Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Bayou Sara, Saraland, AL
| Published date | 31 March 2021 |
| Citation | 86 FR 16680 |
| Record Number | 2021-06482 |
| Section | Proposed rules |
| Court | Coast Guard,Homeland Security Department |
Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 60 (Wednesday, March 31, 2021)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 31, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16680-16683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06482]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2019-0910]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Bayou Sara, Saraland, AL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating requirements
for the CSX Transportation Railroad drawbridge across Bayou Sara, mile
0.1 near Saraland, Mobile County, Alabama. This proposed rule allows
the bridge owner to operate the bridge remotely from the CSX remote
control center in Mobile, AL.
DATES: Comments and relate material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before September 27, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0910 using Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Doug Blakemore. Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administration Branch Chief; telephone (504) 671-2128, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CSX CSX Transportation
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
The CSX Railroad Company, the owner of the bridge requested to
change operation of the bridge from a tended drawbridge to a remotely
operated drawbridge. The CSX Transportation Railroad drawbridge has a
vertical clearance of 5' in the closed to navigation position and
operates in accordance with 33 CFR 117.105. This proposed rule will not
change the operation schedule of the bridge. A copy of the bridge
owners request can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in the
Docket USCG-2019-0910.
The waterway users include recreational vessels and commercial
tows; which combined requires approximately six openings a day.
CSX has completed installation of a remote operation system at the
bridge and a remote control center, located in Mobile, AL. At the
bridge, CSX has installed infrared cameras, closed circuit cameras and
TVs, communication systems and information technology systems on the
bridge that allow an operator from Mobile to monitor and control the
bridge. They have also developed an operations manual that remote
operators use to control each bridge.
[[Page 16681]]
In the future, CSX anticipates to remotely operate an additional
ten drawbridges from the CSX remote control center. As a general rule
the Coast Guard will consider allowing one (1) remote operator to
control up to three (3) separate bridges. This is dependent on the type
of vessels that use the waterways, vessel traffic volume and
environmental or geographical conditions of each bridge and waterway.
On January 22, 2020 the Coast Guard published a temporary deviation
from regulations; request for comments (TD) entitled Drawbridge
Operation Regulation; Bayou Sara, Saraland, AL in the Federal Register
(85 FR 3853). This temporary deviation was issued to test the remote
operations system for 60 days. The objective was to also to collect and
analyze information on how the drawbridge operated from a remote
location and the potential effect on vessel traffic in the area. This
deviation ended March 23, 2020.
Given the duration of time from the end of the test period and the
development of this NPRM, the Coast Guard is authorizing second
deviation to re-test the remote operations of the bridge and its effect
on waterway mobility in that area. However, this deviation will run for
180 days and simultaneously with this NPRM. Both under the same docket
number. Both documents can be found at https://www.regulations.gov and
comments can be made to either document.
During the 60 day test period, the Coast Guard did not identify any
issues with the remote operation of the bridge or any negative impact
to a vessels reasonable ability to use this waterway. The Coast Guard
received two comments from the public during the test period. These
comments can be viewed in the Docket and have been addressed throughout
this NPRM or below. These comments have been summarized and evaluated
by the Coast Guard.
One of the comments received expressed concern that remote
operation systems have not been proven. Under 33 CFR 117.42 the Coast
Guard has authorized a number of drawbridge to be remotely operated
with successful results. Safety is a priority and the bridge must
operate as if a drawtender were present at the bridge.
The same commenter had safety concerns that without drawtenders on
site, maintenance, repairs, inspections and vessel assistance through
the bridge would not be conducted. In accordance with CSX procedures,
drawtenders are not allowed to perform these actions. There are also
concerns about unreported strikes of the bridge by vessels and
potential trespassers at the bridge. CSX has cameras at the bridge and
given that the bridge operating schedule is open on demand, the bridge
must be monitored 24 hours a day. Also, vessels are required to report
certain marine incidents and casualties and local law enforcement will
be alerted if there is illegal activity at the bridge.
Another comment recommended that the bridge remain in the open to
navigation position and close when a train is approaching. Coast Guard
will consider this option and discuss with CSX during the comment and
test period.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
33 CFR 117.42 sets Coast Guard drawbridge regulations. This
regulation authorizes the Coast Guard District Commander to approve
operations from a remote site. CSX has requested to operate the CSX
Transportation Bridge across Bayou Sara from the CSX remote control
center in Mobile, AL. The waterway users include recreational vessels
requires approximately six openings a day.
Presently, the bridge opens on signal for the passage of vessels in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.105 and this proposed rule will not change
that operating schedule. This proposed rule will also not change how a
request to open the bridge will be conducted. Mariners requiring an
opening may do so by contacting the CSX remote control center on
Channels 13/16 or by the phone number posted at the bridge.
The Coast Guard has visited the CSX remote control center several
times and has confirmed that the remote operating system is effective.
This proposed rule allows CSX to control the drawbridge from their
remote control center and requires CSX to have the capability,
including resources and manpower to return the operator to the bridge
location within 3 hours following any of the below situations:
Any component of the remote operations system fails and
prevents the remote operator from being able to visually identify
vessels, communicate with vessels, detect vessels immediately
underneath the bridge or visually identify trains approaching the
bridge.
CSX fails to meet Federal Railway Administration (FRA) or
any other government agency safety requirements.
Anytime that CSX procedures, equipment or operators fail
to safely open and close the bridge fail.
At the direction of the District Commander.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize its
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discusses
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge with the bridge operator
controlling the bridge from a remote location.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121),
[[Page 16682]]
we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule.
If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, the Coast Guard does discuss the effects
of this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f) and have
made. The Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.105 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.105 Bayou Sara.
(a) The draw of the CSX Transportation Railroad bridge, mile 0.1
near Saraland,
AL shall be remotely operated by the bridge operator at CSX's
bridge remote control center in Mobile, Alabama. Closed Circuit TVs,
infrared detectors, communications systems and information technology
systems have been installed at the bridge. Vessels can contact the CSX
bridge operator via VHF-FM channel 13 or by telephone at the number
displayed on the signs posted at the bridge to request an opening of
the draw.
(b) CSX will return the operator to the bridge location within 3
hours following any of the below situations:
(1) Any component of the remote operations system fails and
prevents the remote operator from being able to visually identify
vessels, communicate with vessels, detect vessels immediately
underneath the bridge or visually identify trains approaching the
bridge.
(2) CSX fails to meet Federal Railway Administration (FRA) or any
other government agency safety requirements.
(3) Anytime that CSX procedures, equipment or operators fail to
safely open and close the bridge fail.
(4) Anytime at the direction of the District Commander.
[[Page 16683]]
Dated: March 16, 2021.
John P. Nadeau
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021-06482 Filed 3-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
