Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

Federal Register: March 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 45)

Rules and Regulations

Page 10690-10692

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr09mr10-11

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52

EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0859; FRL-9123-3

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San

Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin

Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) portion of the

California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on December 18, 2009 and concern reduction of animal matter and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from crude oil production, cutback asphalt, and petroleum solvent dry cleaning. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the

Act).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on April 8, 2010.

Page 10691

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0859 for this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).

To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne Wells, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4118, wells.joanne@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and

``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

  1. Proposed Action

  2. Public Comments and EPA Responses

  3. EPA Action

  4. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

  5. Proposed Action

    On December 18, 2009 (74 FR 67154), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP.

    Local agency

    Rule No.

    Rule title

    Amended

    Submitted

    SJVAPCD...........................

    4104 Reduction of Animal Matter..

    12/17/92

    8/24/07

    SJVAPCD...........................

    4404 Heavy Oil Test Station--Kern

    12/17/92

    8/24/07

    County.

    SJVAPCD...........................

    4641 Cutback, Slow Cure, and

    12/17/92

    8/24/07

    Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations.

    SJVAPCD...........................

    4672 Petroleum Solvent Dry

    12/17/92

    8/24/07

    Cleaning Operations.

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.

  6. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We did not receive any comments on the proposed action.

  7. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP.

  8. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a

    SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).

    Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

    Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:

    Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

    Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

    Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory

    Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

    Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded

    Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);

    Does not have Federalism implications as specified in

    Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

    Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

    Is not a significant regulatory action subject to

    Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

    Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the

    National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

    Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the

    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the

    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal

    Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 10, 2010. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Page 10692

    Dated: February 12, 2010.

    Jane Diamond,

    Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 0

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

    PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(351) (i)(C) to read as follows:

    Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.

    * * * * *

    (c) * * *

    (351) * * *

    (i) * * *

    (C) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.

    (1) Rule 4104, ``Reduction of Animal Matter,'' Rule 4404, ``Heavy

    Oil Test Station--Kern County,'' adopted May 21, 1992 and amended on

    December 17, 1992.

    (2) Rule 4641, ``Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations,'' Rule 4672, ``Petroleum Solvent Dry

    Cleaning Operations,'' adopted April 11, 1991 and amended on December 17, 1992.

    * * * * *

    FR Doc. 2010-4967 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am

    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT