Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Bulk Manufacturer of Marihuana: MMJ 95, LLC
| Published date | 26 March 2021 |
| Citation | 86 FR 16237 |
| Record Number | 2021-06257 |
| Section | Notices |
| Court | Drug Enforcement Administration,Justice Department |
16237
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1257]
Certain Organic Light-Emitting Diode
Displays, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same; Institution
of Investigation
AGENCY
: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION
: Notice.
SUMMARY
: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
February 19, 2021, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Samsung Display Co., Ltd. of
Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea and
Intellectual Keystone Technology LLC
of Wilmington, Delaware. A corrected
complaint and supplement was filed on
March 12, 2021. The complaint, as
corrected and supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain organic light-emitting diode
displays, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,845,016 (‘‘the ’016 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 7,342,177 (‘‘the ’177
patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,230,593
(‘‘the ’593 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES
: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Katherine Hiner, Office of the Secretary,
Docket Services Division, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
March 22, 2021, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
2, 4–6, 8, 12, and 13 of the ’016 patent;
claims 1, 3, and 4 of the ’177 patent; and
claims 15–17 and 19 of the ’593 patent;
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘electroluminescent
display panels that comprise organic
light-emitting diode (‘OLED’) pixel
element for presenting information to a
viewer, and display monitor products,
smartphone products, and televisions
products that incorporate
electroluminescent display panels that
comprise OLED pixel elements’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Samsung Display Co., Ltd., #1,
Samsung-ro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si,
Gyeonggi-do, 17113, Republic of
Korea
Intellectual Keystone Technology LLC,
251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington,
Delaware 19808–1674
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., 15 Li-Te
Road, Beitou District, Taipei 112,
Taiwan
ASUS Computer International, 48720
Kato Road, Fremont, California 94538
JOLED Inc., Metlife Building 10F,
Kandanishiki-cho 3–23, Chiyoda-ku,
Tokyo, Japan, 101–0054
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not be named as a
party to this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainants of
the complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 22, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–06249 Filed 3–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–795]
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances Application: Bulk
Manufacturer of Marihuana: MMJ 95,
LLC
AGENCY
: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Justice.
ACTION
: Notice of application.
SUMMARY
: The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is providing
notice of an application it has received
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Mar 25, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
16238
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Notices
from an entity applying to be registered
to manufacture in bulk basic class(es) of
controlled substances listed in schedule
I. DEA intends to evaluate this and other
pending applications according to its
regulations governing the program of
growing marihuana for scientific and
medical research under DEA
registration.
DATES
: Registered bulk manufacturers of
the affected basic class(es), and
applicants therefor, may file written
comments on or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration on
or before May 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES
: Written comments should
be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/DPW 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152. To ensure proper handling of
comments, please reference Docket
No—DEA–795 in all correspondence,
including attachments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
: The
Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
prohibits the cultivation and
distribution of marihuana except by
persons who are registered under the
CSA to do so for lawful purposes. In
accordance with the purposes specified
in 21 CFR 1301.33(a), DEA is providing
notice that the entity identified below
has applied for registration as a bulk
manufacturer of schedule I controlled
substances. In response, registered bulk
manufacturers of the affected basic
class(es), and applicants therefor, may
file written comments on or objections
of the requested registration, as
provided in this notice. This notice does
not constitute any evaluation or
determination of the merits of the
application submitted.
The applicant plans to manufacture
bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients
(APIs) for product development and
distribution to DEA-registered
researchers. If the application for
registration is granted, the registrant
would not be authorized to conduct
other activity under this registration
aside from those coincident activities
specifically authorized by DEA
regulations. DEA will evaluate the
application for registration as a bulk
manufacturer for compliance with all
applicable laws, treaties, and
regulations and to ensure adequate
safeguards against diversion are in
place.
As this applicant has applied to
become registered as a bulk
manufacturer of marihuana, the
application will be evaluated under the
criteria of 21 U.S.C. 823(a). DEA will
conduct this evaluation in the manner
described in the rule published at 85 FR
82333 on December 18, 2020, and
reflected in DEA regulations at 21 CFR
part 1318.
In accordance with 21 CFR
1301.33(a), DEA is providing notice that
on January 13, 2021, MMJ 95, LLC, 2685
Durango Drive, Colorado Springs,
Colorado 80910, applied to be registered
as a bulk manufacturer of the following
basic class(es) of controlled substances:
Controlled
substance Drug
code Schedule
Marihuana Extract ................... 7350 I
Marihuana ............................... 7360 I
William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–06257 Filed 3–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Filing of Proposed
Settlement Agreements Regarding
Natural Resource Damage Claims at
the Western Port Angeles Harbor Site
On March 22, 2021 the Department of
Justice lodged two proposed Consent
Decrees with the United States District
Court for the Western District of
Washington in the lawsuit entitled
United States, on Behalf of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration and the United States
Department of the Interior; State of
Washington Through the Department of
Ecology; Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe;
Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe; and the
Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe,. v. Nippon
Paper Industries USA CO., LTD, Merrill
& Ring Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC, the
Port of Port Angeles, Owens Corning,
and the City of Port Angeles, Civil
Action No. 21–cv–5204.
The proposed Consent Decrees would
resolve claims by Plaintiffs, who are
State, Federal and Tribal Trustees,
under Section 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’),
42 U.S.C. 9607; Section 311 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1321; and
Section 1002 of the Oil Pollution Act of
1990 (OPA), 33 U.S.C. 2702; the Model
Toxics Control Act (‘‘MTCA’’), Wash.
Rev. Code § 70A.305.040(2); and Wash.
Rev. Code § 90.48.142 for natural
resource damages at the Western Port
Angeles Harbor Site.
In the first Consent Decree with
Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd.,
Merrill & Ring Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC,
Owens Corning, and the Port of Port
Angeles Defendants are required to pay
$8,500,000. In a separate Decree, the
City of Port Angeles is required to pay
$800,000. The monies are to be used by
the Trustees to address damages at the
Site and to reimburse Trustees for past
assessment costs.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Settlement Agreement. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States, et al. v. Nippon
Paper Industries USA CO., LTD, et al.
D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–10973. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments: Send them to:
By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
During the public comment period,
the Settlement Agreements may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
Alternatively, a paper copy of the
Settlement Agreements will be provided
upon written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to: Consent Decree
Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box
7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611.
For a copy of the Consent Decree with
the City, please enclose a check or
money order for $8.75 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
United States Treasury. For a copy of
the Consent Decree with Nippon Paper
Industries USA CO., LTD, et al., enclose
a check or money order for $11.50 (25
cents per page reproduction cost)
payable to the United States Treasury. If
you are requesting both agreements, a
check or money order for $20.25
payable to the United States Treasury
should be included.
Finally, please note that the Trustee
agencies have released a Damage
Assessment and Restoration Plan
(DARP). The DARP is related to the
Consent Decree but is a separate
document, subject to a separate
comment process. The Trustees will be
holding a public meeting for more
information. To learn about those
Trustees and that process, please visit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Mar 25, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
