NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Clarification of Award Fee Evaluations and Payments (NFS Case 2016-N008)
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)
Proposed Rules
Pages 23667-23669
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov
FR Doc No: 2016-09356
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1816 and 1852
RIN 2700-AE31
NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Clarification of Award Fee Evaluations and Payments (NFS Case 2016-N008)
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NASA is proposing to amend the NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (NFS) to clarify NASA's award fee process by incorporating terms used in award fee contracting; guidance relative to final award fee evaluations; release of source selection information; and the calculation of the provisional award fee payment percentage in NASA end-item award fee contracts.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before June 21, 2016, to be considered in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by NFS Case 2016-N008, using any of the following methods:
cir Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``NFS Case 2016-N008'' under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``NFS Case 2016-N008.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ``NFS Case 2016-N008'' on your attached document.
cir Email: william.roets-1@nasa.gov. Include NFS Case 2016-N008 in the subject line of the message.
cir Fax: (202) 358-3082.
cir Mail: NASA Headquarters (HQ), Office of Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy Division, Attn: Mr. William Roets, Suite 5M18, 300 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20546-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Roets, NASA HQ, Office of Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy Division, Suite 5M18, 300 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20456-0001. Telephone 202-358-4483; facsimile 202-358-3082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
-
Background
NASA is proposing to revise the NFS to clarify NASA's award fee process. As part of the NASA Office of Procurement internal reviews and the NASA Office of the Inspector General (OIG) audit entitled ``NASA's Use of Award Fee Contracts,'' Report Number IG-14-003, NASA is implementing revisions to NFS 1816.4 and 1852.216-77 to clarify NASA's award fee evaluation and payment processes.
-
Discussion
NASA is proposing the following revisions to clarify NASA's award fee process:
Add new definitions section at NFS 1816.001. Definitions for Earned Award Fee and Unearned Award Fee are being added to provide clarity and consistency in how these terms are utilized in NASA's award fee evaluation process.
Revise NFS 1816.405-273(b) to provide further management review for final award fee determinations that meet certain criteria as outlined in this rule's revised NFS text.
Revise NFS 1816.405-273(c) to provide clarification regarding the release of source selection information that is included in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).
Revise NFS 1816.405-276(b) and 1852.216-77(c)(3) to clarify how provisional award fee payments are calculated in NASA end-
item award fee contracts. The current NFS text describes this calculation as ``limited to a percentage not to exceed 80 percent of the prior interim period's evaluation score'' and yet does not address how the first award fee evaluation period should be handled. To address this issue, NFS is being revised to read: ``limited to a percentage not to exceed 80 percent of the prior interim period's evaluation score, except for the first evaluation period, which is limited to 80 percent of the available award fee for that evaluation period.''
In addition, since the FAR removed clause 52.216-13 in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-17, NASA is removing references to this clause contained in NFS 1816.307, 1816.307-70, and 1852.216-89.
-
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs
Page 23668
and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
-
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the guidance largely clarifies NASA's award fee evaluation and payment process, which should result in a more consistent use and administration of award fees within NASA. These revisions should provide all entities, both large and small, with a positive benefit. However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has been performed and is summarized as follows:
An analysis of data in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) revealed that award fee contracts are primarily awarded to large businesses with large dollar contracts. An analysis of FPDS data over the past three years (Fiscal Year (FY)2013 through FY2015) showed that an average of 157 award fee contracts were awarded at NASA per year, of which 33 (approximately 20%) were awarded to small businesses. Thus, the application of the award fee revisions contained in this rule do not apply to a substantial number of small entities.
The rule imposes no reporting, recordkeeping, or other information collection requirements. The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules, and there are no known significant alternatives to the rule.
NASA invites comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small entities.
NASA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties shall submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (NFS Case 2016-N008), in correspondence.
-
Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1816 and 1852
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA FAR Supplement Manager.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1816 and 1852 are proposed to be amended as follows:
0
-
The authority citation for parts 1816 and 1852 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(a) and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 1816--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
0
-
Add section 1816.001 to read as follows:
1816.001 Definitions.
As used in this part--
``Earned Award Fee'' means the payment of the full amount of an award fee evaluation period's score/rating.
``Unearned Award Fee'' means the difference between the available award fee pool amount for a given award fee evaluation period less the contractor's earned award fee amount for that same evaluation period.
* * * * *
1816.307 Amended
0
-
Amend section 1816.307 by removing paragraph (g)(1) in its entirety.
0
-
Revise section 1816.307-70, in paragraph (f), to read as follows:
1816.307-70 NASA contract clauses.
* * * * *
(f) When FAR clause 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment, is included in the contract, as prescribed at FAR 16.307(a), the contracting officer should include the clause at 1852.216-89, Assignment and Release Forms.
* * * * *
0
-
Amend section 1816.405-273 by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
1816.405-273 Award fee evaluations.
* * * * *
(b) End Item Contracts. On contracts, such as those for end item deliverables, where the true quality of contractor performance cannot be measured until the end of the contract, only the last evaluation is final. At that point, the total contract award fee pool is available, and the contractor's total performance is evaluated against the award fee plan to determine total earned award fee. In addition to the final evaluation, interim evaluations are done to monitor performance prior to contract completion, provide feedback to the contractor on the Government's assessment of the quality of its performance, and establish the basis for making interim award fee payments (see 1816.405-276(a)). These interim evaluations and associated interim award fee payments are superseded by the fee determination made in the final evaluation at contract completion. However, if the final award fee adjectival rating is higher or lower than the average adjectival rating of all the interim award fee periods, or if the final award fee score is eight base percentage points higher or lower than the average award fee score of all interim award fee periods (e.g. 80% to 88%), then the Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) or the Deputy Chief Acquisition Officer (if the HCA is the Fee Determination Official) shall review and concur in the final award fee determination. The Government will then pay the contractor, or the contractor will refund to the Government, the difference between the final award fee determination and the cumulative interim fee payments.
(c) Control of evaluations. Interim and final evaluations may be used to provide past performance information during the source selection process in future acquisitions and should be marked and controlled as ``Source Selection Information--see FAR 3.104''. See FAR 42.1503(h) regarding the requirements for releasing Source Selection Information included in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).
* * * * *
0
-
Amend section 1816.405-276 by revising the last sentence of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
1816.405-276 Award fee payments and limitations.
* * * * *
(b) * * * For an end item contract, the total amount of provisional payments in a period is limited to a percentage not to exceed 80 percent of the prior interim period's evaluation score, except for the first evaluation period which is limited to 80 percent of the available award fee for that evaluation period.
* * * * *
PART 1852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
-
Amend section 1852.216-77 by revising the date of the clause and paragraph (c)(3). The revised text reads as follows:
1852.216-77 Award Fee for End Item Contracts.
* * * * *
Page 23669
Award Fee for End Item Contracts (Date)
* * * * *
(c)(1) * * *
(3) Provisional award fee payments will insert ``not'' if applicable be made under this contract pending each interim evaluation. If applicable, provisional award fee payments will be made to the Contractor on a insert the frequency of provisional payments (not more often than monthly) basis. The amount of award fee which will be provisionally paid in each evaluation period is limited to Insert a percent not to exceed 80 percent of the prior interim evaluation score (see insert applicable cite), except for the first evaluation period which is limited to insert a percent not to exceed 80 percent of the available award fee for that evaluation period. Provisional award fee payments made each evaluation period will be superseded by the interim award fee evaluation for that period. If provisional payments made exceed the interim evaluation score, the Contractor will either credit the next payment voucher for the amount of such overpayment or refund the difference to the Government, as directed by the Contracting Officer. If the Government determines that (i) the total amount of provisional fee payments will apparently substantially exceed the anticipated final evaluation score, or (ii) the prior interim evaluation is ``poor/unsatisfactory,'' the Contracting Officer will direct the suspension or reduction of the future payments and/or request a prompt refund of excess payments as appropriate. Written notification of the determination will be provided to the Contractor with a copy to the Deputy Chief Financial Officer (Finance).
* * * * *
0
-
Amend section 1852.216-89 by revising the date of the clause, and the first sentence of the paragraph to read as follows:
1852.216-89 Assignment and Release Forms.
* * * * *
Assignment and Release Forms (Date)
The Contractor shall use the following forms to fulfill the assignment and release requirements of FAR clause 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment:
* * * * *
FR Doc. 2016-09356 Filed 4-21-16; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
-
