Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Reliability and Maintainability in Weapon System Design (DFARS Case 2019-D003)

Citation84 FR 30984
Published date28 June 2019
Record Number2019-13744
CourtDefense Acquisition Regulations System
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 125 (Friday, June 28, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2019)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 30984-30986]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-13744]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                Defense Acquisition Regulations System
                48 CFR Parts 207, 215, 216, and 234
                [Docket DARS-2019-0026]
                RIN 0750-AK38
                Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Reliability
                and Maintainability in Weapon System Design (DFARS Case 2019-D003)
                AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
                (DoD).
                ACTION: Proposed rule.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: DOD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
                Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National
                Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 that requires the use of
                reliability and maintainability sustainment factors in weapon system
                design.
                DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
                the address shown below on or before August 27, 2019, to be considered
                in the formation of a final rule.
                ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2019-D003, using
                any of the following methods:
                 [cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
                Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``DFARS
                Case 2019-D003'' under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and
                selecting ``Search.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that
                corresponds with ``DFARS Case 2019-D003.'' Follow the instructions
                provided at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name,
                company name (if any), and ``DFARS Case 2019-D003'' on your attached
                document.
                 [cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2019-D003 in
                the subject line of the message.
                 [cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
                 [cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms.
                Kimberly Bass, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
                Washington, DC 20301-3060.
                 Comments received generally will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
                confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
                approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
                (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kimberly Bass, telephone 571-372-
                6174.
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Background
                 DoD is proposing to amend the DFARS to implement section 834 of the
                National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018
                (Pub. L. 115-91). Section 834 amends title 10, United States Code
                (U.S.C.), to add section 2443, sustainment factors in weapon system
                design, which requires program managers or comparable requiring
                activity officials exercising program management responsibilities to
                ensure that reliability and maintainability are included in the
                performance attributes of the key performance parameters on sustainment
                during the development of capabilities requirements for major weapon
                systems design and contracts for the--
                 Engineering and manufacturing development of a weapon
                system, including embedded software; or
                 Production of a weapon system, including embedded
                software.
                 As a matter of policy, the Under Secretary of Defense for
                Acquisition and Sustainment directed application of the requirements of
                10 U.S.C. 2443 to the technical maturation and risk reduction phase.
                II. Discussion and Analysis
                 The following changes to the DFARS are proposed to implement 10
                U.S.C. 2443:
                 DFARS 207.106(S-70)(2)(ii)(A) implements 10 U.S.C. 2443 as an
                additional requirement for major systems, and provides guidance to the
                acquisition team during acquisition planning to ensure that reliability
                and maintainability are included in the performance attributes of the
                key performance parameters on sustainment during the development of
                capabilities requirements.
                 DFARS 207.106(S-72)(5) informs the contracting officer to ensure
                best
                [[Page 30985]]
                practices are used during the development of performance measures for
                use in responding to the negative or positive contractor performance in
                meeting the contract requirements for sustainment for a weapon system
                as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2302 and 2303d during acquisition planning. The
                contracting officer is to encourage the use of incentive fees and
                penalties as appropriate and allow the program manager or requiring
                activity official performing program management responsibilities to
                base determination of contractor performance on reliability and
                maintainability data collected during the program. The data collected
                must be described in detail and shared with appropriate contract and
                Government organizations to the maximum extent practicable.
                 DFARS 215.304(c)(vi) informs the contracting officer that, in
                coordination with the program manager or comparable requiring activity
                official performing program management responsibilities, source
                selections must emphasize sustainment factors and objective reliability
                and maintainability evaluation criteria in competitive contracts for
                the technical maturation and risk reduction phase, and engineering and
                manufacturing development of a weapon system, including embedded
                software; or the production of a weapon system, including embedded
                software. Application of this requirement to competitive contracts for
                the technical maturation and risk reduction phase is a matter of
                policy, whereas application to the engineering and manufacturing
                development and production of a weapon system, including embedded
                software, is required by statute.
                 DFARS 216.402-2(2) requires contracting officers to ensure that
                information about incentive fees, or the imposition of penalties, are
                included in the solicitation for covered contracts if the program
                manager or requiring official includes provisions for the payment of
                incentive fees to the contractor for achievement of design
                specifications for reliability and maintainability or the imposition of
                penalties to be paid by the contractor to the Government for failure to
                achieve the design specifications.
                 DFARS 234.004 informs the contracting officer to: (1) Include
                clearly defined measurable criteria for engineering activities and
                design specifications for reliability and maintainability provided by
                the program manager, or comparable requiring activity official
                performing program management responsibilities; or (2) ensure a copy of
                the justification for the decision not to include the criteria, is
                included in the contract file as provided by the program manager or
                requiring activity official.
                III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
                Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
                Off-the-Shelf Items
                 This rulemaking does not propose to create any new provisions or
                clauses or impact any existing provisions or clauses.
                IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
                 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
                all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
                regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
                net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
                health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
                13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
                of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
                This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
                subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
                and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
                under 5 U.S.C. 804.
                V. Executive Order 13771
                 This proposed rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory
                action, because this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
                VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
                 DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
                economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
                meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
                because the rule requires contracting officers and program managers or
                requiring office officials to give emphasis to sustainment factors in
                weapon system design. However, an initial regulatory flexibility
                analysis has been performed and is summarized as follows:
                 DOD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
                Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement section 834 of the National
                Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. Section 834
                amends Title 10, United States Code, to add section 2443, Sustainment
                factors in weapon system design, which requires program managers or
                comparable requiring activity officials exercising program management
                responsibilities to ensure that reliability and maintainability are
                included in the performance attributes of the key performance
                parameters on sustainment during the development of capabilities
                requirements for major weapon systems design and contracts for the
                technical maturation and risk reduction and engineering and
                manufacturing development of a weapon system, including embedded
                software; or production of a weapon system.
                 The objective of this proposed rule is to require contracting
                officers, in coordination with program managers or requiring office
                officials, to ensure that reliability and maintainability are included
                in the performance attributes of the key performance parameter on
                sustainment during the development of capabilities requirements.
                 According to information available in the Federal Procurement Data
                System for fiscal years 2016 through 2018, DoD made a total of 200
                contract awards under various product service codes for research and
                engineering development under the product service group AC, Research
                and Development-Defense Systems. The award data included task and
                delivery orders under single award indefinite delivery indefinite
                quantity contracts and basic ordering agreements. Of the total 200
                awards for the three-year period cited, 79 awards (approximately 40
                percent) were made to 71 unique small business entities.
                 This proposed rule does not include any new reporting,
                recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small businesses.
                The proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
                other Federal rules.
                 There are no known significant alternative approaches to the
                proposed rule that would meet the proposed objectives.
                 DoD invites comments from small entities concerning the existing
                regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance with 5
                U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and
                should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2019-D003), in correspondence.
                 This action is necessary to implement section 834 of the NDAA for
                FY 2018.
                VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
                 The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
                that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
                the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
                [[Page 30986]]
                List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 207, 215, 216, and 234
                 Government procurement.
                Jennifer Lee Hawes,
                Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
                 Therefore, 48 CFR parts 207, 215, 216, and 234 are proposed to be
                amended as follows:
                0
                1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 207, 215, 216, and 234
                continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
                PART 207--ACQUISITION PLANNING
                0
                2. Amend section 207.106 by--
                0
                a. In paragraph (S-70)(1), removing ``Section 802(a)'' and adding
                ``section 802(a)'' in its place;
                0
                b. Redesignating paragraphs (S-70)(2)(ii) through (iv) as paragraphs
                (iii) through (v), respectively;
                0
                c. Adding a new paragraph (S-70)(2)(ii); and
                0
                d. Adding paragraph (S-72)(5).
                 The additions read as follows:
                207.106 Additional requirements for major systems.
                * * * * *
                 (S-70) * * *
                 (2) * * *
                 (ii) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2443, to emphasize reliability
                and maintainability in weapon system design, ensure that reliability
                and maintainability are included in the performance attributes of the
                key performance parameters on sustainment during the development of
                capabilities requirements. For additional guidance see PGI
                207.105(b)(14)(ii)(2);
                * * * * *
                 (S-72) * * *
                 (5) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2443, acquisition plans for
                engineering manufacturing and development and production of major
                systems as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2302 and 2302d and for major defense
                acquisition programs as defined in 202.101, shall include performance
                measures that are developed using best practices for responding to the
                positive or negative performance of a contractor for the engineering
                and manufacturing development or production of a weapon system,
                including embedded software. At a minimum the contracting officer
                shall--
                 (i) Encourage the use of incentive fees and penalties as
                appropriate; and
                 (ii) Allow the program manager or comparable requiring activity
                official exercising program management responsibilities, to base
                determinations of a contractor's performance on reliability and
                maintainability data collected during the program. Such data collection
                and associated evaluation metrics shall be described in detail in the
                contract; and to the maximum extent practicable, the data shall be
                shared with appropriate contractor and Government organizations.
                * * * * *
                PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
                0
                3. Amend section 215.304 by adding paragraph (c)(vi) to read as
                follows:
                215.304 Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.
                 (c) * * *
                 (vi) Ensure source selections emphasize sustainment factors and
                objective reliability and maintainability evaluation criteria in
                competitive contracts for the--
                 (A) Technical maturation and risk reduction phase of weapon system
                design (see guidance at PGI 207.105(b)(14)(ii)(2));
                 (B) Engineering and manufacturing development phase of a weapon
                system, including embedded software (10 U.S.C. 2443); or
                 (C) Production and deployment phase of a weapon system, including
                embedded software (10 U.S.C. 2443).
                PART 216--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
                0
                4. Amend section 216.402-2 by--
                0
                a. Designating the text as paragraph (1); and
                0
                b. Adding paragraph (2).
                 The addition reads as follows:
                216.402-2 Technical performance incentives.
                * * * * *
                 (2) Contracting officers shall ensure requirements about the
                payment of incentive fees or the imposition of penalties are included
                in the solicitation for a contract for the engineering and
                manufacturing development or production of a weapon system, including
                embedded software, if the program manager or comparable requiring
                activity official exercising program manager responsibilities
                includes--
                 (i) Provisions for the payment of incentive fees to the contractor,
                based on achievement of design specification requirements for
                reliability and maintainability of weapons systems under the contract;
                or
                 (ii) The imposition of penalties to be paid by the contractor to
                the Government for failure to achieve such design specification
                requirements (10 U.S.C. 2443).
                PART 234--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
                0
                5. Amend section 234.004 by adding paragraph (3) to read as follows:
                234.004 Acquisition strategy.
                * * * * *
                 (3) The contracting officer shall include in solicitations for
                contracts for the technical maturation and risk reduction phase,
                engineering and manufacturing development phase or production phase of
                a weapon system, including embedded software--
                 (i) Clearly defined measurable criteria for engineering activities
                and design specifications for reliability and maintainability provided
                by the program manager, or the comparable requiring activity official
                performing program management responsibilities; or
                 (ii) Ensure a copy of the justification, executed by the program
                manager or the comparable requiring activity official performing
                program management responsibilities for the decision that engineering
                activities and design specifications for reliability and
                maintainability should not be a requirement, is included in the
                contract file (10 U.S.C. 2443).
                [FR Doc. 2019-13744 Filed 6-27-19; 8:45 am]
                 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT