Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Little Rock, Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas

Published date13 February 2020
Citation85 FR 8205
Record Number2020-02833
SectionProposed rules
CourtPersonnel Management Office
Federal Register, Volume 85 Issue 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 8205-8207]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2020-02833]
                ========================================================================
                Proposed Rules
                 Federal Register
                ________________________________________________________________________
                This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
                the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
                notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
                the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
                ========================================================================
                Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 /
                Proposed Rules
                [[Page 8205]]
                OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
                5 CFR Part 532
                RIN 3206-AN95
                Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Little Rock,
                Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System
                Wage Areas
                AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
                ACTION: Proposed rule.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed
                rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of the Little Rock,
                Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, appropriated fund Federal Wage System
                (FWS) wage areas. The proposed rule would redefine the Fort Chaffee
                portion of Franklin County, AR, to the Tulsa wage area. This change is
                based on a recent consensus recommendation of the Federal Prevailing
                Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC).
                DATES: Send comments on or before March 16, 2020.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
                Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:
                 Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
                Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
                 All submissions received must include the agency name and docket
                number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and
                other submissions from members of the public is to make these
                submissions available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov
                as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers
                or contact information.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
                (202) 606-2838 or by email at [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is issuing a proposed rule to redefine
                the Little Rock, AR, and Tulsa, OK, appropriated fund FWS wage areas.
                This proposed rule would redefine the Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin
                County, AR, from the Little Rock wage area to the Tulsa wage area. This
                change is based on a recent recommendation of FPRAC, the statutory
                national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on
                matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC
                reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with
                recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that changes are
                warranted.
                 As provided by 5 CFR 532.211, this regulation allows consideration
                of the following criteria when defining wage area boundaries: distance,
                transportation facilities, and geographic features; commuting patterns;
                and similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and
                sizes of private industrial establishments.
                 In addition, under OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211(2)(b), it is
                permissible for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) to be split
                between FWS wage areas only in very unusual circumstances.
                 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defines MSAs and
                maintains and periodically updates the definitions of MSA boundaries.
                MSAs are composed of counties and are defined on the basis of a central
                urbanized area--a contiguous area of relatively high population
                density. Additional surrounding counties are included in MSAs if they
                have strong social and economic ties to central counties.
                 When the boundaries of wage areas were first established in the
                1960s, there were fewer MSAs than there are today and the boundaries of
                the then existing MSAs were much smaller. Most MSAs were contained
                within the boundaries of a wage area. With each OMB update, MSAs have
                expanded and in some cases now extend beyond the boundaries of the wage
                area.
                 Crawford, Franklin, and Sebastian Counties, AR, and Sequoyah
                County, OK, comprise the Fort Smith, AR-OK MSA. The Fort Smith MSA is
                split between the Little Rock, AR, and Tulsa, OK, wage areas. Crawford,
                Sebastian, and Sequoyah Counties are part of the Tulsa wage area, and
                Franklin County is part of the Little Rock wage area.
                 Crawford, Sebastian, and Sequoyah Counties continue to be
                appropriately defined to the Tulsa wage area. Managed by the Forest
                Service, the Ozark National Forest is located in parts of 16 counties
                in northwestern Arkansas. There are FWS Forest Service employees
                working in the Ozark National Forest portion of Franklin and Stone
                Counties. To avoid splitting the Forest Service employees working in
                the Ozark National Forest between two wage areas, Franklin County also
                continues to be appropriately defined to the Little Rock wage area.
                 However, in addition to the Forest Service employees currently
                working in Franklin County, there are now three Department of the Army
                employees working in the portion of Fort Chaffee located in Franklin
                County. The Department of the Army also employs 74 FWS employees in the
                portion of Fort Chaffee located in Sebastian County. So that the FWS
                employees working at Fort Chaffee are not split between two wage areas,
                OPM proposes that the Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin County be
                redefined to the Tulsa wage area. Fort Chaffee would then be entirely
                defined to the Tulsa wage area. This change would provide equal pay
                treatment for FWS employees working at Fort Chaffee.
                 FPRAC, the national labor-management committee responsible for
                advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees,
                recommended this change by consensus. This change would be effective on
                the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after
                30 days following publication of the final regulations.
                Regulatory Impact Analysis
                 This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
                terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
                and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76
                FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
                Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
                 This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
                this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
                Regulatory Flexibility Act
                 OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic
                impact on a substantial number of small entities.
                [[Page 8206]]
                Federalism
                 We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order
                13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any
                negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State,
                local, or tribal governments.
                Civil Justice Reform
                 This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in
                Executive Order 12988.
                Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
                 This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
                tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
                million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
                affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
                under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
                Congressional Review Act
                 This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and
                organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
                obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as
                that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the
                Small Business ``Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996''
                (SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
                not apply.
                Paperwork Reduction Act
                 This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping
                requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
                List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
                 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
                Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
                Office of Personnel Management.
                Alexys Stanley,
                Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
                 Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
                PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
                5 U.S.C. 552.
                0
                2. In Appendix C to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area
                listings for the States of ``Arkansas'' and ``Oklahoma'' to read as
                follows:
                Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
                Areas
                DEFINITIONS OF WAGE AREAS AND WAGE AREA SURVEY AREAS
                
                
                
                
                 * * * * *
                 ARKANSAS
                 Little Rock
                 Survey Area
                Arkansas:
                 Jefferson
                 Pulaski
                 Saline
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
                Arkansas:
                 Arkansas
                 Ashley
                 Baxter
                 Boone
                 Bradley
                 Calhoun
                 Chicot
                 Clay
                 Clark
                 Cleburne
                 Cleveland
                 Conway
                 Dallas
                 Desha
                 Drew
                 Faulkner
                 Franklin (Does not include the Fort Chaffee portion)
                 Fulton
                 Garland
                 Grant
                 Greene
                 Hot Spring
                 Independence
                 Izard
                 Jackson
                 Johnson
                 Lawrence
                 Lincoln
                 Logan
                 Lonoke
                 Marion
                 Monroe
                 Montgomery
                 Newton
                 Ouachita
                 Perry
                 Phillips
                 Pike
                 Polk
                 Pope
                 Prairie
                 Randolph
                 Scott
                 Searcy
                 Sharp
                 Stone
                 Union
                 Van Buren
                 White
                 Woodruff
                 Yell
                
                 * * * * *
                 OKLAHOMA
                 Oklahoma City
                 Survey Area
                Oklahoma:
                 Canadian
                 Cleveland
                 McClain
                 Oklahoma
                 Pottawatomie
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
                Oklahoma:
                 Alfalfa
                 Atoka
                 Beckham
                 Blaine
                 Bryan
                 Caddo
                 Carter
                 Coal
                 Custer
                 Dewey
                 Ellis
                 Garfield
                 Garvin
                 Grady
                 Grant
                 Harper
                 Hughes
                 Johnston
                 Kingfisher
                 Lincoln
                 Logan
                 Love
                 Major
                 Marshall
                 Murray
                 Noble
                 Payne
                 Pontotoc
                 Roger Mills
                 Seminole
                 Washita
                 Woods
                 Woodward
                 Tulsa
                 Survey Area
                Oklahoma:
                 Creek
                 Mayes
                 Muskogee
                 Osage
                 Pittsburg
                 Rogers
                 Tulsa
                 Wagoner
                 Area of Application. Survey area plus:
                Arkansas:
                 Benton
                 Carroll
                 Crawford
                 Franklin (Only includes the Fort Chaffee portion)
                 Madison
                 Sebastian
                 Washington
                Missouri:
                 McDonald
                Oklahoma:
                 Adair
                 Cherokee
                 Choctaw
                 Craig
                 Delaware
                 Haskell
                 Kay
                 Latimer
                 LeFlore
                 McCurtain
                 McIntosh
                 Nowata
                [[Page 8207]]
                
                 Okfuskee
                 Okmulgee
                 Ottawa
                 Pawnee
                 Pushmataha
                 Sequoyah
                 Washington
                
                 * * * * *
                
                [FR Doc. 2020-02833 Filed 2-12-20; 8:45 am]
                 BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT