Indian Gaming Regulatory Act: Fee rates,
[Federal Register: October 8, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 195)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 58053-58054]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08oc03-19]
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION
25 CFR Part 514
RIN 3141-AA16
Fees
AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC or Commission) is proposing to amend its fee regulations. The regulations are being amended to reflect changes in the statutory limit set by Congress.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 30, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Fee Change Comments, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC, 20005, delivered to that address between 8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, or faxed to 202/632-7066 (this is not a toll-free number). Comments received may be inspected between 9 a.m. and noon, and between 2 p.m. and 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John R. Hay at 202/632-7003; fax 202/ 632-7066 (these are not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), enacted on October 17, 1988, established the National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission). The Commission is funded entirely from fees collected from Indian gaming operations. The Commission is proposing changing its current regulations to reflect changes in the statutory limit imposed by Congress. This regulation is being amended so that the amount of fees imposed by the Commission is directly related to congressional action. Under the current regulation the Commission may only impose fees not exceeding $8,000,000, during any fiscal year. For fiscal year 2004, Congress has increased that amount to a maximum of $12,000,000. The proposed change will allow the Commission to collect up to the statutory maximum and will eliminate the need to regularly amend this regulation as Congress raises or lowers the fee level.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission certifies that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The factual basis for this certification is as follows:
Of the 330 Indian gaming operations across the country, approximately 150 have revenues under 10 million. Of these, approximately 90 operations have gross revenues of under 3 million. Those operations that gross less than 1.5 million are exempt from fees. Since fee assessments are based on a percentage of gross revenues until the maximum allowed by Congress is reached, and new gaming operations continue to open, the amount individual tribal gaming operations will pay in fees will likely only increase slightly or may in fact decrease. For these reasons, the Commission has concluded that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on those small entities subject to the rule.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. The proposed rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of more than $100 million per year; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of U.S. based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Commission is an independent regulatory agency, and, as such, is not subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. Even so, the Commission has determined that this final rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector, of more than $100 million per year. Thus, it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
Takings
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the Commission has determined that this rule does not have significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of General Counsel has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any information collection requirements for which OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) would be required.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Commission has determined that this proposed rule does not constitute a major Federal Action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
Dated: October 2, 2003. Philip N. Hogen, Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 514
Gambling, Indians-lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 25 CFR part 514 is proposed to be amended as follows:
The authority citation for part 514 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2702 et seq.
Section 514.1(d) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 514.1 Annual fees.
* * * * *
[[Page 58054]]
(d) The total amount of all fees imposed during any fiscal year shall not exceed the statutory maximum imposed by Congress. The Commission shall credit pro-rata any fees collected in excess of this amount against amounts otherwise due at the end of the quarter following the quarter during which the Commission makes such determination.
(1) The Commission will notify each gaming operation as to the amount of overpayment, if any, and therefore the amount of credit to be taken against the next quarterly payment otherwise due.
(2) The notification required in paragraph (d)(1) of this section shall be made in writing addressed to the gaming operation. * * * * *
[FR Doc. 03-25472 Filed 10-7-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P
