Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order; Reallocation of Council Membership
| Published date | 11 February 2019 |
| Citation | 84 FR 3114 |
| Record Number | 2019-01727 |
| Section | Proposed rules |
| Court | Agricultural Marketing Service |
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 28 (Monday, February 11, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3114-3116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01727]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 28 / Monday, February 11, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3114]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1209
[Document Number AMS-SC-18-0009]
Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order;
Reallocation of Council Membership
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposal invites comments on reallocating the membership
of the Mushroom Council (Council) under the Agricultural Marketing
Service's (AMS) regulations regarding a national research and promotion
program for mushrooms. This action was recommended by the Council after
a review of the geographic distribution of the volume of mushroom
production throughout the United States and the volume of imports. The
number of Council members would be revised in two of the four
geographic regions under the program. This action is necessary to
provide for equitable representation of producers and importers on the
Council.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments may be submitted on the internet at:
http://www.regulations.gov or to the Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room
1406-S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC 20250-0244; facsimile: (202) 205-
2800. All comments should reference the document number and the date
and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made
available for public inspection, including name and address, if
provided, in the above office during regular business hours or it can
be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacy Jones King, Marketing
Specialist, Promotion and Economics Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406-S, Stop 0244,
Washington, DC 20250-0244; telephone: (202) 720-9915; facsimile (202)
205-2800; or electronic mail: Stacy.JonesKing@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal affecting 7 CFR part 1209 is
authorized under the Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer
Information Act of 1990 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 6101-6112).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules and promoting flexibility.
This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not
have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not
have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. Section
1930 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6109) provides that it shall not affect or
preempt any other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or
research relating to mushrooms.
Under section 1927 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6106), a person subject to
an order issued under the Act may file a written petition with USDA
stating that an order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order, is not established in accordance
with the law, and request a modification of the order or an exemption
from the order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision
of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order,
shall be filed within two years after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The
petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
Thereafter, USDA will issue a ruling on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States for any district in which
the petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction
to review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of USDA's final ruling.
Background
This proposal invites comments on reallocating the membership of
the Council established under the Mushroom Promotion, Research, and
Consumer Information Order (Order). The Order is administered by the
Council with oversight by USDA. This action was recommended by the
Council after a review of the geographic distribution of the volume of
mushroom production throughout the United States and the volume of
imports. The number of Council members would be revised in two of the
four regions under the program. This action is necessary to provide for
equitable representation of producers and importers on the Council.
Section 1209.30(a) of the Order specifies that the Council shall
consist of not less than four or more than nine members who are
mushroom producers and importers. Pursuant to Sec. 1209.30(b), for
purposes of nominating and appointing producers to the Council, the
United States is divided into three geographic regions and the number
of Council members from each region are currently as follows: (1)
Region 1: All
[[Page 3115]]
other States including the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico except for Pennsylvania and California--two members; (2)
Region 2: Pennsylvania--four members; and (3) Region 3: California--two
members. Pursuant to Sec. 1209.30(c), importers are represented by a
single, separate region, referred to as Region 4, when imports, on
average, equal or exceed 50,000,000 pounds of mushrooms annually.
Section 1209.30(d) prescribes that, at least every five years, and
not more than every three years, the Council must review changes in the
geographic distribution of mushroom production volume throughout the
United States and import volume, using the average annual mushroom
production and imports over the preceding four years. The Council must
recommend to the Secretary reapportionment of the regions and/or
modification of the number of members from such regions as necessary to
best reflect the geographic distribution of mushroom production volume
in the United States and representation of imports, if applicable.
Section 1209.30(e) prescribes a procedure to be used to determine
the number of members for each region to serve on the Council, subject
to the nine-member maximum limitation. Each region that produces, on
average, at least 50,000,000 pounds of mushrooms annually is entitled
to one representative on the Council. Importers are represented by a
single, separate region, which is entitled to one representative, if
the region imports, on average, at least 50,000,000 pounds of mushrooms
annually. If the annual production of a region is greater than
110,000,000 pounds, but less than or equal to 180,000,000 pounds, the
region must be represented by one additional member. If the annual
production of a region is greater than 180,000,000 pounds, but less
than or equal to 260,000,000 pounds, the region must be represented by
two additional members. If the annual production of a region is greater
than 260,000,000 pounds, the region must be represented by three
additional members. Finally, if in the aggregate, regions are entitled
to levels of representation that would exceed the nine-member limit on
the Council, the seat or seats assigned shall be assigned to that
region or those regions with greater on-average production or import
volume than the other regions otherwise eligible at that increment
level.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On average means a rolling average of production or imports
during the last two fiscal years, or such other period as may be
determined by the Secretary (7 CFR part 1209.2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Council met in February 2018 and reviewed the geographic
distribution of mushroom production volume throughout the United States
and import volume to assess whether reapportionment of the current
regions or modification of the number of members from such regions, or
both were warranted. Table 1 below is based on Council assessment data
for the preceding four years (2014 through 2017).
Table 1--Analysis of Council Representation Based on Assessment Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current In millions
Region council -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New council
representation 2014 pounds 2015 pounds 2016 pounds 2017 pounds 4-year average representation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 (All other States).................... 2 202.7 205 203.8 196 201.9 3
2 (PA).................................. 4 480.6 488 477.8 502.6 487.3 4
3 (CA).................................. 2 109.5 102.3 106.7 91.2 102.4 1
4 (Imports)............................. 1 98.8 110.1 119.3 132 115.1 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 below provides a similar analysis based on U.S. production
data from USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and
import data from USDA's Global Agricultural Trade System (GATS).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ NASS United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2018)
Quick Stats. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural
Statistics Service, Washington DC. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/.
GATS United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2018)
Global Agricultural Trade System. U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington DC. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats/.
Table 2--Analysis of Council Representation Based on NASS and GATS Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current In millions
Region council -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New council
representation 2014 pounds 2015 pounds 2016 pounds 2017 pounds 4-year average representation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 (All other States).................... 2 208.8 217.5 221.6 223.9 218.0 3
2 (PA).................................. 4 571.7 584.0 587.4 577.6 580.2 4
3 (CA).................................. 2 101.5 105.6 109.9 101.7 104.7 1
4 (Imports)............................. 1 .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Council Recommendation
Based on its analysis, the Council unanimously recommended
increasing the number of members in Region 1 by one and decreasing the
number of members in Region 3 by one. This action is necessary to
provide for equitable representation of producers and importers on the
Council. No changes are necessary to the number of members in Regions 2
and 4 or to the make-up of any of the regions. Section 1209.230 which
is currently reserved, would be added accordingly.
[[Page 3116]]
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the proposed rule on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on such entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA)
defines, in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural
service firms (importers) as those having annual receipts of no more
than $7.5 million.
It is estimated that there are about 120 mushroom producers in the
United States and about 20 importers eligible to serve on the Council.
The majority of these producers and importers would be considered small
entities as defined by the SBA. Persons who produce or import organic
mushrooms or who produce or import 500,000 pounds or less on average of
mushrooms annually for the fresh market are exempt from the
requirements of the Order.
This proposal invites comments on reallocating the membership of
the Council under the Order. The Order is administered by the Council
with oversight by USDA. This action was recommended by the Council
after a review of the geographic distribution of the volume of mushroom
production throughout the United States and the volume of imports. The
number of Council members would be revised in two of the four regions
under the program. This action is necessary to provide for equitable
representation of producers and importers on the Council. Section
1209.230 which is currently reserved, would be added accordingly.
Authority for this action is provided in section 1209.30(d) of the
Order and section 6104 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6104).
Regarding the economic impact of this proposed rule on affected
entities, revising the number of members in Regions 1 and 3 would
impose no additional costs on industry members. Eligible producers and
importers interested in serving on the Council would have to complete a
background questionnaire. Those requirements are addressed in the
section below titled Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements. The
changes are necessary to provide for the equitable representation of
producers and importers on the Council.
Regarding alternatives, one option to the proposed action would be
to maintain the status quo and not revise the number of Council members
representing Regions 1 and 3. However, the Council's analysis of the
assessment data and NASS and GATS data support the proposed changes.
USDA concludes that the changes are necessary and appropriate.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the background form, which represents the information
collection and recordkeeping requirements that are imposed under the
program, have been approved previously under OMB number 0581-0093. The
mushroom Order requires that two nominees be submitted for each vacant
position. With regard to information collection requirements, producers
and importers interested in serving on the Council must submit
background forms (Form AD-755) to USDA to verify their eligibility for
appointment to the Council. However, serving on the Council is
voluntary, and the burden of submitting the background form would be
offset by the benefits of serving on the Council.
As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information collection requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule. AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, this action was discussed by the
Council at its meeting held in February 2018 where the Council
unanimously made its recommendation. All of the Council's meetings are
open to the public and interested persons are invited to participate
and express their views.
AMS has performed this initial RFA regarding the impact of this
proposed action on small entities and invites comments concerning
potential effects of this action.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments received in response to
this proposed rule by the date specified would be considered prior to
finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1209
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements, Mushroom promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1209 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1209--MUSHROOM PROMOTION, RESEARCH AND CONSUMER INFORMATION
ORDER
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1209 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6101-6112 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Section 1209.230 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1209.230 Reallocation of Council members.
Pursuant to Sec. 1209.30 of the Order, the number of members on
the Council shall be as follows:
(1) Region 1: All other States including the District of Columbia
and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico except for Pennsylvania and
California--3 Members.
(2) Region 2: The State of Pennsylvania--4 Members.
(3) Region 3: The State of California--1 Member.
(4) Region 4: Importers--1 Member.
Dated: February 5, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-01727 Filed 2-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
