Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska: Gulf of Alaska; Final 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications for Groundfish
Federal Register: March 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 48)
Rules and Regulations
Page 11749-11778
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr12mr10-8
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679
Docket No. 0910131362-0087-02
RIN 0648-XS43
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of
Alaska; Final 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications for Groundfish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; closures.
SUMMARY: NMFS announces final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications, apportionments, and Pacific halibut prohibited species catch limits for the groundfish fishery of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is necessary to establish harvest limits for groundfish during the 2010 and 2011 fishing years and to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the GOA. The intended effect of this action is to conserve and manage the groundfish resources in the GOA in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
DATES: Effective at 1200 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 12, 2010, through 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Final Alaska Groundfish Harvest
Specifications Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Record of Decision
(ROD), Supplementary Information Report (SIR) to the EIS, and Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) prepared for this action are available from http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. The final 2009 Stock
Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for the groundfish resources of the GOA, dated November 2009, is available from the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council's (the Council) Web site at http:// alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Pearson, 907-481-1780, or Obren
Davis, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the GOA groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the GOA under the FMP. The Council prepared the FMP under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations governing U.S.
Page 11750
fisheries and implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR parts 600, 679, and 680.
The FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS, after consultation with the Council, to specify the total allowable catch
(TAC) for each target species and for the ``other species'' category, the sum of which must be within the optimum yield (OY) range of 116,000 to 800,000 metric tons (mt). Section 679.20(c)(1) further requires NMFS to publish and solicit public comment on proposed annual TACs, halibut prohibited species catch (PSC) amounts, and seasonal allowances of pollock and inshore/offshore Pacific cod. Upon consideration of public comment received under Sec. 679.20(c)(1), NMFS must publish notice of final specifications for up to two fishing years as annual target and
``other species'' TAC, per Sec. 679.20(c)(3)(ii). The final specifications set forth in Tables 1 through 28 of this document reflect the outcome of this process, as required at 679.20(c).
The proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications for groundfish of the GOA and Pacific halibut PSC allowances were published in the
Federal Register on November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62533). Comments were invited and accepted through December 30, 2009. NMFS received three letters of comment on the proposed specifications. The comments are summarized in the Response to Comments section of this action. In
December 2009, NMFS consulted with the Council regarding the 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications. After considering public comments received, as well as biological and economic data that were available at the Council's December 2009 meeting, NMFS is implementing the final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications, as recommended by the Council.
For 2010, the sum of the TAC amounts is 292,087 mt. For 2011, the sum of the TAC amounts is 328,464 mt.
Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) and TAC Specifications
In December 2009, the Council, its Advisory Panel (AP), and its
Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC), reviewed current biological and harvest information about the condition of groundfish stocks in the
GOA. This information was compiled by the Council's GOA Plan Team and was presented in the final 2009 SAFE report for the GOA groundfish fisheries, dated November 2009 (see ADDRESSES). The SAFE report contains a review of the latest scientific analyses and estimates of each species' biomass and other biological parameters, as well as summaries of the available information on the GOA ecosystem and the economic condition of the groundfish fisheries off Alaska. From these data and analyses, the Plan Team estimates an ABC for each species or species category.
The final ABCs and TACs are based on the best available biological and socioeconomic information, including projected biomass trends, information on assumed distribution of stock biomass, and revised methods used to calculate stock biomass. The FMP specifies the formulas, or tiers, to be used to compute ABCs and overfishing levels
(OFLs). The formulas applicable to a particular stock or stock complex are determined by the level of reliable information available to fisheries scientists. This information is categorized into a successive series of six tiers to define OFL and ABC amounts, with tier one representing the highest level of information quality available and tier six representing the lowest level of information quality available. The SSC adopted the final 2010 and 2011 OFLs and ABCs recommended by the Plan Team for all groundfish species.
The final TAC recommendations were based on the ABCs as adjusted for other biological and socioeconomic considerations, including maintaining the sum of all TACs within the required OY range of 116,000 to 800,000 mt. The Council adopted the SSC's OFL and ABC recommendations and the AP's TAC recommendations. The Council recommended TACs for 2010 and 2011 that are equal to ABCs for pollock, deep-water flatfish, rex sole, sablefish, Pacific ocean perch, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, northern rockfish, pelagic shelf rockfish, thornyhead rockfish, demersal shelf rockfish, big skate, longnose skate, and other skates. The Council recommended TACs for 2010 and 2011 that are less than the ABCs for Pacific cod, flathead sole, shallow-water flatfish, arrowtooth flounder, other rockfish, Atka mackerel, and ``other species.'' None of the Council's recommended TACs for 2010 and 2011 exceed the final ABC for any species or species category. The 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications approved by the
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) are unchanged from those recommended by the Council and are consistent with the preferred harvest strategy alternative in the EIS (see ADDRESSES). NMFS finds that the Council's recommended OFLs, ABCs, and TACs are consistent with the biological condition of the groundfish stocks as described in the 2009 SAFE report and approved by the Council. NMFS also finds that the Council's recommendations for OFLs, ABCs, and TACs are consistent with the biological condition of groundfish stocks as adjusted for other biological and socioeconomic considerations, including maintaining the total TAC within the OY range. NMFS reviewed the Council's recommended
TAC specifications and apportionments and approves these specifications under 50 CFR 679.20(c)(3)(ii). The apportionment of TAC amounts among gear types, processing sectors, and seasons is discussed below.
Tables 1 and 2 list the final 2010 and 2011 OFLs, ABCs, TACs, and area apportionments of groundfish in the GOA. The sums of the 2010 and 2011 ABCs are 565,499 mt and 605,086 mt, respectively, which are higher in 2010 and 2011 than the 2009 ABC sum of 516,055 mt (74 FR 7333,
February 17, 2009).
Specification and Apportionment of TAC Amounts
As in prior years, the SSC and Council recommended that the method of apportioning the sablefish ABC among management areas in 2010 and 2011 include commercial fishery and survey data. NMFS stock assessment scientists believe the use of unbiased commercial fishery data reflecting catch-per-unit-effort provides rational input for stock distribution assessments. NMFS annually evaluates the use of commercial fishery data to ensure unbiased information is included in stock distribution models. The Council's recommendation for sablefish area apportionments also takes into account the prohibition on the use of trawl gear in the Southeast Outside (SEO) District of the Eastern
Regulatory Area and makes available five percent of the combined
Eastern Regulatory Area ABCs to trawl gear for use as incidental catch in other directed groundfish fisheries in the West Yakutat (WYK)
District (Sec. 679.20(a)(4)(i)).
Since the inception of a State of Alaska (State) managed pollock fishery in Prince William Sound (PWS), the GOA Plan Team has recommended the guideline harvest level (GHL) for the pollock fishery in PWS be deducted from the ABC for the western stock of pollock in the
GOA in the Western/Central/West Yakutat (W/C/WYK) Area. For the 2010 and 2011 pollock fisheries in PWS, the State's GHL is 1,650 mt.
The apportionment of annual pollock TAC among the Western and
Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA reflects the seasonal biomass distribution and is discussed in greater detail below. The annual pollock TAC in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA is
Page 11751
apportioned among Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, as well as equally among each of the following four seasons: The A season (January 20 through March 10), the B season (March 10 through May 31), the C season (August 25 through October 1), and the D season (October 1 through November 1) (50 CFR 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv) and 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(A), (B)).
The SSC, AP, and Council recommended apportionment of the ABC for
Pacific cod in the GOA among regulatory areas based on the three most recent NMFS summer trawl surveys. The 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod TACs are affected by the State's fishery for Pacific cod in State waters in the Central and Western Regulatory Areas, as well as in PWS. The Plan
Team, SSC, AP, and Council recommended that the sum of all State and
Federal water Pacific cod removals from the GOA not exceed ABC recommendations. Accordingly, the Council recommended reducing the 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod TACs from the ABCs in the Central and Western
Regulatory Areas to account for State GHLs. Therefore, the 2010 Pacific cod TACs are less than the ABCs by the following amounts: (1) Eastern
GOA, 356 mt; (2) Central GOA, 12,260 mt; and (3) Western GOA, 6,921 mt.
The 2011 Pacific cod TACs are less than the ABCs by the following amounts: (1) Eastern GOA, 441 mt; (2) Central GOA, 15,174 mt; and (3)
Western GOA, 8,566 mt. These amounts reflect the sum of the State's 2010 and 2011 GHLs in these areas, which are 15 percent, 25 percent, and 25 percent of the Eastern, Central, and Western GOA ABCs, respectively. The percentage of the ABC used to calculate the 2010 and 2011 GHL for the State-managed Pacific cod fishery in PWS fisheries has been increased from 10 percent in 2009 to 15 percent of the Eastern GOA
ABC in 2010 and 2011.
NMFS establishes seasonal apportionments of the annual Pacific cod
TAC in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas. Sixty percent of the annual TAC is apportioned to the A season for hook-and-line, pot, and jig gear from January 1 through June 10, and for trawl gear from
January 20 through June 10. Forty percent of the annual TAC is apportioned to the B season for hook-and-line, pot, and jig gear from
September 1 through December 31, and for trawl gear from September 1 through November 1 (Sec. Sec. 679.23(d)(3) and 679.20(a)(12)).
NMFS establishes--for 2010 and 2011--an A season directed fishing allowance (DFA) for the Pacific cod fisheries in the GOA based on the management area TACs minus the recent average A season incidental catch of Pacific cod in each management area before June 10 (Sec. 679.20(d)(1)). The DFA and incidental catch before June 10 will be managed such that total harvest in the A season will be no more than 60 percent of the annual TAC. Incidental catch taken after June 10 will continue to accrue against the B season TAC. This action meets the intent of the Steller sea lion protection measures by achieving temporal dispersion of the Pacific cod removals and by reducing the likelihood of harvest exceeding 60 percent of the annual TAC in the A season.
Other Actions Affecting the 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications
The Council is developing an amendment to the FMP to comply with
Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements associated with annual catch limits and accountability measures. That amendment may result in revisions to how total annual groundfish mortality is estimated and accounted for in the annual SAFE reports, which in turn may affect the OFLs and ABCs for certain groundfish species. NMFS will attempt to identify additional sources of mortality to groundfish stocks not currently reported or considered by the groundfish stock assessments in recommending OFL,
ABC, and TAC for certain groundfish species. These changes would not be in effect until 2011, and could affect the 2011 OFLs, ABCs, and TACs contained in this action.
In October 2008, the Council adopted Amendment 34 to the Fishery
Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs.
Amendment 34 would amend the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab
Rationalization Program (Crab Rationalization Program) to exempt additional fishery participants from harvest limits, called sideboards, which apply to some vessels and license limitation program (LLP) licenses that are used to participate in GOA Pacific cod and pollock fisheries. These particular sideboards are discussed under the subsequent section titled ``Non-AFA Crab Vessel Groundfish Harvest
Limitations.'' Tables 19 and 20 specify the 2010 and 2011 sideboard amounts. If the Secretary approves Amendment 34, NMFS would revise the sideboard amounts specified in Tables 19 and 20.
Changes From the Proposed 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications in the
GOA
In October 2009, the Council's recommendations for the proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications (74 FR 62533, November 30, 2009) were based largely upon information contained in the final 2008 SAFE report for the GOA groundfish fisheries, dated November 2008 (see
ADDRESSES). The Council proposed that the OFLs, ABCs, and TACs established for the groundfish fisheries in 2009 (74 FR 7333, February 17, 2009, see Table 2) be rolled over to 2010 and 2011, pending completion and review of the 2009 SAFE report at its December 2009 meeting.
The 2009 SAFE report, which was not available when the Council made its recommendations in October 2009, contains the best and most recent scientific information on the condition of the groundfish stocks. The
Council considered this report in December 2009 when it made recommendations for the final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications. The
Council's final 2010 and 2011 TAC recommendations increase fishing opportunities for species for which the Council had sufficient information to raise TAC levels. Conversely, the Council reduced TAC levels to provide greater protection for some species. Based on the final 2009 SAFE report, the sum of the 2010 final TACs for the GOA
(292,087 mt) is 7,399 mt higher than the sum of the proposed 2010 TACs
(284,688 mt). The largest 2010 increases occurred for pollock, from 74,330 mt to 84,745 mt (14 percent increase); for rex sole, from 8,827 mt to 9,729 mt (10 percent increase); for Pacific ocean perch, from 15,098 mt to 17,584 mt (16 percent increase); for northern rockfish, from 4,173 mt to 5,098 mt (22 percent increase); and for pelagic shelf rockfish, from 4,465 mt to 5,059 mt (13 percent increase). The largest decreases occurred for deep-water flatfish, from 9,793 mt to 6,190 mt
(37 percent decrease); for shallow-water flatfish, from 22,256 mt to 20,062 mt (10 percent decrease); for flathead sole, from 11,289 mt to 10,441 mt (8 percent decrease); for other rockfish, from 1,730 mt to 1,192 mt (31 percent decrease); for thornyhead rockfish, from 1,910 mt to 1,770 mt (7 percent decrease); and for demersal shelf rockfish, from 362 mt to 295 mt (18 percent decrease). The sum of the final 2011 TACs for the GOA (328,464 mt) is 43,776 mt higher than the sum of the proposed 2011 TACs (284,688 mt). The largest 2011 increases occurred for pollock, Pacific cod, rex sole, Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, and pelagic shelf rockfish. Concurrently, decreases occurred for sablefish, deep-water flatfish, shallow-water flatfish, flathead sole, other rockfish, demersal shelf rockfish, and thornyhead rockfish.
Other increases or decreases in 2010 and 2011 are within 2 percent of the proposed specifications.
Page 11752
The changes in the final rule from the proposed rule are based on the most recent scientific information and implement the harvest strategy described in the proposed rule for the harvest specifications.
Tables 1 and 2 list the 2010 and 2011, respectively, final OFL, ABC, and TAC amounts for GOA groundfish.
Table 1--Final 2010 ABCs, TACs, and OFLs of Groundfish for the Western/Central/West Yakutat (W/C/WYK), Western
(W), Central (C), Eastern (E) Regulatory Areas, and in the West Yakutat (WYK), Southeast Outside (SEO) and
Gulfwide (GW) Districts of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA)
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Species
Area \1\
ABC
TAC
OFL
Pollock \2\........................... Shumagin (610)..........
26,256
26,256
n/a
Chirikof (620)..........
28,095
28,095
n/a
Kodiak (630)............
19,118
19,118
n/a
WYK (640)...............
2,031
2,031
n/a
W/C/WYK (subtotal)......
75,500
75,500
103,210
SEO (650)...............
9,245
9,245
12,326
Total................
84,745
84,745
115,536
Pacific cod \3\....................... W.......................
27,685
20,764
n/a
C.......................
49,042
36,782
n/a
E.......................
2,373
2,017
n/a
Total................
79,100
59,563
94,100
Sablefish \4\......................... W.......................
1,660
1,660
n/a
C.......................
4,510
4,510
n/a
WYK.....................
1,620
1,620
n/a
SEO.....................
2,580
2,580
n/a
E (WYK and SEO)
4,200
4,200
n/a
(subtotal).
Total................
10,370
10,370
12,270
Deep-water flatfish \5\............... W.......................
521
521
n/a
C.......................
2,865
2,865
n/a
WYK.....................
2,044
2,044
n/a
SEO.....................
760
760
n/a
Total................
6,190
6,190
7,680
Shallow-water flatfish \6\............ W.......................
23,681
4,500
n/a
C.......................
29,999
13,000
n/a
WYK.....................
1,228
1,228
n/a
SEO.....................
1,334
1,334
n/a
Total................
56,242
20,062
67,768
Rex sole.............................. W.......................
1,543
1,543
n/a
C.......................
6,403
6,403
n/a
WYK.....................
883
883
n/a
SEO.....................
900
900
n/a
Total................
9,729
9,729
12,714
Arrowtooth flounder................... W.......................
34,773
8,000
n/a
C.......................
146,407
30,000
n/a
WYK.....................
22,835
2,500
n/a
SEO.....................
11,867
2,500
n/a
Total................
215,882
43,000
254,271
Flathead sole......................... W.......................
16,857
2,000
n/a
C.......................
27,124
5,000
n/a
WYK.....................
1,990
1,990
n/a
SEO.....................
1,451
1,451
n/a
Total................
47,422
10,411
59,295
Pacific ocean perch \7\............... W.......................
2,895
2,895
3,332
C.......................
10,737
10,737
12,361
WYK.....................
2,004
2,004
n/a
SEO.....................
1,948
1,948
n/a
E (WYK and SEO)
3,952
3,952
4,550
(subtotal).
Page 11753
Total................
17,584
17,584
20,243
Northern rockfish \8\ \9\............. W.......................
2,703
2,703
n/a
C.......................
2,395
2,395
n/a
E.......................
0
0
n/a
Total................
5,098
5,098
6,070
Rougheye rockfish \10\................ W.......................
80
80
n/a
C.......................
862
862
n/a
E.......................
360
360
n/a
Total................
1,302
1,302
1,568
Shortraker rockfish \11\.............. W.......................
134
134
n/a
C.......................
325
325
n/a
E.......................
455
455
n/a
Total................
914
914
1,219
Other rockfish \9\ \12\............... W.......................
212
212
n/a
C.......................
507
507
n/a
WYK.....................
273
273
n/a
SEO.....................
2,757
200
n/a
Total................
3,749
1,192
4,881
Pelagic shelf rockfish \13\........... W.......................
650
650
n/a
C.......................
3,249
3,249
n/a
WYK.....................
434
434
n/a
SEO.....................
726
726
n/a
Total................
5,059
5,059
6,142
Demersal shelf rockfish \14\.......... SEO.....................
295
295
472
Thornyhead rockfish................... W.......................
425
425
n/a
C.......................
637
637
n/a
E.......................
708
708
n/a
Total................
1,770
1,770
2,360
Atka mackerel......................... GW......................
4,700
2,000
6,200
Big skate \15\........................ W.......................
598
598
n/a
C.......................
2,049
2,049
n/a
E.......................
681
681
n/a
Total................
3,328
3,328
4,438
Longnose skate \16\................... W.......................
81
81
n/a
C.......................
2,009
2,009
n/a
E.......................
762
762
n/a
Total................
2,852
2,852
3,803
Other skates \17\..................... GW......................
2,093
2,093
2,791
Other species \18\.................... GW......................
7,075
4,500
9,432
Total............................. ........................
565,499
292,087
693,253
\1\ Regulatory areas and districts are defined at Sec. 679.2.
\2\ Pollock is apportioned in the Western/Central Regulatory Areas among three statistical areas. During the A season, the apportionment is based on an adjusted estimate of the relative distribution of pollock biomass of approximately 30 percent, 46 percent, and 24 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively.
During the B season, the apportionment is based on the relative distribution of pollock biomass at 30 percent, 54 percent, and 16 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. During the C and D seasons, the apportionment is based on the relative distribution of pollock biomass at 41 percent, 27 percent, and 32 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. Tables 5 and 6 list the proposed 2010 and 2011 pollock seasonal apportionments. In the West Yakutat and Southeast Outside Districts of the Eastern Regulatory
Area, pollock is not divided into seasonal allowances.
\3\ The annual Pacific cod TAC is apportioned 60 percent to the A season and 40 percent to the B season in the
Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA. Pacific cod is allocated 90 percent for processing by the inshore component and 10 percent for processing by the offshore component. Table 7 and 8 list the proposed 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod seasonal apportionments.
Page 11754
\4\ Sablefish is allocated to trawl and hook-and-line gears for 2010 and to trawl gear in 2011. Tables 3 and 4 list the proposed 2010 and 2011 sablefish TACs.
\5\ ``Deep-water flatfish'' means Dover sole, Greenland turbot, and deepsea sole.
\6\ ``Shallow-water flatfish'' means flatfish not including ``deep-water flatfish,'' flathead sole, rex sole, or arrowtooth flounder.
\7\ ``Pacific ocean perch'' means Sebastes alutus.
\8\ ``Northern rockfish'' means Sebastes polyspinous. For management purposes the 2 mt apportionment of ABC to the Eastern GOA has been included in the slope rockfish complex.
\9\ ``Slope rockfish'' means Sebastes aurora (aurora), S. melanostomus (blackgill), S. paucispinis (bocaccio),
S. goodei (chilipepper), S. crameri (darkblotch), S. elongatus (greenstriped), S. variegatus (harlequin), S. wilsoni (pygmy), S. babcocki (redbanded), S. proriger (redstripe), S. zacentrus (sharpchin), S. jordani
(shortbelly), S. brevispinis (silvergrey), S. diploproa (splitnose), S. saxicola (stripetail), S. miniatus
(vermilion), and S. reedi (yellowmouth). In the Eastern GOA only, slope rockfish also includes northern rockfish, S. polyspinous.
\10\ ``Rougheye rockfish'' means Sebastes aleutianus (rougheye) and Sebastes melanostictus (blackspotted).
\11\ ``Shortraker rockfish'' means Sebastes borealis.
\12\ ``Other rockfish'' in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas and in the WYK District means slope rockfish and demersal shelf rockfish. The category ``other rockfish'' in the SEO District means slope rockfish.
\13\ ``Pelagic shelf rockfish'' means Sebastes ciliatus (dark), S. variabilis (dusky), S. entomelas (widow), and
S. flavidus (yellowtail).
\14\ ``Demersal shelf rockfish'' means Sebastes pinniger (canary), S. nebulosus (china), S. caurinus (copper),
S. maliger (quillback), S. helvomaculatus (rosethorn), S. nigrocinctus (tiger), and S. ruberrimus (yelloweye).
\15\ ``Big skate'' means Raja binoculata.
\16\ ``Longnose skate'' means Raja rhina.
\17\ ``Other skates'' means Bathyraja spp.
\18\ ``Other species'' means sculpins, sharks, squid, and octopus.
Table 2--Final 2011 ABCs, TACs, and OFLs of Groundfish for the Western/Central/West Yakutat (W/C/WYK), Western
(W), Central (C), Eastern (E) Regulatory Areas, and in the West Yakutat (WYK), Southeast Outside (SEO) and
Gulfwide (GW) Districts of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA)
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Species
Area \1\
ABC
TAC
OFL
Pollock \2\........................... Shumagin (610)..........
34,728
34,728
n/a
Chirikof (620)..........
37,159
37,159
n/a
Kodiak (630)............
25,287
25,287
n/a
WYK (640)...............
2,686
2,686
n/a
W/C/WYK (subtotal)......
99,860
99,860
135,010
SEO (650)...............
9,245
9,245
12,326
Total................
109,105
109,105
147,336
Pacific cod \3\....................... W.......................
34,265
25,699
n/a
C.......................
60,698
45,524
n/a
E.......................
2,937
2,496
n/a
Total................
97,900
73,719
116,700
Sablefish \4\......................... W.......................
1,488
1,488
n/a
C.......................
4,042
4,042
n/a
WYK.....................
1,450
1,450
n/a
SEO.....................
2,320
2,320
n/a
E (WYK and SEO)
3,770
3,770
n/a
(subtotal).
Total................
9,300
9,300
11,008
Deep-water flatfish \5\............... W.......................
530
530
n/a
C.......................
2,928
2,928
n/a
WYK.....................
2,089
2,089
n/a
SEO.....................
778
778
n/a
Total................
6,325
6,325
7,847
Shallow-water flatfish \6\............ W.......................
23,681
4,500
n/a
C.......................
29,999
13,000
n/a
WYK.....................
1,228
1,228
n/a
SEO.....................
1,334
1,334
n/a
Total................
56,242
20,062
67,768
Rex sole.............................. W.......................
1,521
1,521
n/a
C.......................
6,312
6,312
n/a
WYK.....................
871
871
n/a
SEO.....................
888
888
n/a
Total................
9,592
9,592
12,534
Arrowtooth flounder................... W.......................
34,263
8,000
n/a
C.......................
144,262
30,000
n/a
Page 11755
WYK.....................
22,501
2,500
n/a
SEO.....................
11,693
2,500
n/a
Total................
212,719
43,000
250,559
Flathead sole......................... W.......................
17,520
2,000
n/a
C.......................
28,190
5,000
n/a
WYK.....................
2,068
2,068
n/a
SEO.....................
1,508
1,508
n/a
Total................
49,286
10,576
61,601
Pacific ocean perch \7\............... W.......................
2,797
2,797
3,220
C.......................
10,377
10,377
11,944
WYK.....................
1,937
1,937
n/a
SEO.....................
1,882
1,882
n/a
E (WYK and SEO)
3,819
3,819
4,396
(subtotal).
Total................
16,993
16,993
19,560
Northern rockfish \8\ \9\............. W.......................
2,549
2,549
n/a
C.......................
2,259
2,259
n/a
E.......................
0
0
n/a
Total................
4,808
4,808
5,730
Rougheye rockfish \10\................ W.......................
81
81
n/a
C.......................
869
869
n/a
E.......................
363
363
n/a
Total................
1,313
1,313
1,581
Shortraker rockfish \11\.............. W.......................
134
134
n/a
C.......................
325
325
n/a
E.......................
455
455
n/a
Total................
914
914
1,219
Other rockfish \\9 \12\............... W.......................
212
212
n/a
C.......................
507
507
n/a
WYK.....................
273
273
n/a
SEO.....................
2,757
200
n/a
Total................
3,749
1,192
4,881
Pelagic shelf rockfish \13\........... W.......................
607
607
n/a
C.......................
3,035
3,035
n/a
WYK.....................
405
405
n/a
SEO.....................
680
680
n/a
Total................
4,727
4,727
5,739
Demersal shelf rockfish \14\.......... SEO.....................
295
295
472
Thornyhead rockfish................... W.......................
425
425
n/a
C.......................
637
637
n/a
E.......................
708
708
n/a
Total................
1,770
1,770
2,360
Atka mackerel......................... GW......................
4,700
2,000
6,200
Big skate \15\........................ W.......................
598
598
n/a
C.......................
2,049
2,049
n/a
E.......................
681
681
n/a
Total................
3,328
3,328
4,438
Longnose skate \16\................... W.......................
81
81
n/a
C.......................
2,009
2,009
n/a
Page 11756
E.......................
762
762
n/a
Total................
2,852
2,852
3,803
Other skates \17\..................... GW......................
2,093
2,093
2,791
Other species \18\.................... GW......................
7,075
4,500
9,432
Total............................. ........................
605,086
328,464
743,559
\1\ Regulatory areas and districts are defined at Sec. 679.2.
\2\ Pollock is apportioned in the Western/Central Regulatory Areas among three statistical areas. During the A season, the apportionment is based on an adjusted estimate of the relative distribution of pollock biomass of approximately 30 percent, 46 percent, and 24 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively.
During the B season, the apportionment is based on the relative distribution of pollock biomass at 30 percent, 54 percent, and 16 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. During the C and D seasons, the apportionment is based on the relative distribution of pollock biomass at 41 percent, 27 percent, and 32 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. Tables 5 and 6 list the proposed 2010 and 2011 pollock seasonal apportionments. In the West Yakutat and Southeast Outside Districts of the Eastern Regulatory
Area, pollock is not divided into seasonal allowances.
\3\ The annual Pacific cod TAC is apportioned 60 percent to the A season and 40 percent to the B season in the
Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA. Pacific cod is allocated 90 percent for processing by the inshore component and 10 percent for processing by the offshore component. Tables 7 and 8 list the proposed 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod seasonal apportionments.
\4\ Sablefish is allocated to trawl and hook-and-line gears for 2010 and to trawl gear in 2011. Tables 3 and 4 list the proposed 2010 and 2011 sablefish TACs.
\5\ ``Deep-water flatfish'' means Dover sole, Greenland turbot, and deepsea sole.
\6\ ``Shallow-water flatfish'' means flatfish not including ``deep-water flatfish,'' flathead sole, rex sole, or arrowtooth flounder.
\7\ ``Pacific ocean perch'' means Sebastes alutus.
\8\ ``Northern rockfish'' means Sebastes polyspinous. For management purposes the 2 mt apportionment of ABC to the Eastern GOA has been included in the slope rockfish complex.
\9\ ``Slope rockfish'' means Sebastes aurora (aurora), S. melanostomus (blackgill), S. paucispinis (bocaccio),
S. goodei (chilipepper), S. crameri (darkblotch), S. elongatus (greenstriped), S. variegatus (harlequin), S. wilsoni (pygmy), S. babcocki (redbanded), S. proriger (redstripe), S. zacentrus (sharpchin), S. jordani
(shortbelly), S. brevispinis (silvergrey), S. diploproa (splitnose), S. saxicola (stripetail), S. miniatus
(vermilion), and S. reedi (yellowmouth). In the Eastern GOA only, slope rockfish also includes northern rockfish, S. polyspinous.
\10\ ``Rougheye rockfish'' means Sebastes aleutianus (rougheye) and Sebastes melanostictus (blackspotted).
\11\ ``Shortraker rockfish'' means Sebastes borealis.
\12\ ``Other rockfish'' in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas and in the WYK District means slope rockfish and demersal shelf rockfish. The category ``other rockfish'' in the SEO District means slope rockfish.
\13\ ``Pelagic shelf rockfish'' means Sebastes ciliatus (dark), S. variabilis (dusky), S. entomelas (widow), and
S. flavidus (yellowtail).
\14\ ``Demersal shelf rockfish'' means Sebastes pinniger (canary), S. nebulosus (china), S. caurinus (copper),
S. maliger (quillback), S. helvomaculatus (rosethorn), S. nigrocinctus (tiger), and S. ruberrimus (yelloweye).
\15\ ``Big skate'' means Raja binoculata.
\16\ ``Longnose skate'' means Raja rhina.
\17\ ``Other skates'' means Bathyraja spp.
\18\ ``Other species'' means sculpins, sharks, squid, and octopus.
Apportionment of Reserves
Section 679.20(b)(2) requires 20 percent of each TAC for pollock,
Pacific cod, flatfish, and the ``other species'' category be set aside in reserves for possible apportionment at a later date during the fishing year. In 2009, NMFS reapportioned all the reserves in the final harvest specifications. For 2010 and 2011, NMFS proposed reapportionment of all the reserves in the proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications published in the Federal Register on November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62533). NMFS received no public comments on the proposed reapportionments. For the final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications, NMFS reapportioned, as proposed, all the reserves for pollock, Pacific cod, flatfish, and ``other species.'' Specifications of TAC shown in Tables 1 and 2 reflect reapportionment of reserve amounts for these species and species groups.
Allocations of the Sablefish TAC Amounts to Vessels Using Hook-and-Line and Trawl Gear
Section 679.20(a)(4)(i) and (ii) require allocations of sablefish
TACs for each of the regulatory areas and districts to hook-and-line and trawl gear. In the Western and Central Regulatory Areas, 80 percent of each TAC is allocated to hook-and-line gear, and 20 percent of each
TAC is allocated to trawl gear. In the Eastern Regulatory Area, 95 percent of the TAC is allocated to hook-and-line gear, and five percent is allocated to trawl gear. The trawl gear allocation in the Eastern
Regulatory Area may only be used to support incidental catch of sablefish in directed fisheries for other target species (Sec. 679.20(a)(1)). In recognition of the trawl ban in the SEO District of the Eastern Regulatory Area, the Council recommended (and NMFS concurs with) the allocation of five percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory
Area sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the WYK District and the remainder of the WYK sablefish TAC be available to vessels using hook-and-line gear. As a result, NMFS allocates 100 percent of the sablefish TAC in the SEO District to vessels using hook-and-line gear. This recommendation results in an allocation of 210 mt to trawl gear and 1,410 mt to hook-and-line gear in the WYK District in 2010, an allocation of 2,580 mt to hook-and-line gear in the SEO District in 2010, and 189 mt to trawl gear in the WYK District in 2011. Table 3 lists the allocations of the 2010 sablefish TACs to hook-and-line and trawl gear. Table 4 lists the allocations of the 2011 sablefish TACs to trawl gear.
The Council recommended that the hook-and-line sablefish TAC be established annually to ensure that the Individual Fishery Quota (IFQ) fishery is conducted concurrent with the halibut IFQ fishery and is based on the most recent survey information. The Council also recommended that only a
Page 11757
trawl sablefish TAC be established for two years so that retention of incidental catch of sablefish by trawl gear could commence in January in the second year of the groundfish harvest specifications. However, since there is an annual assessment for sablefish and the final harvest specifications are expected to be published before the IFQ season begins (typically, early March), the industry and Council recommended that the sablefish TAC be set on an annual basis so that the best and most recent scientific information could be considered in recommending the ABCs and TACs. Since sablefish is on bycatch status for trawl gear during the entire fishing year, and given that fishing for groundfish is prohibited prior to January 20, it is not likely that the sablefish allocation to trawl gear would be reached before the effective date of the final harvest specifications.
Table 3--Final 2010 Sablefish TAC Specifications in the GOA and Allocations to Hook-and-Line and Trawl Gear
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Hook-and-line
Trawl
Area/district
TAC
allocation
allocation
Western.........................................................
1,660
1,328
332
Central.........................................................
4,510
3,608
902
West Yakutat \1\................................................
1,620
1,410
210
Southeast Outside...............................................
2,580
2,580
0
Total.......................................................
10,370
8,926
1,444
\1\ Represents an allocation of 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the WYK District.
Table 4--Final 2011 Sablefish TAC Specifications in the GOA and Allocation to Trawl Gear \1\
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Hook-and-line
Trawl
Area/district
TAC
allocation
allocation
Western.........................................................
1,488
n/a
298
Central.........................................................
4,042
n/a
808
West Yakutat \2\................................................
1,450
n/a
189
Southeast Outside...............................................
2,320
n/a
0
Total.......................................................
9,300
n/a
1,295
\1\ The Council recommended that harvest specifications for the hook-and-line gear sablefish Individual Fishing
Quota fisheries be limited to one year.
\2\ Represents an allocation of 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the WYK District.
Apportionments of Pollock TAC Among Seasons and Regulatory Areas, and
Allocations for Processing by Inshore and Offshore Components
In the GOA, pollock is apportioned by season and area, and is further allocated for processing by inshore and offshore components.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B), the annual pollock TAC specified for the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA is apportioned into four equal seasonal allowances of 25 percent. As established by
Sec. 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, B, C, and D season allowances are available from January 20 to March 10, March 10 to May 31, August 25 to October 1, and October 1 to November 1, respectively.
Pollock TACs in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA are apportioned among Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, pursuant to
Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(A). In the A and B seasons, the apportionments are in proportion to the distribution of pollock biomass based on the four most recent NMFS winter surveys. In the C and D seasons, the apportionments are in proportion to the distribution of pollock biomass based on the four most recent NMFS summer surveys. For 2010 and 2011, the Council recommends, and NMFS approves, averaging the winter and summer distribution of pollock in the Central Regulatory Area for the A season. The average is intended to reflect the distribution of pollock and the performance of the fishery in the area during the A season for the 2010 and 2011 fishing years. Within any fishing year, the amount by which a seasonal allowance is under- or overharvested may be added to, or subtracted from, subsequent seasonal allowances in a manner to be determined by the Regional Administrator (Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B)).
The rollover amount of unharvested pollock is limited to 20 percent of the seasonal apportionment for the statistical area. Any unharvested pollock above the 20-percent limit could be further distributed to the other statistical areas, in proportion to the estimated biomass in the subsequent season in those statistical areas (Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B)). The pollock TACs in the WYK and SEO District of 2,031 mt and 9,245 mt, respectively, in 2010, and 2,686 mt and 9,245 mt, respectively, in 2011, are not allocated by season.
Section 679.20(a)(6)(i) requires the allocation of 100 percent of the pollock TAC in all regulatory areas and all seasonal allowances to vessels catching pollock for processing by the inshore component after subtraction of amounts projected by the Regional Administrator to be caught by, or delivered to, the offshore component incidental to directed fishing for other groundfish species. Thus, the amount of pollock available for harvest by vessels harvesting pollock for processing by the offshore component is that amount that will be taken as incidental catch during directed fishing for groundfish species other than pollock, up to the maximum retainable amounts allowed by
Sec. 679.20(e) and (f). At this time, these incidental catch amounts of pollock are unknown and will be determined during the fishing year.
Tables 5 and 6 list the seasonal biomass distribution of pollock in the
Page 11758
Western and Central Regulatory Areas, area apportionments, and seasonal allowances. The amounts of pollock for processing by the inshore and offshore components are not shown.
Table 5--Final 2010 Distribution of Pollock in the Central and Western Regulatory Areas of the GOA; Seasonal Biomass Distribution, Area Apportionments; and Seasonal Allowances of Annual TAC
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Season \1\
Shumagin (Area 610)
Chirikof (Area 620)
Kodiak (Area 630)
Total \2\
A (Jan 20-Mar 10)............................................
5,551
(30.22%)
8,414
(45.81%)
4,403
(23.97%)
18,368
B (Mar 10-May 31)............................................
5,551
(30.22%)
9,925
(54.04%)
2,891
(15.74%)
18,367
C (Aug 25-Oct 1).............................................
7,577
(41.25%)
4,878
(26.55%)
5,912
(32.19%)
18,367
D (Oct 1-Nov 1)..............................................
7,577
(41.25%)
4,878
(26.55%)
5,912
(32.19%)
18,367
Annual Total.............................................
26,256 ...........
28,095 ...........
19,118 ...........
73,469
\1\ As established by Sec. 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, B, C, and D season allowances are available from January 20 to March 10, March 10 to
May 31, August 25 to October 1, and October 1 to November 1, respectively. The amounts of pollock for processing by the inshore and offshore components are not shown in this table.
\2\ The WYK and SEO District pollock TACs are not allocated by season and are not included in the total pollock TACs shown in this table.
Table 6--Final 2011 Distribution of Pollock in the Central and Western Regulatory Areas of the GOA; Seasonal Biomass Distribution, Area Apportionments; and Seasonal Allowances of Annual TAC
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Season \1\
Shumagin (Area 610)
Chirikof (Area 620)
Kodiak (Area 630)
Total \2\
A (Jan 20-Mar 10)............................................
7,342
(30.22%)
11,129
(45.81%)
5,823
(23.97%)
24,294
B (Mar 10-May 31)............................................
7,342
(30.22%)
13,128
(54.04%)
3,824
(15.74%)
24,294
C (Aug 25-Oct 1).............................................
10,022
(41.25%)
6,451
(26.55%)
7,820
(32.19%)
24,293
D (Oct 1-Nov 1)..............................................
10,022
(41.25%)
6,451
(26.55%)
7,820
(32.19%)
24,293
Annual Total.............................................
34,728 ...........
37,159 ...........
25,287 ...........
97,174
\1\ As established by Sec. 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, B, C, and D season allowances are available from January 20 to March 10, March 10 to
May 31, August 25 to October 1, and October 1 to November 1, respectively. The amounts of pollock for processing by the inshore and offshore components are not shown in this table.
\2\ The WYK and SEO District pollock TACs are not allocated by season and are not included in the total pollock TACs shown in this table.
Seasonal Apportionments of Pacific Cod TAC and Allocations for
Processing of Pacific Cod TAC Between Inshore and Offshore Components
Pacific cod fishing is divided into two seasons in the Western and
Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA. For hook-and-line, pot, and jig gear, the A season is January 1 through June 10, and the B season is
September 1 through December 31. For trawl gear, the A season is
January 20 through June 10, and the B season is September 1 through
November 1 (Sec. 679.23(d)(3)(i)). After subtraction of incidental catch from the A season, 60 percent of the annual TAC will be available as a DFA during the A season for the inshore and offshore components.
The remaining 40 percent of the annual TAC will be available for harvest during the B season. Under Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(ii), any overage or underage of the Pacific cod allowance from the A season may be subtracted from or added to the subsequent B season allowance.
Section 679.20(a)(6)(ii) requires allocation of the TAC apportionments of Pacific cod in all regulatory areas to vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the inshore and offshore components. Ninety percent of the Pacific cod TAC in each regulatory area is allocated to vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the inshore component. The remaining 10 percent of the TAC is allocated to vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the offshore component.
Tables 7 and 8 list the seasonal apportionments and allocations of the final 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod TACs, respectively.
Table 7--Final 2010 Seasonal Apportionments and Allocation of Pacific Cod TAC Amounts in the GOA; Allocations for Processing by the Inshore and Offshore Components
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Component allocation
Regulatory area
Season
TAC
-----------------------------------
Inshore (90%)
Offshore (10%)
Western............................ Annual...............
20,764
18,687
2,077
A season (60%).......
12,458
11,212
1,246
B season (40%).......
8,306
7,475
831
Central............................ Annual...............
36,782
33,104
3,678
A season (60%).......
22,069
19,862
2,207
B season (40%).......
14,713
13,242
1,471
Page 11759
Eastern............................ Annual...............
2,017
1,816
201
Total.......................... .....................
59,563
53,607
5,956
Table 8--Final 2011 Seasonal Apportionments and Allocation of Pacific Cod TAC Amounts in the GOA; Allocations for Processing by the Inshore and Offshore Components
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Component allocation
Regulatory area
Season
TAC
-----------------------------------
Inshore (90%)
Offshore (10%)
Western............................ Annual...............
25,699
23,129
2,570
A season (60%).......
15,419
13,877
1,542
B season (40%).......
10,280
9,252
1,028
Central............................ Annual...............
45,524
40,972
4,552
A season (60%).......
27,314
24,583
2,731
B season (40%).......
18,210
16,389
1,821
Eastern............................ Annual...............
2,496
2,246
250
Total.......................... .....................
73,719
66,347
7,372
Demersal Shelf Rockfish (DSR)
The recommended 2010 and 2011 DSR TAC is 295 mt. In 2006, the
Alaska Board of Fish (BOF) allocated the SEO District DSR TAC between the commercial fishery (84 percent) and the sportfish fishery (16 percent). This results in 2010 and 2011 allocations of 248 mt to the commercial fishery and 47 mt to the sportfish fishery. Alaska
Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) deducts estimates of incidental catch of DSR in the commercial halibut fishery from the DSR commercial fishery allocation. In 2009, this resulted in 115 mt being available for the directed commercial DSR fishery apportioned between four outer coast areas. Only two of these areas had GHLs large enough to support directed fisheries, totaling 78 mt. Of this amount, 76 mt were harvested in directed fisheries. DSR harvest in the halibut fishery is linked to the halibut quota; therefore the ADF&G cannot estimate potential DSR incidental catch in that fishery until those quotas are established. Federally permitted catcher vessels using hook-and-line or jig gear fishing for groundfish and Pacific halibut in the SEO District of the GOA are required Full retention of all DSR (Sec. 679.20(j)).
The ADF&G announced the opening of directed fishing for DSR in January following the International Pacific Halibut Commission's (IPHC) annual
January meeting.
Apportionments to the Central GOA Rockfish Pilot Program
Section 679.81(a)(1) and (2) require the allocation of the primary rockfish species TACs in the Central Regulatory Area, after deducting incidental catch needs in other directed groundfish fisheries, to participants in the Rockfish Program. Five percent (2.5 percent to trawl gear and 2.5 percent to fixed gear) of the final TACs for Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, and pelagic shelf rockfish in the
Central Regulatory Area are allocated to the entry-level rockfish fishery; the remaining 95 percent are allocated to those vessels eligible to participate in the Rockfish Program. NMFS is setting aside--in 2010 and 2011--incidental catch amounts (ICAs) of 500 mt of
Pacific ocean perch, 100 mt of northern rockfish, and 100 mt of pelagic shelf rockfish for other directed fisheries in the Central Regulatory
Area. These amounts are based on recent average incidental catch in the
Central Regulatory Area by these other groundfish fisheries.
Section 679.83(a)(1)(i) requires that allocations to the trawl entry-level fishery must be made first from the allocation of Pacific ocean perch available to the rockfish entry-level fishery. If the amount of Pacific ocean perch available for allocation is less than the total allocation allowable for trawl catcher vessels in the rockfish entry-level fishery, then northern rockfish and pelagic shelf rockfish must be allocated to trawl catcher vessels. Allocations of Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, and pelagic shelf rockfish to longline gear vessels must be made after the allocations to trawl gear.
Tables 9 and 10 list the final 2010 and 2011 allocations of rockfish in the Central GOA to trawl and longline gear in the entry- level rockfish fishery, respectively. Allocations of primary rockfish species TACs among participants in the Rockfish Program are not included in the final harvest specifications because applications for catcher/processor and catcher vessel cooperatives are due to NMFS on
March 1 of each calendar year, thereby preventing NMFS from calculating final 2010 allocations. NMFS will post these allocations on the Alaska
Region Web site (http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/ goarat/default.htm) when they become available in March 2010.
Page 11760
Table 9--Final 2010 Allocations of Rockfish in the Central Gulf of Alaska to Trawl and Longline Gear \1\ in the Entry-Level Rockfish Fishery
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Incidental
Entry-level
Entry-level
Species
TAC
catch
TAC minus ICA
5% TAC
2.5% TAC
trawl
longline allowance
allocation
allocation
Pacific ocean perch.....................
10,737
500
10,237
512
256
392
120
Northern rockfish.......................
2,395
100
2,295
115
57
0
115
Pelagic shelf rockfish..................
3,249
100
3,149
157
79
0
157
Total...................................
16,381
700
15,681
784
392
392
392
\1\ Longline gear includes jig and hook-and-line gear.
Table 10--Final 2011 Allocations of Rockfish in the Central GOA to Trawl and Longline Gear \1\ in the Entry-Level Rockfish Fishery
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
Incidental
Entry-level
Entry-level
Species
TAC
catch
TAC minus ICA
5% TAC
2.5% TAC
trawl
longline allowance
allocation
allocation
Pacific ocean perch.....................
10,377
500
9,877
494
247
375
119
Northern rockfish.......................
2,259
100
2,159
108
54
0
108
Pelagic shelf rockfish..................
3,035
100
2,935
147
74
0
147
Total...............................
15,671
700
14,971
749
375
375
374
\1\ Longline gear includes jig and hook-and-line gear.
Halibut PSC Limits
Section 679.21(d) establishes the annual halibut PSC limit apportionments to trawl and hook-and-line gear and permits the establishment of apportionments for pot gear. In December 2009, the
Council recommended that NMFS maintain the 2009 halibut PSC limits of 2,000 mt for the trawl fisheries and 300 mt for the hook-and-line fisheries. Ten mt of the hook-and-line limit is further allocated to the DSR fishery in the SEO District. The DSR fishery is defined at
Sec. 679.21(d)(4)(iii)(A). This fishery has been apportioned 10 mt in recognition of its small-scale harvests. Most vessels in the DSR fishery are less than 60 ft (18.3 m) length overall (LOA) and are exempt from observer coverage. Therefore, observer data are not available to verify actual bycatch amounts. NMFS assumes the halibut bycatch in the DSR fishery is low because of the short soak times for the gear and duration of the DSR fishery. Also, the DSR fishery occurs in the winter when less overlap occurs in the distribution of DSR and halibut. Finally, much of the DSR TAC is not available to the directed
DSR commercial fishery. ADF&G sets the GHLs after estimates of incidental catch in all fisheries (including halibut and subsistence) and allocation to the sportfish fishery have been deducted. Of the 362 mt TAC for DSR in 2009, 115 mt was available for the commercial fishery, of which 76 mt were harvested.
The FMP authorizes the Council to exempt specific gear from the halibut PSC limits. NMFS, after consultation with the Council, exempts pot gear, jig gear, and the sablefish IFQ hook-and-line gear fishery from the non-trawl halibut limit for 2010 and 2011. The Council recommended these exemptions because (1) the pot gear fisheries have low annual halibut bycatch mortality (averaging 18 mt annually from 2001 through 2009); (2) IFQ program regulations prohibit discard of halibut if any halibut IFQ permit holder on board a catcher vessel holds unused halibut IFQ (Sec. 679.7(f)(11)). Sablefish IFQ fishermen typically also hold halibut IFQ permits, so are required to retain the halibut they catch while fishing sablefish IFQ; and (3) halibut mortality for the jig gear fisheries is assumed to be negligible.
Halibut mortality is assumed to be negligible in the jig gear fisheries given the small amount of groundfish harvested by jig gear (averaging 258 mt annually from 2001 through 2009), the selective nature of jig gear, and the high survival rates of halibut caught and released with jig gear.
Section 679.21(d)(5) authorizes NMFS to seasonally apportion the halibut PSC limits after consultation with the Council. The FMP and regulations require the Council and NMFS to consider the following information in seasonally apportioning halibut PSC limits: (1) Seasonal distribution of halibut; (2) seasonal distribution of target groundfish species relative to halibut distribution; (3) expected halibut bycatch needs on a seasonal basis relative to changes in halibut biomass and expected catch of target groundfish species; (4) expected bycatch rates on a seasonal basis; (5) expected changes in directed groundfish fishing seasons; (6) expected actual start of fishing effort; and (7) economic effects of establishing seasonal halibut allocations on segments of the target groundfish industry. The information to establish the halibut PSC limits was obtained from the 2009 SAFE report, NMFS, ADF&G, the IPHC, and public testimony.
NMFS concurs in the Council's recommendations listed in Table 11, which shows the final 2010 and 2011 Pacific halibut PSC limits, allowances, and apportionments. Sections 679.21(d)(5)(iii) and (iv) specify that any underages or overages of a seasonal apportionment of a
PSC limit will be deducted from or added to the next respective seasonal apportionment within the fishing year.
Page 11761
Table 11--Final 2010 and 2011 Pacific Halibut PSC Limits, Allowances, and Apportionments
Values are in metric tons
Trawl gear
Hook-and-line gear \1\
Other than DSR
DSR
Season
Percent
Amount ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Season
Percent
Amount
Season
Amount
January 20-April 1......................
27.5
550 January 1-June 10.........
86
250 January 1-December 31.....
10
April 1-July 1..........................
20
400 June 10-September 1.......
2
5
July 1-September 1......................
30
600 September 1-December 31...
12
35
September 1-October 1...................
7.5
150
October 1-December 31...................
15
300
Total............................... ..........
2,000 .......................... .........
290 ..........................
10
\1\ The Pacific halibut PSC limit for hook-and-line gear is allocated to the DSR fishery and fisheries other than DSR. The hook-and-line sablefish fishery is exempt from halibut PSC limits.
Section 679.21(d)(3)(ii) authorizes further apportionment of the trawl halibut PSC limit to trawl fishery categories. The annual apportionments are based on each category's proportional share of the anticipated halibut bycatch mortality during the fishing year and optimization of the total amount of groundfish harvest under the halibut PSC limit. The fishery categories for the trawl halibut PSC limits are (1) a deep-water species category, comprised of sablefish, rockfish, deep-water flatfish, rex sole, and arrowtooth flounder; and
(2) a shallow-water species category, comprised of pollock, Pacific cod, shallow-water flatfish, flathead sole, Atka mackerel, skates, and
``other species'' (Sec. 679.21(d)(3)(iii)). Table 12 lists the final 2010 and 2011 apportionments of Pacific halibut PSC trawl limits between the trawl gear deep-water and the shallow-water species categories.
Table 12--Final 2010 and 2011 Apportionment of Pacific Halibut PSC Trawl Limits Between the Trawl Gear Deep-
Water Species Complex and the Shallow-Water Species Complex
Values are in metric tons
Season
Shallow-water
Deep-water \1\
Total
January 20-April 1........................
450 100.............................
550
April 1-July 1............................
100 300.............................
400
July 1-September 1........................
200 400.............................
600
September 1-October 1.....................
150 Any remainder...................
150
Subtotal January 20-October 1.........
900 800.............................
1,700
October 1-December 31 \2\................. ................ ................................
300
Total................................. ................ ................................
2,000
\1\ Vessels participating in cooperatives in the Central GOA Rockfish Program will receive a portion of the third season (July 1-September 1) deep-water category halibut PSC apportionment. This amount is not currently known but will be posted later on the Alaska Region Web site (http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov) when it becomes available.
\2\ There is no apportionment between shallow-water and deep-water trawl fishery categories during the fifth season (October 1-December 31).
Estimated Halibut Bycatch in Prior Years
The best available information on estimated halibut bycatch is data collected by observers during 2009. The calculated halibut bycatch mortality by trawl, hook-and-line, and pot gears through December 31, 2009, is 1,817 mt, 277 mt, and 7 mt, respectively, for a total halibut mortality of 2,101 mt. This mortality was calculated using groundfish and halibut catch data from the NMFS, Alaska Region's catch accounting system. This system contains historical and recent catch information compiled from each Alaska groundfish fishery.
Halibut bycatch restrictions seasonally constrained trawl gear fisheries during the 2009 fishing year. Table 13 displays the closure dates for fisheries that resulted from the attainment of seasonal or annual halibut PSC limits. NMFS does not know amount of groundfish that trawl gear might have harvested if halibut PSC limits had not restricted some 2009 GOA groundfish fisheries.
Table 13--Fishery Closures Due to Attainment of Pacific Halibut PSC Limits
Fishery category
Opening date
Closure date
Federal Register Citation
Trawl Deep-water, season 1..... January 20, 2009.. March 3, 2009..... 74 FR 9964, March 9, 2009.
Trawl Deep-water, season 2..... April 1, 2009..... April 23, 2009.... 74 FR 19459, April 29, 2009.
Trawl Shallow-water, season 4.. Sept 1, 2009...... Sept. 2, 2009..... 74 FR 45378, Sept. 2, 2009.
Page 11762
Expected Changes in Groundfish Stocks and Catch
The final 2010 and 2011 ABCs for pollock, Pacific cod, rex sole, flathead sole, Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, rougheye rockfish, shortraker rockfish, and ``other species'' are higher than those established for 2009, while the final 2010 and 2011 ABCs for sablefish, deep-water flatfish, shallow-water flatfish, arrowtooth flounder, other rockfish, demersal shelf rockfish, thornyhead rockfish, big skate, longnose skate, and ``other skates'' are lower than those established for 2009. The final ABCs for pelagic shelf rockfish are, respectively, higher in 2010 and lower in 2011 than the 2009 ABCs. For the remaining target species, the Council recommended and the Secretary approved ABC levels in 2010 and 2011 that remain unchanged from 2009.
More information on these changes is included in the final 2009 SAFE report. This document is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
In the GOA, the total final 2010 TAC amount is 292,087 mt, an increase of three percent from the total proposed 2010 TAC limit of 284,688 mt. The total final 2011 TAC amount is 328,464 mt, an increase of 15 percent from the total proposed 2011 TAC limit of 284,688 mt.
Table 14 compares the proposed 2010 TACs to the final 2010 and 2011
TACs.
Table 14--Comparison of Proposed and Final 2010 and 2011 GOA TACs
Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton
2010
2011
Species
2010 final TAC 2010 proposed difference 2011 final TAC 2011 proposed difference
TAC
from proposed
TAC
from proposed
Pollock.................................................
84,745
74,330
10,415
109,105
74,330
34,775
Pacific cod.............................................
59,563
60,102
-539
73,719
60,102
13,617
Sablefish...............................................
10,370
10,337
33
9,300
10,337
-1,037
Deep-water flatfish.....................................
6,190
9,793
-3,603
6,325
9,793
-3,468
Shallow-water flatfish..................................
20,062
22,256
-2,194
20,062
22,256
-2,194
Rex sole................................................
9,729
8,827
902
9,592
8,827
765
Arrowtooth flounder.....................................
43,000
43,000
0
43,000
43,000
0
Flathead sole...........................................
10,441
11,289
-848
10,576
11,289
-713
Pacific ocean perch.....................................
17,584
15,098
2,486
16,993
15,098
1,895
Northern rockfish.......................................
5,098
4,173
925
4,808
4,173
635
Rougheye rockfish.......................................
1,302
1,297
5
1,313
1,297
16
Shortraker rockfish.....................................
914
898
16
914
898
16
Other rockfish..........................................
1,192
1,730
-538
1,192
1,730
-538
Pelagic shelf rockfish..................................
5,059
4,465
594
4,727
4,465
262
Demersal shelf rockfish.................................
295
362
-67
295
362
-67
Thornyhead rockfish.....................................
1,770
1,910
-140
1,770
1,910
-140
Atka mackerel...........................................
2,000
2,000
0
2,000
2,000
0
Big skate...............................................
3,328
3,330
-2
3,328
3,330
-2
Longnose skates.........................................
2,852
2,887
-35
2,852
2,887
-35
Other skates............................................
2,093
2,104
-11
2,093
2,104
-11
Other species...........................................
4,500
4,500
0
4,500
4,500
0
Total...............................................
292,087
284,688
7,399
328,464
284,688
43,776
Current Estimates of Halibut Biomass and Stock Condition
The most recent halibut stock assessment was developed by the IPHC staff in December 2009 for the 2010 commercial fishery; this assessment was considered by the IPHC at its annual January 2010 meeting. Since 2006, the IPHC stock assessment has been fitted to a coastwide data set
(including the United States and Canada) to estimate total exploitable biomass. Coastwide exploitable biomass at the beginning of 2010 is estimated to be 334 million pounds. The assessment revised last year's estimate of 325 million pounds at the start of 2009 downwards to 291 million pounds and projects an increase of 14 percent over that value to arrive at the 2010 value of 334 million pounds. At least part, if not most, of the downward revision for 2009 is believed to be caused by the ongoing decline in size at age, which continues for all ages in all areas. Projections based on the currently estimated age compositions suggest that the exploitable and female spawning biomasses will continue to increase over the next several years as a sequence of strong year classes recruit to the legal-sized component of the population. The coastwide exploitable biomass was apportioned among regulatory areas in accordance with survey estimates of relative abundance and other considerations. The assessment recommends a coastwide harvest rate of 20 percent of the exploitable biomass overall, but a lower harvest rate of 15 percent for Areas 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 3B.
The halibut resource is fully utilized. Recent catches, over the last 16 years (1994-2009) in the commercial halibut fisheries in Alaska have averaged 32,850 mt round weight. In December 2009, IPHC staff recommended Alaska commercial catch limits totaling 25,008 mt round weight for 2010, a 5 percent decrease from 26,338 mt in 2009. Through
December 31, 2009, commercial hook-and-line harvests of halibut off
Alaska totaled 25,536 mt round weight.
Additional information on the Pacific halibut stock assessment may be found in the IPHC's 2009 Pacific halibut stock assessment (December 2009), available on the IPHC Web site at http:// www.iphc.washington.edu. The IPHC considered the 2009 Pacific halibut assessment for 2010 at its January 2010 annual meeting when it set the 2010 commercial halibut fishery catch limits.
Other Factors
The proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications (74 FR 62533,
November 30, 2009) discuss potential impacts of expected fishing for groundfish on halibut stocks, as well as methods available for, and costs of, reducing halibut bycatch in the groundfish fisheries.
Page 11763
Halibut Discard Mortality Rates
The Council recommended and NMFS concurs that the halibut discard mortality rates (DMRs) developed and recommended by the IPHC for the 2010 through 2012 GOA groundfish fisheries be used to monitor the 2010 and 2011 GOA halibut bycatch mortality allowances. The IPHC will analyze observer data annually and recommend changes to the DMRs when a
DMR shows large variation from the mean. Most of the IPHC's assumed
DMRs were based on an average of mortality rates determined from NMFS observer data collected between 1999 and 2008. Long-term average DMRs were not available for some fisheries (for example, the deepwater flatfish fishery has not been prosecuted in recent years), so the IPHC used the average rates from the available years between 1999 and 2008.
For other fisheries targets (which include Atka mackerel, ``other species,'' and skates for all gear types; and for the hook-and-line sablefish targets), where no data mortality was available, the IPHC recommended the mortality rate of halibut caught in the Pacific cod fishery for that gear type as a default rate. Table 15 compares the final GOA halibut DMRs for 2010 and 2011 with the DMRs published in the proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications (74 FR 62533, November 30, 2009). A discussion of the DMRs and their justification is presented in Appendix 2 to the 2009 SAFE report (see ADDRESSES).
Table 15--Comparison of Proposed and Final 2010 and 2011 Halibut DMRs for Vessels Fishing in the GOA
Values are percent of halibut bycatch assumed to be dead
Proposed 2010 and 2011
Final 2010 and
Gear
Target fishery
mortality rate 2011 mortality
(%)
rate (%)
Hook-and-line.............................. Other fisheries \1\................
14
12
Pacific cod........................
14
12
Rockfish...........................
10
9
Trawl...................................... Arrowtooth flounder................
69
72
Deep-water flatfish................
53
48
Flathead sole......................
61
65
Non-pelagic pollock................
59
59
Other fisheries \1\................
63
62
Pacific cod........................
63
62
Pelagic pollock....................
76
76
Rex sole...........................
63
64
Rockfish...........................
67
67
Sablefish..........................
65
65
Shallow-water flatfish.............
71
71
Pot........................................ Other fisheries \1\................
16
17
Pacific cod........................
16
17
\1\ Other fisheries include all gear types for Atka mackerel, ``other species,'' and skates; and hook-and-line sablefish.
American Fisheries Act (AFA) Catcher/Processor and Catcher Vessel (CV)
Groundfish Harvest and PSC Limits
Section 679.64 establishes groundfish harvesting and processing sideboard limitations on AFA catcher/processors and CVs in the GOA.
These sideboard limits are necessary to protect the interests of fishermen and processors, who have not directly benefitted from the
AFA, from fishermen and processors who have received exclusive harvesting and processing privileges under the AFA. Section 679.7(k)(1)(ii) prohibits listed AFA catcher/processors from harvesting any species of fish in the GOA. Additionally, Sec. 679.7(k)(1)(iv) prohibits listed AFA catcher/processors from processing any pollock harvested in a directed pollock fishery in the GOA and any groundfish harvested in Statistical Area 630 of the GOA.
AFA CVs that are less than 125 ft (38.1 m) LOA, have annual landings of pollock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands less than 5,100 mt, and have made at least 40 groundfish landings from 1995 through 1997 are exempt from GOA sideboard limits under Sec. 679.64(b)(2)(ii). Sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA CVs in the GOA are based on their traditional harvest levels of TAC in groundfish fisheries covered by the FMP. Section 679.64(b)(3)(iii) establishes the groundfish sideboard limitations in the GOA based on the retained catch of non-exempt AFA CVs of each sideboard species from 1995 through 1997 divided by the TAC for that species over the same period. Tables 16 and 17 list the final 2010 and 2011 non-exempt AFA CV groundfish sideboard limits. NMFS will deduct all targeted or incidental catch of sideboard species made by non-exempt AFA CVs from the sideboard limits specified in Tables 16 and 17.
Page 11764
Table 16--Final 2010 GOA Non-Exempt AFA CV Groundfish Harvest Sideboard Limitations
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of 1995- 1997 non-
2010 non-
Species
Apportionments Area/component exempt AFA CV
2010 TAC
exempt AFA CV by season/gear
catch to 1995-
sideboard 1997 TAC
limit
Pollock...................... A Season--
Shumagin (610)..
0.6047
5,551
3,357
January 20-
March 10.
Chirikof (620)..
0.1167
8,414
982
Kodiak (630)....
0.2028
4,403
893
B Season--March Shumagin (610)..
0.6047
5,551
3,357 10-May 31.
Chirikof (620)..
0.1167
9,925
1,158
Kodiak (630)....
0.2028
2,891
586
C Season--
Shumagin (610)..
0.6047
7,577
4,582
August 25-
October 1.
Chirikof (620)..
0.1167
4,878
569
Kodiak (630)....
0.2028
5,912
1,199
D Season--
Shumagin (610)..
0.6047
7,577
4,582
October 1-
November 1.
Chirikof (620)..
0.1167
4,878
569
Kodiak (630)....
0.2028
5,912
1,199
Annual......... WYK (640).......
0.3495
2,031
710
SEO (650).......
0.3495
9,245
3,231
Pacific cod.................. A Season \1\-- W inshore.......
0.1365
11,212
1,530
January 1-June 10.
W offshore......
0.1026
1,246
128
C inshore.......
0.0689
19,862
1,368
C offshore......
0.0721
2,207
159
B Season \2\-- W inshore.......
0.1365
7,475
1,020
September 1-
December 31.
W offshore......
0.1026
831
85
C inshore.......
0.0689
13,242
912
C offshore......
0.0721
1,471
106
Annual......... E inshore.......
0.0079
1,815
14
E offshore......
0.0078
202
2
Sablefish.................... Annual, trawl
W...............
0.0000
332
0 gear.
C...............
0.0642
902
58
E...............
0.0433
210
9
Flatfish, deep-water......... Annual......... W...............
0.0000
521
0
C...............
0.0647
2,865
185
E...............
0.0128
2,804
36
Flatfish, shallow-water...... Annual......... W...............
0.0156
4,500
70
C...............
0.0587
13,000
763
E...............
0.0126
2,562
32
Rex sole..................... Annual......... W...............
0.0007
1,543
1
C...............
0.0384
6,403
246
E...............
0.0029
1,783
5
Arrowtooth Flounder.......... Annual......... W...............
0.0021
8,000
17
C...............
0.0280
30,000
840
E...............
0.0002
5,000
1
Flathead sole................ Annual......... W...............
0.0036
2,000
7
C...............
0.0213
5,000
107
E...............
0.0009
3,441
3
Pacific ocean Perch.......... Annual......... W...............
0.0023
2,895
7
C...............
0.0748
10,737
803
E...............
0.0466
3,952
184
Northern Rockfish............ Annual......... W...............
0.0003
2,703
1
Page 11765
C...............
0.0277
2,395
66
Rougheye Rockfish............ Annual......... W...............
0.0000
80
0
C...............
0.0237
862
20
E...............
0.0124
360
4
Shortraker Rockfish.......... Annual......... W...............
0.0000
134
0
C...............
0.0218
325
7
E...............
0.0110
455
5
Other Rockfish............... Annual......... W...............
0.0034
212
1
C...............
0.1699
507
86
E...............
0.0000
473
0
Pelagic shelf Rockfish....... Annual......... W...............
0.0001
650
0
C...............
0.0000
3,249
0
E...............
0.0067
1,160
8
Demersal shelf rockfish...... Annual......... SEO.............
0.0020
295
1
Thornyhead Rockfish.......... Annual......... W...............
0.0280
425
12
C...............
0.0280
637
18
E...............
0.0280
708
20
Atka mackerel................ Annual......... Gulfwide........
0.0309
2,000
62
Big skates................... Annual......... W...............
0.0063
598
4
C...............
0.0063
2,049
13
E...............
0.0063
681
4
Longnose Skates.............. Annual......... W...............
0.0063
81
0
C...............
0.0063
2,009
13
E...............
0.0063
762
5
Other skates................. Annual......... Gulfwide........
0.0063
2,093
13
Other species................ Annual......... Gulfwide........
0.0063
4,500
28
\1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
\2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
Table 17--Final 2011 GOA Non-Exempt AFA CV Groundfish Harvest Sideboard Limitations
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of 1995- 1997 non-
2011 non-
Species
Apportionments
Area/component exempt AFA CV
2011 TAC
exempt AFA CV by season/gear
catch to 1995-
sideboard 1997 TAC
limit
Pollock...................... A Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.6047
7,342
4,440
January 20-
March 10.
Chirikof (620).
0.1167
11,129
1,299
Kodiak (630)...
0.2028
5,823
1,181
B Season--March Shumagin (610).
0.6047
7,342
4,440 10--May 31.
Chirikof (620).
0.1167
13,128
1,532
Kodiak (630)...
0.2028
3,824
776
C Season--August Shumagin (610).
0.6047
10,022
6,060 25-October 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.1167
6,451
753
Kodiak (630)...
0.2028
7,820
1,586
D Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.6047
10,022
6,060
October 1-
November 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.1167
6,451
753
Kodiak (630)...
0.2028
7,820
1,586
Annual.......... WYK (640)......
0.3495
2,686
939
Page 11766
SEO (650)......
0.3495
9,245
3,231
Pacific cod.................. A Season \1\
W inshore......
0.1365
13,877
1,894
January 1-June 10.
W offshore.....
0.1026
1,542
158
C inshore......
0.0689
24,583
1,694
C offshore.....
0.0721
2,731
197
B Season \2\
W inshore......
0.1365
9,252
1,263
September 1-
December 31.
W offshore.....
0.1026
1,028
105
C inshore......
0.0689
16,389
1,129
C offshore.....
0.0721
1,821
131
Annual.......... E inshore......
0.0079
2,246
18
E offshore.....
0.0078
250
2
Sablefish.................... Annual, trawl
W..............
0.0000
298
0 gear.
C..............
0.0642
808
52
E..............
0.0433
189
8
Flatfish, deep-water......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
530
0
C..............
0.0647
2,928
189
E..............
0.0128
2,867
37
Flatfish, shallow-water...... Annual.......... W..............
0.0156
4,500
70
C..............
0.0587
13,000
763
E..............
0.0126
2,562
32
Rex sole..................... Annual.......... W..............
0.0007
1,521
1
C..............
0.0384
6,312
242
E..............
0.0029
1,759
5
Arrowtooth Flounder.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0021
8,000
17
C..............
0.0280
30,000
840
E..............
0.0002
5,000
1
Flathead sole................ Annual.......... W..............
0.0036
2,000
7
C..............
0.0213
5,000
107
E..............
0.0009
3,576
3
Pacific ocean Perch.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0023
2,797
6
C..............
0.0748
10,377
776
E..............
0.0466
3,819
178
Northern Rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
0.0003
2,549
1
C..............
0.0277
2,259
63
Rougheye Rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
81
0
C..............
0.0237
869
21
E..............
0.0124
363
5
Shortraker Rockfish.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
134
0
C..............
0.0218
325
7
E..............
0.0110
455
5
Other Rockfish............... Annual.......... W..............
0.0034
212
1
C..............
0.1699
507
86
E..............
0.0000
473
0
Pelagic shelf Rockfish....... Annual.......... W..............
0.0001
607
0
C..............
0.0000
3,035
0
E..............
0.0067
1,085
7
Demersal shelf rockfish...... Annual.......... SEO............
0.0020
295
1
Thornyhead Rockfish.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0280
425
12
C..............
0.0280
637
18
Page 11767
E..............
0.0280
708
20
Atka mackerel................ Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0309
2,000
62
Big skates................... Annual.......... W..............
0.0063
598
4
C..............
0.0063
2,049
13
E..............
0.0063
681
4
Longnose Skates.............. Annual.......... W..............
0.0063
81
0
C..............
0.0063
2,009
13
E..............
0.0063
762
5
Other skates................. Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0063
2,093
13
Other species................ Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0063
4,500
28
\1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
\2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
The halibut PSC sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA CVs in the GOA are based on the aggregate retained groundfish catch by non-exempt AFA
CVs in each PSC target category from 1995 through 1997 divided by the retained catch of all vessels in that fishery from 1995 through 1997
(Sec. 679.64(b)(4)). Table 18 lists the final 2010 and 2011 non-exempt
AFA CV halibut PSC limits for vessels using trawl gear in the GOA.
Table 18--Final 2010 and 2011 Non-Exempt AFA CV Halibut Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) Limits for Vessels Using
Trawl Gear in the GOA
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of 1995- 1997 non-
2010 and 2011 exempt AFA CV 2010 and 2011 non- exempt
Season
Season dates
Target fishery retained catch
PSC limit
AFA CV PSC to total
limit retained catch
-
January 20-April shallow-water..
0.340
450
153 1. deep-water.....
0.070
100
7
-
April 1-July 1.. shallow-water..
0.340
100
34 deep-water.....
0.070
300
21
-
July 1-September shallow-water..
0.340
200
68 1. deep-water.....
0.070
400
28
-
September 1-
shallow-water..
0.340
150
51
October 1. deep-water.....
0.070
0
0
-
October 1-
all targets....
0.205
300
62
December 31.
Non-AFA Crab Vessel Groundfish Harvest Limitations
Section 680.22 establishes groundfish catch limits for vessels with a history of participation in the Bering Sea snow crab fishery to prevent these vessels from using the increased flexibility provided by the Crab Rationalization Program to expand their level of participation in the GOA groundfish fisheries. Sideboard limits restrict the vessels' catch to their collective historical landings in each GOA groundfish fishery (except the fixed-gear sablefish fishery). Sideboard limits also apply to catch made using an LLP license derived from the history of a restricted vessel, even if that LLP license is used on another vessel.
Sideboard limits for non-AFA crab vessels in the GOA are based on their traditional harvest levels of TAC in groundfish fisheries covered by the FMP. Sections 680.22(d) and (e) base the groundfish sideboard limitations in the GOA on the retained catch by non-AFA crab vessels of each sideboard species from 1996 through 2000 divided by the total retained harvest of that species over the same period. Tables 19 and 20 list the final 2010 and 2011 GOA groundfish sideboard limits for non-
AFA crab vessels. All targeted or incidental catch of sideboard species made by non-AFA crab vessels will be
Page 11768
deducted from the sideboard limits specified in Tables 19 and 20.
Vessels exempt from Pacific cod sideboards are those that landed less than 45,359 kilograms of Bering Sea snow crab and more than 500 mt of groundfish (in round weight equivalents) from the GOA between
January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2000, and any vessel named on an LLP that was generated in whole or in part by the fishing history of a vessel meeting the criteria in Sec. 680.22(a)(3).
Table 19--Final 2010 GOA Non-American Fisheries Act Crab Vessel Groundfish Harvest Sideboard Limits
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of 1996- 2000 non-AFA
2010 non-AFA crab vessel
crab vessel
Species
Season/gear
Area/component catch to 1996-
2010 TAC
sideboard 2000 total
limit harvest
Pollock...................... A Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.0098
5,551
54
January 20-
March 10.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
8,414
26
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
4,403
1
B Season--March Shumagin (610).
0.0098
5,551
54 10-May 31.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
9,925
31
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
2,891
1
C Season--August Shumagin (610).
0.0098
7,577
74 25-October 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
4,878
15
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
5,912
1
D Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.0098
7,577
74
October 1-
November 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
4,878
15
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
5,912
1
Annual.......... WYK (640)......
0.0000
2,031
0
SEO (650)......
0.0000
9,245
0
Pacific cod.................. A Season \1\--
W inshore......
0.0902
11,212
1,011
January 1-June 10.
W offshore.....
0.2046
1,246
255
C inshore......
0.0383
19,862
761
C offshore.....
0.2074
2,207
458
B Season \2\--
W inshore......
0.0902
7,475
674
September 1-
December 31.
W offshore.....
0.2046
831
170
C inshore......
0.0383
13,242
507
C offshore.....
0.2074
1,471
305
Annual.......... E inshore......
0.0110
1,815
20
E offshore.....
0.0000
202
0
Sablefish.................... Annual, trawl
W..............
0.0000
332
0 gear.
C..............
0.0000
902
0
E..............
0.0000
210
0
Flatfish, deep-water......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0035
521
2
C..............
0.0000
2,865
0
E..............
0.0000
2,804
0
Flatfish, shallow-water...... Annual.......... W..............
0.0059
4,500
27
C..............
0.0001
13,000
1
E..............
0.0000
2,562
0
Rex sole..................... Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
1,543
0
C..............
0.0000
6,403
0
E..............
0.0000
1,783
0
Arrowtooth Flounder.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0004
8,000
3
C..............
0.0001
30,000
3
E..............
0.0000
5,000
0
Flathead Sole................ Annual.......... W..............
0.0002
2,000
0
C..............
0.0004
5,000
2
E..............
0.0000
3,441
0
Pacific ocean Perch.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
2,895
0
C..............
0.0000
10,737
0
Page 11769
E..............
0.0000
3,952
0
Northern Rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
0.0005
2,703
1
C..............
0.0000
2,395
0
Rougheye Rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
0.0067
80
1
C..............
0.0047
862
4
E..............
0.0008
360
0
Shortraker Rockfish.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0013
134
0
C..............
0.0012
325
0
E..............
0.0009
455
0
Other Rockfish............... Annual.......... W..............
0.0035
212
1
C..............
0.0033
507
2
E..............
0.0000
473
0
Pelagic shelf Rockfish....... Annual.......... W..............
0.0017
650
1
C..............
0.0000
3,249
0
E..............
0.0000
1,160
0
Demersal shelf Rockfish...... Annual.......... SEO............
0.0000
295
0
Thornyhead Rockfish.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0047
425
2
C..............
0.0066
637
4
E..............
0.0045
708
3
Atka mackerel................ Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0000
2,000
0
Big skate.................... Annual.......... W..............
0.0392
598
23
C..............
0.0159
2,049
33
E..............
0.0000
681
0
Longnose Skate............... Annual.......... W..............
0.0392
81
3
C..............
0.0159
2,009
32
E..............
0.0000
762
0
Other skates................. Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0176
2,093
37
Other species................ Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0176
4,500
79
\1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
\2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
Table 20--Final 2011 GOA Non-American Fisheries Act Crab Vessel Groundfish Harvest Sideboard Limits
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of 1996- 2000 non-AFA
2011 non-AFA crab vessel
crab vessel
Species
Season/gear
Area/component catch to 1996-
2011 TAC
sideboard 2000 total
limit harvest
Pollock...................... A Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.0098
7,342
72
January 20-
March 10.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
11,129
34
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
5,823
1
B Season--March Shumagin (610).
0.0098
7,342
72 10-May 31.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
13,128
41
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
3,824
1
C Season--August Shumagin (610).
0.0098
10,022
98 25-October 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
6,451
20
Page 11770
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
7,820
2
D Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.0098
10,022
98
October 1-
November 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.0031
6,451
20
Kodiak (630)...
0.0002
7,820
2
Annual.......... WYK (640)......
0.0000
2,686
0
SEO (650)......
0.0000
9,245
0
Pacific cod.................. A Season \1\
W inshore......
0.0902
13,877
1,252
January 1-June 10.
W offshore.....
0.2046
1,542
315
C inshore......
0.0383
24,583
942
C offshore.....
0.2074
2,731
566
B Season \2\
W inshore......
0.0902
9,252
835
September 1-
December 31.
W offshore.....
0.2046
1,028
210
C inshore......
0.0383
16,389
628
C offshore.....
0.2074
1,821
378
Annual.......... E inshore......
0.0110
2,246
25
E offshore.....
0.0000
250
0
Sablefish.................... Annual, trawl
W..............
0.0000
298
0 gear.
C..............
0.0000
808
0
E..............
0.0000
188
0
Flatfish, deep-water......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0035
530
2
C..............
0.0000
2,928
0
E..............
0.0000
2,867
0
Flatfish, shallow-water...... Annual.......... W..............
0.0059
4,500
27
C..............
0.0001
13,000
1
E..............
0.0000
2,562
0
Rex sole..................... Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
1,541
0
C..............
0.0000
6,312
0
E..............
0.0000
1,759
0
Arrowtooth Flounder.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0004
8,000
3
C..............
0.0001
30,000
3
E..............
0.0000
5,000
0
Flathead Sole................ Annual.......... W..............
0.0002
2,000
0
C..............
0.0004
5,000
2
E..............
0.0000
3,576
0
Pacific ocean Perch.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0000
2,797
0
C..............
0.0000
10,377
0
E..............
0.0000
3,819
0
Northern Rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
0.0005
2,549
1
C..............
0.0000
2,259
0
Rougheye Rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
0.0067
81
1
C..............
0.0047
869
4
E..............
0.0008
363
0
Shortraker Rockfish.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0013
134
0
C..............
0.0012
325
0
E..............
0.0009
455
0
Other Rockfish............... Annual.......... W..............
0.0035
212
1
C..............
0.0033
507
2
E..............
0.0000
473
0
Page 11771
Pelagic shelf Rockfish....... Annual.......... W..............
0.0017
607
1
C..............
0.0000
3,035
0
E..............
0.0000
1,085
0
Demersal shelf............... Annual.......... SEO............
0.0000
295
0
Rockfish.....................
Thornyhead Rockfish.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.0047
425
2
C..............
0.0066
637
4
E..............
0.0045
708
3
Atka mackerel................ Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0000
2,000
0
Big skate.................... Annual.......... W..............
0.0392
598
23
C..............
0.0159
2,049
33
E..............
0.0000
681
Longnose Skate............... Annual.......... W..............
0.0392
81
3
C..............
0.0159
2,009
32
E..............
0.0000
762
0
Other skates................. Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0176
2,093
37
Other species................ Annual.......... Gulfwide.......
0.0176
4,500
79
\1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
\2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
Rockfish Program Groundfish Sideboard Limitations and Halibut Mortality
Limitations
Section 679.82(d) establishes sideboards to limit the ability of participants eligible for the Rockfish Program to harvest fish in fisheries other than the Central GOA rockfish fisheries. The Rockfish
Program provides certain economic advantages to harvesters, who could use this economic advantage to increase their participation in other fisheries, thus possibly adversely affecting participants in other fisheries. The final sideboards for 2010 and 2011 limit the total amount of catch that could be taken by eligible harvesters and limit the amount of halibut mortality to historic levels. The sideboard measures are in effect only during the month of July. Traditionally, the Central GOA rockfish fisheries opened in July. The sideboards are designed to restrict fishing during the historical season for the fishery, but allow eligible rockfish harvesters to participate in fisheries before or after the historical rockfish season. Tables 21 and 22 list the final 2010 and 2011 Rockfish Program harvest limits in the
WYK District and the Western GOA. Table 23 lists the final 2010 and 2011 Rockfish Program halibut mortality limits for catcher/processors and CVs.
Table 21--Final 2010 Rockfish Program Harvest Limits by Sector for WYK District and Western Regulatory Area by the Catcher/Processor (C/P) and Catcher Vessel (CV) Sectors
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
C/P sector CV sector
2010 C/P
2010 CV
Area
Fishery
(% of TAC) (% of TAC) 2010 TAC
limit
limit
West Yakutat District........ Pelagic shelf
72.4
1.7
434
314
7 rockfish.
Pacific ocean
76.0
2.9
2,004
1,523
58 perch.
Western GOA.................. Pelagic shelf
63.3
0
650
411
0 rockfish.
Pacific ocean
61.1
0
2,895
1,769
0 perch.
Northern
78.9
0
2,703
2,133
0 rockfish.
Page 11772
Table 22--Final 2011 Rockfish Program Harvest Limits by Sector for WYK District and Western Regulatory Area by the Catcher/Processor (C/P) and Catcher Vessel (CV) Sectors
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
C/P sector CV sector
2011 C/P
2011 CV
Area
Fishery
(% of TAC) (% of TAC) 2011 TAC
limit
limit
West Yakutat District........ Pelagic shelf
72.4
1.7
405
293
7 rockfish.
Pacific ocean
76.0
2.9
1,937
1,472
56 perch.
Western GOA.................. Pelagic shelf
63.3
0
607
384
0 rockfish.
Pacific ocean
61.1
0
2,797
1,709
0 perch.
Northern
78.9
0
2,549
2,011
0 rockfish.
Table 23--Final 2010 and 2011 Rockfish Program Halibut Mortality Limits for the Catcher/Processor (C/P) and Catcher Vessel (CV) Sectors
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Annual shallow-
Annual deep-
Shallow-water
Deep-water
Annual halibut
water complex
water complex
Sector
complex halibut complex halibut mortality limit
halibut PSC
halibut PSC
PSC sideboard
PSC sideboard
(mt)
sideboard limit sideboard limit ratio (percent) ratio (percent)
(mt)
(mt)
C/P...........................................................
0.54
3.99
2,000
11
80
CV............................................................
6.32
1.08
2,000
126
22
GOA Amendment 80 Vessel Groundfish Harvest and PSC Limits
Amendment 80 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area, hereinafter referred to as the ``Amendment 80 program,'' established a limited access privilege program for the non-AFA trawl catcher/processor sector. In order to limit the ability of participants eligible for the Amendment 80 program to expand their harvest efforts in the GOA, the Amendment 80 program established groundfish and halibut PSC catch limits for
Amendment 80 program participants.
Section 679.92 establishes groundfish harvesting sideboard limits on all Amendment 80 program vessels, other than the F/V GOLDEN FLEECE, to amounts no greater than the limits shown in Table 37 to part 679.
Sideboard limits in the GOA are for pollock in the Western and Central
Regulatory Areas and in the WYK District, for Pacific cod gulfwide, for
Pacific ocean perch and pelagic shelf rockfish in the Western
Regulatory Area and WYK District, and for northern rockfish in the
Western Regulatory Area. The harvest of Pacific ocean perch, pelagic shelf rockfish, and northern rockfish in the Central Regulatory Area of the GOA is subject to regulation under the Central GOA Rockfish
Program. Amendment 80 program vessels not qualified under the Rockfish
Program are excluded from directed fishing for these rockfish species in the Central GOA. Under regulations, the F/V GOLDEN FLEECE is prohibited from directed fishing for pollock, Pacific cod, Pacific ocean perch, pelagic shelf rockfish, and northern rockfish in the GOA.
Groundfish sideboard limits for Amendment 80 program vessels operating in the GOA are based on their average aggregate harvests from 1998 to 2004. Tables 24 and 25 list the final 2010 and 2011 sideboard limits for Amendment 80 program vessels, respectively. All targeted or incidental catch of sideboard species made by Amendment 80 program vessels will be deducted from the sideboard limits in Tables 24 and 25.
Table 24--Final 2010 GOA Groundfish Sideboard Limits for Amendment 80 Program Vessels
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of
Apportionments
Amendment 80
2010 Amendment
Species
and allocations
Area
sector vessels 2010 TAC (mt)
80 vessel by season
1998-2004
sideboards catch to TAC
(mt)
Pollock...................... A Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.003
5,551
17
January 20-
February 25.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
8,414
17
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
4,403
9
B Season--March Shumagin (610).
0.003
5,551
17 10-May 31.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
9,925
20
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
2,891
6
C Season--August Shumagin (610).
0.003
7,577
23 25-September 15.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
4,878
10
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
5,912
12
Page 11773
D Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.003
7,577
23
October 1-
November 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
4,878
10
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
5,912
12
Annual.......... WYK (640)......
0.002
2,031
5
Pacific cod.................. A Season \1\--
W..............
0.020
12,458
249
January 1-June 10.
C..............
0.044
22,069
971
B Season \2\--
W..............
0.020
8,306
166
September 1-
December 31.
C..............
0.044
14,713
647
Annual.......... WYK............
0.034
2,017
69
Pacific ocean perch.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.994
2,895
2,878
WYK............
0.961
2,004
1,926
Northern rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
1.000
2,703
2,703
Pelagic shelf rockfish....... Annual.......... W..............
0.764
650
497
WYK............
0.896
434
389
\1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
\2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
Table 25--Final 2011 GOA Groundfish Sideboard Limits for Amendment 80 Program Vessels
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Ratio of
Apportionments
Amendment 80
2011 Amendment
Species
and allocations
Area
sector vessels 2011 TAC (mt)
80 vessel by season
1998-2004
sideboards catch to TAC
(mt)
Pollock...................... A Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.003
7,342
22
January 20-
February 25.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
11,129
22
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
5,823
12
B Season--March Shumagin (610).
0.003
7,342
22 10-May 31.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
13,128
26
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
3,824
8
C Season--August Shumagin (610).
0.003
10,022
30 25-September 15.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
6,451
13
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
7,820
16
D Season--
Shumagin (610).
0.003
10,022
30
October 1-
November 1.
Chirikof (620).
0.002
6,451
13
Kodiak (630)...
0.002
7,820
16
Annual.......... WYK (640)......
0.002
2,686
5
Pacific cod.................. A Season\1\--
W..............
0.020
15,419
308
January 1-June 10.
C..............
0.044
27,314
1,202
B Season\2\--
W..............
0.020
10,280
206
September 1-
December 31.
C..............
0.044
18,210
801
Annual.......... WYK............
0.034
2,496
85
Pacific ocean perch.......... Annual.......... W..............
0.994
2,797
2,780
WYK............
0.961
1,937
1,861
Northern rockfish............ Annual.......... W..............
1.000
2,549
2,549
Pelagic shelf rockfish....... Annual.......... W..............
0.764
607
464
WYK............
0.896
405
363
\1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
\2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
Page 11774
The PSC sideboard limits for Amendment 80 program vessels in the
GOA are based on the historic use of halibut PSC by Amendment 80 program vessels in each PSC target category from 1998 through 2004.
These values are slightly lower than the average historic use to accommodate two factors: Allocation of halibut PSC Cooperative Quotas
(CQs) under the Central GOA Rockfish Program and the exemption of the
F/V GOLDEN FLEECE from this restriction (Sec. 679.92(b)(2)). Table 26 lists the final 2010 and 2011 halibut PSC limits for Amendment 80 program vessels, as proscribed at Table 38 to 50 CFR part 679.
Table 26--Final 2010 and 2011 Halibut PSC Limits for Amendment 80 Program Vessels in the GOA
Values are rounded to nearest metric ton
Historic
Amendment 80
2010 and 2011 use of the
2010 and 2011 Amendment 80
Season
Season dates
Target fishery annual halibut annual PSC
vessel PSC
PSC limit
limit (mt)
limit (mt) catch (ratio)
-
January 20-April 1 shallow-water.....
0.0048
2,000
10 deep-water........
0.0115
2,000
23 2....................... April 1-July 1.... shallow-water.....
0.0189
2,000
38 deep-water........
0.1072
2,000
214 3....................... July 1-September 1 shallow-water.....
0.0146
2,000
29 deep-water........
0.0521
2,000
104 4....................... September 1-
shallow-water.....
0.0074
2,000
15
October 1. deep-water........
0.0014
2,000
3 5....................... October 1-December shallow-water.....
0.0227
2,000
45 31. deep-water........
0.0371
2,000
74
Directed Fishing Closures
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(i), if the Regional Administrator determines (1) that any allocation or apportionment of a target species or ``other species'' category allocated or apportioned to a fishery will be reached; or (2) with respect to pollock and Pacific cod, that an allocation or apportionment to an inshore or offshore component allocation will be reached, the Regional Administrator may establish a
DFA for that species or species group. If the Regional Administrator establishes a DFA and that allowance is or will be reached before the end of the fishing year, NMFS will prohibit directed fishing for that species or species group in the specified GOA regulatory area or district (Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iii)).
The Regional Administrator has determined that the following TAC amounts in Table 27 are necessary as incidental catch to support other anticipated groundfish fisheries for the 2010 and 2011 fishing years:
Table 27--2010 and 2011 Directed Fishing Closures in the GOA
Amounts for incidental catch in other directed fisheries are in metric tons
Target
Area/component/gear
Incidental catch amount
Atka mackerel......................... all...................... 2,000.
Thornyhead rockfish................... all...................... 1,770.
Shortraker rockfish................... all...................... 914.
Rougheye rockfish..................... all...................... 1,302 (2010); 1,313 (2011).
Other rockfish........................ all...................... 1,192.
Sablefish............................. all/trawl................ 1,444 (2010); 1,295 (2011).
Big skate............................. all...................... 3,328.
Longnose skate........................ all...................... 2,852.
Other skates.......................... all...................... 2,093.
Pollock............................... all/offshore............. unknown\1\.
\1\Pollock is closed to directed fishing in the GOA by the offshore component under Sec. 679.20(a)(6)(i).
Consequently, in accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(i), the
Regional Administrator establishes the DFA for the species or species groups listed in Table 27 as zero. Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iii), NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for those species, areas, gear types, and components in the GOA listed in Table 27. These closures will remain in effect through 2400 hrs, A.l.t.,
December 31, 2011.
Section 679.64(b)(5) provides for management of AFA CV groundfish harvest limits and PSC bycatch limits using directed fishing closures and PSC closures according to procedures set out at Sec. Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iv), 679.21(d)(8), and 679.21(e)(3)(v). The Regional
Administrator has determined that, in addition to the closures listed above, many of the non-exempt AFA CV sideboard limits listed in Tables 16 and 17 are necessary as incidental catch to support other anticipated groundfish fisheries for the 2010 and 2011 fishing years.
In accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iv), the Regional Administrator sets the DFAs for the species and species groups in Table 28 at zero.
Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iii), NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing by non-exempt AFA CVs in the GOA for the species and specified areas listed in Table 28. These closures will remain in effect through 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2011.
Page 11775
Table 28--2010 and 2011 Non-Exempt AFA CV Sideboard Directed Fishing
Closures for All Gear Types in the GOA
Amounts for incidental catch in other directed fisheries are in metric tons
Regulatory area/
Incidental catch
Species
district
amount
Pacific cod................. Eastern............. 16 (inshore) and 2
(offshore) in 2010. 18 (inshore) and 2
(offshore) in 2011.
Deep-water flatfish......... Western............. 0.
Rex sole.................... Eastern and Western. 5 and 1.
Flathead sole............... Eastern and Western. 3 and 7.
Arrowtooth flounder......... Eastern and Western. 1 and 17.
Pacific ocean perch......... Western............. 7 in 2010. 6 in 2011.
Northern rockfish........... Western............. 1.
Pelagic shelf rockfish...... Entire GOA.......... 0 (W), 0 (C), 8 (E) in 2010. 0 (W), 0 (C), 7 (E) in 2011.
Demersal shelf rockfish..... SEO District........ 1
Section 680.22 provides for the management of non-AFA crab vessel
GHLs using directed fishing closures in accordance with Sec. 680.22(e)(2) and (3). The Regional Administrator has determined that the non-AFA crab vessel sideboards listed in Tables 19 and 20 are insufficient to support a directed fishery and set the sideboard DFA at zero, with the exception of Pacific cod in the Western and Central
Regulatory Areas. Therefore, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing by non-AFA crab vessels in the GOA for all species and species groups listed in Tables 19 and 20, with the exception of Pacific cod in the
Western and Central Regulatory Areas.
Section 679.82 provides for the management of Rockfish Program sideboard limits using directed fishing closures in accordance with
Sec. 679.82(d)(7)(i) and (ii). The Regional Administrator has determined that the CV sideboards listed in Tables 21 and 22 are insufficient to support a directed fishery and set the sideboard DFA at zero. Therefore, NMFS is closing directed fishing for pelagic shelf rockfish and Pacific ocean perch in the WYK District and the Western
Regulatory Area and for northern rockfish in the Western Regulatory
Area by CVs participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program during the month of July in 2010 and 2011. These closures will remain in effect through 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2011.
Closures implemented under the 2009 and 2010 Gulf of Alaska harvest specifications for groundfish (74 FR 7333, February 17, 2009) remain effective under authority of these final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications, and are posted at the following Web sites: http:// alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/index/infobulletins/infobulletins.asp?Yr=2010, and http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/2010/status.htm. While these closures are in effect, the maximum retainable amounts at Sec. 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time during a fishing trip. These closures to directed fishing are in addition to closures and prohibitions found in regulations at 50 CFR part 679. NMFS may implement other closures during the 2010 and 2011 fishing years as necessary for effective conservation and management.
Response to Comments
NMFS received three letters of comment, which included six distinct comments, in response to the proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications (74 FR 62533, November 30, 2009). These letters were from an individual, an environmental organization, and a company involved in the guided Pacific halibut sport fishery in Alaska, respectively. These comments are summarized and responded to below.
Comment 1: The commenter raises general concerns about NMFS's management of fisheries, asserting that fishery policies have not benefited American citizens. The commenter also asserts that NMFS does not enforce fisheries regulations and should not be allowed to manage commercial fisheries.
Response: This comment is not specifically related to the proposed rule. The comment recommends broad changes to fisheries management and provides opinions of the Federal Government's general management of marine resources that are outside the scope of this action. The comment did not raise new relevant issues or concerns that have not been explained in the preamble to the proposed rule or addressed in the SAFE reports and other analyses prepared to support the GOA groundfish harvest specifications.
Comment 2: The comment asserts that the groundfish quotas are too high.
Response: The harvest specifications process is intended to foster conservation and management of marine resources. This process incorporates the best available scientific information from the most recent stock assessment and fisheries evaluation reports prepared by multi-disciplinary teams of scientists. Such reports contain the most recent scientific information on the condition of various groundfish stocks, as well as the condition of other ecosystem components and economic data about Alaska groundfish fisheries. This suite of information allows the Council to make scientifically-based recommendations for annual catch limits that do not exceed, on a species-by-species basis, the OFLs and ABCs established for each GOA target species managed under the FMP.
Comment 3: Overfishing is having a detrimental effect on the health of oceans and coastal communities.
Response: This comment does not specially address the proposed 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications for the GOA. None of the species encompassed by these harvest specifications are overfished or subject to overfishing.
Comment 4: The decline of pollock stocks is having a detrimental impact on marine mammals.
Response: The most recent GOA pollock stock surveys indicate that pollock stocks in this management area are increasing. Furthermore, the
EIS (see ADDRESSES) prepared for the Alaska groundfish fisheries specifications process identified a preferred harvest strategy for groundfish and concluded that the preferred harvest strategy, under existing regulations, would have no lasting adverse impacts on marine mammals and other marine life. Additionally, pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act, NMFS consults to ensure that Federal actions, including this one, do not jeopardize the
Page 11776
continued existence of any endangered or threatened marine mammal species.
Comment 5: Federal agencies are obligated to renew an EIS when conditions prevalent at the time of the EIS's development have substantially changed. Recent reductions in the amount of halibut allocated to the halibut IFQ fisheries, as well as implementation of a one-halibut daily bag limit for the guided sport fishery in 2009, constitute a substantial change in environmental conditions. NMFS should update the EIS and adopt reductions in the halibut PSC limits to address the disparity between relatively constant halibut PSC limits and decreasing IFQ halibut and sport halibut allocations.
Response: The EIS examines the environmental impacts of alternative harvest strategies for the federally managed groundfish fisheries in the GOA and the BSAI management areas. The EIS concludes that for all of the components of the environment analyzed, the effects of the harvest specifications, including PSC limits, are insignificant based on the available scientific information. That information is annually updated and incorporated into the harvest specifications process. The
EIS explains how PSC limits constrain bycatch in the groundfish fisheries, as well as how halibut bycatch is accounted for by the IPHC.
The IPHC is responsible for analyzing the status of halibut stocks and setting the constant exploitation yield (CEY). The CEY is adjusted to account for a variety of removals that occur outside of the commercial hook-and-line fisheries, including incidental catch of halibut in the groundfish fisheries.
NMFS annually prepares a SIR (see ADDRESSES) to evaluate the need to prepare a Supplemental EIS. A Supplemental EIS should be prepared if the agency makes substantial changes in a proposed action that are relevant to environmental concerns, or if significant new circumstances or information exist relevant to environmental concerns associated with the action. The 2010 SIR analyzes the information contained in the
Council's SAFE reports and other new, relevant information associated with the management of Alaska groundfish fisheries. The SIR concluded that (1) new changes to the preferred harvest strategy (the action) have not occurred and (2) the new information evaluated in the SIR does not indicate that there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts. The harvest specifications will result in environmental impacts within the scope of those analyzed and disclosed in the EIS.
Comment 6: Businesses engaged in the guided sport fishing sector in
IPHC Area 2C have suffered economic and social impacts due to the 2009 implementation of a one-halibut daily bag limit for guided sport fishermen. These impacts could be mitigated to some extent by managing the halibut PSC limit apportioned to the GOA trawl fisheries to mirror the fluctuations in the directed fishery catch limits set by the IPHC.
Response: The commercial halibut setline and groundfish trawl fisheries currently are subject to binding halibut PSC limits set by the IPHC and Council, respectively, as a part of their efforts to maintain sustainable groundfish stocks. These commercial fisheries are required to stop fishing when their halibut limits (either IFQ or PSC) are taken. Commercial groundfish fisheries are often closed due to the attainment of halibut PSC limits before target species TACs have been fully harvested. Participants in these fisheries incur significant costs to stay within their halibut catch limits. The issue regarding changes to commercial catch limits was considered during the development of the one-halibut daily bag limit (74 FR 21194, May 6, 2009). In the context of seeking economic parity between halibut resource user groups, implementing additional restrictions on the incidental catch of halibut by the commercial fishing sector is outside the scope of this action.
Classification
NMFS has determined that these final harvest specifications are consistent with the FMP and with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
This action is authorized under 50 CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an EIS for this action (see ADDRESSES) and made it available to the public on January 12, 2007 (72 FR 1512). On February 13, 2007, NMFS issued the Record of Decision (ROD) for the EIS. In
January 2010, NMFS prepared a Supplemental Information Report (SIR) for this action. Copies of the EIS, ROD, and SIR for this action are available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The EIS analyzes the environmental consequences of the groundfish harvest specifications and alternative harvest strategies on resources in the action area. The SIR evaluates the need to prepare a Supplemental EIS (SEIS) for the 2010 and 2011 groundfish harvest specifications.
A SEIS should be prepared if (1) the agency makes substantial changes in the proposed action that are relevant to environmental concerns, or (2) significant new circumstances or information exist relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(1)). After reviewing the information contained in the SIR and SAFE reports, the Regional Administrator has determined that (1) approval of the 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications, which were set according to the preferred harvest strategy in the EIS, do not constitute a change in the action; and (2) there are no significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the action or its impacts.
Additionally, the 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications will result in environmental impacts within the scope of those analyzed and disclosed in the EIS. Therefore, supplemental National Environmental Protection
Act (NEPA) documentation is not necessary to implement the 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications.
The proposed harvest specifications were published in the Federal
Register on November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62533). An Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared to evaluate the impacts on small entities of alternative harvest strategies for the groundfish fisheries in the EEZ off Alaska. The public comment period ended on
December 30, 2009. No comments were received regarding the IRFA or the economic impacts of this action. A FRFA was prepared pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Copies of the IRFA and FRFA prepared for this action are available from NMFS,
Alaska Region (see ADDRESSES).
Each year, NMFS promulgates a rule establishing the harvest specifications pursuant to the adopted harvest strategy. While the harvest specification numbers may change from year to year, the harvest strategy for establishing those numbers does not change. Therefore,
NMFS is using the same IRFA and FRFA prepared in connection with the
EIS in association with this action. NMFS considers the annual rulemakings establishing the harvest specification numbers to be a series of closely-related rules stemming from the harvest strategy and representing one rule for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(c)). A summary of the FRFA follows.
The action analyzed in the FRFA is the adoption of a harvest strategy to govern the catch of groundfish in the GOA. The preferred alternative is the
Page 11777
status quo harvest strategy in which TACs fall within the range of ABCs recommended by the Council's harvest specifications process and TACs recommended by the Council. This action is taken in accordance with the
FMP prepared by the Council pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The directly regulated small entities include approximately 747 small CVs and fewer than 20 small catcher/processors. The entities directly regulated by this action harvest groundfish in the EEZ of the
GOA, and in parallel fisheries within State of Alaska waters. These include entities operating CVs and catcher/processor vessels within the action area, and entities receiving direct allocations of groundfish.
CVs and catcher/processors were considered to be small entities if they had annual gross receipts of $4 million per year or less from all economic activities, including the revenue of their affiliated operations. Data from 2005 were the most recent available to determine the number of small entities.
Estimates of first wholesale gross revenues for the GOA were used as indices of the potential impacts of the alternative harvest strategies on small entities. An index of revenues was projected to decline under the preferred alternative due to declines in ABCs for key species in the GOA. The index of revenues declined by less than four percent between 2007 and 2008, and by less than one percent between 2007 and 2009.
The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) was compared to four other alternatives. These included Alternative 1, which would have set
TACs to generate fishing rates equal to the maximum permissible ABC (if the full TAC were harvested), unless the sum of TACs exceeded the GOA
OY, in which case harvests would be limited to the OY. Alternative 3 would have set TACs to produce fishing rates equal to the most recent five-year average fishing rate. Alternative 4 would have set TACs to equal the lower limit of the GOA OY range. Alternative 5--the ``no action'' alternative--would have set TACs equal to zero.
Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 were all associated with smaller levels for important fishery TACs than Alternative 2. Estimated total first wholesale gross revenues were used as an index of potential adverse impacts to small entities. As a consequence of the lower TAC levels,
Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 all had smaller first wholesale revenue indices than Alternative 2. Thus, Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 had greater adverse impacts on small entities. Alternative 1 appeared to generate higher values of the gross revenue index for fishing operations in the
GOA than Alternative 2. A large part of the Alternative 1 GOA revenue appears to be due to the assumption that the full Alternative 1 TAC would be harvested. This increased revenue is due to increases in flatfish TACs that were much higher for Alternative 1 than for
Alternative 2. In recent years, halibut bycatch constraints in these fisheries have kept actual flatfish catches from reaching Alternative 1 levels. Therefore, a large part of the revenues associated with
Alternative 1 are unlikely to occur. Also, Alternative 2 TACs are constrained by the ABCs the Plan Teams and SSC are likely to recommend to the Council on the basis of a full consideration of biological issues. These ABCs are often less than Alternative 1's maximum permissible ABCs; therefore higher TACs under Alternative 1 may not be consistent with prudent biological management of the resource. For these reasons, Alternative 2 is the preferred alternative.
This action does not modify recordkeeping or reporting requirements, or duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any Federal rules.
Adverse impacts on marine mammals resulting from fishing activities conducted under this rule are discussed in the EIS (see ADDRESSES).
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness for this rule. Plan Team review occurred in November 2009, and Council consideration and recommendations occurred in
December 2009. Accordingly, NMFS review could not begin until January 2010. For all fisheries not currently closed because the TACs established under the final 2009 and 2010 harvest specifications (74 FR 7333, February 17, 2009) were not reached, the possibility exists that they would be closed prior to the expiration of a 30-day delayed effectiveness period, if implemented, because their TACs could be reached. Certain fisheries, such as those for pollock and Pacific cod are intensive, fast-paced fisheries. Other fisheries, such as those for flatfish, rockfish, and ``other species,'' are critical as directed fisheries and as incidental catch in other fisheries. U.S. fishing vessels have demonstrated the capacity to catch the TAC allocations in these fisheries. Any delay in allocating the final TACs in these fisheries would cause confusion to the industry and potential economic harm through unnecessary discards. Determining which fisheries may close is impossible because these fisheries are affected by several factors that cannot be predicted in advance, including fishing effort, weather, movement of fishery stocks, and market price. Furthermore, the closure of one fishery has a cascading effect on other fisheries by freeing-up fishing vessels, allowing them to move from closed fisheries to open ones, increasing the fishing capacity in those open fisheries and causing them to close at an accelerated pace.
In fisheries subject to declining sideboards, a failure to implement the updated sideboards before initial season's end could preclude the intended economic protection to the non-sideboarded sectors. Conversely, in fisheries with increasing sideboards, economic benefit could be precluded to the sideboarded sectors.
If the final harvest specifications are not effective by March 6, 2010, which is the start of the 2010 Pacific halibut season as specified by the IPHC, the hook-and-line sablefish fishery will not begin concurrently with the Pacific halibut IFQ season. This would result in confusion for the industry and economic harm from unnecessary discard of sablefish that are caught along with Pacific halibut, as both hook-and-line sablefish and Pacific halibut are managed under the same IFQ program. Immediate effectiveness of the final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications will allow the sablefish IFQ fishery to begin concurrently with the Pacific halibut IFQ season. Also, the immediate effectiveness of this action is required to provide consistent management and conservation of fishery resources based on the best available scientific information. This is particularly true of those species which have lower 2010 ABCs and TACs than those established in the 2009-2010 harvest specifications. Immediate effectiveness also would give the fishing industry the earliest possible opportunity to plan and conduct its fishing operations with respect to new information about TAC limits. Therefore, NMFS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Small Entity Compliance Guide
The following information is a plain language guide to assist small entities in complying with this final rule as required by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This final rule's primary purpose is to announce the final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications and prohibited species bycatch allowances for the groundfish fisheries of the GOA. This action is necessary to establish harvest
Page 11778
limits and associated management measures for groundfish during the 2010 and 2011 fishing years and to accomplish the goals and objectives of the FMP. This action affects all fishermen who participate in the
GOA fisheries. The specific amounts of OFL, ABC, TAC, and PSC are provided in tables to assist the reader. NMFS will announce closures of directed fishing in the Federal Register and information bulletins released by the Alaska Region. Affected fishermen should keep themselves informed of such closures.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1540 (f), 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 105-277; Pub. L. 106-31; Pub.
L. 106-554; Pub. L. 108-199; Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 109-241; Pub.
L 109-479.
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
FR Doc. 2010-5472 Filed 3-11-10; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P