Operation Exemption: San Francisco Bay Railroad-Mare Island; California Northern Railroad
FR, October 14, 2009 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:FR, October 14, 2009 › Notices › Surface Transportation Board
Linked as:Text
Federal Register: October 14, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 197)
Notices
Page 52837-52838
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr14oc09-107
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
STB Finance Docket No. 35304
San Francisco Bay Railroad-Mare Island--Operation Exemption--
California Northern Railroad
San Francisco Bay Railroad-Mare Island (SF Bay-Mare Is.), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate approximately 8 miles of unmarked rail line (the line) owned by the City of Vallejo (the City) and Lennar Mare Island,
LLC (LMI), in Vallejo, CA. There are no mileposts on the line; however, the track is described as extending from a junction located on the
California Northern Railroad approximately 800 feet north of Sereno
Drive in Vallejo, CA, to the end of track just south of Detoro Way on
Mare Island in the City of Vallejo, CA, and branching at A Street on
Mare Island to the end of track at approximately L Street on Mare
Island in the City of Vallejo, CA. SF Bay-Mare Is. states that it intends to interchange traffic with the California Northern Railroad at
Flosden Acres, in Vallejo, CA.
This transaction is related to a concurrently filed notice of exemption for David Gavrich to continue in control of SF Bay-Mare Is. upon SF Bay-Mare Is.'s becoming a Class III rail carrier. See David
Gavrich--Continuance in Control Exemption--San Francisco Bay Railroad-
Mare Island, STB Finance Docket No. 35303.
SF Bay-Mare Is. is currently negotiating an operating agreement with the City. SF Bay-Mare Is. states that it intends to commence operations over the line as soon as authority is granted.
SF Bay-Mare Is. certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of the transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class III rail carrier.
Pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110-161, Sec. 193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007), nothing in this decision authorizes the following activities at any solid waste rail transfer facility: collecting, storing or transferring solid waste outside of its original shipping container; or separating or processing solid waste (including baling, crushing, compacting and shredding). The term
``solid waste'' is defined in section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, 42 U.S.C. 6903.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than October 21, 2009 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB
Finance Docket No. 35304, must be filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on John F. McHugh, 6 Water St.,
New York, NY 10004.
Page 52838
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http:/
/www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: October 8, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
FR Doc. E9-24693 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Humane Society Seeking New Offices | los angeles | courtside wheel cases show frustration of injury work in missouri | Iran Unveils Underground Missile Silos | sentenza nº 4029 de tribunali amministrativi regionali puglia t.a.r - puglia bari november 20 2006 | sentenza nº 3649 de tribunali amministrativi regionali, piemonte, t.a.r. - piemonte - torino,... | Sentenza nº 7091 de Tribunali Amministrativi Regionali Lazio T.A.R - Lazio Roma July ... | Ordinanze Sospensive nº 107 de Tribunali Amministrativi Regionali Puglia T.A.R - Puglia Bari February 07 2007