MoviePass, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

Citation86 FR 32039
Published date16 June 2021
Record Number2021-12701
SectionNotices
CourtFederal Trade Commission
Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)]
                [Notices]
                [Pages 32039-32041]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2021-12701]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
                [File No. 192 3000]
                MoviePass, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public
                Comment
                AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
                ACTION: Proposed consent agreement; request for comment.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
                violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
                practices. The attached Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid
                Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint
                and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--
                that would settle these allegations.
                DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2021.
                ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments online or on paper by
                following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Please write ``MoviePass,
                Inc.; File No. 192 3000'' on your comment, and file your comment online
                at https://www.regulations.gov by following the instructions on the
                web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail your
                comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of
                the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex D),
                Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address:
                Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center,
                400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
                20024.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas B. Carter (214-979-9372),
                Federal Trade Commission, Southwest Regional Office, 199 Bryan Street,
                Suite 2150, Dallas, TX 75201.
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
                Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34,
                notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement
                containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with
                and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been
                placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The
                following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the
                consent agreement and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic
                copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained
                at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/commission-actions.
                 You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
                consider your comment, we must receive it on or before July 16, 2021.
                Write ``MoviePass, Inc.; File No. 192 3000'' on your comment. Your
                comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the
                public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable,
                on the https://www.regulations.gov website.
                 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the agency's heightened security
                screening, postal mail addressed to the Commission will be subject to
                delay. We strongly encourage you to submit your comments online through
                the https://www.regulations.gov website.
                 If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``MoviePass,
                Inc.; File No. 192 3000'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail
                your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
                of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex D),
                Washington, DC 20580; or deliver your comment to the following address:
                Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center,
                400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
                [[Page 32040]]
                Washington, DC 20024. If possible, submit your paper comment to the
                Commission by courier or overnight service.
                 Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible
                website at https://www.regulations.gov, you are solely responsible for
                making sure your comment does not include any sensitive or confidential
                information. In particular, your comment should not include sensitive
                personal information, such as your or anyone else's Social Security
                number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state
                identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number;
                financial account number; or credit or debit card number. You are also
                solely responsible for making sure your comment does not include
                sensitive health information, such as medical records or other
                individually identifiable health information. In addition, your comment
                should not include any ``trade secret or any commercial or financial
                information which . . . is privileged or confidential''--as provided by
                Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2),
                16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including in particular competitively sensitive
                information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
                patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
                 Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
                requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
                ``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
                the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
                comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and
                must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
                the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
                confidential only if the General Counsel grants your request in
                accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
                been posted on the https://www.regulations.gov website--as legally
                required by FTC Rule 4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment
                from that website, unless you submit a confidentiality request that
                meets the requirements for such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and
                the General Counsel grants that request.
                 Visit the FTC website at http://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and
                the news release describing the proposed settlement. The FTC Act and
                other laws that the Commission administers permit the collection of
                public comments to consider and use in this proceeding, as appropriate.
                The Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments
                that it receives on or before July 16, 2021. For information on the
                Commission's privacy policy, including routine uses permitted by the
                Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
                Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
                 The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') has
                accepted, subject to final approval, an agreement containing a proposed
                consent order (``Proposed Order'') from MoviePass, Inc., a corporation,
                Helios and Matheson Analytics, Inc. (``Helios''), a corporation,
                Mitchell Lowe, individually and as an officer of MoviePass, Inc., and
                Theodore Farnsworth, individually and as an officer of Helios
                (``Respondents''). The Proposed Order has been placed on the public
                record for 30 days to receive comments by interested persons. Comments
                received during this period will become part of the public record.
                After 30 days, the Commission will again review the agreement and the
                comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from the
                agreement and take appropriate action or make final the agreement's
                Proposed Order.
                 This matter involves Respondents' advertising, promotion and sale
                of the movie-viewing subscription service ``MoviePass,'' which offered
                consumers access to one movie per day at their local movie theaters for
                a monthly subscription price. The FTC complaint challenges two aspects
                of Respondents' marketing of MoviePass:
                 First, the complaint alleges that Respondents' offer of one movie
                per day was deceptive due to several measures Respondents took to
                prevent consumers from using the service as promised--measures that
                included invalidating certain consumers' passwords, adding a difficult
                and defective ticket verification procedure to view movies, and placing
                undisclosed usage caps on frequent users.
                 The complaint alleges that this conduct violated two laws the FTC
                enforces. First, the FTC alleges the conduct to be a ``deceptive act[ ]
                or practice[ ]'' that violates Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade
                Commission Act (``FTC Act''), 15 U.S.C. 45(a). The conduct described
                above was deceptive because Respondents engaged in it to prevent
                consumers from using MoviePass once per day as advertised. Second, the
                FTC alleges that Respondents violated the Restore Online Shoppers'
                Confidence Act (``ROSCA''), 15 U.S.C. 8403, through the same conduct by
                failing to disclose the steps that they took to prevent consumers from
                using MoviePass once per day. This failure violated ROSCA in two ways--
                by failing to disclose all material terms of the transaction as
                required by 15 U.S.C. 8403(1) and by failing to secure consumers'
                express informed consent to the transaction before charging their
                financial accounts as required by 15 U.S.C. 8403(2).
                 In addition to the deceptive marketing of MoviePass's ``one movie
                per day'' service, the complaint further alleges that Respondents
                MoviePass, Inc., Helios, and Lowe misrepresented the data security
                measures they took to protect consumers' personal information against
                unauthorized access. The complaint alleges that Respondents' actions
                constitute unfair or 1 deceptive acts or practices and the making of
                false advertisements, in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act.
                 The Proposed Order is designed to prevent Respondents from engaging
                in similar acts or practices in the future. It includes injunctive
                relief to address these alleged violations and to prohibit similar and
                related conduct:
                 Part I prohibits Respondents from future
                misrepresentations similar to those at issue in the complaint by
                prohibiting them from misrepresenting that:
                 [cir] A service will allow consumers to view one movie per day at
                their local theaters;
                 [cir] A service will allow consumers to view any movie, in any
                theater, at any time; and
                 [cir] Respondents will take reasonable administrative, technical,
                physical, or managerial measures to protect consumers' personal
                information from unauthorized access.
                 Part I also features ancillary relief relating to the
                challenged conduct by prohibiting misrepresentations relating to (1)
                the total costs to purchase, receive, or use, and the quantity of, any
                good or service, (2) any material restrictions, limitations, or
                conditions to purchase, receive, or use the product or service, (3) the
                extent to which Respondents otherwise protect the privacy, security,
                availability, confidentiality, or integrity of consumers' personal
                information, and (4) any other material fact.
                 Parts II-VI provide ancillary relief relating to the data
                security practices of MoviePass, Inc., Helios, and Lowe. The provisions
                thus only apply to businesses these three respondents operate.
                 [cir] Part II requires a comprehensive information security program
                for any enterprise that collects consumers' personal information,
                requiring among other things:
                [[Page 32041]]
                 [ssquf] That the information security program contain safeguards
                that are based on the volume and sensitivity of the personal
                information at risk;
                 [ssquf] That testing and monitoring of the safeguards are conducted
                regularly but no less often than once a year; and
                 [ssquf] That the information security program be documented,
                evaluated, and adjusted in light of any changes to business operations
                or new technological advancements.
                 [cir] Parts III and IV respectively require the three respondents
                (1) to obtain an initial and then biennial third-party information
                security assessments and (2) to cooperate with the third parties
                conducting the assessments.
                 [cir] Part V requires the three respondents to report to the
                Commission any event involving consumers' personal information that
                constitutes a reportable event to any U.S. federal, state, or local
                government authority.
                 [cir] Part VI mandates that the three respondents submit an annual
                certification regarding their compliance with the Proposed Order's data
                security requirements.
                 Parts VII through XI are reporting and compliance
                provisions. Part VII mandates that all Respondents acknowledge receipt
                of the Proposed Order and, for 20 years, distribute the Proposed Order
                to certain employees and agents and secure acknowledgments from
                recipients of the Proposed Order. Part VIII requires that Respondents
                submit compliance reports to the FTC one year after the order's
                issuance and submit additional reports when certain events occur. Part
                IX requires that, for 20 years, Respondents create certain records and
                retain them for at least 5 years. Part X provides for the FTC's
                continued compliance monitoring of Respondents' activity during the
                Proposed Order's effective dates. Part XI is a provision ``sunsetting''
                the Proposed Order after 20 years, with certain exceptions. Respondents
                MoviePass, Inc. and Helios are exempt from Sections II-X of the
                Proposed Order until their bankruptcy cases are closed, and these
                bankruptcies led the FTC to not seek a monetary judgment in this
                matter.
                 The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
                Proposed Order. It is not intended to constitute an official
                interpretation of the complaint or Proposed Order, or to modify in any
                way the Proposed Order's terms.
                 By direction of the Commission.
                Joel Christie,
                Acting Secretary.
                [FR Doc. 2021-12701 Filed 6-15-21; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT