Common carrier services: Access charges— National Exchange Carrier Association; election requirements; biennial review,

[Federal Register: August 6, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 151)]

[Rules and Regulations]

[Page 46500-46502]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr06au03-22]

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 69

[CC Docket No. 01-174; FCC 03-151]

2000 Biennial Review--Requirement Governing the NECA Board of Directors

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission modifies the requirements governing how the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) conducts elections for its board of directors (Board). The Commission eliminates the requirement that NECA hold annual elections and that Board members serve one-year terms. The Commission also liberalizes its rules regarding contested elections for NECA's non-telecommunications industry directors (Outside Directors).

DATES: Effective September 5, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cara Voth, Attorney, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-7400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order in CC Docket No. 01-174, FCC 03-151 released on July 3, 2003. The full text of this document is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY- A257, 445 Twelfth Street SW., Washington, DC, 20554.

  1. Introduction

    1. In this Report and Order, as part of our biennial regulatory review under section 11 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), we modify the requirements governing how the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) conducts elections for its board of directors (Board). We eliminate the requirement that NECA hold annual elections and that Board members serve one-year terms. We also liberalize our rules regarding contested elections for NECA's non- telecommunications industry directors (Outside Directors). Under the liberalized rules, no Outside Director may serve for more than six consecutive calendar years without standing for an election in which that director is opposed by at least one other qualified candidate. By modifying our election requirements for the Board, we reduce the regulatory burdens that the current election requirements impose on NECA, while furthering our goal of ensuring that NECA fulfills certain Commission-specified functions.

  2. Discussion

    1. We find that the current election process imposes several unnecessary administrative burdens on NECA and therefore we eliminate certain election requirements for NECA's Board. We also find, however, that because NECA continues to perform certain functions pursuant to Commission rules, we have a continuing interest in ensuring that NECA fulfills its obligations. In retaining certain requirements, we seek

      [[Page 46501]]

      to ensure that NECA, as overseen by its Board, continues to comply with the Commission's rules. We find that the modifications to the Board requirements allow us to achieve our goals, yet impose minimal burdens on NECA.

    2. We retain the current composition of NECA's Board positions, which consists of five Outside Directors, two directors representing Subset I, two directors representing Subset II, and six directors representing Subset III. NECA is a unique organization that performs several functions pursuant to the Commission's rules, including the administration of the common line and traffic sensitive access tariff pools. The access rates established by these pools have a direct impact on interstate telephone rates and pursuant to section 201 of the Act, interstate telephone rates must be just and reasonable. We believe that a Board that consists of directors representing all classes of carriers helps to ensure that NECA prepares accurate and reasonable tariffs, which in turn helps to further the Commission's implementation of the statutory requirement that rates be just and reasonable.

    3. Although we retain our rules regarding the composition of the Board, we find that it is appropriate to eliminate our rule that requires that NECA elect its directors annually for one-year terms. As NECA notes, Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) does not require non-stock corporations like NECA to hold annual elections. We find it is no longer in the public interest to retain such requirements in our rules because we accept NECA's claim that the election requirements are overly burdensome without a concomitant benefit. Our primary policy goal is to ensure that NECA, as overseen by its Board, fulfills its Commission-specified functions. In this regard, we believe that the composition of the Board positions, and not how often elections are held or the terms of the directors, best achieves this goal. We find that the presence on the Board of five Outside Directors is particularly important to achieving our goals, including providing effective governance of NECA consistent with our rules. As described in more detail, we amend the contested election requirement for Outside Directors to provide NECA greater flexibility in how it elects these Outside Directors. With regard to the Board generally, we conclude that safeguards exist to ensure that NECA will adopt an appropriate election process, even absent specific Commission direction, because NECA must continue to comply with all applicable DGCL rules and regulations.

    4. We believe that it is in the public interest, as NECA proposes, to modify the contested election rules so that instead of every three years as the current rules require, Outside Directors may not serve for more than six consecutive calendar years without standing for an election in which that director is opposed by at least one other qualified candidate. The Commission instituted contested elections for Outside Directors to ``assure NECA's members an opportunity to choose among a range of candidates for each outside director position.'' Also, the overarching goal of the NECA Board Order, 60 FR 19528, April 19, 1995, was to add Outside Directors to NECA's Board to bring independent perspectives to NECA's deliberations and ensure that NECA complies with the Commission rules. While our goals remain the same, we recognize the burdens associated with contested elections, and believe that this rule can be liberalized without impairing our achievement of those fundamental goals. We believe it appropriate to amend our rules so that contested elections for Outside Directors will occur at least every six years. We note that, although we are relaxing the contested election requirement for Outside Directors, this will not preclude contested elections from taking place more frequently than every six years. If it so chooses, NECA may allow independent parties to challenge an incumbent Outside Director's seat whenever that seat is subject to an election.

    5. The rule amendments adopted herein will be effective thirty days after publication in the Federal Register. We also direct NECA to revise its by-laws and articles of incorporation as required by Delaware state law and in accordance with this order, and to submit its revised by-laws to the Commission as soon as practicable. Finally, we note that NECA lists its current Board of directors on its Internet website. We strongly encourage NECA to continue to post this listing and revise it each time there is a change to the Board.

  3. Procedural Issues

    1. Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, (RFA), requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice and comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration (SBA).

    2. In this Report and Order, we amend certain of our rules pertaining to the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA), which operates pooling mechanisms to collect and distribute revenues among its participating carriers. In particular, we eliminate the requirement that NECA hold annual elections and the requirement that NECA's board of directors serve one-year terms. We also modify the rule requiring NECA to hold contested elections for its non-telecommunications industry directors (Outside Directors) at least every three years. Under the modified rule, Outside Directors may not serve more than six consecutive calendar years without standing for a contested election. In the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification in the Notice, we stated that the proposed rules, if adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. No comments were received concerning that initial certification.

    3. We conclude that this regulatory flexibility certification is appropriate for the amended rules adopted herein. NECA is a non-profit association created to administer the Commission's interstate access tariff and revenue distribution processes. Because the proposed rule amendments affect only NECA directly, we find that the amendments will not affect a substantial number of small entities. In addition, any economic effect that might result is positive (de-regulatory) and not significant. Therefore, we certify that the amended rules adopted in this Report and Order will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Commission will send a copy of the Report and Order, including a copy of this Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, in a report to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. In addition, the Report and Order and this final certification will be sent to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA, and it will be published in the Federal Register.

  4. Ordering Clauses

    1. Pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 11, 201-

      [[Page 46502]]

      205, 218-220, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 161, 201-205, 218-220, and 403, and 5 U.S.C. 553(d), that part 69 of the Commission's rules, is amended, and is effective September 5, 2003.

    2. The National Exchange Carrier Association's Petition for Waiver, filed January 31, 2003, is dismissed without prejudice.

    3. The Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Report and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.

      List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 69

      Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telephone.

      Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.

      Final Rules

      0 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 69 as follows:

      PART 69--ACCESS CHARGES

      0 1. The authority citation for part 69 continues to read as follows:

      Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403.

      0 2. Section 69.602 is amended by revising paragraphs (c), (e), and (f), and by removing paragraph (i) to read as follows:

      Sec. 69.602 Board of directors.

      * * * * *

      (c) Two directors shall represent the first subset, two directors shall represent the second subset, six directors shall represent the third subset, and five directors shall represent all three subsets. * * * * *

      (e) Each subset of the association membership shall select the directors who will represent it through elections in which each member of the subset shall be entitled to one vote for each director position within that subset.

      (f) The association membership shall select the directors who will represent all three subsets through an election in which each member of the association shall be entitled to one vote for each director position. No director representing all three subsets may serve for more than six consecutive calendar years without standing for an election in which that director is opposed by at least one other candidate meeting the qualifications in paragraph (d) of this section. * * * * *

      [FR Doc. 03-20052 Filed 8-5-03; 8:45 am]

      BILLING CODE 6712-01-P

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT