Human drugs: Drug approvals; circumstances under which an active ingredient may be marketed in both prescription and over-the-counter products,

[Federal Register: September 1, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 169)]

[Proposed Rules]

[Page 52050-52051]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr01se05-26]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 310

[Docket No. 2005N-0345]

RIN 0910-AF72

Drug Approvals: Circumstances Under Which an Active Ingredient May Be Simultaneously Marketed in Both a Prescription Drug Product and an Over-the-Counter Drug Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing this advance notice of proposed rulemaking to request comment on whether to initiate a rulemaking to codify its interpretation of section 503(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301, et seq.), regarding when an active ingredient may be simultaneously marketed in both a prescription drug product and an over-the-counter (OTC) drug product.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by November 1, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2005N-0345 and/or RIN number 0910-AF72, by any of the following methods:

Electronic Submissions

Submit electronic comments in the following ways:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Agency Web site: http://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site.

Written Submissions

Submit written submissions in the following ways:

FAX: 301-827-6870.

Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions]: Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852

To ensure more timely processing of comments, FDA is no longer accepting comments submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages you to continue to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal or the agency Web site, as described in the Electronic Submissions portion of this paragraph.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket No. or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm, including any personal

information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm

and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact the FDA at 301-827-0002 or by e-mail at pcomments@fda.gov. This phone number and this e-mail account have been set-up to address questions relating to this notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. Background

   Since Congress first enacted the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act (the act) in 1938, there has been a great deal of discussion about when drug products should be sold as prescription drugs as opposed to OTC drugs.

   [[Page 52051]]

   Until 1951, the act did not contain criteria for determining when to limit a drug's approval to prescription use. Consequently, different manufacturers made different decisions about whether to market a drug as prescription or OTC. This resulted in confusion and uncertainty for pharmacists and consumers, and made it difficult for FDA to ensure that the only drugs available OTC were those that were safe for use without the supervision of a licensed medical practitioner.

   To eliminate this confusion and uncertainty, and to protect the public health, Congress enacted the Durham-Humphrey Amendments in 1951 (Public Law 82-215, 65 Stat. 648). Congress had two primary objectives in enacting the Amendments: (1) To protect the public from abuses in the sale of potent Rx drugs; and (2) to relieve retail pharmacists and the public from burdensome and unnecessary restrictions on the dispensing of drugs that are safe for use without the supervision of a physician. See S. Rep. No. 946, at 1 (1951), reprinted in 1951 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2454. To this end, the new legislation codified a statutory definition of prescription drug in section 503(b) of the act.

   Section 503(b) of the act sets forth the Federal standard used to classify drugs as prescription or OTC, and it describes when and how to switch a drug from prescription to OTC status. Section 503(b)(1) of the act defines a prescription drug as:

   (1) A drug intended for use by man which--

   (A) because of its toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use, is not safe for use except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug; or

   (B) is limited by an approved application under section 505 to use under the professional supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug.

   The act does not define ``OTC drug,'' but the term has been adopted to refer to any drug that does not meet the definition of prescription drug in section 503(b) of the act.

   Given this dichotomy between prescription and OTC drugs, questions have arisen over the years about whether there are any conditions under which an active ingredient may be simultaneously marketed in both a prescription drug product and an OTC drug product. FDA has interpreted the language in 503(b)(1) of the act to allow marketing of the same active ingredient in products that are both prescription and OTC, assuming some meaningful difference exists between the two that makes the prescription product safe only under the supervision of a licensed practitioner. Examples of such drugs include: Meclizine (prescription for vertigo/OTC for nausea with motion sickness); Clotrimazol (prescription for candidiasis/OTC for athlete's foot, ring worm, jock itch); Loperamide (prescription for chronic diarrhea/OTC for acute diarrhea); Nicotine products (prescription for administration through inhalers and nasal sprays/OTC in gums, lozenges and patches); ibuprofren (prescription at 400mg+ for arthritis/OTC at 400mg and below for aches and pains); and H2 blockers (prescription at 300mg+ for ulcers/OTC at 200mg for heartburn). The key distinction in these examples is that there is some meaningful difference between the two products (e.g., indication, strength, route of administration, dosage form) that makes the prescription product safe only under the supervision of a licensed practitioner. To date, FDA has not allowed marketing of the same active ingredient in a prescription product for one population and in an OTC product for a subpopulation.

2. Agency Request for Information

   Despite the preceding examples, we recognize that FDA's interpretation of section 503(b) of the act has not been explicitly set forth in any of the regulations that discuss the process by which FDA classifies (or re-classifies) drugs as OTC or prescription. See, e.g., 21 CFR 310.200 and 310.201.

   To address this concern, we therefore ask for comments on the following questions: 1.

   1. Should FDA initiate a rulemaking to codify its interpretation of section 503(b) of the act regarding when an active ingredient can be simultaneously marketed in both a prescription drug product and an OTC drug product?

   2. Is there significant confusion regarding FDA's interpretation of section 503(b) of the act?

   3. If so, would a rulemaking on this issue help dispel that confusion? 2.

   1. If FDA limited sale of an OTC product to a particular subpopulation, e.g., by making the product available to the subpopulation by prescription only, would FDA be able to enforce such a limitation as a matter of law?

   2. If it could, would it be able to do so as practical matter and, if so, how? 3.

   1. Assuming it is legal to market the same active ingredient in both a prescription and OTC product, may the different products be legally sold in the same package?

   2. If the two products may be lawfully sold in a single package, under what circumstances would it be inappropriate to do so?

3. Comments

   Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.

   Dated: August 26, 2005. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

   [FR Doc. 05-17390 Filed 8-26-05; 4:59 pm]

   BILLING CODE 4160-01-S