Alpha-d-Glucopyranoside, Beta-d-Fructofuranosyl, Mixed Palmitates and Stearates in Pesticide Formulations; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
| Citation | 91 FR 55482 |
| Published date | 28 August 2026 |
| FR Document | 2026-17579 |
| Pages | 55482-55486 |
| Section | Rules and Regulations |
| Issuer | Environmental Protection Agency |
Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 166 (Friday, August 28, 2026)
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55482-55486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-17579]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0286; FRL-13571-01-OCSPP]
Alpha-d-Glucopyranoside, Beta-d-Fructofuranosyl, Mixed Palmitates
and Stearates in Pesticide Formulations; Exemption From the Requirement
of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates (CAS Reg. No. 84066-95-
5) when used as an inert ingredient (surfactant) on growing crops pre-
harvest at no more than 12% of the final pesticide formulation. Elicit
Plant S.A.S submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and
stearates, when used in accordance with the terms of this exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 28, 2026. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 27, 2026
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of this document).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0286, is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. Additional information about dockets
generally, along with instructions for visiting the docket in-person,
is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Registration Division
(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (202) 566-1030; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
proposed action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?
EPA is issuing this rulemaking undersection 4088 of the Federal
Food, Drug, andCosmetic Act (FFDCA)),21 U.S.C. 346aa.FFDCAAsection
408(c)(2)(A)(i)) allows EPA to establish an exemption from the
requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is
``safe.''FFDCAAsection 408(c)(2)(A)(ii)) defines ``safe'' to mean that
``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all
anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there
is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking
water and in residential settings but does not include occupational
exposure. Pursuant toFFDCAAsection 408(c)(2)(B)), in establishing or
maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance,
EPA must take into account the factors set forth inFFDCAAsection
408(b)(2)(C)), which require EPA to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . . . ''
Additionally,FFDCAAsection 408(b)(2)(D)) requires that the Agency
consider, among other things, ``available information concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. If you fail to file an objection to the
final rule within the time period specified in the final rule, you will
have waived the right to raise any issues resolved in the final rule.
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions provided in40 CFR part 1788. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify the docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OPP-2025-0286 in the subject line on the first page of your submission.
All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must
be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before October 27, 2026.
EPA'sAdministrative Laww Judges Division (ALJD), in which the
Hearing Clerk is housed, urges parties to file and serve documents by
electronic means only, notwithstanding any other particular
requirements set forth in other procedural rules governing those
proceedings. See ``Order Urging Electronic Filing and Service,'' dated
December 3, 2025, which can be found at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2025-12/2025-12-03-order-urging-electronic-filing-and-service.pdf.
[[Page 55483]]
Although EPA's regulations require submission via U.S. Mail or hand
delivery, EPA intends to treat submissions filed via electronic means
as properly filed submissions; therefore, EPA believes the preference
for submission via electronic means will not be prejudicial. When
submitting documents to the ALJD electronically, a person should
utilize the e-filing system at https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/eab/eab-alj_upload.nsf.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in40 CFR part 1788, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you wish to
include CBI in your request, please follow the applicable instructions
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules and clearly
mark the information that you claim to be CBI. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to40 CFR part 22 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice.
II. Petition for Exemption
In theFederal Register of July 3, 20255 90 FR 295155) (FRL-12474-
05-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21
U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-
11962) by TSG Consulting on behalf of Elicit Plant S.A.S, 1 Passage de
la Croix, Lieu-dit le chataignier, 16220 Moulins-sur-tardoire, France.
The petition requested that40 CFR 180.9200 be amended by establishing
an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of alpha-
d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and
stearates (CAS Reg. No. 84066-95-5) when used as an inert ingredient
(surfactant) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops pre-
harvest. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by
Elicit Plant S.A.S, which is available in the docket. There were no
comments received in response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition and in
accordance with its authority underFFDCAAsection 408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPAA
is establishing an exemption limiting the concentration of alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates
to no more than 12% of the final pesticide formulation to decrease any
potential for surfactant effects on the respiratory system.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in40 CFR 153.1255 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Final Tolerance Actions
A. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance may be established.
Consistent withFFDCAAsection 408(c)(2)(A)), and the factors
specified inFFDCAAsection 408(c)(2)(B), EPAA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-
d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates, including exposure
resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates
follows.
B. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates as well as the no
observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) and the lowest observed adverse
effect level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this
unit.
The toxicological database of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates is supported by data
regarding several other mixtures of sucrose esters of fatty acids which
have similar compositions and are manufactured by inter-esterification
of sucrose with fatty acids derived from edible vegetable oils and fats
(stearic acid and palmitic acid). These include fatty acids, C16-18
(even numbered), mono diesters with sucrose; Ryoto Sugar Ester S-570;
and Ryoto Sugar Ester S-1170. EPA has determined that it is appropriate
to bridge data from these three compounds to assess alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates
due to similarities in the manufacturing processes and composition.
Based on the available toxicity studies, alpha-d-glucopyranoside,
beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates is anticipated
to have low overall toxicity. Physico-chemical properties suggest low
potential for dermal toxicity. Studies with surrogate chemicals showed
low acute toxicity via the oral route, and low potential for skin
irritation or sensitization. Alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates may be irritating to
the eye.
There is a general concern regarding the disruption of natural
surfactants in the lungs from inhalation of chemicals with surfactant
properties. EPA lacks acute inhalation toxicity data for alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates
to determine whether it may cause such effects. However, the chemical's
physico-chemical properties
[[Page 55484]]
suggest low potential for inhalation toxicity. Moreover, EPA is
establishing a tolerance exemption with a 12% concentration limitation
to reduce exposure, which EPA believes will also reduce any potential
for such effects.
Read-across information did not identify adverse effects in a
subchronic study, a combined developmental/reproductive toxicity study,
or a chronic/carcinogenicity study. There was also no evidence of
mutagenicity. Therefore, concern for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity
is low. Neurotoxicity and immunotoxicity studies are not available for
review. However, no evidence of neurotoxicity or immunotoxicity was
observed in the available studies.
C. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level, generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose or a reference dose, and a safe margin of
exposure. For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount
of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the
adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program.
The hazard profile of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates is adequately defined.
Overall, alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed
palmitates and stearates is of low acute, subchronic, and developmental
toxicity. No systemic toxicity is observed up to 1,000 mg/kg/day. Since
signs of toxicity were not observed, no toxicological endpoints of
concern or PODs were identified. Therefore, a qualitative risk
assessment for alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed
palmitates and stearates can be performed.
D. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed
palmitates and stearates, EPA considered exposure under the proposed
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance and existing uses. EPA
assessed dietary exposures from alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates in food as follows:
Dietary exposure (food and drinking water) to alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates
may occur following ingestion of foods with residues from their use in
accordance with this exemption. Dietary exposure also may occur
following ingestion of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl,
mixed palmitates and stearates when used as a food additive. Although
alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and
stearates itself is not a food additive authorized by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration, similar sucrose esters of fatty acids, meeting the
criteria outlined in21 CFR 172.8599 and21 CFR 172.8699, are authorized
for use as emulsifiers, stabilizers, and texturizers in various food
products (e.g., chewing gum, coffee, beverages, sauces, meat, and
seafood). However, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment was not
conducted since a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment was not
identified.
2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
Alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates
and stearates may be present in pesticide and non-pesticide products
(e.g., cosmetics) that may be used in and around the home. However, a
quantitative residential exposure assessment was not conducted since a
toxicological endpoint for risk assessment was not identified.
3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity.Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v)) ofFFDCAA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
Based on the lack of toxicity in the available database, EPA has
not found alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed
palmitates and stearates to share a common mechanism of toxicity with
any other substances, and alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance exemption, therefore, EPA has assumed that
alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and
stearates does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.
E. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) ofFFDCAA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as theFood Quality Protection Actt
safety factor. In applying this provision, EPA either retains the
default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
Based on an assessment of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates, EPA has concluded that
there are no toxicological endpoints of concern for the U.S.
population, including infants and children. Because there are no
threshold effects associated with alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates, EPA conducted a
qualitative assessment. As part of that assessment, the Agency did not
use safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor
is needed for assessing risk to infants and children.
[[Page 55485]]
F. Determination of Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of concern were identified, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to residues of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates.
G. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of
alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and
stearates in or on any food commodities. EPA is establishing a
limitation on the amount of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates that may be used in
pesticide formulations applied pre-harvest. This limitation will be
enforced through the pesticide registration process under theFederal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Actt (`FIFRAA''),7 U.S.C.. 136
et seq. EPA will not register any pesticide formulation for food use
that exceeds 12% alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed
palmitates and stearates in the final pesticide formulation.
H. Conclusion
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established for residues of alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d-
fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates CAS Reg. No. 84066-955-
5) when used as an inert ingredient (surfactant) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops pre-harvest under40 CFR 180.9200
at no more than 12% of the final pesticide formulation.
V. Statutory andExecutive Orderr Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/regulations/and-executive-orders.
A.Executive Order 128666: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is exempt from review underExecutive Order 128666 58
FR 517355, October 4, 1993), because it establishes or modifies a
pesticide tolerance or a tolerance exemption underFFDCAAsection 4088 in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review underExecutive Order 128666.
B.Executive Order 141922: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
Executive Order 141922 90 FR 90655, February 6, 2025) does not apply
because actions that establish a tolerance or a tolerance exemption
underFFDCAAsection 4088 are exempted from review underExecutive Order
128666.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA,44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.., because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is not subject to the RFA,5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.. The RFA
applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under theAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)),5 U.S.C.
5533, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to the APA but is
subject toFFDCAAsection 408(d)), which does not require notice and
comment rulemaking to take this action in response to a petition.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more (in 1995 dollars and adjusted annually for inflation) as described
in UMRA,2 U.S.C. 1531-15388, and does not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any
state, local or tribal governments or the private sector.
F.Executive Order 131322: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 131322 64 FR 432555, August 10, 1999), because it will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G.Executive Order 131755: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 131755 65 FR 672499, November 9, 2000), because it will
not have substantial direct effects on Tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal government and the Indian Tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes.
H.Executive Order 130455: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject toExecutive Order 130455 62 FR 198855,
April 23, 1997) because it is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 128666 (see Unit IV.A.), and because
EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed
by this action present a disproportionate risk to children.
However, EPA's 2026 Policy on Children's Health applies to this
action. This rule finalizes tolerance actions under theFFDCAA, which
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . .'' FFDCAA 408(b)(2)(C)). The Agency's
consideration is documented in the pesticide-specific registration
review documents, located in the applicable docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
I.Executive Order 132111: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject toExecutive Order 132111 66 FR 283555)
(May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 128666.
J. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical standards that would require
Agency consideration under NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA,5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.., and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action not a ``major
rule'' as defined by5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
List of Subjects in40 CFR Part 1800
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 55486]]
Dated: August 25, 2026.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR chapter I is amended
as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCESS AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation forpart 1800 continues to read as follows:
Authority:21 U.S.C. 321(q)), 346a and 371.
0
2. Amend Sec. 180.920, by adding an entry for ``Alpha-d-
glucopyranoside, beta-d-fructofuranosyl, mixed palmitates and stearates
(CAS Reg. No. 84066-95-5)'' in alphabetical order to Table 1 to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.9200 Inert ingredients used pre-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
Table 1--to Sec. 180.920
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Alpha-d-glucopyranoside, beta-d- No more than 12% Surfactant.
fructofuranosyl, mixed of the final
palmitates and stearates (CAS pesticide
Reg. No. 84066-95-5). formulation.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2026-17579 Filed 8-27-26; 8:45 am]
BILLINGCODE 6560-50-PP
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
