Privacy Act Regulations

Published date04 December 2019
Citation84 FR 66319
Record Number2019-25929
SectionRules and Regulations
CourtNational Foundation On The Arts And The Humanities
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2019)]
                [Rules and Regulations]
                [Pages 66319-66320]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-25929]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
                45 CFR Part 1115
                RIN 3135-AA34; 3136-AA40; 3137-AA28
                Privacy Act Regulations
                AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Endowment for the
                Humanities, Institute of Museum and Library Services, National
                Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.
                ACTION: Final rule.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: This document removes the National Foundation on the Arts and
                the Humanities' (the ``Foundation'') regulations implementing the
                Privacy Act of 1974. These regulations are obsolete because each of the
                Foundation's constituent agencies--the National Endowment for the Arts
                (``NEA''), the National Endowment for the Humanities (``NEH''), the
                Institute of Museum and Library Services (``IMLS''), and the Federal
                Council on the Arts and the Humanities (``FCAH'')--either have adopted
                their own, agency-specific regulations, or are not required to
                implement Privacy Act regulations.
                DATES: Effective December 4, 2019.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
                Counsel, National Endowment for the Humanities, (202) 606-8322;
                [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                1. Background
                 The Foundation operates under the National Foundation on the Arts
                and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended (20 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), and
                consists of NEA, NEH, IMLS, and FCAH (collectively, the ``Foundation's
                constituent agencies''). The Privacy Act regulations published at part
                1115 within Subchapter A of 45 CFR Chapter XI apply to the entire
                Foundation.
                 As of August 19, 2019, however, the Foundation's Privacy Act
                regulations are obsolete because NEA, NEH, and IMLS have each adopted
                their own, agency-specific regulations, and FCAH is not required to
                implement Privacy Act regulations. On that date, NEH added NEH-specific
                Privacy Act regulations to 45 CFR Chapter XI, Subchapter D (45 CFR part
                1169), replacing the Foundation's Privacy Act regulations with respect
                to NEH. NEA and IMLS had previously added NEA- and IMLS-specific
                Privacy Act regulations to 45 CFR, subchapters B and E (45 CFR parts
                1159 and 1182), respectively, which replaced the Foundation's Privacy
                Act regulations with respect to NEA and IMLS. FCAH relies upon NEA and
                NEH for its administration and does not maintain any systems of records
                of its own; thus, it has no need or obligation to publish Privacy Act
                regulations. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(f) (requiring that only an agency that
                ``maintains a system of records shall promulgate rules'' implementing
                the Privacy Act).
                 Because the Foundation's Privacy Act regulations are now obsolete,
                NEA, NEH, and IMLS are issuing this joint final rule to remove them.
                2. Public Notice and Comment
                 Consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the
                Foundation's constituent agencies find that there is ``good cause'' to
                remove the Foundation's obsolete Privacy Act regulations without public
                notice and comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). Public notice and
                comment is unnecessary because this final rule is a minor, non-
                controversial technical amendment that is unlikely to attract public
                comment. Moreover, NEA, NEH, and IMLS previously issued their own
                Privacy Act regulations subject to public notice and comment, and at
                that time they indicated that the Foundation's regulations would no
                longer apply to their specific agency. See 84 FR 34788 (July 19, 2019);
                65 FR 46371 (July 28, 2000); and 71 FR 6374 (February 8, 2006).
                 In addition, the Foundation's constituent agencies find ``good
                cause'' to issue this final rule without a delayed effective date. See
                5 U.S.C. 553(d)(8). A delayed effective date is not necessary in this
                instance because NEA's, NEH's, and IMLS's agency-specific regulations
                are already in effect, and thus the public does not need advance notice
                to prepare for the removal of the Foundation's obsolete regulations.
                3. Regulatory Analyses
                Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
                Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
                 This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
                therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
                for review.
                [[Page 66320]]
                Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
                Costs
                 This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
                regulatory action because this action is not significant under
                Executive Order 12866.
                Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA'')
                 This action does not impose an information collection burden under
                the PRA. This action contains no provisions constituting a collection
                of information under the PRA.
                Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (``RFA'')
                 This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
                substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will
                not impose any requirements on small entities.
                Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``UMRA'')
                 This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
                the UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely
                affect small governments.
                Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
                 This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not
                have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
                between the national government and the states, or on the distribution
                of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
                Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
                Governments
                 This final rule does not have tribal implications as specified in
                Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
                this action.
                List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1115
                 Administrative practice and procedure, Privacy.
                PART 1115--[REMOVED]
                0
                For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of 5
                U.S.C. 552a(f), NEA, NEH (for itself and on behalf of FCAH, for which
                NEH provides legal counsel), and IMLS amend 45 CFR chapter XI,
                subchapter D by removing part 1115.
                India Pinkney,
                General Counsel, National Endowment for the Arts.
                Michael P. McDonald,
                General Counsel, National Endowment for the Humanities.
                Nancy E. Weiss,
                General Counsel, Institute of Museum and Library Services.
                [FR Doc. 2019-25929 Filed 12-3-19; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT