Anchorage Grounds; Atlantic Ocean, Delaware

CourtCoast Guard
Citation87 FR 16126
Record Number2022-05806
Published date22 March 2022
Federal Register, Volume 87 Issue 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2022)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2022)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 16126-16129]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2022-05806]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
                Coast Guard
                33 CFR Part 110
                [Docket Number USCG-2019-0822]
                RIN 1625-AA01
                Anchorage Grounds; Atlantic Ocean, Delaware
                AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
                ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to amend the anchorage
                regulations for the Delaware Bay and River, and adjacent waters, by
                establishing two new, offshore deep-water anchorages. The purpose of
                this proposed rule is to improve navigation safety by accommodating
                recent and anticipated future growth in vessel size and volume of
                vessel traffic entering the Delaware Bay and River, and to preserve
                areas traditionally used or needed for anchoring. We invite your
                comments on this proposed rulemaking.
                DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
                Guard on or before May 23, 2022.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
                2019-0822 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
                Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
                instructions on submitting comments.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
                proposed rulemaking, call or email Marine Science Technician First
                Class (MST1) Jennifer Padilla, Sector Delaware Bay, U.S. Coast Guard;
                telephone (215) 271-4889, email [email protected]; or Mr.
                Matt Creelman, Fifth Coast Guard District (dpw), U.S. Coast Guard;
                telephone (757) 398-6230, email [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Table of Abbreviations
                ACPARS Atlantic Coast Port Access Route Study
                AIS Automatic Identification System
                BOEM Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
                CFR Code of Federal Regulations
                COTP Captain of the Port
                DHS Department of Homeland Security
                FR Federal Register
                NOI Notice of Intent
                NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
                OREA Offshore Renewable Energy Area
                PARS Port Access Route Study
                Sec. Section
                U.S.C. United States Code
                II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
                 In 2011, the Coast Guard received requests to formally establish
                anchorages in the Atlantic Ocean offshore from the Delaware coast in
                response to the Atlantic Coast Port Access Route Study (ACPARS), a
                multiyear study that included public participation and identified the
                navigation routes customarily followed by ships engaged in commerce
                between international and domestic U.S. ports. The ACPARS is available
                at https://navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=PARSReports. To preserve areas
                traditionally used for anchoring from offshore development, the Federal
                Pilots and the Mariners' Advisory Committee for the Bay and River
                Delaware requested formal anchorage grounds be established to the east
                and the west of the southeastern approach traffic separation scheme.
                While these requests were noted in the ACPARS, the Coast Guard took no
                action in the pursuing years, and the areas to the east and the west of
                the southeastern approach traffic separation scheme continued to be
                used as traditional and unregulated anchorage grounds.
                 On July 12, 2018, and August 21, 2018, the Coast Guard held
                meetings with maritime stakeholders and waterway users to discuss the
                impacts to vessel traffic and navigation safety on the Delaware Bay and
                River due to the expansion of the Panama Canal and the planned
                deepening of the Delaware River from 40 to 45 feet. Meeting attendees
                included the Pilots' Association for the Bay and River Delaware, the
                Mariners' Advisory Committee for the Bay and River Delaware, Interport
                Pilots Association, and port and terminal representatives. The
                attendees concluded the increased volume of vessel traffic and the size
                of vessels calling on the Delaware Bay and River, and planned and
                potential offshore development, heightened the need to formally
                establish three new anchorage grounds: Two offshore in the Atlantic
                Ocean and an additional inshore anchorage located in the Delaware Bay
                near the Cape Henlopen breakwaters. The participants suggested the
                anchorages would preserve areas traditionally used for anchoring and
                provide for the ongoing and future growth of the marine transportation
                system on the Delaware Bay and River.
                 On November 29, 2019, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Inquiry
                (NOI) in the Federal Register (81 FR 25854) to formally seek feedback
                on whether the Coast Guard should consider a proposed rulemaking to
                establish the three new anchorages. Following the naming convention in
                33 CFR 110.157, the anchorages were referred to as Anchorage B--
                Breakwater, Anchorage C--Cape Henlopen, and Anchorage D--Indian River.
                We received 42 comments in response to the NOI. Five comments were
                supportive; twenty eight were opposed to the proposed inshore
                anchorage, Anchorage B; and fourteen were opposed to the proposed
                offshore anchorages, Anchorages C and D.
                 On May 5, 2020, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Study;
                request for comments entitled ``Port Access Route Study (PARS) for the
                Seacoast of New Jersey Including Offshore Approaches to the Delaware
                Bay, Delaware'' in the Federal Register (85 FR 26695). The initial
                comment period closed on July 5, 2020. The Coast Guard conducted two
                virtual public meetings on October 28, 2020, and November 4, 2020, and
                the initial comment period was re-opened through November 10, 2020. The
                study included an in-depth analysis of historical anchoring patterns in
                the approaches to the Delaware Bay and River. Anchorage related
                comments received during the study are discussed in Section III, and a
                full list of comments can be found in the Port Access Route Study
                ``PARS,'' docket number USCG-2020-0172.\1\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \1\ The docket folder for USCG-2020-0172 is available at:
                Regulations.gov.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Based on feedback received to date, primary objections to the
                proposed inshore anchorage are environmental in nature and concern
                potential impacts on Atlantic Sturgeon, an endangered species under the
                Endangered Species Act. Primary objections to the proposed offshore
                anchorages concern potential conflicts between the siting of the
                anchorage grounds and the need to route electricity transmission export
                cables to the proposed or future offshore wind developments. Based on
                the differences and nature of concerns between the anchorages located
                inshore, in the Delaware River estuary, and the
                [[Page 16127]]
                anchorages located offshore in the Atlantic Ocean, the Coast Guard
                intends to move forward with two separate rulemakings, one for the
                inshore anchorage, and another for the offshore anchorages. With this
                rulemaking, the Coast Guard proposes the establishment of the
                anchorages located offshore in the Atlantic Ocean, Anchorage C--Cape
                Henlopen, and Anchorage D--Indian River.
                 The purpose of this proposed rule is to improve navigation safety
                by accommodating recent and anticipated future growth in cargo vessel
                size and volume of vessel traffic entering the Delaware Bay and River,
                and to preserve areas traditionally used or needed for anchoring. We
                invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
                 The legal basis and authorities for this notice of proposed
                rulemaking are found in 46 U.S.C. 70006, 33 CFR 1.05-1, DHS Delegation
                No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to propose,
                establish, and define regulatory anchorage grounds.
                III. Discussion of Comments on NOI
                 This section provides a detailed discussion of the public comments
                on the proposed Delaware Bay Anchorages received during the NOI comment
                period and during the two virtual public meetings held for the New
                Jersey PARS study. Also contributing to this rulemaking through the
                PARS study process, the Coast Guard Navigation Center collected and
                analyzed vessel historical Automatic Information System (AIS) track
                line data from all vessels between 2017 and 2019 and created AIS ``heat
                maps.'' These heat maps show a concentration of vessels and their
                voyage routes and give insight into their operations and use of the
                waterways and, most pertinent to this NPRM, the location of vessels
                when at anchor. A copy of this AIS Anchorage report can be found in the
                docket.\2\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \2\ The docket folder for USCG-2019-0822 is available at:
                Regulations.gov.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 On the NOI, the Coast Guard received a total of 19 comments
                concerning proposed Anchorage C--Cape Henlopen and Anchorage D--Indian
                River, five supportive and 14 opposed. Comments submitted to the online
                docket aligned into four categories: Environmental concerns,
                electricity transmission export cable routing safety and security, view
                shed concerns, and supporters. Copies of the public comments received
                are available for viewing in the public docket for this rulemaking
                under docket number USCG-2019-0822. Commenters represented a wide range
                of individuals and entities, including State and local government
                officials, port authorities, representatives of affected industries,
                such as maritime, port, and other facilities, and private citizens. The
                comments received from these parties helped to inform the proposal in
                this NPRM.
                1. Environmental Concerns
                 We received eight comments opposing the anchorage locations due to
                concerns that the presence of anchored ships could disrupt or pollute
                marine life habitats and behaviors. The Coast Guard has prepared a
                preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) for this NPRM,
                which is available in the NPRMs docket folder, and has made a
                preliminary determination that the proposed anchorages do not
                cumulatively or individually have significant effect on the natural or
                human environment.
                 We also note there are existing laws and regulations in place to
                govern behavior of mariners and vessels related to concerns about the
                release of pollutants. In terms of the discharge of pollutants, our
                regulations in 33 CFR part 151 and the Act to Prevent Pollution from
                Ships implement provisions of the International Convention for
                Prevention of Pollution from Ships and subject violators to
                penalties.\3\ In addition, the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA) of
                1972 (33 U.S.C. 1221, 1223, 1228, 1232 et seq.) and PWSA-implementing
                regulations help us ensure vessel compliance with all applicable
                standards, operating requirements, conditions for entry into port, and
                enforcement provisions.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \3\ 33 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 The Coast Guard also notes that this rulemaking will not
                significantly change the current and historical anchoring habits of
                vessels in these areas. This is demonstrated in the AIS heat maps for
                anchored vessels showing a concentration of vessels in or very near to
                the proposed anchorage areas. The formal regulation of these anchorages
                would not change the number of vessels that are anchoring and would
                provide greater oversight and predictability to vessel navigation in
                the area, which would ultimately lessen the potential for marine
                accidents and environmental impacts.
                2. Electricity Transmission Export Cable Routing and Safety Concerns
                 There were three comments submitted that pertained to concerns
                regarding the new anchorages coexisting with potential undersea cable
                routes to adjacent wind farm leases. Commenters requested mitigating
                measures and further discussion with wind farm stakeholders to avoid
                anchors striking or fouling undersea cables. Conversations between the
                Coast Guard and offshore wind developers have continued, both during
                and subsequent to the NOI and New Jersey PARS comment periods and
                virtual meetings. These conversations, among other things, have
                resulted in the developers choosing to pursue alternate cable routing
                measures that will avoid the proposed anchorage grounds.
                3. Tourism Concerns and View Shed Concerns
                 Four comments submitted were opposed to the new anchorages stating
                that anchored vessels would obscure the ocean views from the coast and
                reduce the tourism appeal of the local areas and harm the local
                economies. In considering these comments, we note that the approval of
                the proposed anchorages will not directly change the status quo for
                vessels anchoring in these areas. AIS tracking data from 2017 to 2019
                show vessels consistently anchoring in the same general area as the
                proposed areas, and that anchoring would continue in these areas
                regardless of the outcome of this rulemaking. By officially designating
                these anchorages, the Coast Guard can formally regulate the vessels
                that anchor in these offshore areas and limit vessels from anchoring
                elsewhere in the future, further affecting the human environment and
                local traffic.
                4. Anchorage Proponents
                 There were five comments that stated the anchorages were necessary
                to preserve areas traditionally used for anchoring from offshore wind
                development and to provide adequate safe anchorage for vessels calling
                on the growing ports of the Delaware Bay and River. These comments were
                supported by AIS vessel data collected by the Coast Guard showing
                consistent anchorage in the proposed areas between 2017-2019.
                5. Comments Received During the PARS Meetings and Anchoring Data
                 Of the comments received during the New Jersey PARS virtual public
                meetings, six pertained to the proposed anchorages. One commenter
                specifically requested that this NPRM be available for at least 60 days
                for public comment. The remaining comments supported the anchorage
                proposal but stated concern for conflicts between vessel anchors and
                electricity transmission export cables. Conversations between the Coast
                Guard and offshore wind developers have continued, both during and
                subsequent
                [[Page 16128]]
                to the NOI and New Jersey PARS comment periods and virtual meetings.
                These conversations, among other things, have resulted in the
                developers choosing to pursue alternate cable routing measures that
                will avoid the proposed anchorage grounds.
                IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule
                 The Coast Guard is proposing to establish new anchorage grounds
                Anchorage C--Cape Henlopen and Anchorage D--Indian River. This proposal
                reflects our consideration of comments received at public meetings and
                in the docket, the preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration,
                and data analysis collected during the New Jersey PARS study.
                 We believe this proposal will establish new deep-water anchorage
                grounds for commercial vessels that will support the new and projected
                growth in maritime commerce vessel traffic throughout the Delaware Bay
                and River. These anchorages will create predictable navigation patterns
                greatly improving safety of navigation at sea and limit the impact of
                anchoring to the sea floor to specific determined areas.
                 Anchorage C--Cape Henlopen would be located in the Atlantic Ocean
                approximately 9.4 miles east of the Delaware coast. The proposed
                Anchorage C would be located in naturally deep water with charted
                depths between 41 and 85 feet. The boundaries of Anchorage C--Cape
                Henlopen are presented in Sec. 110.157(a)(19) of the proposed
                regulatory text at the end of this document.
                 Anchorage D--Indian River would be located in the Atlantic Ocean
                beginning approximately 6 miles east of the Delaware coast. The
                proposed Anchorage D--Indian River will be located in naturally deep
                water with charted depths between 40 and 85 feet. The proposed location
                of Anchorage D has historically been used as an unregulated anchorage
                by vessels entering and exiting the port. The boundaries of Anchorage
                D--Indian River are presented in Sec. 110.157(a)(20) of the proposed
                regulatory text at the end of this document.
                V. Regulatory Analyses
                 We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
                and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
                analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and
                we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
                A. Regulatory Planning and Review
                 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
                costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
                regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
                net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
                regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
                designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
                12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
                Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
                from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
                 This regulatory action determination is based on the location and
                size of the proposed anchorage grounds, as well as the vessel traffic
                and anchoring data provided by the Coast Guard Navigation Center. The
                regulation would ensure approximately 27 square miles of anchorage
                grounds are designated to provide necessary commercial deep draft
                anchorages and enhance the navigational safety of commercial vessels
                transiting to, from, and within the Delaware Bay and River. The impacts
                on routine navigation are expected to be minimal because the proposed
                anchorage areas are located outside of the established traffic
                separation zones and are consistent with current anchorage habits. When
                not occupied, vessels would be able to maneuver in, around, and through
                the anchorages.
                B. Impact on Small Entities
                 The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
                amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
                regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
                entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
                that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
                fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
                50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
                proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
                substantial number of small entities.
                 The number of small entities impacted and the extent of the impact,
                if any, is expected to be minimal. Proposed Anchorage C--Cape Henlopen
                and Anchorage D--Indian River are located in an area of the Atlantic
                Ocean which is not a popular or productive fishing location. Further,
                the location is not in an area routinely transited by vessels heading
                to, or returning from, known fishing grounds. Finally, the anchorage is
                located in an area that is not currently used by small entities,
                including small vessels, for anchoring due to the depth of water
                naturally present in the area.
                 If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
                jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
                a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
                ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
                degree this rule would economically affect it.
                 Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
                Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
                entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
                your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
                have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
                please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
                question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
                of the Coast Guard.
                C. Collection of Information
                 This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
                information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
                3520).
                D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
                 A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132,
                Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
                relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
                distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
                government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
                have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental Federalism
                principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
                13132.
                 Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
                Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
                Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
                one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
                Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
                responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
                you believe this proposed rule has implications for Federalism or
                Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section.
                [[Page 16129]]
                E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
                requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
                regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
                result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
                the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
                inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
                result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
                elsewhere in this preamble.
                F. Environment
                 We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
                Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
                guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
                Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
                determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
                not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
                environment. This proposed rule involves amending the regulations for
                Delaware Bay and River anchorage grounds by establishing two new
                anchorage regulations; Anchorage C --Cape Henlopen and Anchorage D--
                Indian River. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
                further review under paragraph L59(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
                Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
                Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
                in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
                information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
                environmental impact from this proposed rule.
                G. Protest Activities
                 The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
                Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
                your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
                security of people, places, or vessels.
                VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments
                 We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
                and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
                period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
                you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
                rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
                each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
                recommendation.
                 Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
                the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
                do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2019-0822 in the
                search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
                Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
                option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
                instructions.
                 Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
                proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
                described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
                Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
                also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
                instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
                Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
                post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
                choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
                we receive.
                 Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
                post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
                information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
                to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
                System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
                List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
                 Anchorage grounds.
                 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
                proposing to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
                PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071; 46 U.S.C. 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
                Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
                0
                2. Amend Sec. 110.157 by adding paragraphs (a)(18) through (20) to
                read as follows:
                Sec. 110.157 Delaware Bay and River.
                 (a) * * *
                 (18) Reserved.
                 (19) Anchorage C--Cape Henlopen. The waters bounded by a line
                connecting the following points:
                ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Latitude Longitude
                ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                38[deg]40'54.00'' N 74[deg]52'00.00'' W
                38[deg]40'56.08'' N 74[deg]48'51.34'' W
                38[deg]37'36.00'' N 74[deg]48'30.00'' W
                ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (DATUM: NAD 83)
                 (20) Anchorage D--Indian River. The waters bounded by a line
                connecting the following points:
                ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Latitude Longitude
                ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                38[deg]34'56.25'' N 74[deg]52'19.12'' W
                38[deg]33'40.91'' N 74[deg]54'41.50'' W
                38[deg]31'31.08'' N 74[deg]55'27.96'' W
                38[deg]29'07.35'' N 74[deg]53'29.25'' W
                38[deg]28'56.87'' N 74[deg]50'28.69'' W
                38[deg]30'07.37'' N 74[deg]48'08.38'' W
                ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (DATUM: NAD 83)
                * * * * *
                 Dated: March 14, 2022.
                L.M. Dickey,
                Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
                [FR Doc. 2022-05806 Filed 3-21-22; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT