Antidumping: Malaysia,
[Federal Register: February 23, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 37)]
[Notices]
[Page 11254-11255]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23fe01-25]
[[Page 11254]]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-557-805]
Extruded Rubber Thread From Malaysia; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final results of antidumping duty administrative review.
SUMMARY: On November 3, 2000, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on extruded rubber thread from Malaysia (65 FR 66232). This review covers three manufacturers/exporters of the subject merchandise to the United States (Filati Lastex Sdn. Bhd., Heveafil Sdn. Bhd./ Filmax Sdn. Bhd, and Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd.). The period of review is October 1, 1998, through September 30, 1999.
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23, 2001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina Itkin, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482- 0656.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Applicable Statute
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's (the Department's) regulations are to 19 CFR Part 351 (2000).
Background
On November 3, 2000, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on extruded rubber thread from Malaysia. See Extruded Rubber Thread from Malaysia; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 65 FR 66232 (Nov. 3, 2000).
In response to the Department's invitation to comment on the preliminary results of these reviews, Heveafil Sdn. Bhd./Filmax Sdn. Bhd. (Heveafil) and Filati Lastex Sdn. Bhd. (Filati) filedcase briefs on November 28, 2000. We did not receive comments from Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. (Rubberflex) or the petitioner. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Act.
Scope of Review
The product covered by this review is extruded rubber thread. Extruded rubber thread is defined as vulcanized rubber thread obtained by extrusion of stable or concentrated natural rubber latex of any cross sectional shape, measuring from 0.18 mm, which is 0.007 inch or 140 gauge, to 1.42 mm, which is 0.056 inch or 18 gauge, in diameter. Extruded rubber thread is currently classifiable under subheading 4007.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of this review is dispositive.
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is October 1, 1998, through September 30, 1999.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum'' (Decision Memo) from Richard W. Moreland, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration, to Bernard Carreau, fulfilling the duties of Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated February 16, 2001, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have responded, all of which are in the Decision Memo, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit, room B-099, of the main Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. These changes are discussed in the relevant sections of the Decision Memo.
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following weighted-average margins exist for the period October 1, 1998, through September 30, 1999:
Percentage Manufacturer/exporter
margin
Filati Lastex Sdn. Bhd.....................................
6.00 Heveafil Sdn. Bhd./Filmax Sdn. Bhd.........................
0.04 Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd........................................
0.14
The Department shall determine, and Customs shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b), we have calculated importer-specific assessment rates. For Filati and Heveafil, we divided the total dumping margins for the reviewed sales by their total entered value for each importer. We will direct Customs to assess the resulting percentage margins against the entered values for the subject merchandise on each of that importer's entries. However, we will instruct Customs to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties all entries for any importer for whom the assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
For Rubberflex, we divided the total dumping margins by the entered quantity for each importer. We will direct Customs to assess these per- unit amounts on all entries by these importers.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of extruded rubber thread from Malaysia entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed firms will be the rates shown above, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106, the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
[[Page 11255]]
review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.16 percent. This rate is the ``All Others'' rate from the LTFV investigation.
These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review.
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: February 16, 2001. Timothy J. Hauser, Acting Under Secretary for International Trade.
Appendix--Issues in Decision Memo
Comments
-
Calculation of the CEP Ratio 2. Calculation of Credit Expenses
[FR Doc. 01-4534Filed2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
