Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C) Data Points and Coverage
| Citation | 84 FR 20049 |
| Record Number | 2019-08979 |
| Published date | 08 May 2019 |
| Court | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau |
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20049-20053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08979]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
12 CFR Part 1003
[Docket No. CFPB-2019-0020]
RIN 3170-AA97
Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C) Data Points and Coverage
AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) is
issuing this Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) to solicit
comments relating to whether to make changes to the data points that
the Bureau's October 2015 final rule implementing the Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act (HMDA) added to Regulation C or revised to require
additional information. Additionally, the Bureau is issuing this ANPR
to solicit comments relating to the requirement that institutions
report certain business- or commercial-purpose transactions under
Regulation C.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 8, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit responsive information and other comments,
identified by Docket No. CFPB-2019-0020, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include Docket No. CFPB-
2019-0020 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Comment Intake, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment Intake, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Instructions: When responding to a particular question, please note
the question number at the top of the response.
You are not required to answer all questions to receive
consideration of your comments. The Bureau encourages the early
submission of comments. All submissions must include the document title
and docket number.
Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the Bureau is
subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments
electronically. In general, all comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov. In addition, comments
will be available for public inspection and copying at 1700 G Street
NW, Washington, DC 20552, on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. eastern daylight time. You can make an
appointment to inspect the documents by telephoning 202-435-7275.
All submissions, including attachments and other supporting
materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public
disclosure. Sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or
Social Security numbers, or names of other individuals, should not be
included. Submissions will not be edited to remove any identifying or
contact information.
The Bureau invites comment on all aspects of the ANPR from all
interested parties. In the event that a respondent may have concerns
about revealing proprietary or personal information, the Bureau
welcomes comments from attorneys, consumer advocacy organizations,
trade associations, or other representatives that do not identify their
clients.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaydee DiGiovanni or Shaakira Gold-
Ramirez, Counsels; or Amanda Quester or Alexandra Reimelt, Senior
Counsels, Office of Regulations, at 202-435-7700 or https://reginquiries.consumerfinance.gov. If you require this document in an
alternative electronic format, please contact
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau is issuing this ANPR to solicit
information relating to whether to make changes to the data points that
the Bureau's October 2015 final rule implementing HMDA (2015 HMDA Rule)
added to Regulation C or revised to require additional information. The
Bureau also seeks comments relating to the requirement that
institutions report certain business- or commercial-purpose
transactions under Regulation C.
I. Background
A. HMDA and Regulation C
HMDA requires certain depository institutions and for-profit
nondepository institutions to collect, record, and report data about
originations and purchases of mortgage loans, as well as mortgage loan
applications that do not result in originations (for example,
applications that are denied or withdrawn).\1\ By its statutory terms,
HMDA defines ``mortgage loan'' as (1) ``a loan which is secured by
residential real property,'' or (2) a ``home improvement loan.'' \2\
The purposes of HMDA are to provide the public with loan data that can
be used: (i) To help determine whether financial institutions are
serving the housing needs of their communities; (ii) to assist public
officials in distributing public-sector investment so as to attract
private investment to areas where it is needed; and (iii) to assist in
identifying possible discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing
antidiscrimination statutes.\3\ Prior to the enactment of the Dodd-
Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act),
Regulation C required reporting of 22 data points and allowed for
optional reporting of reasons an institution denied an application.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To simplify review of this document, the Bureau generally
refers herein to the obligation to report data instead of listing
all of these obligations in each instance.
\2\ 12 U.S.C. 2802(a)(2).
\3\ 12 CFR 1003.1.
\4\ As used in this document, the term ``data point'' refers to
items of information that entities are required to compile and
report, generally listed in separate paragraphs in Regulation C.
Some data points are reported using multiple data fields.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20050]]
B. Dodd-Frank Act
In 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Act, which amended HMDA
and transferred HMDA rulemaking authority and other functions from the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) to the
Bureau.\5\ Among other changes, the Dodd-Frank Act expanded the scope
of information relating to mortgage applications and loans that
institutions must compile, maintain, and report under HMDA.
Specifically, the Dodd-Frank Act amended HMDA section 304(b)(4) by
adding one new data point, the age of loan applicants and mortgagors.
The Dodd-Frank Act also added new HMDA section 304(b)(5) and (6), which
requires the following additional new data points: Information relating
to the total points and fees payable at origination (total loan costs
or total points and fees); the difference between the annual percentage
rate (APR) associated with the loan and a benchmark rate or rates for
all loans (rate spread); the term of any prepayment penalty; the value
of real property to be pledged as collateral; the term of the loan and
of any introductory interest rate on the loan; the presence of contract
terms allowing non-amortizing payments; the channel through which the
application was made; and the credit scores of applicants and
mortgagors.\6\ New HMDA section 304(b)(6) in addition authorizes the
Bureau to require, ``as [it] may determine to be appropriate,'' a
unique identifier that identifies the loan originator, a universal loan
identifier (ULI), and the parcel number that corresponds to the real
property pledged as collateral for the mortgage loan.\7\ New HMDA
section 304(b)(5)(D) and (6)(J) further provides the Bureau with the
authority to mandate reporting of ``such other information as the
Bureau may require.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1980, 2035-38, 2097-101
(2010).
\6\ Dodd-Frank Act section 1094(3), amending HMDA section
304(b), 12 U.S.C. 2803(b).
\7\ Id.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. 2015 HMDA Rule, 2017 HMDA Rule, December 2017 Statement, and EGRRCPA
In October 2015, the Bureau issued the 2015 HMDA Rule.\9\ Most of
the 2015 HMDA Rule took effect on January 1, 2018.\10\ The 2015 HMDA
Rule, among other things, implemented the new data points specified in
the Dodd-Frank Act and re-adopted certain pre-existing data points
added to Regulation C by the Board. The 2015 HMDA Rule also added a
number of additional data points pursuant to the Bureau's discretionary
authority under HMDA section 304(b)(5) and (6) and revised certain pre-
existing data points to provide for greater specificity or additional
information in reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C), 80 FR 66128 (Oct.
28, 2015).
\10\ Id. at 66128, 66256-58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau added the following data points to Regulation C to
implement specific provisions added by the Dodd-Frank Act in HMDA
section 304(b)(4), (5)(A) through (C), and (6)(A) through (I): ULI;
\11\ property address; age; rate spread for all loans; \12\ credit
score; total loan costs or total points and fees; prepayment penalty
term; loan term; introductory rate period; non-amortizing features;
property value; application channel; and mortgage loan originator
identifier.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Prior to the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board
required reporting of an identifying number for the loan or
application but did not require that the identifier be universal.
HMDA section 304(b)(6)(G) requires reporting of, ``as the Bureau may
determine to be appropriate, a universal loan identifier.''
\12\ Prior to the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board
required financial institutions to report rate spread for higher-
priced mortgage loans. 67 FR 7222 (Feb. 15, 2002); 67 FR 43218 (June
27, 2002). HMDA section 304(b)(5)(B) requires reporting of rate
spread for all loans.
\13\ 12 CFR 1003.4(a)(1)(i), (a)(9)(i), (a)(10)(ii), and
(a)(12), (15), (17), (22), (25) through (28), and (33) and (34).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau also re-adopted certain data points in the 2015 HMDA
Rule that are substantially similar or identical to pre-existing data
points added to Regulation C by the Board. These data points include
the following: Application date; loan type; whether the application or
covered loan involved a request for a preapproval of a home purchase
loan under a preapproval program; construction method for the dwelling
related to the subject property; \14\ the amount of the covered loan or
the amount applied for; the action taken by the financial institution
and the date of the action taken; State; county; census tract; sex;
income; type of purchaser; whether the loan is subject to the Home
Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 (HOEPA); lien status of the
subject property; \15\ and the total number of individual dwelling
units contained in the dwelling related to the loan (number of units
).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Construction method and number of units, together, replaced
property type, the pre-existing Regulation C data point; the
information required by the new data points is very similar to what
the Board required, but institutions now must report the precise
number of units rather than categorizing dwellings into one-to-four
family dwellings and multifamily dwellings.
\15\ The 2015 HMDA Rule extends the requirement to report lien
status to purchased loans. 80 FR 66128, 66201 (Oct. 28, 2015).
\16\ 12 CFR 1003.4(a)(1)(ii), (a)(2), (4), (5), and (7),
(a)(8)(i) and (ii), (a)(9)(ii), (a)(10)(i) and (iii), and (a)(11),
(13) and (14), and (31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In other instances, the 2015 HMDA Rule revised pre-existing
Regulation C data points established by the Board to require additional
information be reported for those data points. Such revised data points
include the following: The purpose of the loan or application;
occupancy type; ethnicity; race; and legal entity identifier (LEI).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 12 CFR 1003.4(a)(3), (a)(6), (a)(10)(i); 12 CFR
1003.5(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Bureau added the following new data points in the
2015 HMDA Rule pursuant to its discretionary authority under HMDA
section 304(b)(5) and (6): Reasons for denial of a loan application,
which were optionally reported under the Board's rule but became
mandatory in the 2015 HMDA Rule; \18\ the total origination charges
associated with the loan; the total points paid to the lender to reduce
the interest rate of the loan (discount points); the amount of lender
credits; the interest rate applicable at closing or account opening;
the debt-to-income ratio; the ratio of the total amount of debt secured
by the property to the value of the property (combined loan-to-value
ratio); for transactions involving manufactured homes, whether the loan
or application is or would have been secured by a manufactured home and
land or by a manufactured home and not land (manufactured home secured
property type); the land property interest for loans or applications
related to manufactured housing (manufactured home land property
interest); the number of individual dwellings units that are income-
restricted pursuant to Federal, State, or local affordable housing
programs (multifamily affordable units); information related to the
automated underwriting system used in evaluating an application and the
result generated by the automated underwriting system; whether the loan
is a reverse mortgage; whether the loan is an open-end line of credit;
and whether the loan is primarily for a business or commercial
purpose.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Financial institutions regulated by the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) are also required to report
reasons for denial on their HMDA loan/application registers pursuant
to 12 CFR 27.3(a)(1)(i) and 128.6. Similarly, pursuant to
regulations transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision,
certain financial institutions supervised by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are required to report reasons for
denial on their HMDA loan/application registers. 12 CFR 390.147.
\19\ 12 CFR 1003.4(a)(16), (18) through (21), (23) and (24),
(29) and (30), (32), and (35) through (38).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20051]]
The 2015 HMDA Rule also requires reporting of applications for, and
originations of, dwelling-secured business- or commercial-purpose
closed-end mortgage loans and open-end lines of credit for home
purchase, refinancing, or home improvement purposes.\20\ Prior to the
2015 HMDA Rule, Regulation C covered closed-end, business- or
commercial-purpose loans made to purchase, refinance, or improve a
dwelling. Thus, the 2015 HMDA Rule revised coverage of business- or
commercial-purpose transactions by: (1) Adding the dwelling-secured
test, and (2) requiring reporting of dwelling-secured, business- or
commercial-purpose open-end lines of credit for the purpose of home
purchase, refinancing, or home improvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 80 FR 66128, 66169-72 (Oct. 28, 2015). As used in
Regulation C, the term dwelling includes a multifamily residential
structure or community. 12 CFR 1003.2(f); comment 2(f)-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before institutions had to comply with the new and revised data
reporting requirements in 2015 HMDA Rule, the Bureau in September 2017
issued a final rule amending certain aspects of the 2015 HMDA Rule
(2017 HMDA Rule).\21\ Among other things, the 2017 HMDA Rule addressed
certain technical errors in the 2015 HMDA Rule, eased the burden of
reporting certain data requirements, and clarified key terms to
facilitate compliance with Regulation C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C), 82 FR 43088 (Sept.
13, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau issued a statement in December 2017 (December 2017
Statement) in which it indicated that it intended to engage in a
rulemaking to reconsider various aspects of the 2015 HMDA Rule, such as
the institutional and transactional coverage tests and the rule's
discretionary data points.\22\ This ANPR is part of that rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., ``Statement with Respect to
HMDA Implementation'' (Dec. 21, 2017), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_statement-with-respect-to-hmda-implementation_122017.pdf. Additionally, in recognition of
the significant systems and operations challenges needed to adjust
to the revised regulation, the December 2017 Statement indicated
that, for HMDA data collected in 2018 and reported in 2019, the
Bureau does not intend to require data resubmission unless data
errors are material. The December 2017 Statement also explained that
the Bureau does not intend to assess penalties with respect to
errors in data collected in 2018 and reported in 2019. As explained
in the statement, any supervisory examinations of 2018 HMDA data
will be diagnostic to help institutions identify compliance
weaknesses and will credit good-faith compliance efforts. The
statement also indicated that collection and submission of the 2018
HMDA data will provide financial institutions an opportunity to
identify any gaps in their implementation of amended Regulation C
and make improvements in their HMDA compliance management systems
for future years. The Board, the FDIC, the National Credit Union
Administration, and the OCC released similar statements relating to
their supervisory examinations. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 24, 2018, the President signed the Economic Growth,
Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) into law.\23\
Section 104(a) of the EGRRCPA amends section 304(i) of HMDA by adding
partial exemptions from HMDA's requirements for certain transactions of
insured depository institutions and insured credit unions. Certain of
the data points about which the Bureau is soliciting information in
this ANPR are covered under the EGRRCPA partial exemptions.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296 (2018).
\24\ See Partial Exemptions from the Requirements of the Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act under the Economic Growth, Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Regulation C), 83 FR 45325,
45328-29 (Sept. 7, 2018) (Bureau's Interpretive and Procedural Rule
clarifying and implementing EGRRCPA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Feedback Since Issuing 2015 HMDA Rule and 2017 HMDA Rule
Since issuing the 2015 HMDA Rule and 2017 HMDA Rule, the Bureau has
heard concerns about the burden associated with reporting certain of
the new or revised data points relative to the value of the information
in serving HMDA's purposes. The Bureau has also heard continuing
concerns about Regulation C's coverage of certain business- or
commercial-purpose loans. In addition, although the 2015 HMDA Rule was
outside the scope of the Bureau's Call for Evidence series of Requests
for Information (RFIs) \25\ issued in spring 2018, the Bureau received
several comments regarding HMDA in response to the RFIs. The Bureau has
considered those comments as well as other input it has received from
stakeholders through its efforts to monitor and support industry
implementation of the 2015 HMDA Rule and the 2017 HMDA Rule in
developing this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ E.g., Request for Information Regarding the Bureau's
Adopted Regulations and New Rulemaking Authorities, 83 FR 12286
(Mar. 21, 2018); Request for Information Regarding the Bureau's
Inherited Regulations and Inherited Rulemaking Authorities, 83 FR
12881 (Mar. 26, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Among other things, some industry stakeholders have advised the
Bureau that it is more burdensome to report information about whether a
borrower owns or leases the land on which a manufactured home is
located \26\ than the Bureau anticipated in 2015 because such
information is not generally collected in the ordinary course of
business. Additionally, prior to the 2015 HMDA Rule, financial
institutions were required to ask loan applicants to identify their
ethnicity using aggregate categories (Hispanic or Latino, not Hispanic
or Latino) and to do the same for race (e.g., Asian). Pursuant to the
2015 HMDA Rule, institutions are now required to request that the
applicant self-identify their ethnicity using disaggregated categories
(e.g., Cuban or Mexican) and their race using disaggregated categories
(e.g., Chinese or Korean) in addition to the pre-existing aggregate
categories.\27\ Some financial institutions have stated that these new
requirements can prolong and complicate the application process. In
response to the Bureau's RFIs, one credit union expressed concern about
complying with the new disaggregated data field requirements. On the
other hand, one community group stated that disaggregated data on race
and ethnicity helps to identify predatory lending and that such data
could have helped to avoid the negative impacts on many communities
resulting from the housing crisis that began in 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 80 FR 66128, 66226-27 (Oct. 28, 2015).
\27\ Id. at 66187-94.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2015 HMDA Rule also requires financial institutions to complete
free-form text fields for certain data points if certain circumstances
are met. For example, the 2015 HMDA Rule made reporting of reasons for
denial mandatory and provides various reporting options from which
financial institutions may choose.\28\ The 2015 HMDA Rule requires that
financial institutions include a reason for loan denial in a free-form
text data field if the institution chooses the option of ``Other.''
\29\ Several financial institutions have expressed that using this
free-form text field can be a cumbersome process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Id. at 66205.
\29\ Id. at 66205-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, in the past year the Bureau has heard from several
industry stakeholders requesting that the Bureau should exclude from
Regulation C's coverage business- or commercial-purpose loans made to a
non-natural person and secured by a multifamily dwelling. For example,
in response to the Bureau's RFIs a few industry commenters stated that
requiring reporting of such transactions is not necessary to fulfilling
the purposes of HMDA and that the burden of reporting them does not
outweigh the benefits of doing so.
II. Request for Comment
The Bureau is issuing this ANPR to solicit comments relating to
whether to make changes to (1) the data points that the 2015 HMDA Rule
added to Regulation C or revised to require additional information, and
(2)
[[Page 20052]]
Regulation C's coverage of business- or commercial-purpose loans made
to a non-natural person and secured by a multifamily dwelling. The
Bureau will carefully consider the public's input as it determines
whether to formulate a proposed rule relating to changing any of these
data points from the 2015 HMDA Rule and in deciding whether to address
certain business- or commercial-purpose transactions as part of any
upcoming rulemaking.
A. Data Points Required by 2015 HMDA Rule
The Bureau is soliciting comment, data, and information from the
public relating to whether to make changes to the data points that the
2015 HMDA Rule added to Regulation C or revised to require additional
information.\30\ One of the Bureau's goals in gathering information in
this ANPR is to ensure that the data requirements established in the
2015 HMDA Rule appropriately balance the benefits and burdens
associated with data reporting. Financial institutions were required to
report their first data pursuant to the 2015 HMDA Rule by March 1,
2019. Now that financial institutions have completed their first
submissions of the additional information required under the 2015 HMDA
Rule and institution-specific submissions are available to the public,
the Bureau believes that they and other stakeholders may have
additional and more accurate information to offer relating to the
benefits and burdens associated with the data points required by the
2015 HMDA Rule. Below is a table that lists the data points that the
Bureau added or revised to require additional information pursuant to
the 2015 HMDA Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ As discussed above in part I.C, many of the data points in
the 2015 HMDA Rule implement data points specified in the Dodd-Frank
Act or re-adopt pre-existing data points added to Regulation C by
the Board. Other data points, however, were added pursuant to the
Bureau's discretionary authority provided by the Dodd-Frank Act or
revise pre-existing data points to require additional information.
The type or extent of changes the Bureau may propose relating to any
of these data points in a future notice of proposed rulemaking may
vary depending on the category under which the data point falls.
Table 1--Data Points Added or Revised To Require Additional Information Pursuant to the 2015 HMDA Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data points added by 2015 HMDA Rule Data points revised by 2015 HMDA
to implement Dodd-Frank Act Data points added by 2015 HMDA Rule Rule to require additional
requirements pursuant to discretionary authority information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Universal Loan Identifies Reasons for Denial Loan Purpose
(ULI)
Property Address Origination Charges Occupancy Type
Age Discount Points Ethnicity
Rate Spread for all loans Lender Credits Race
Credit Score Interest Rate Legal Entity Identifier
(LEI)
Total Loan Cost or Total Debt-to-Income Ratio
Points and Fees
Prepayment Penalty Term Combined Loan to Value Ratio
Loan Term Manufactured Home Secured
Property Type
Introductory Rate Period Manufactured Home Land
Property Interest
Non-Amortizing Features Multifamily Affordable Units
Property Value Automated Underwriting System
Application Channel Reverse Mortgage Flag
Mortgage Loan Originator Open-End Line of Credit Flag
Identifier Business or Commercial
Purpose Flag
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau encourages commenters to be specific and, where
possible, to include any relevant empirical evidence. Comment is
requested from all interested parties on the following four topics:
1. Please identify any new data point or any data point revised to
require additional information from the table above for which the cost
of collecting and reporting the information does not justify the
benefit that the information collected and reported provides in
furthering the purposes of HMDA. For each such data point:
i. Please describe the nature and magnitude of any operational
challenges in collecting and reporting the required information.
ii. What ongoing costs are incurred in collecting and reporting the
required information? Has the Bureau's new web-based data submission
and edit-check system affected ongoing costs of collecting and
reporting the required information? If so, how and how much? To what
extent are the data point's requirements aligned with industry
standards, and how does that affect ongoing costs of collecting and
reporting the required information?
iii. Would financial institutions generally collect the required
information in the ordinary course of business absent Regulation C
requirements? If so, what are the incremental costs associated with
reporting the required information? If not, what are the costs
associated with collecting and reporting the required information?
iv. How much value does the data point provide in furthering the
purposes of HMDA?
2. The 2015 HMDA Rule requires financial institutions to complete
free-form text fields for certain data points when certain
circumstances are met. For each free-form text field required by the
2015 HMDA Rule:
i. What are the costs of providing information through the free-
form text field?
ii. What are the benefits of providing information through the
free-form text field?
iii. Are there better alternatives to providing information than
through the free-form text field?
3. Are there other considerations the Bureau should take into
account in deciding whether to propose to eliminate or revise any new
data point or revised data point from the 2015 HMDA Rule?
4. Are there new or revised data points under the 2015 HMDA Rule
for which more explanation is needed to clarify the collection and
reporting requirements? If so, please identify any data point for which
additional clarity could reduce the costs associated with collecting
and reporting the data and improve the value of the data in furthering
the purposes of HMDA.
[[Page 20053]]
B. Coverage of Certain Business- or Commercial-Purpose Transactions
The Bureau seeks to assess the extent to which requiring reporting
of information on business- or commercial-purpose loans made to a non-
natural person and secured by a multifamily dwelling imposes burdens on
financial institutions and furthers HMDA's purposes.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ HMDA's purposes are: (i) To help determine whether
financial institutions are serving the housing needs of their
communities; (ii) to assist public officials in distributing public-
sector investment so as to attract private investment to areas where
it is needed; and (iii) to assist in identifying possible
discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing antidiscrimination
statutes. 12 CFR 1003.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bureau seeks information that might assist the Bureau in
deciding whether to propose to exclude such transactions from HMDA's
requirements, including information about the following:
5. The value that data on such transactions provides in serving
HMDA's purposes;
6. Other benefits associated with reporting such transactions; and
7. The burden imposed by the requirement to report data on such
transactions.
Dated: April 26, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019-08979 Filed 5-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P
