Airworthiness Directives:
Federal Register Volume 76, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2011)
Rules and Regulations
Pages 60367-60370
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FR Doc No: 2011-25008
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39
Docket No. FAA-2009-0218; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-006-AD;
Amendment 39-16820; AD 2009-13-06 R1
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Piper Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-23, PA-23-160, PA-23-235, PA-23- 250, PA-23-250 (Navy UO-1), PA-E23-250, PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325,
PA-31-350, PA-31P, PA-31P-350, PA-31T, PA-31T1, PA-31T2, PA-31T3, PA- 42, PA-42-720, and PA-42-1000 airplanes that are equipped with a baggage door in the fuselage nose section (a nose baggage door). That
AD currently establishes life limits and replacement requirements for safety-critical nose baggage door components and repetitive inspections and lubrication of the nose baggage door latching mechanism and lock assembly. This new AD removes the requirement for the nose baggage door compartment interior light inspection and retains the other requirements from AD 2009-13-06, Amendment 39-15944. This AD was prompted by further investigation and a request for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC). We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective November 3, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 24, 2009 (74 FR 29118, June 19, 2009).
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Piper
Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; telephone:
(772) 567-4361; fax: (772) 978-6573; Internet: http://www.newpiper.com/company/publications.asp. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory K. Noles, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue,
College Park, Georgia 30337; telephone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474- 5606; e-mail: gregory.noles@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to revise AD 2009-13-06, amendment 39-15944 (74 FR 29118, June 19, 2009). That AD applies to the specified products. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 20, 2011 (76 FR 29176). That
NPRM proposed to continue to require establishment of life limits for safety-critical nose baggage door components. That NPRM also proposed to continue to require replacement of those safety-critical nose baggage door components
Page 60368
and repetitive inspections and lubrications of the nose baggage door latching mechanism and lock assembly. The NPRM also proposed to remove the requirement for the nose baggage door compartment interior light inspection.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. Ed Keith of Wright Air Service, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots
Association, Gary King, and several others commented that they support the NPRM. The following presents a comment received on the proposal and the FAA's response to the comment:
Revised Compliance Time
Ben Stevens and another commenter requested we revise the compliance time in paragraph (f)(2) for the repetitive interval to allow for a 10 percent (110 hours) overrun for return to a maintenance base for inspection. The commenters stated this would match program extensions for aircraft that are in for-hire or instructional usage per 14 CFR 91.409(b) and that similar allowance had been allowed in other
ADs.
We agree with this comment because the requested extension provides an acceptable level of safety for this class of aircraft. We revised paragraph (f)(2) of this AD to include the following text: ``Initially within 100 hours TIS after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from AD 2009-13-06, amendment 39-15944 (74 FR 29118, June 19, 2009); and repetitively thereafter at intervals of 100 hours TIS. The 100-hour interval may be exceeded by not more than 10 hours TIS to reach a place where the inspection can be done, per 14 CFR 91.409(b). The excess time used to reach a place where the inspection can be done must be included in computing the next 100 hours of TIS.''
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 8,000 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
Cost per
Cost on U.S.
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
product
operators
Inspection and parts replacement of 4 work-hours x $85 per hour
$190
$530
$4,240,000 nose baggage door.
= $340.
The new requirements of this AD add no additional economic burden.
The increased estimated cost of this AD is due to increased labor cost from 2009 when AD 2009-13-06, amendment 39-15944 (74 FR 29118, June 19, 2009) was issued.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive AD 2009-13-06, amendment 39-15944 (74 FR 29118, June 19, 2009), and adding the following new AD: 2009-13-06 R1 Piper Aircraft, Inc.: Amendment 39-16820; Docket No.
FAA-2009-0218; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-006-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective November 3, 2011.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD revises AD 2009-13-06, amendment 39-15944 (74 FR 29118,
June 19, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Models PA-23, PA-23-160, PA-23-235, PA-23- 250, PA-23-250 (Navy UO-1), PA-E23-250, PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325,
PA-31-350, PA-31P, PA-31P-350, PA-31T, PA-31T1, PA-31T2, PA-
Page 60369
31T3, PA-42, PA-42-720, and PA-42-1000 airplanes, all serial numbers, that are:
(1) Certificated in any category; and
(2) Equipped with a baggage door in the fuselage nose section (a nose baggage door).
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code, 52, Doors.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by several incidents and accidents, including fatal accidents, where the nose baggage door opening in flight was listed as a causal factor. We are issuing this AD to establish life limits for safety-critical nose baggage door components, replace those safety-critical nose baggage door components, and repetitively inspect and lubricate the nose baggage door latching mechanism and lock assembly. The door opening in flight could significantly affect the handling and performance of the aircraft. It could also allow baggage to be ejected from the nose baggage compartment and strike the propeller. This failure could lead to loss of control.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) For all aircraft: (i)
Initially within
Follow INSTRUCTIONS:
Inspect the nose baggage
1,000 hours time-in- PART I of Piper door assembly for damaged, service (TIS) since Aircraft, Inc. worn, corroded, or
all life-limited
Mandatory Service non[dash]conforming
components were
Bulletin No. 1194A, components; (ii) Replace
installed new
dated November 10, life-limited components
following Piper
2008. As an specified in the service
Aircraft, Inc.
alternative to information; and (iii)
Mandatory Service
using the part
Install or inspect, as
Bulletin No. 1194A, number 100700-079 applicable, the nose
dated November 10, placard, you may baggage placard following
2008, or within the fabricate a placard the service information.
next 100 hours TIS
(using at least \1/ after July 24, 2009 8\-inch letters)
(the effective date with the words in retained from AD
figure 1 of this AD 2009-13-06,
and install the amendment 39-15944 placard directly
(74 FR 29118, June above the nose 19, 2009),
baggage door whichever occurs
handle. This AD later. Repetitively does not require thereafter at
the verification of intervals not to
proper functioning exceed 1,000 hours of the nose baggage
TIS.
compartment interior light set forth in the last sentence of PART 1, paragraph 1, of
Piper Aircraft,
Inc. Mandatory
Service Bulletin
No. 1194A, dated
November 10, 2008.
(2) For all aircraft: (i)
Initially within 100 Follow INSTRUCTIONS:
Lubricate and inspect all
hours TIS after
PART II of Piper nose baggage door latching
July 24, 2009 (the
Aircraft, Inc. and locking components for effective date
Mandatory Service damaged, worn, corroded, or retained from AD
Bulletin No. 1194A, non-conforming components; 2009-13-06,
dated November 10, and (ii) Verify the key can amendment 39-15944 2008. only be removed from the
(74 FR 29118, June lock assembly in the locked 19, 2009); and position in accordance with repetitively the service instructions.
thereafter at intervals of 100 hours TIS. The 100- hour interval may be exceeded by not more than 10 hours
TIS to reach a place where the inspection can be done, per 14 CFR 91.409(b). The excess time used to reach a place where the inspection can be done must be included in computing the next 100 hours of TIS.
(3) For all aircraft with
Before further
Follow Piper damaged, worn, corroded, or flight after any
Aircraft, Inc. non-conforming components: inspection required Mandatory Service
Repair/replace any damaged, in paragraphs
Bulletin No. 1194A, worn, corroded, or non-
(f)(1) and (f)(2)
dated November 10, conforming components.
of this AD where
2008. any evidence of damaged, worn, corroded or non- conforming components was found.
Page 60370
GRAPHIC
TIFF OMITTED TR29SE11.000
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(3) AMOCs approved for AD 2009-13-06, amendment 39-15944 (74 FR 29118, June 19, 2009) are approved as AMOCs for this AD. The format has been revised and certain paragraphs have been rearranged since
AD 2009-13-06 was issued, including changes to paragraph identifiers in this AD. Previous AMOCs may refer to particular paragraph identifiers from the original AD, however, the corresponding actions of the AMOC in the revised AD still apply even though the identifiers have changed.
(h) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Gregory K. Noles,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College
Park, Georgia 30337; telephone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; e-mail: gregory.noles@faa.gov.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) You must use Piper Aircraft, Inc. Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 1194A, dated November 10, 2008, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 on July 24, 2009 (74 FR 29118,
June 19, 2009).
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Piper
Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; telephone: (772) 567-4361; fax: (772) 978-6573; Internet: http://www.newpiper.com/company/publications.asp.
(3) You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-3768.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at an NARA facility, call 202-741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on September 20, 2011.
Wes Ryan,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
FR Doc. 2011-25008 Filed 9-28-11; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P