Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan Engines

Published date01 August 2019
Citation84 FR 37570
Record Number2019-16329
SectionRules and Regulations
CourtFederal Aviation Administration
37570
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
returned payment fee, the amount of the
fee may be no more than $25 pursuant
to § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A).
2. Adjustments based on Consumer
Price Index. For purposes of
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and (b)(1)(ii)(B),
the Bureau shall calculate each year
price level adjusted amounts using the
Consumer Price Index in effect on June
1 of that year. When the cumulative
change in the adjusted minimum value
derived from applying the annual
Consumer Price level to the current
amounts in § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and
(b)(1)(ii)(B) has risen by a whole dollar,
those amounts will be increased by
$1.00. Similarly, when the cumulative
change in the adjusted minimum value
derived from applying the annual
Consumer Price level to the current
amounts in § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and
(b)(1)(ii)(B) has decreased by a whole
dollar, those amounts will be decreased
by $1.00. The Bureau will publish
adjustments to the amounts in
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and (b)(1)(ii)(B).
i. Historical thresholds.
A. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$25 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $35
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2013.
B. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$26 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $37
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2014.
C. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$27 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $38
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2015.
D. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$27 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A), through
December 31, 2016. Card issuers were
permitted to impose a fee for violating
the terms of an agreement if the fee did
not exceed $37 under
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through June 26,
2016, and $38 under
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B) from June 27, 2016
through December 31, 2016.
E. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$27 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $38
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2017.
F. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$27 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $38
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2018.
G, Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$28 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $39
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2019.
3. Delinquent balance for charge card
accounts. Section 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C)
provides that, when a charge card issuer
that requires payment of outstanding
balances in full at the end of each
billing cycle has not received the
required payment for two or more
consecutive billing cycles, the card
issuer may impose a late payment fee
that does not exceed three percent of the
delinquent balance. For purposes of
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C), the delinquent
balance is any previously billed amount
that remains unpaid at the time the late
payment fee is imposed pursuant to
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C). Consistent with
§ 1026.52(b)(2)(ii), a charge card issuer
that imposes a fee pursuant to
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C) with respect to a
late payment may not impose a fee
pursuant to § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B) with
respect to the same late payment. The
following examples illustrate the
application of § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C):
i. Assume that a charge card issuer
requires payment of outstanding
balances in full at the end of each
billing cycle and that the billing cycles
for the account begin on the first day of
the month and end on the last day of the
month. At the end of the June billing
cycle, the account has a balance of
$1,000. On July 5, the card issuer
provides a periodic statement disclosing
the $1,000 balance consistent with
§ 1026.7. During the July billing cycle,
the account is used for $300 in
transactions, increasing the balance to
$1,300. At the end of the July billing
cycle, no payment has been received
and the card issuer imposes a $25 late
payment fee consistent with
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A). On August 5, the
card issuer provides a periodic
statement disclosing the $1,325 balance
consistent with § 1026.7. During the
August billing cycle, the account is used
for $200 in transactions, increasing the
balance to $1,525. At the end of the
August billing cycle, no payment has
been received. Consistent with
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C), the card issuer
may impose a late payment fee of $40,
which is 3% of the $1,325 balance that
was due at the end of the August billing
cycle. Section 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C) does
not permit the card issuer to include the
$200 in transactions that occurred
during the August billing cycle.
ii. Same facts as above except that, on
August 25, a $100 payment is received.
Consistent with § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C),
the card issuer may impose a late
payment fee of $37, which is 3% of the
unpaid portion of the $1,325 balance
that was due at the end of the August
billing cycle ($1,225).
iii. Same facts as in paragraph A
above except that, on August 25, a $200
payment is received. Consistent with
§ 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(C), the card issuer
may impose a late payment fee of $34,
which is 3% of the unpaid portion of
the $1,325 balance that was due at the
end of the August billing cycle ($1,125).
In the alternative, the card issuer may
impose a late payment fee of $35
consistent with § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B).
However, § 1026.52(b)(2)(ii) prohibits
the card issuer from imposing both fees.
* * * * *
Dated: July 24, 2019.
Thomas Pahl,
Policy Associate Director, Bureau of
Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019–16300 Filed 7–31–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0567; Product
Identifier 2019–NE–21–AD; Amendment 39–
19698; AD 2019–15–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY
: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION
: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY
: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
(RRD) Trent 1000–AE3, Trent 1000–
CE3, Trent 1000–D3, Trent 1000–G3,
Trent 1000–H3, Trent 1000–J3, Trent
1000–K3, Trent 1000–L3, Trent 1000–
M3, Trent 1000–N3, Trent 1000–P3,
Trent 1000–Q3 and Trent 1000–R3
engines. This AD requires removal of
the affected high-pressure turbine (HPT)
disk front cover plate before reaching its
new life limit. This AD was prompted
by a recent analysis that determined the
HPT disk front cover plate may have a
safe life below its declared life limit.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES
: This AD is effective August 16,
2019.
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by September 16, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Jul 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
37571
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
ADDRESSES
: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202–493–2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Rolls-Royce plc,
Corporate Communications, P.O. Box
31, Derby, United Kingdom, DE24 8BJ;
phone: 011–44–1332–242424; fax: 011–
44–1332–249936; email:
corporate.care@rolls-royce.com;
internet: https://customers.rolls-
royce.com/public/rollsroycecare. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 781–238–7759. It is also
available on the internet at http://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0567.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at http://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0567; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Besian Luga, Aerospace Engineer, ECO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–
238–7750; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
Besian.luga@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Discussion
The European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA
AD 2018–0164R1, dated March 14, 2019
(corrected copy dated March 21, 2019)
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
address an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Following a recent analysis of the material
condition used in manufacture of these parts,
it was established that the HP turbine disc
front cover plate may have a safe life below
its declared safe cyclic life (DSCL).
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to premature failure of an affected part,
possibly resulting in damage to the engine
and reduced control of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
RR published the NMSB to provide the new
DSCL and replacement instructions.
Consequently, EASA issued AD 2018–0164
to require implementation of the reduced
DSCL and removal from service of those
affected parts that have exceeded the reduced
DSCL.
Since that [EASA] AD was issued, further
analysis has resulted in the approval of an
extended life for the affected parts. RR has
published the TLM Task for this extended
limit and it is expected the NMSB will be
cancelled accordingly.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at http://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0567.
Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed Rolls-Royce plc
(RR) Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
TRENT1000 72–AK057, Initial Issue,
dated April 10, 2018. The service
information describes procedures for
either removing the engine containing
the affected HPT disk front cover plate
or replacing the HPT disk front cover
plate during a shop visit.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
EASA and is approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the European
Community, EASA has notified us of
the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. The FAA is issuing
this AD because we evaluated all the
relevant information provided by EASA
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
AD Requirements
This AD requires removal of the
affected HPT disk front cover plate from
service before reaching its new life limit
and replacing it with a part eligible for
installation.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
This AD and EASA AD 2018–0164R1,
dated March 14, 2019 (corrected copy
dated March 21, 2019) require removal
of the affected HPT disk front cover
plate before accumulating 1,250 cycles
since first installation on an engine. RR
ASB Trent1000 72–AK057, Initial Issue,
dated April 10, 2018, requires removal
of the affected HPT disk front cover
plate before accumulating 865 cycles
since first installation. Since publication
of the ASB, the manufacturer has
revised its analysis, which has resulted
in an extension of the life limit for this
part to 1,250 cycles.
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
No domestic operators use this
product. Therefore, the FAA finds good
cause that notice and opportunity for
prior public comment are unnecessary.
In addition, for the reason stated above,
the FAA finds that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less
than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and
was not preceded by notice and an
opportunity for public comment.
However, the FAA invites you to send
any written data, views, or arguments
about this final rule. Send your
comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES
section. Include the docket
number FAA–2019–0567 and Product
Identifier 2019–NE–21–AD at the
beginning of your comments. The FAA
specifically invites comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this final rule. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this final rule
because of those comments.
The FAA will post all comments we
receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact we receive about this final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when
an agency finds good cause pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without
prior notice and comment. Because the
FAA has determined that it has good
cause to adopt this rule without notice
and comment, RFA analysis is not
required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Jul 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
37572
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 0 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this AD:
E
STIMATED
C
OSTS
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per
product Cost on U.S.
operators
Replace HPT disk front cover plate ................ 7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ............. $307,137 $307,732 $0
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch,
Policy and Innovation Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2019–15–05 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd &
Co KG: Amendment 39–19698; Docket
No. FAA–2019–0567; Product Identifier
2019–NE–21–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective August 16, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Trent 1000–
AE3, Trent 1000–CE3, Trent 1000–D3, Trent
1000–G3, Trent 1000–H3, Trent 1000–J3,
Trent 1000–K3, Trent 1000–L3, Trent 1000–
M3, Trent 1000–N3, Trent 1000–P3, Trent
1000–Q3 and Trent 1000–R3 engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 7250, Turbine Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by recent analysis
of the material condition used in the
manufacture of these parts that determined
the high-pressure turbine (HPT) disk front
cover plate may have a safe life below its
declared safe cyclic life. The FAA is issuing
this AD to prevent failure of the HPT disk
front cover plate. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in uncontained
release of the HPT turbine disk front cover
plate, damage to the engine, and damage to
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
Remove the HPT disk front cover plate,
part number KH59279, from service prior to
it reaching 1,250 engine cycles since first
installation on an engine and replace with a
part eligible for installation.
(h) Installation Prohibition
Do not install any HPT disk front cover
plate, part number KH59279, into any engine,
or any engine onto any airplane, if that part
has exceeded 1,250 engine cycles since first
installation on an engine.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Besian Luga, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–238–
7750; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
Besian.luga@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2018–0164R1,
dated March 14, 2019 (corrected copy dated
March 21, 2019), for more information. You
may examine the EASA AD in the AD docket
on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA–2019–0567.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Jul 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
37573
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
July 26, 2019.
Karen M. Grant,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–16329 Filed 7–31–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FDA–2018–C–4464]
Listing of Color Additives Exempt
From Certification; Soy
Leghemoglobin
AGENCY
: Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION
: Final rule.
SUMMARY
: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
amending the color additive regulations
to provide for the safe use of soy
leghemoglobin as a color additive in
ground beef analogue products. We are
taking this action in response to a color
additive petition (CAP) submitted by
Impossible Foods, Inc. (Impossible
Foods or petitioner).
DATES
: This rule is effective September
4, 2019. See section X for further
information on the filing of objections.
Submit either electronic or written
objections and requests for a hearing on
the final rule by September 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES
: You may submit objections
and requests for a hearing as follows.
Please note that late, untimely filed
objections will not be considered.
Electronic objections must be submitted
on or before September 3, 2019. The
https://www.regulations.gov electronic
filing system will accept comments
until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end
of September 3, 2019. Objections
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Objections submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
objection will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit an objection
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the objection as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper objections
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your objection, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2018–C–4464 for ‘‘Listing of Color
Additives Exempt From Certification;
Soy Leghemoglobin.’’ Received
objections, those filed in a timely
manner (see
ADDRESSES
), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or with the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Confidential Submissions—To
submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
objections only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff.
If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-
23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740–3835, 240–
402–1309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
I. Introduction
In a notice published in the Federal
Register of December 13, 2018 (83 FR
64045), we announced that we filed a
color additive petition (CAP 9C0314)
submitted by Impossible Foods, Inc.,
c/o Exponent, Inc., 1150 Connecticut
Avenue NW, Suite 1100, Washington,
DC 20036. The petition proposed to
amend the color additive regulations in
part 73 (21 CFR part 73), ‘‘Listing of
Color Additives Exempt from
Certification’’ to provide for the safe use
of soy leghemoglobin as a color additive
in ground beef analogue products such
that the amount of soy leghemoglobin
protein does not exceed 0.8 percent by
weight of the uncooked ground beef
analogue product. For the purposes of
this final rule, the term ‘‘ground beef
analogue products’’ refers to plant-based
or other non-animal derived ground
beef-like food products. The petition
describes soy leghemoglobin protein as
the principal reddish brown coloring
component of a stabilized mixture,
referred to as soy leghemoglobin
preparation. We are establishing soy
leghemoglobin as the common or usual
name for this color additive and note
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Jul 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT