Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: California; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard

Federal Register: December 3, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 231)

Rules and Regulations

Page 63309-63310

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr03de09-6

Page 63309

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52

EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0188; FRL-9086-7

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

California; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone

Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has monitored attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS since the 2006-2008 monitoring period. In addition, quality controlled and quality assured ozone data for 2008 that are available in the EPA Air

Quality System database, but not yet certified, show that this area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination suspends the requirements for California to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning State Implementation Plans for this area related to attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. These requirements shall remain suspended for so long as the area continues to attain the ozone NAAQS.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on January 4, 2010.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket

Identification No. EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0188. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the

Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning

Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105-3901. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:55, excluding

Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105-3901, telephone number (415) 947-4192, fax number

(415) 947-3579, electronic mail Tax.wienke@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''

``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

1. What Action Is EPA Taking?

2. What Is the Effect of This Action?

3. Final Action

4. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

1. What Action Is EPA Taking?

   EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California moderate 8- hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour National

   Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has monitored attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS since the 2006-2008 monitoring period. In addition, quality controlled and quality assured ozone data for 2009 that are available in the EPA Air Quality System

   (AQS) database, but not yet certified, show that this area continues to attain the ozone NAAQS.

   Other specific requirements of the determination and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the Notice of Proposed

   Rulemaking (NPR) published on September 23, 2009 (74 FR 48495) and will not be restated here. EPA received no public comments on the NPR.

2. What Is the Effect of This Action?

   Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR 51.918), this determination suspends the requirements for the Imperial

   County, California moderate ozone nonattainment area to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, section 172(c)(9) contingency measures, and any other planning State

   Implementation Plans (SIPs) related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for so long as the area continues to attain the 1997 ozone

   NAAQS.

   This action does not constitute a redesignation to attainment under

   CAA section 107(d)(3), because the area does not have an approved maintenance plan as required under section 175A of the CAA, nor a determination that the area has met the other requirements for redesignation. The classification and designation status of the area remains moderate nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that it meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment.

   If EPA subsequently determines, after notice-and-comment rulemaking in the Federal Register, that the area has violated the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, the basis for the suspension of these requirements would no longer exist, and the area would thereafter have to address the pertinent requirements.

3. Final Action

   EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and continues to attain the standard based on data through the 2009 ozone season. As provided in 40 CFR 51.918, this determination suspends the requirements for California to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, and contingency measures under section 172(c)(9), and any other planning SIP related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for this area, for so long as the area continues to attain the standard.

5. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

   Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,

   ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy

   Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action makes a determination based on air quality data, and results in the suspension of certain Federal requirements. Accordingly, the

   Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the

   Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule makes a determination based on air quality data, and results in the suspension of certain Federal requirements, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104- 4).

   This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more

   Page 63310

   Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and

   Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by

   Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely makes a determination based on air quality data and results in the suspension of certain Federal requirements, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from

   Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it determines that air quality in the affected area is meeting Federal standards.

   The requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology

   Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply because it would be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when determining the attainment status of an area, to use voluntary consensus standards in place of promulgated air quality standards and monitoring procedures that otherwise satisfy the provisions of the

   Clean Air Act.

   This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)

   Under Executive Order 12898, EPA finds that this rule involves a determination of attainment based on air quality data and will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any communities in the area, including minority and low- income communities.

   The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the

   Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the

   United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

   Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal

   Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

   Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 19, 2008. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

   Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,

   Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

   Dated: November 13, 2009.

   Laura Yoshii,

   Acting Regional Administrator,

   Region IX. 0

   Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

   PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

   Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.282 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:

   Sec. 52.282 Control strategy and regulations: Ozone.

   * * * * *

   (c) Determination of attainment. Effective January 4, 2010, EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR 51.918), this determination suspends the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act for as long as the area does not monitor any violations of the 8-hour ozone standard.

   If a violation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS is monitored in the Imperial

   County, California 8-hour ozone nonattainment area, this determination shall no longer apply.

   FR Doc. E9-28536 Filed 12-2-09; 8:45 am

   BILLING CODE 6560-50-P