      1149 Storage Tank and Pipeline

      05/02/08

      04/06/09

      Cleaning and Degassing.

      SCAQMD............................

      1168 Adhesive and Sealant

      01/07/05

      04/29/09

      Applications.

      On May 13, 2009 and July 20, 2009, EPA determined that the submittals for SCAQMD Rules 1125 and 1149 and SCAQMD Rule 1168 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

   2. Are there Other Versions of these Rules?

      We approved earlier versions of Rule 1125, Rule 1149, and Rule 1168 into the SIP on June 13, 1995(60 FR 31081), August 19, 1999(64 FR 45175), and December 12, 2003(68 FR 69320).

   3. What is the Purpose of the Submitted Rules or Rule Revisions?

      VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. Rule 1125 lowers a

      VOC limit, Rule 1149 expands the rule to include pipelines and Rule 1168 adjusts a few VOC limits. EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about these rules.

2. EPA's Evaluation and Action

   1. How is EPA Evaluating the Rules?

      Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the

      Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines

      (CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see sections 182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). The South Coast Air Quality

      Management District regulates an ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81), so Rule 1125, Rule 1149, and Rule 1168 must fulfill RACT.

      Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the following: 1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and

      Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook). 2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule

      Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 3. ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions From Existing Stationary

      Sources Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics,

      Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks'' EPA-450/2-77-008, May 1977. 4. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial

      Adhesives'' EPA-453/R-08-005, September 2008. 5. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and

      Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Adhesives and Sealants''

      CARB, December 1998.

   2. Do the Rules Meet the Evaluation Criteria?

      We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs have more information on our evaluation.

   3. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

      The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rules.

   4. Public Comment and Final Action

      As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.

      However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by January 20, 2010, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on February 19, 2010. This will incorporate these rules into the Federally enforceable SIP.

      Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

   Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a

   SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).

   Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

   Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:

   Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

   Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

   Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory

   Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

   Page 67823

   Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded

   Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);

   Does not have Federalism implications as specified in

   Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

   Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

   Is not a significant regulatory action subject to

   Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

   Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the

   National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

   Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under

   Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

   In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the

   SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on

   Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.

   The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the

   Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the

   United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

   Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal

   Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

   Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 19, 2010. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

   Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

   Dated: October 23, 2009.

   Jane Diamond,

   Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 0

   Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

   PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

   Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(362) (i)(B)and

   (c)(366)(i)(B) to read as follows:

   Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.

   * * * * *

   (c) * * *

   (362) * * *

   (i) * * *

   (B) South Coast Air Quality Management District.

   (1) Rule 1168, ``Adhesive and Sealant Applications,'' amended on

   January 7, 2005.

   * * * * *

   (366) * * *

   (i) * * *

   (B) South Coast Air Quality Management District.

   (1) Rule 1125, ``Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coating

   Operations,'' amended on March 7, 2008.

   (2) Rule 1149, ``Storage Tank and Pipeline Cleaning and

   Degassing,'' amended on May 2, 2008.

   * * * * *

   FR Doc. E9-30152 Filed 12-18-09; 8:45 am

   BILLING CODE 6560-50-P