Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Draft Research Test Procedures

Published date21 November 2019
Citation84 FR 64405
Record Number2019-25217
SectionNotices
CourtNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration,Transportation Department
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2019)]
                [Notices]
                [Pages 64405-64406]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-25217]
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
                [Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0102]
                RIN 2127-ZRIN
                Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Draft Research Test Procedures
                AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
                Department of Transportation (DOT).
                ACTION: Request for comments (RFC).
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: NHTSA seeks public comment on a series of nine draft research
                test procedures developed by the agency to assess the performance of
                certain types of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) available to
                consumers. NHTSA is specifically requesting comment on whether these
                draft research test procedures adequately, objectively, and practically
                assess the system performance of the underlying ADAS in a test track
                environment. NHTSA intends to use these draft research test procedures
                to further its research goals by using the output from clearly defined
                test methods to help better understand system operation, performance,
                and potential limitations.
                DATES: Comments must be received no later than January 21, 2020.
                ADDRESSES:
                 Documents: The draft research test procedures described in this RFC
                are available for viewing in PDF format in Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0102.
                 Comments: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. NHTSA-
                2019-0102, by any of the following methods:
                 Internet: To submit comments electronically, go to the
                U.S. Government regulations website at http://www.regulations.gov.
                Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
                 Fax: Written comments may be faxed to 202-493-2251.
                 Mail: Send comments to Docket Management Facility, U.S.
                Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
                Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
                 Hand Delivery: If you submit written comments by hand or
                courier, please do so at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
                Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
                Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
                 You may call Docket Management at 1-800-647-5527.
                 Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
                additional information, see the Public Participation heading of the
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Note that all
                comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
                 Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
                comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
                posts these comments, without edit, to www.regulations.gov, as
                described in the system of records notice, DOT/ALL-14 FDMS, accessible
                through https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. To facilitate tracking
                and response, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the
                name of their organization; however, submission of names is completely
                optional. All timely comments will be fully considered, regardless of
                whether commenters directly identify themselves. If you wish to provide
                comments containing proprietary or confidential information, please
                contact the agency for alternate submission instructions.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For research issues: Mr. Garrick
                Forkenbrock, Research Engineer, Vehicle Research and Test Center,
                National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 10820 SR 347, Bldg. 60,
                East Liberty, OH 43319. Telephone: 937-666-4511. Email:
                [email protected]. For legal issues: Ms. Sara Bennett,
                Attorney-Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic
                Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
                Telephone: 202-366-2992. Email: [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA seeks comment on the draft research
                test procedures listed below, which assess nine different ADAS
                technologies. As background, the agency develops different test
                procedures for different purposes. Most commonly, those test procedures
                are for rulemaking, New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), or research
                purposes. This RFC includes test procedures that have been developed
                for research purposes only. Research test procedures are used by the
                agency to evaluate a technology of interest and, when presented
                publicly, provide a basis from which gaps in test methodology or other
                specific deficiencies may be identified and resolved. In contrast,
                rulemaking test procedures are developed to support identified
                rulemaking efforts and, if a regulation is adopted, focus on ensuring
                that a technology meets the level of performance defined in the
                regulation and are used by the agency to determine compliance. Thus,
                the fact that NHTSA is researching a specific technology is not an
                indication that it will now or at any time initiate a rulemaking
                related to that technology or include that technology as part of NCAP.
                To the extent that research does inform future rulemaking efforts or
                revisions to NCAP, the agency will appropriately engage the public
                through public comment and other means during those processes.
                 NHTSA developed the draft test procedures made available today to
                research ways to objectively and practically assess the performance of
                ADAS technologies presently available to consumers on certain vehicles
                sold in the United States. NHTSA highlights that some of the research
                test procedures included in this RFC are in the early stages of
                development, while others are closer to being fully developed.
                 For light vehicles, these include:
                 Active Parking Assist (APA) \1\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \1\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
                August). Active park assist system confirmation test (DOT HS 812
                714). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
                Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Blind Spot Detection (BSD) \2\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \2\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2018, June).
                Blind spot detection system confirmation test (working draft).
                Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Blind Spot Intervention (BSI) \3\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \3\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019, July).
                Blind spot intervention system confirmation test (working draft).
                Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Intersection Safety Assist (ISA) \4\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \4\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
                September). Intersection safety assist system confirmation test
                (working draft). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
                Administration
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Opposing Traffic Safety Assist (OTSA) \5\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \5\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
                September). Opposing traffic safety assist system confirmation test
                (working draft). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
                Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking (PAEB) \6\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \6\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
                April). Pedestrian automatic emergency brake system confirmation
                test (working draft). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic
                Safety Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                [[Page 64406]]
                 Rear Automatic Braking \7\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \7\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2015,
                December). Rear automatic braking feature confirmation test
                procedure). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
                Administration. www.regulations.gov, Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0119-
                0030.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Traffic Jam Assist (TJA) \8\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \8\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019, June).
                Traffic jam assist system confirmation test (working draft).
                Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 For heavy vehicles, this includes:
                 Forward Collision Warning (FCW) \9\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \9\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
                March). Test track procedures for heavy vehicle forward collision
                warning and automatic emergency braking systems. Washington, DC:
                National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) \9\
                 Each draft procedure includes test scenarios designed to emulate
                real-world crash-imminent situations, all performed within the
                controlled confines of a test track. To ensure these tests are
                objective (i.e., clear about exactly how they should be executed), and
                can be accurately and repeatedly performed, each draft procedure
                contains detailed specifications pertaining to test conduct including,
                but not limited to, the equipment, facilities, instructions, and
                tolerances needed to perform them in the most objective and consistent
                manner possible. While the procedures include draft evaluation
                criteria, there are no pass/fail assessments provided because they have
                been assembled for research purposes only.
                 NHTSA invites public comment on each of its draft research ADAS
                test procedures. Specifically, the agency seeks information related to
                the following areas of interest. In your responses, please clearly
                specify to which test procedure(s) your comments apply.
                 1. Can the test procedures be expected to assess adequately for the
                purposes of research, within practical limitations, the performance of
                the underlying ADAS technologies? If not, please provide specific
                reasons why, and suggestions for how they may be improved.
                 2. Do any of the draft research test procedures contain elements
                that may potentially confound the system operation and/or test results
                (e.g., regarding test conduct)? If so, please indicate what those
                elements are and how they might be addressed and/or mitigated?
                 3. Are the draft research test procedures clearly written,
                understandable, and executable? If not, please provide specific areas
                for which clarification is necessary, and suggestions for how they may
                be improved.
                 4. Are the ranges of test speeds, speed combinations, and/or speed
                increments specified within each draft research test procedure
                reasonable? If not, please provide any data or evidence to support any
                claim of unreasonableness from a research perspective.
                 5. To reduce test burden for the assessment of some technologies
                for research purposes, the number of repeated trials per test condition
                is proposed to be less than or equal to seven based on our experience
                from past test procedure design work. Is this adequate, or should
                another number of repeated trials be performed for all technology/
                condition combinations to support an assessment of whether differences
                in the test results, for a given condition, are statistically
                significant?
                 6. Are there additional ADAS technologies NHTSA should be
                evaluating for research purposes? If so, please indicate what they are.
                 7. Are there existing, alternative test procedures for the ADAS
                technologies identified in this notice that NHTSA should consider? If
                so, please identify them and provide any comparisons/contrasts that
                might be useful to the agency.
                Public Participation
                How can I be sure that my comments were received?
                 If you submit comments by hard copy and wish Docket Management to
                notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed,
                stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon
                receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by
                mail. If you submit comments electronically, your comments should
                appear automatically in Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0102 on
                www.regulations.gov. If they do not appear within two weeks of posting,
                NHTSA suggested that you call the Docket Management Facility at (202)
                366-9826.
                How do I submit confidential business information?
                 If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
                confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
                submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
                business information, to the Office of Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S.
                Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
                20590. In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have
                deleted the claimed confidential business information, to Docket
                Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a
                comment containing information claimed to be confidential business
                information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the
                information specified in our confidential business information
                regulation. (49 CFR part 512)
                Will the agency consider late comments?
                 In our response, we will consider all comments that Docket
                Management receives before the close of business on the comment closing
                date indicated above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also
                consider comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
                How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
                 You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
                address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the docket are
                indicated above in the same location. You may also see the comments on
                the internet, at www.regulations.gov, identified by the docket number
                at the heading of this notice. Please note that, even after the comment
                closing date, NHTSA will continue to file relevant information in the
                docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late
                comments. Accordingly, NHTSA recommends that you periodically check the
                docket for new material.
                 Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
                1.95 and 501.4.
                James Clayton Owens,
                Acting Administrator.
                [FR Doc. 2019-25217 Filed 11-20-19; 8:45 am]
                 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT