Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019
| Published date | 19 March 2020 |
| Citation | 85 FR 15763 |
| Record Number | 2020-05756 |
| Section | Notices |
| Court | International Trade Administration |
15763
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 54 / Thursday, March 19, 2020 / Notices
1
See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 66880
(December 6, 2019).
2
See Pidilite’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 from India—Request for Administrative
Review,’’ dated December 31, 2019.
3
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
6896 (February 6, 2020).
4
See Pidilite’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 from India—Withdrawal of Request for
Continued
Estimated Number of Respondents:
488.
Estimated Time per Response: 10
hours.
Needs and Uses: This collection of
information is needed to detect
violations of the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) and determine if an
investigation or prosecution is necessary
and to reach a settlement with violators.
Voluntary self-disclosure of EAR
violations strengthens BIS’s
enforcement efforts by allowing BIS to
conduct investigations of the disclosed
incidents faster than would be the case
if BIS had to detect the violations
without such disclosures. BIS evaluates
the seriousness of the violation and
either (1) Informs the person making the
disclosure that no action is warranted;
(2) issues a warning letter; (3) issues a
proposed charging letter and attempts to
settle the matter; (4) issues a charging
letter if settlement is not reached; and/
or (5) refers the matter to the U.S.
Department of Justice for criminal
prosecution.
Affected Public: Business or other for-
profit organizations.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Dated: March 16, 2020.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2020–05716 Filed 3–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Voluntary Self-
Disclosure of Antiboycott Violations
The Department of Commerce will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), on or after
the date of publication of this notice.
The public is invited to submit
comments on this request.
ADDRESSES
: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0694–0132.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Copies of this submission may be
obtained from Mark Crace, Bureau of
Industry and Security, 1401
Constitution Avenue, Suite 2099B,
Washington, DC 20233, or viewing the
entire information collection request at
www.reginfo.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) if the
information will be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimates of the burden and
cost of the collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (4)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information collection; and
(5) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Agency: Bureau of Industry and
Security.
Title: Voluntary Self-Disclosure of
Antiboycott Violations.
Form Number(s): N/A.
OMB Control Number: 0694–0132.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 4,220.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 9.
Estimated Time per Response: 10 to
600 hours.
Needs and Uses: This collection of
information supports enforcement of the
Antiboycott provisions of the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
providing a method for industry to
voluntarily self-disclose Antiboycott
violations.
Affected Public: Business or other for-
profit organizations.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Dated: March 13, 2020.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2020–05719 Filed 3–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–838]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018–2019
AGENCY
: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY
: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbazole
violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India
for the period December 1, 2018 through
November 30, 2019.
DATES
: Applicable March 19, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Background
On December 6, 2019, Commerce
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from
India for the period of review (POR)
December 1, 2018 through November
30, 2019.
1
On December 31, 2019, Pidilite
Industries Limited (Pidilite), an Indian
producer and exporter of CVP 23,
requested an administrative review of
the order of CVP 23 from India with
respect to its entries of subject
merchandise during the POR.
2
No other
party requested an administrative
review of this order. On February 6,
2020, in accordance with section 751(a)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i),
we published the notice of initiation of
an administrative review of the order on
CVP 23 from India with respect to
Pidilite.
3
On March 3, 2020, Pidilite
withdrew its request for an
administrative review.
4
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Mar 18, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
15764
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 54 / Thursday, March 19, 2020 / Notices
Administrative Review and Request for Rescission,’’
dated March 3, 2020.
1
See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 31296,
31296 (July 1, 2019).
2
See The petitioner’s letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey:
Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 30,
2019.
3
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
47242, 47254 (September 9, 2019) (Initiation
Notice).
4
See Habas’ letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing
Bar from Turkey; Habas
¸no shipment letter,’’ dated
September 11, 2019.
5
See Customs Instructions Message 9304317,
dated October 31, 2019.
6
See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey:
Results of No Shipment Inquiry,’’ dated March 2,
2020.
7
See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey:
Deadline for Comments on Results of No Shipment
Inquiry,’’ dated March 5, 2020.
8
See, e.g., Certain Hardwood Plywood Products
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017–
2018, 84 FR 54844, 54845 & n.8 (October 11, 2019)
(citing Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015,
82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017)).
9
See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
10
See, e.g., Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from
the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested the
review withdraws its request within 90
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of the requested
review. In this case, Pidilite timely
withdrew its request by the 90-day
deadline, and no other party requested
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order. Therefore, we
are rescinding the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on CVP
23 from India for the period December
1, 2018 through November 30, 2019, in
its entirety, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1).
Assessment
Commerce intends to instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of CVP 23 from India
during the POR at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends
to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We intend to issue and publish this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 16, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020–05756 Filed 3–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–830]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
the Republic of Turkey: Rescission of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2018
AGENCY
: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY
: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel
concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the
Republic of Turkey (Turkey), covering
the period January 1, 2018, through
December 31, 2018.
DATES
: Applicable March 19, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Kathryn Turlo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3870.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Background
On July 1, 2019, Commerce published
in the Federal Register a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
review of the CVD order on rebar from
Turkey.
1
On July 30, 2019, the Rebar
Trade Action Coalition (the petitioner)
timely requested that Commerce
conduct an administrative review of
Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal
Endustrisi A.S. (Habas).
2
We received
no other requests for review. On
September 9, 2019, Commerce
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation with respect to
Habas, in accordance with section
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
3
On September 11,
2019, Habas notified Commerce that it
had no sales, shipments, or entries of
subject merchandise during the period
of review (POR).
4
On October 31, 2019,
Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to corroborate Habas’ claim.
5
On
March 2, 2020, Commerce notified all
interested parties that CBP found no
evidence of shipments of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
by Habas during the POR.
6
On March 5,
2020, Commerce established a period
for comments regarding CBP’s findings.
7
No parties submitted comments.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is
Commerce’s practice to rescind an
administrative review of a CVD order
where it concludes that there were no
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR.
8
Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the CVD
assessment rate for the review period.
See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). Therefore, for
an administrative review to be
conducted, there must be a reviewable,
suspended entry that Commerce can
instruct CBP to liquidate at the
calculated CVD assessment rate for the
review period.
9
As noted above, the CBP
confirmed that there were no entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
with respect to Habas, the only exporter
or producer subject to this
administrative review.
10
Accordingly, in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Mar 18, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
