Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Alaska

Federal Register: March 3, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 40)

Proposed Rules

Page 9180-9185

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr03mr09-11

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 55

EPA-R10-OAR-2009-0111; FRL-8777-6

Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for

Alaska

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule-consistency update.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to update a portion of the Outer Continental

Shelf (``OCS'') Air Regulations. Requirements applying to OCS sources located within 25 miles of States' seaward boundaries must be updated periodically to remain consistent with the requirements of the corresponding onshore area (``COA''), as mandated by the Clean Air Act

(``the Act''). The portion of the OCS air regulations that is being updated pertains to the requirements for OCS sources in the State of

Alaska. The intended effect of approving the OCS requirements for the

State of Alaska is to regulate emissions from OCS sources

Page 9181

in accordance with the requirements onshore. The change to the existing requirements discussed below is proposed to be incorporated by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations and is listed in the appendix to the OCS air regulations.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-

R10-OAR-2009-0111, by one of the following methods:

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments;

2. E-Mail: greaves.natasha@epa.gov;

3. Mail: Natasha Greaves, Federal and Delegated Air Programs Unit,

   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,

   Suite 900, Mail Stop: AWT-107, Seattle, WA 98101;

4. Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10,

   Attn: Natasha Greaves (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, 9th Floor. Such deliveries are only accepted during normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

   Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR- 2009-0111. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be

   Confidential Business Information (``CBI'') or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

   Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the

   Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

   Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101.

   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natasha Greaves, Federal and Delegated

   Air Programs Unit, Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, U.S. Environmental

   Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mail Stop:

   AWT-107, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206) 553-7079; e-mail address: greaves.natasha@epa.gov.

   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

   Table of Contents

   1. Background Information

      Why Is EPA Taking This Action?

   2. EPA's Evaluation

      What Criteria Were Used To Evaluate Rules Submitted To Update 40

      CFR Part 55?

   3. Administrative Requirements

1. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

2. Paperwork Reduction Act

3. Regulatory Flexibility Act

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

6. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal

   Governments

7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From

   Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks

8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect

   Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

   1. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

   1. Background Information

      Why Is EPA Taking This Action?

      On September 4, 1992, EPA promulgated 40 CFR part 55,\1\ which established requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources in order to attain and maintain federal and state ambient air quality standards and to comply with the provisions of part C of title I of the

      Act. Part 55 applies to all OCS sources offshore of the States except those located in the Gulf of Mexico west of 87.5 degrees longitude.

      Section 328 of the Act requires that for such sources located within 25 miles of a State's seaward boundary, the requirements shall be the same as would be applicable if the sources were located in the COA. Because the OCS requirements are based on onshore requirements, and onshore requirements may change, section 328(a)(1) requires that EPA update the

      OCS requirements as necessary to maintain consistency with onshore requirements.

      \1\ The reader may refer to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,

      December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63774), and the preamble to the final rule promulgated September 4, 1992 (57 FR 40792) for further background and information on the OCS regulations.

      Pursuant to Sec. 55.12 of the OCS rule, consistency reviews will occur (1) at least annually; (2) upon receipt of a Notice of Intent under Sec. 55.4; or (3) when a state or local agency submits a rule to

      EPA to be considered for incorporation by reference in part 55. This proposed action is being taken in response to the submittal of a Notice of Intent on January 9, 2009 by Shell Offshore, Inc. of Houston, Texas.

      Public comments received in writing within 30 days of publication of this proposed rule will be considered by EPA before publishing a final rule.

      Section 328(a) of the Act requires that EPA establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles of

      States' seaward boundaries that are the same as onshore requirements.

      To comply with this statutory mandate, EPA must incorporate applicable onshore rules into part 55 as they exist onshore. This limits EPA's flexibility in deciding which requirements will be incorporated into part 55 and prevents EPA from making substantive changes to the requirements it incorporates. As a result, EPA may be incorporating rules into part 55 that do not conform to all of EPA's state implementation plan (``SIP'') guidance or certain requirements of the

      Act.

      Consistency updates may result in the inclusion of state or local rules or regulations into part 55, even though the same rules may ultimately be disapproved for inclusion as part of the SIP. Inclusion in the OCS rule does not imply that a rule meets the requirements of the Act for SIP approval, nor does it imply that the rule will be approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP.

      Page 9182

   2. EPA's Evaluation

      What Criteria Were Used To Evaluate Rules Submitted To Update 40 CFR

      Part 55?

      In updating 40 CFR part 55, EPA reviewed the rules submitted for inclusion in part 55 to ensure that they are rationally related to the attainment or maintenance of federal or state ambient air quality standards or part C of title I of the Act, that they are not designed expressly to prevent exploration and development of the OCS and that they are applicable to OCS sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also evaluated the rules to ensure they are not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR 55.12

      (e). In addition, EPA has excluded administrative or procedural rules,\2\ and requirements that regulate toxics which are not related to the attainment and maintenance of federal and state ambient air quality standards.

      \2\ Each COA which has been delegated the authority to implement and enforce part 55, will use its administrative and procedural rules as onshore. However, in those instances where EPA has not delegated authority to implement and enforce part 55, as in Alaska,

      EPA will use its own administrative and procedural requirements to implement the substantive requirements. See 40 CFR 55.14 (c)(4).

   3. Administrative Requirements

1. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

   Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)), the

   Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') review and the requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines

   ``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:

   (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities;

   (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;

   (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or

   (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.

   This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is therefore not subject to OMB

   Review. This rule implements requirements specifically and explicitly set forth by the Congress in section 328 of the Clean Air Act, without the exercise of any policy discretion by EPA. These OCS rules already apply in the COA, and EPA has no evidence to suggest that these OCS rules have created an adverse material effect. As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this action simply updates the existing OCS requirements to make them consistent with rules in the COA.

2. Paperwork Reduction Act

   The OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in 40 CFR part 55, and by extension this update to the rules, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0249. The OMB Notice of

   Action is dated January 15, 2009. The approval expires January 31, 2012.

   OMB's Notice of Action dated January 15, 2007 indicated that the, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for collection of information under 40 CFR part 55 is estimated to average 112 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

   An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.

3. Regulatory Flexibility Act

   The Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA'') generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions.

   This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule implements requirements specifically and explicitly set forth by the Congress in section 328 of the Clean Air Act, without the exercise of any policy discretion by

   EPA. These OCS rules already apply in the COA, and EPA has no evidence to suggest that these OCS rules have had a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this action simply updates the existing OCS requirements to make them consistent with rules in the COA. Therefore,

   I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

   Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``UMRA''),

   Public Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the

   UMRA, EPA generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost- benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million of more in any one year.

   Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the

   Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that alternative was not adopted.

   Before EPA establishes any regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying potentially affected small governments,

   Page 9183

   enabling officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory requirements.

   Today's proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector in any one year. This rule implements requirements specifically and explicitly set forth by the Congress in section 328 of the Clean Air Act without the exercise of any policy discretion by EPA. These OCS rules already apply in the COA, and EPA has no evidence to suggest that these OCS rules have created an adverse material effect. As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this action simply updates the existing OCS requirements to make them consistent with rules in the COA.

5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

   Executive Orders 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255

   (August 10, 1999)), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have

   ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''

   This proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. This rule implements requirements specifically and explicitly set forth by the Congress in section 328 of the Clean Air Act, without the exercise of any policy discretion by EPA. As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this rule simply updates the existing OCS rules to make them consistent with current COA requirements. This rule does not amend the existing provisions within 40 CFR part 55 enabling delegation of OCS regulations to a COA, and this rule does not require the COA to implement the OCS rules. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.

   In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and State and local governments, EPA specifically solicits comments on this proposed rule from State and local officials.

6. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

   Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249 (November 9, 2000)), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' This rule does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal

   Government and Indian tribes and thus does not have ``tribal implications,'' within the meaning of Executive Order 13175. This rule implements requirements specifically and explicitly set forth by the

   Congress in section 328 of the Clean Air Act, without the exercise of any policy discretion by EPA. As required by section 328 of the Clean

   Air Act, this rule simply updates the existing OCS rules to make them consistent with current COA requirements. In addition, this rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. Consultation with Indian tribes is therefore not required under Executive Order 13175. Nonetheless, in the spirit of

   Executive Order 13175 and consistent with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and tribes, EPA specifically solicits comments on this proposed rule from tribal officials.

7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental

   Health Risks and Safety Risks

   Executive Order 13045: ``Protection of Children from Environmental

   Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885 (April 23, 1997)), applies to any rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.

   This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866.

   In addition, the Agency does not have reason to believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this action present a disproportional risk to children.

8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy

   Supply, Distribution, or Use

   This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,

   ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy

   Supply, Distribution, or Use'' [66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)] because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

   1. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

   Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement

   Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable laws or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide

   Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decided not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.

   As discussed above, this rule implements requirements specifically and explicitly set forth by the Congress in section 328 of the Clean

   Air Act, without the exercise of any policy discretion by EPA. As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this rule simply updates the existing OCS rules to make them consistent with current COA requirements. In the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus standards and in light of the fact that EPA is required to make the OCS rules consistent with current COA requirements, it would be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in this action. Therefore, EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards. EPA welcomes

   Page 9184

   comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking and, specifically, invites the public to identify potentially applicable voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such standards should be used in this regulation.

   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 55

   Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,

   Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference,

   Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Nitrogen oxides, Outer

   Continental Shelf, Ozone, Particulate matter, Permits, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

   Dated: February 20, 2009.

   Michelle L. Pirzadeh,

   Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.

   Title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal Regulations, is proposed to be amended as follows:

   PART 55--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 55 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: Section 328 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.) as amended by Public Law 101-549. 2. Section 55.14 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(2)(i)(A) to read as follows:

   Sec. 55.14 Requirements that apply to OCS sources located within 25 miles of States' seaward boundaries, by State.

   * * * * *

   (e) * * *

   (2) * * *

   (i) * * *

   (A) State of Alaska Requirements Applicable to OCS Sources,

   November 9, 2008.

   * * * * * 3. Appendix A to CFR part 55 is amended by revising paragraph

   (a)(1) under the heading ``Alaska'' to read as follows:

   Appendix A to Part 55--Listing of State and Local Requirements

   Incorporated by Reference Into Part 55, by State

   * * * * *

   Alaska

   (a) * * *

   (1) The following State of Alaska requirements are applicable to

   OCS Sources, December 3, 2005, Alaska Administrative Code--

   Department of Environmental Conservation. The following sections of

   Title 18, Chapter 50:

   Article 1. Ambient Air Quality Management 18 AAC 50.005. Purpose and Applicability of Chapter (effective 1/18/ 97) 18 AAC 50.010. Ambient Air Quality Standards (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.015. Air Quality Designations, Classification, and Control

   Regions (effective 1/18/97) except (d)(2)

   Table 1. Air Quality Classifications 18 AAC 50.020. Baseline Dates and Maximum Allowable Increases

   (effective 1/18/97)

   Table 2. Baseline Dates

   Table 3. Maximum Allowable Increases 18 AAC 50.025. Visibility and Other Special Protection Areas

   (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.030. State Air Quality Control Plan (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.035. Documents, Procedures, and Methods Adopted by

   Reference (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.040. Federal Standards Adopted by Reference (effective 1/ 18/97) except (a)(H), (a)(I). (a)(N) through (a)(P), (a)(R) through

   (a)(U), (a)(W), (a)(Y), (a)(AA), (a)(CC) through (a)(EE),

   (a)(II)(a)(KK), (c)(4), (c)(5), (c)(12), (c)(14) through (c)(16),

   (c)(18), (c)(20), (c)(25), (c)(26) through (c)(29), (c)(30), (c)(31) and (g) 18 AAC 50.045. Prohibitions (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.050. Incinerator Emissions Standards (effective 1/18/97)

   Table 4. Particulate Matter Standards for Incinerators 18 AAC 50.055. Industrial Processes and Fuel-Burning Equipment

   (effective 1/18/97) except (a)(3) through (a)(9), (b)(2)(A), (b)(4) through (b)(6), (e) and (f) 18 AAC 50.065. Open Burning (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.070. Marine Vessel Visible Emission Standards (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.075. Wood-Fired Heating Device Visible Emission Standards

   (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.080. Ice Fog Standards (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.085. Volatile Liquid Storage Tank Emission Standards

   (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.090. Volatile Liquid Loading Racks and Delivery Tank

   Emission Standards (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.100. Nonroad Engines (effective 10/1/04) 18 AAC 50.110. Air Pollution Prohibited (effective 5/26/72)

   Article 2. Program Administration 18 AAC 50.200. Information Requests (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.201. Ambient Air Quality Investigation (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.205. Certification (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.215. Ambient Air Quality Analysis Methods (effective 1/18/ 97)

   Table 5. Significant Impact Levels (SILs) 18 AAC 50.220. Enforceable Test Methods (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.225. Owner-Requested Limits (effective 1/18/97) except (c) through (g) 18 AAC 50.230. Preapproved Emission Limits (effective 1/18/97) except (d) 18 AAC 50.235. Unavoidable Emergencies and Malfunctions (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.240. Excess Emissions (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.245. Air Episodes and Advisories (effective 1/18/97)

   Table 6. Concentrations Triggering an Air Episode 18 AAC 50.260. Guidance for Best Available Retrofit Technology under the Regional Haze Rule (effective 12/30/07)

   Article 3. Major Stationary Source Permits 18 AAC 50.301. Permit Continuity (effective 10/1/04) except (b) 18 AAC 50.302. Construction Permits (effective 10/01/04) 18 AAC 50.306. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permits

   (effective 10/01/04) except (c)(2) and (e) 18 AAC 50.311. Nonattainment Area Major Stationary Source Permits

   (effective 10/01/04) except (c) 18 AAC 50.316. Preconstruction Review for Construction or

   Reconstruction of a Major Source of Hazardous Air Pollutants

   (effective 10/01/04) except (c) 18 AAC 50.321. Case-By-Case Maximum Achievable Control Technology

   (effective 12/01/04) 18 AAC 50.326. Title V Operating Permits (effective 10/01/04) except

   (c)(1), (h), (i)(3), (j)(5), (j)(6), (k)(1)(k)(3), (k)(5), and

   (k)(6) 18 AAC 50.345. Construction, Minor and Operating Permits: Standard

   Permit Conditions (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.346. Construction and Operating Permits: Other Permit

   Conditions (effective 10/01/04)

   Table 7. Standard Operating Permit Condition

   Article 4. User Fees 18 AAC 50.400. Permit Administration Fees (effective 1/18/97) except

   (c)(1) through (c)(3), (c)(6), (k)(3) and (m)(3) 18 AAC 50.403. Negotiated Service Agreements (effective 1/29/05) 18 AAC 50.405. Transition Process for Permit Fees (effective 1/29/ 05) 18 AAC 50.410. Emission Fees (effective 1/18/97) 18 AAC 50.499. Definition for User Fee Requirements (effective 1/29/ 05)

   Article 5. Minor Permits 18 AAC 50.502. Minor Permits for Air Quality Protection (effective 10/1/04) except (b)(1) through (b)(3), (b)(5), (d)(1) and (d)(2) 18 AAC 50.508. Minor Permits Requested by the Owner or Operator

   (effective 10/1/04) 18 AAC 50.509. Construction of a Pollution Control Project without a

   Permit (effective 10/1/04) 18 AAC 50.540. Minor Permit: Application (effective 10/1/04) 18 AAC 50.542. Minor Permit: Review and Issuance (effective 10/1/04) except (a), (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(4), (b)(5), and (d) 18 AAC 50.544. Minor Permits: Content (effective 10/1/04) 18 AAC 50.546. Minor Permits: Revisions (effective 10/1/04) 18 AAC 50.560. General Minor Permits (effective 10/1/04) except (b)

   Page 9185

   Article 9. General Provisions 18 AAC 50.990. Definitions (effective 1/18/97)

   * * * * *

   FR Doc. E9-4465 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am

   BILLING CODE 6560-50-P