Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Johnson County, Indiana, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area

Citation85 FR 637
Record Number2019-28008
Published date07 January 2020
SectionRules and Regulations
CourtPersonnel Management Office
Federal Register, Volume 85 Issue 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2020)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2020)]
                [Rules and Regulations]
                [Page 637]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-28008]
                ========================================================================
                Rules and Regulations
                 Federal Register
                ________________________________________________________________________
                This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
                having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
                to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
                under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
                The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
                ========================================================================
                Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 4 / Tuesday, January 7, 2020 / Rules
                and Regulations
                [[Page 637]]
                OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
                5 CFR Part 532
                RIN 3206-AN93
                Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Johnson County, Indiana,
                to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
                AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
                ACTION: Final rule.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final
                rule to define Johnson County, Indiana, as an area of application
                county to the Hardin-Jefferson, Kentucky, nonappropriated fund (NAF)
                Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because
                there is one NAF FWS employee working in Johnson County, and the county
                is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.
                DATES:
                 Effective date: This regulation is effective February 6, 2020.
                 Applicability date: This change applies on the first day of the
                first applicable pay period beginning on or after February 6, 2020.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
                (202) 606-2858 or by email at [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 20, 2019, OPM issued a proposed
                rule (84 FR 49483) to define Johnson County, IN, as an area of
                application county to the Hardin-Jefferson, KY, NAF FWS wage area.
                 The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the
                national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on
                matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, reviewed and recommended
                these changes by consensus.
                 The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period, during which OPM
                received no comments.
                Regulatory Impact Analysis
                 This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
                terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
                and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76
                FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
                Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
                 This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
                this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
                Regulatory Flexibility Act
                 OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic
                impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will
                affect only Federal agencies and employees.
                Federalism
                 We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order
                13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any
                negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State,
                local, or tribal governments.
                Civil Justice Reform
                 This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in
                Executive Order 12988.
                Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
                 This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
                tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
                million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
                affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
                under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
                Congressional Review Act
                 This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and
                organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
                obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as
                that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the
                Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
                Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
                Paperwork Reduction Act
                 This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping
                requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
                List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
                 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
                Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
                Office of Personnel Management.
                Alexys Stanley,
                Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
                 Accordingly, OPM amends 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
                PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
                5 U.S.C. 552.
                0
                2. In Appendix D to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area
                listing for the State of Kentucky to read as follows:
                Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage
                * * * * *
                 Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas
                
                
                
                
                 * * * * *
                 KENTUCKY
                
                 Christian-Montgomery
                
                 Survey Area
                Kentucky:
                 Christian
                Tennessee:
                 Montgomery
                
                 Area of Application. Survey area.
                
                 Hardin-Jefferson
                Kentucky:
                 Hardin
                 Jefferson
                
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
                Indiana:
                 Jefferson
                 Johnson
                 Martin
                Kentucky:
                 Fayette
                 Madison
                 Warren
                
                * * * * *
                [FR Doc. 2019-28008 Filed 1-6-20; 8:45 am]
                 BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT