Flights To and From Cuba
| Published date | 25 June 2019 |
| Citation | 84 FR 29795 |
| Record Number | 2019-13431 |
| Section | Rules and Regulations |
| Court | U.s. Customs And Border Protection |
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29795-29797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13431]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 29795]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 234
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[Docket No. USCBP-2016-0015; CBP Decision No. 19-06]
RIN 1651-AB10
Flights To and From Cuba
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final, without change, interim amendments
to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations published
in the Federal Register on March 21, 2016, that removed certain
provisions regarding flights to and from Cuba that were either obsolete
due to intervening regulatory changes or were duplicative of
regulations applicable to all other similarly situated international
flights.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur A.E. Pitts, Sr., U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations, by phone at (202)
344-2752 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 21, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
published an interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal Register (81 FR
14948) amending CBP regulations to remove regulations previously
codified at 19 CFR, part 122, subpart O. The removed regulations
imposed certain restrictions and reporting requirements on flights to
and from Cuba. The implementation of robust reporting requirements that
generally apply to all international flights rendered much of subpart O
redundant. Additionally, the Department of the Treasury's Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Department of Commerce's Bureau
of Industry and Security (BIS) issued changes to the Cuban Assets
Control Regulations (CACR) and the Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) that rendered many sections of subpart O obsolete.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Following the publication of the IFR, BIS and OFAC published
additional changes to the CACR and the EAR in order to implement the
National Security Presidential Memorandum on Strengthening the
Policy of the United States Toward Cuba (June 16, 2017). See 82 FR
51983 (Nov. 9, 2017) and 82 FR 51998 (Nov. 9, 2017). These changes
did not affect provisions related to former subpart O and do not
require modification to the IFR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite the removal of subpart O, flights to and from Cuba continue
to be subject to the same entry and clearance requirements in 19 CFR
part 122 as all other similarly situated international flights.
Additionally, flights to and from Cuba continue to be subject to other
legal requirements relating to travel and trade between the United
States and Cuba including, but not limited to, the CACR and the EAR.
In the IFR, DHS also amended several provisions of title 8 CFR (8
CFR 234.2) and title 19 CFR (19 CFR 122.31 and 122.42) to bring these
sections into conformity with the removal of 19 CFR part 122, subpart
O.
II. Discussion of Comments
A. Overview
Although the interim regulatory amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment procedures pursuant to the foreign
affairs exemption in 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), the IFR provided for the
submission of public comments that would be considered before adoption
of the interim regulations as a final rule. The prescribed 30-day
public comment period closed on April 20, 2016. DHS received
submissions from 30 commenters.
The vast majority of commenters supported the removal of subpart O.
Those commenters supported the removal of subpart O based on the
expectation that it would benefit the U.S. airline industry and other
U.S. businesses hoping to expand to Cuba, lower the cost of flights to
and from Cuba by increasing flight options available to U.S. consumers,
and potentially lead to future trade agreements and other economic
cooperation between the United States and Cuba. Three of the commenters
that supported the rule requested that DHS impose additional
restrictions on international flights and individuals arriving in the
United States. Two commenters opposed the IFR due to legal and policy
concerns regarding Cuba. A summary of the comments and comment
responses follow.
B. Discussion
Comment: One commenter expressed concern that the removal of
subpart O would encourage the spread of communist beliefs and stated
that DHS should take steps to continue to isolate Cuba. Another
commenter stated that the removal of subpart O was inconsistent with
federal laws that restrict trade with Cuba and with CBP's putative duty
to prevent trade with Cuba. Specifically, it is the position of the
commenter that section 6063 of title 22 of the U.S. Code prohibits CBP
from removing subpart O until there is a transition government in place
in Cuba.
Response: DHS disagrees that the removal of subpart O is
inconsistent with U.S. law or CBP's obligations under the law. As noted
above and explained in detail in the IFR, each section previously
codified in subpart O is either redundant of other regulatory
provisions or is obsolete due to intervening regulatory changes issued
by OFAC and BIS pursuant to OFAC's and BIS's statutory authority to
regulate travel and trade with Cuba. Additionally, none of the
regulatory requirements previously codified in subpart O is mandated by
statute. Rather, subpart O was promulgated pursuant to the Secretary of
Homeland Security's broad authority to regulate all aircraft arriving
to and departing from the United States. See 19 U.S.C. 1433, 1644, and
1644a. The elimination of subpart O, therefore, merely updates CBP's
regulations to conform to OFAC's and BIS's regulations and does not
conflict with the existing statutory or regulatory scheme restricting
travel or trade with Cuba.
The removal of subpart O also does not conflict with title II of
the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996,
Public Law 104-114, sections 201-207, 110 Stat.
[[Page 29796]]
785, 805-814, which includes the provisions codified at 22 U.S.C. 6063.
Those provisions do not specifically address DHS's authority to
regulate aircraft flying to or from Cuba. The President is authorized
to suspend aspects of the economic embargo of Cuba only if certain
conditions are met, including the determination that ``a transition
government in Cuba is in power.'' 22 U.S.C. 6064(a). As explained
above, however, the removal of the provisions in subpart O, which are
either redundant or obsolete, merely conforms CBP's regulations to the
BIS and OFAC requirements. It does not affect the existing embargo, and
therefore does not require a determination that a transition government
is in power in Cuba.
Comment: Two commenters expressed support for the removal of
subpart O but requested that individuals arriving in the United States
from any foreign place, including individuals arriving from Cuba, be
subject to criminal background checks in order to enter the United
States. One commenter requested that additional restrictions be placed
on flights to and from any foreign place.
Response: The requirements applicable to foreign individuals
seeking entry into the United States are beyond the scope of this rule.
However, DHS notes that despite the removal of subpart O, all travelers
arriving in the United States from Cuba must still report to a CBP
officer and undergo a customs and immigration inspection, as required
by various provisions in the United States Code and titles 8 and 19 and
of the CFR. DHS and its component agencies also work closely with the
Department of State and other agencies responsible for enforcing the
sanctions regime against Cuba, including OFAC and BIS, to ensure that
individuals on the Specially Designated National (SDN) list are
prohibited entry into the United States.
In addition, despite the removal of subpart O, all aircraft
arriving in the United States from Cuba are subject to the various
reporting and inspection requirements of title 19 CFR.
Comment: One commenter requested that DHS amend section 122.153(c)
of title 19 (19 CFR 122.153) to permit Key West International Airport
to receive flights to and from Cuba.
Response: Section 122.153 of title 19 is within subpart O and,
therefore, has been removed. However, it is not necessary to amend the
list of airports authorized to accept flights to and from Cuba
previously contained in 122.153(c) to add Key West International
Airport, or any other airport, in order for that airport to receive
flights to and from Cuba. With the removal of subpart O, any airport,
including Key West International Airport, may request a new
international flight to or from Cuba under the same procedures and
requirements applicable to all other similarly situated airports and
aircraft operators seeking to conduct international flights. In order
to operate flights between the United States and Cuba, all airports and
aircraft operators must comply with applicable regulatory requirements
of DHS and its component agencies, such as CBP, the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) and the U.S. Coast Guard, as well as the regulatory requirements
of OFAC, BIS, and the Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation
Administration.
III. Conclusions--Regulatory Amendments
After careful consideration of the comments received, DHS is
adopting the interim regulations, as set forth in the IFR published in
the Federal Register at 81 FR 14948 on March 21, 2016, as final without
change.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Statutory Requirements
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requirements in 5 U.S.C. 553
govern agency rulemaking procedures. Among other procedural
requirements, the APA generally requires that a final rule have a 30-
day delayed effective date. The APA provides a full exemption from the
requirements of section 553 for rules involving the foreign affairs
function of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). This final rule
is excluded from the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 as a foreign
affairs function of the United States because it concerns international
flights between the United States and Cuba, consistent with U.S.
foreign policy goals. These amendments clarify and simplify the
regulations regarding air travel between the United States and Cuba and
are consistent with President Trump's continued efforts to ensure that
engagement between the United States and Cuba advances the interests of
the United States and the Cuban people, including the mutual interest
in facilitating lawful travel and safe civil aviation.\2\ See 82 FR
48875. Accordingly, this final rule is not subject to the 30-day
delayed effective date requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ National Security Presidential Memorandum on Strengthening
the Policy of the United States Toward Cuba (June 16, 2017) Sec.
2(d), (f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, because this rule is not subject to the requirements
of 5 U.S.C. 553, it is not subject to the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13771
Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') directs
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits. Rules involving the foreign
affairs function of the United States are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation
and Controlling Regulatory Costs'') requires that whenever an agency
promulgates a new regulation, it must identify at least two existing
regulations to be repealed. It further directs that any new incremental
costs associated with new regulations must be offset by the elimination
of existing costs associated with two prior regulations. Pursuant to
section 4(a), Executive Order 13771 does not apply to regulations
issued with respect to a foreign affairs function of the United States.
As discussed above, DHS has concluded that clarifying and
simplifying the regulations regarding restrictions on travel between
the United States and Cuba is a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government. Accordingly, this rule is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Orders 12866 and 13771.
Signing Authority
This final rule is being issued in accordance with 8 CFR 2.1 and 19
CFR 0.2(a). Accordingly, this final rule is signed by the Secretary of
Homeland Security.
List of Subjects
8 CFR Part 234
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports, Aliens, Cuba.
19 CFR Part 122
Administrative practice and procedure, Air carriers, Aircraft,
Airports, Alcohol and alcoholic beverages, Cigars and cigarettes, Cuba,
Customs duties and inspection, Drug traffic control, Freight,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures.
Amendments to Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the IFR amending part 122 of the
CBP regulations (19 CFR part 122), which
[[Page 29797]]
was published in the Federal Register at 81 FR 14948 on March 21, 2016,
is adopted as a final rule without change.
Dated: June 14, 2019.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-13431 Filed 6-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
