Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same (II); Institution of Investigation

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)

Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)

Notices

Pages 49421-49422

From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov

FR Doc No: 2017-23105

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Investigation No. 337-TA-1076

Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same (II); Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on September 19, 2017, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of FUJIFILM Corporation of Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts. A supplement to the complaint was filed on October 6, 2017. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,630,256 (``the '256 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,835,451 (``the '451 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,011,899 (``the '899 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,462,905 (``the '905 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 6,783,094 (``the '094 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.

The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-

2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).

Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on October 19, 2017, ordered that--

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-5 and 7-9 of the '256 patent; 1-14 of the '451 patent; claims 1, 2, and 6-12 of the '899 patent; claims 1-4 of the '905 patent; and claims 1-12 and 18-22 of the '094 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);

(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a) The complainants are:

FUJIFILM Corporation, 7-3 Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052, Japan

FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 45 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA 01730-1401

(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:

Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Komacrnan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan

Page 49422

Sony Storage Media Solutions Corporation, 1-7-1 Komacrnan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan

Sony Storage Media Manufacturing Corporation, 3-4-1 Sakuragi, Tagajo, Miyagi 985-0842, Japan

Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN 47804

Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL 33126

(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and

(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.

Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 19, 2017.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

FR Doc. 2017-23105 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P