Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, CA

Published date25 October 2021
Citation86 FR 58827
Record Number2021-23060
SectionProposed rules
CourtCoast Guard
Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 58827-58829]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2021-23060]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
                Coast Guard
                33 CFR Part 117
                [Docket No. USCG-2021-0181]
                RIN 1625-AA09
                Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria
                Island and Byron Tract, CA
                AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
                ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
                governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway
                bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron
                Tract, California. This action is proposed due to the infrequent amount
                of vessels requiring drawbridge openings on the waterway and will
                reduce unnecessary staffing of the drawbridge during periods of
                navigational inactivity while continuing to meet the reasonable needs
                of navigation. The proposed rulemaking would require vessels to provide
                a four-hour advance notification for a bridge opening. We invite your
                comments on this proposed rulemaking.
                DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
                before December 27, 2021.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
                2021-0181 using Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
                 See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
                of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
                submitting comments.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
                rule, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh
                Coast Guard District; telephone 510-437-3516, email
                [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Table of Abbreviations
                CADFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
                Caltrans California Department of Transportation
                CFR Code of Federal Regulations
                CCCO Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff
                DHS Department of Homeland Security
                FR Federal Register
                OMB Office of Management and Budget
                NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
                Sec. Section
                U.S.C. United States Code
                II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
                 Old River is a tidal distributary of the San Joaquin River that
                flows for about 40 miles and is navigable in its entirety. It is
                located in the southern portion of the San Joaquin River Delta. There
                are approximately 10 marinas on Old River and nearby waterways with two
                marinas upriver from the bridge. From 2011 through June 2020, the swing
                span opened for vessels 474 times, an average of 4.27 openings per
                month. Most openings have been for vessels operated by the CADFW (58%),
                followed by recreational vessels (22%), towboat-vessel assistance (9%),
                and tug and barge units (6%). Law enforcement and search and rescue
                vessels also used the waterway. The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge
                across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron Tract,
                is a swing span drawbridge. It provides a horizontal clearance of 98
                feet and a vertical clearance of 12.7 feet above mean high water in the
                closed position with unlimited vertical clearance when fully opened.
                The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge is currently governed by 33 CFR
                117.183, which requires the draw to open on signal from May 1 through
                October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from November 1 through April 30
                from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the
                [[Page 58828]]
                draw opens on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the
                drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile
                12.8.
                 Due to infrequent calls for drawbridge openings, Caltrans has
                requested a four- hour notification year-round for drawbridge openings
                at this location. A four-hour notification will allow Caltrans to use
                personnel more efficiently and reduce unnecessary staffing of the
                drawbridge during periods of navigational inactivity while continuing
                to meet the reasonable needs of navigation on the waterway.
                 In order to gather public comments to the proposed operating
                schedule change, a test deviation was conducted from May 10, 2021
                through August 7, 2021. The notice of this test deviation was published
                in the Federal Register (83 FR 23278) on May 3, 2021. The purpose of
                the test deviation was to evaluate the possible impacts to navigation
                with the bridge operating under a 4-hour advance notice for openings.
                During the test deviation period CCCO submitted a comment, stating
                their office responds to calls for service, including emergency
                situations, south of the Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge on Old
                River. Most of their patrol vessels exceed the bridge vertical
                clearance at mean high water, and cannot transit through the bridge in
                the closed position. CCCO concluded that a 4-hour advance notice for
                bridge openings would limit their ability to respond quickly to
                emergencies, thus jeopardizing public safety. In response, the Coast
                Guard cited 33 CFR 117.31(b) ``Drawbridge operations for emergency
                vessels,'' which states the drawtender shall take all reasonable
                measures to have the draw opened, regardless of the operating schedule
                of the draw, for passage of Federal, State, and local government
                vessels used for public safety. Drawtender logs, during the test
                deviation, recorded four CADFW vessels requested openings in May, eight
                CADFW vessels requested openings in June, four CADFW vessels and one
                survey vessel requested openings in July and two CADFW vessels
                requested openings in August. No recreational or commercial vessels
                requested an opening of the swing span during the 90 day test
                deviation.
                III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
                 The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
                governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway
                bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron
                Tract, California.
                 This proposed rule would implement regulations for the bridge to
                open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender
                at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8.
                 This proposed rule change would meet the reasonable needs of
                navigation on this portion of Old River.
                IV. Regulatory Analyses
                 We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
                and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
                analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
                First Amendment rights of protestors.
                A. Regulatory Planning and Review
                 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
                costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
                regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
                net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
                regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
                has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
                 This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
                vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice.
                B. Impact on Small Entities
                 The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
                amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
                regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
                entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
                that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
                fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
                50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
                proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
                substantial number of small entities.
                 While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
                bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
                above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
                on any vessel owner or operator.
                 If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
                jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
                a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
                ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
                degree this rule would economically affect it.
                 Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
                Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
                entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
                your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
                have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
                please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
                question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
                of the Coast Guard.
                C. Collection of Information
                 This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
                under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
                D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
                 A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
                (Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
                the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
                the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
                of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
                have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
                principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
                13132.
                 Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
                Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
                Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
                one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
                Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
                responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
                you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
                Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section.
                E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
                requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
                regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
                result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
                the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
                inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
                result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
                proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
                [[Page 58829]]
                F. Environment
                 We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
                Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
                instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
                (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
                Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
                Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
                actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
                effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the
                operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such
                actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph
                L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
                Planning Implementation Procedures.
                 Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
                for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
                information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
                environmental impact from this proposed rule.
                G. Protest Activities
                 The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
                Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
                your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
                security of people, places or vessels.
                V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
                 We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
                and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
                period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
                you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
                rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
                each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
                recommendation.
                 We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
                Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
                submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
                instructions.
                 We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
                without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
                personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
                submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
                of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
                 Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
                and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
                instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
                for email alerts, you will be notified.
                List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
                 Bridges.
                 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
                to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
                PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; DHS Delegation No.
                0170.1.
                0
                2. Revise Sec. 117.183 to read as follows:
                Sec. 117.183 Old River
                 The draw of the California Department of Transportation (Route 4)
                highway bridge, mile 14.8 between Victoria Island and Byron Tract,
                shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the
                drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile
                12.8.
                 Dated: October 18, 2021.
                Brian K. Penoyer,
                Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
                District.
                [FR Doc. 2021-23060 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT