Anchorage Regulations; Special Anchorages Areas Within the First Coast Guard District
| Citation | 86 FR 18224 |
| Record Number | 2021-06487 |
| Published date | 08 April 2021 |
| Court | Coast Guard |
Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 66 (Thursday, April 8, 2021)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 66 (Thursday, April 8, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18224-18227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06487]
[[Page 18224]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0952]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations; Special Anchorages Areas Within the First
Coast Guard District
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to revise the notes for its First
Coast Guard District special anchorage area regulations and to remove
language from the text of four of these regulations because those
provisions are inconsistent with simply designating the location of a
special anchorage area. These existing notes and regulatory text
provisions, which contain obsolete and duplicative language, would be
replaced with a note in a new section we are adding that would apply to
all special anchorage area regulations in the First Coast Guard
District. The note would advise interested persons that state and local
regulations may apply and that they should contact other authorities,
such as the local harbormaster, to ensure compliance with any such
applicable regulations. These changes are primarily editorial in nature
and are intended to clarify and update First Coast Guard District
special anchorage area regulations. This proposed rule would not
create, remove, or change any previously established special anchorage
areas in the First Coast Guard District.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0952 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, contact Mr. Craig Lapiejko, Waterways Management
at First Coast Guard District, telephone 617-223-8351, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OMB Office of Management and Budget
SAA Special Anchorage Area
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The First Coast Guard District has received a request to remove the
note in 33 CFR 110.32--Hingham Harbor, Hingham, Massachusetts. This
regulation with its note was added to 33 CFR part 110 soon after the
Coast Guard was given authority for Federal anchorage regulations more
than 50 years ago.
In 1967, as part of the creation of the Department of
Transportation and the government restructuring that followed,
authority for federal anchorage regulations was transferred from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to the Coast Guard as reflected in a rule
published December 12, 1967 (32 FR 17726). We have made a copy of this
rule available in the docket along with other rulemaking documents we
reference that were published before 1995. At the time of transfer, the
Coast Guard adopted the special anchorage area (SAA) regulations that
were previously in effect. The regulations for SAAs located in the
First Coast Guard District were moved from 33 CFR part 202 to 33 CFR
110.2 through 110.60. During the transfer of the SAA regulations from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to the Coast Guard we did not focus on
the notes to these regulations. Over the ensuing 50 years, the SAAs
within the First Coast Guard District, 33 CFR 110.2 through 110.60,
have been amended numerous times as SAAs were added, amended, or
removed.
In a rule published August 3, 1968 (33 FR 11079), the Coast Guard
added Sec. 110.32 to 33 CFR part 110 which created five separate SAAs
in Hingham Harbor, MA. That regulation was issued in response to a
request from the Chairman of the Board of Selectmen of Hingham, MA. The
note in that regulation said that:
These areas will be principally used by yachts and other
recreational craft.
Temporary floats or buoys for marking anchors will be
allowed in the areas but fixed piles or stakes may not be placed.
The anchoring of vessels and the placing of moorings in
these areas will be under the jurisdiction of the local Harbor Master.
In a 1988 notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)(53 FR 7949, 7950,
Mar. 11, 1988), among other proposed changes, the Coast Guard proposed
to remove notes from SAA regulations including the note for 33 CFR
110.32--Hingham Harbor, Hingham, Massachusetts. Later in 1988, the
Coast Guard published a supplemental NPRM (53 FR 48935, Dec. 5, 1988)
to both expand its suggested revisions and address comments on the
NPRM. Then in 1995, citing both the lapse of time since proposals in
1988 and the lack of resources to complete the rulemaking, the Coast
Guard terminated that rulemaking (60 FR 2364, Jan. 9, 1995).
In response to the 2019 request to remove the note for Sec.
110.32, we decided to adopt the sound reasoning given in 1988 to remove
both that note and notes for all other regulations for SAAs in the
First Coast Guard District. In the 1988 supplemental NPRM (53 FR 48935,
Dec. 5, 1988), we stated that the Coast Guard does not regulate vessel
activities within SAAs as it does in anchorage grounds, and that the
only effect of designating a SAA under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 2071
is that vessels under 20 meters in length (65 feet) anchored in these
areas do not have to exhibit the lights and shapes or sound signals
required by Rules 30 and 35 of the Inland Rules.\1\ We also noted in
the supplemental NPRM (53 FR 48935, Dec. 5, 1988) that other vessel
activity within these SAAs may be regulated by local authorities as
long as the local regulations do not conflict with Federal regulations
which may be promulgated under other statutory authority. Earlier that
year, in the NPRM (53 FR 7949, 7950, Mar. 11, 1988), we noted that
inclusion of references to state or local ordinances in part 110 is not
desirable because it makes it appear as though the Coast Guard has
incorporated these ordinances into the Federal regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Currently these two rules may be found in 33 CFR 83.30 and
83.35.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed rule is being issued under authority in 33 U.S.C.
2071. That authority has been delegated to the Coast Guard by
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, and to District
Commanders by 33 CFR 1.05-1(e).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would remove existing notes in regulations for
SAAs in the First Coast Guard District and remove the regulatory
provisions in Sec. 110.25, Sec. 110.29, Sec. 110.50d, and Sec.
110.60 that do not designate the location of SAAs. Additionally, we
would add Sec. 110.3, entitled, ``First Coast Guard District Special
Anchorage Areas.'' Its text would identify SAA
[[Page 18225]]
regulations for the First Coast Guard District (Sec. 110.4 through
Sec. 110.60) and its note would advise those planning to use a SAA in
the First District that state ordinances, local ordinances, or both,
may apply to those anchoring there and that the local harbormaster is
often the best source of information about any such ordinances. These
ordinances may involve, for example, compliance with direction from the
local harbormaster when placing or using moorings within the anchorage.
These changes are primarily editorial in nature and are intended to
clarify and update the notes in this part. This rule does not create,
remove, or change any SAA. Vessels less than 65 feet in length, when at
anchor in these SAAs, are not required to sound signals or display
anchorage lights or shapes when at anchor.
This proposed rule would remove notes from the following sections
in 33 CFR part 110 that designate SAAs in the First Coast Guard
District:
Sec. 110.4, Penobscot Bay, Maine.
Sec. 110.5, Casco Bay, Maine.
Sec. 110.6, Portland Harbor, Portland, Maine (between Little
Diamond Island and Great Diamond Island).
Sec. 110.8, Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont.
Sec. 110.26, Marblehead Harbor, Marblehead, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.29, Boston Inner Harbor, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.30, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.31, Hull Bay and Allerton Harbor at Hull,
Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.32, Hingham Harbor, Hingham, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.37, Sesuit Harbor, Dennis, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.38, Edgartown Harbor, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.45a, Mattapoisett Harbor, Mattapoisett, Massachusetts.
Sec. 110.50, Stonington Harbor, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.50a, Fishers Island Sound, Stonington, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.50b, Mystic Harbor, Groton and Stonington,
Connecticut.
Sec. 110.50c, Mumford Cove, Groton, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.51, Groton, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.52, Thames River, New London, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.53, Niantic, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.55, Connecticut River, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.55a, Five Mile River, Norwalk and Darien, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.55b, Connecticut River, Old Saybrook, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.56, Noroton Harbor, Darien, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.58, Cos Cob Harbor, Greenwich, Connecticut.
Sec. 110.59, Eastern Long Island, New York.
Sec. 110.60, Captain of the Port, New York.
For a specific listing of the notes being removed, please review
the proposed regulatory text at the end of this NPRM.
Additionally, this proposed rule would remove regulatory text from
four CFR sections because that text is inconsistent with simply
designating the location of a SAA. In Sec. 110.25, Salem Sound,
Massachusetts, we propose to remove the last two sentences of paragraph
(c). In Sec. 110.29, Boston Inner Harbor, Massachusetts, we propose to
remove paragraph (d)(2). In Sec. 110.50d, Mystic Harbor, Noank,
Connecticut, we propose to remove paragraph (b). Finally, in Sec.
110.60, Captain of the Port, New York; we would remove paragraphs
(c)(13)(i), (d)(7)(i), and (d)(9)(i).
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
These changes are primarily editorial in nature and are intended to
clarify and update notes for First Coast Guard District SAA regulations
and to remove regulatory text in four CFR sections that is not needed
to designate the location of SAAs. This proposed rule would not create,
remove, or change any previously established SAAs in the First Coast
Guard District.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We reach this conclusion based on
the reasons stated in section IV.A above.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person
[[Page 18226]]
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a state, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule would remove
existing notes in regulations for SAAs in the First Coast Guard
District and remove regulatory text in four CFR sections that is not
needed to designate the location of SAAs. These existing notes and
provisions in regulatory text, would be replaced with a note in a newly
added section that would apply to all SAA regulations in the First
Coast Guard District. The note would advise those planning to use a SAA
in the First Coast Guard District that state ordinances, local
ordinances, or both, may apply to those anchoring there and that the
local harbormaster is often the best source of information about any
such ordinances. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph A3 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071; 46 U.S.C. 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 110.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.3 First Coast Guard District Special Anchorage Areas.
Regulations designating special anchorage areas in the First Coast
Guard District appear in Sec. 110.4 through Sec. 110.60.
Note to Sec. 110.3: Those planning to use these special
anchorage areas are advised that state ordinances, local ordinances,
or both, may apply. The local harbormaster is often the best source
of information about any such ordinances.
Sec. 110.4 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 110.4, remove the notes to paragraph (a), (b), (c) and (d)
Sec. 110.5 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 110.5, remove the notes following paragraphs (a-1), (d),
(e) and (f).
Sec. 110.6 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 110.6, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.8 [Amended]
0
6. In Sec. 110.8, remove the notes following paragraphs (c-2) and (i).
Sec. 110.25 [Amended]
0
7. In Sec. 110.25, remove the last two sentences in paragraph (c).
Sec. 110.26 [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 110.26, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.29 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 110.29, redesignate paragraph (d)(1) as paragraph (d),
remove paragraph (d)(2), and remove the note to paragraph (d).
Sec. 110.30 [Amended]
0
10. In Sec. 110.30, remove the notes to paragraphs (b), (h), (k)
through (q).
Sec. 110.31 [Amended]
0
11. In Sec. 110.31, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.32 [Amended]
0
12. In Sec. 110.32, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.37 [Amended]
0
13. In Sec. 110.37, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.38 [Amended]
0
14. In Sec. 110.38, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.45a [Amended]
0
15. In Sec. 110.45a, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.50 [Amended]
0
16. In Sec. 110.50, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.50a [Amended]
0
17. In Sec. 110.50a, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.50b [Amended]
0
18. In Sec. 110.50b, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.50c [Amended]
0
19. In Sec. 110.50c, remove the note for the section.
[[Page 18227]]
Sec. 110.50d [Amended]
0
20. In Sec. 110.50d, redesignate paragraph (a) as an undesignated
paragraph and remove paragraph (b).
Sec. 110.51 [Amended]
0
21. In Sec. 110.51, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.52 [Amended]
0
22. In Sec. 110.52, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.53 [Amended]
0
23. In Sec. 110.53, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.55 [Amended]
0
24. In Sec. 110.55, remove the notes following paragraph (b), (c),
(e), (e-1), (e-2) and (g).
Sec. 110.55a [Amended]
0
25. In Sec. 110.55a, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.55b [Amended]
0
26. In Sec. 110.55b, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.56 [Amended]
0
27. In Sec. 110.56, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.58 [Amended]
0
28. In Sec. 110.58, remove the note for the section.
Sec. 110.59 [Amended]
0
29. In Sec. 110.59, remove the note following paragraph (g).
Sec. 110.60 [Amended]
0
30. In Sec. 110.60, remove the notes to paragraphs (a)(2) and (13);
(b)(5) and (6); (c)(3); (5) and (6); (d)(2), and (5), and remove
paragraphs (c)(13)(i) and (ii), (d)(7)(i) and (ii), and (d)(9)(i) and
(ii).
Dated: March 22, 2021.
T.G. Allan Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021-06487 Filed 4-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
