Revision of Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp (Duck Stamp) Contest Regulations

Published date29 January 2020
Citation85 FR 5182
Record Number2020-01497
SectionProposed rules
CourtFish And Wildlife Service
Federal Register, Volume 85 Issue 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2020)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2020)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 5182-5186]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2020-01497]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                Fish and Wildlife Service
                50 CFR Part 91
                [Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2019-0105; FXMB12330900000//201//FF09M13200]
                RIN 1018-BE20
                Revision of Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp
                (Duck Stamp) Contest Regulations
                AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
                ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose
                revising regulations governing the annual Migratory Bird Hunting and
                Conservation Stamp Contest (also known as the Federal Duck Stamp
                [[Page 5183]]
                Contest (Contest)). Our proposed amendments would specify a permanent
                theme and the mandatory inclusion of an appropriate hunting element
                beginning with the 2020 Contest, make a permanent change to the
                qualifications of the judging panel, and remove references to the 2018
                Contest.
                DATES: We will accept comments that we receive on or before March 16,
                2020. Please note that if you are using the Federal eRulemaking Portal
                (see ADDRESSES, below), the deadline for submitting an electronic
                comment is 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
                 Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
                Follow the instructions for submitting comments on Docket No. FWS-HQ-
                MB-2019-0105.
                 U.S. Mail or Hand-Delivery: Public Comments Processing,
                Attn: FWS-HQ-MB-2019-0105; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 5275
                Leesburg Pike, MS: JAO/1N; Falls Church, VA 22041.
                 We will not accept emailed or faxed comments. We will post all
                comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that your
                entire submission--including any personal identifying information--will
                be posted on the website. See the Public Comments Procedures and Public
                Availability of Comments, below, for more information.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Fellows at: Federal Duck Stamp
                Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior,
                MS:MB, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041; (703) 358-2145;
                [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                Background
                History of the Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp
                (Duck Stamp) Program
                 On March 16, 1934, Congress passed, and President Franklin D.
                Roosevelt signed, the Migratory Bird Hunting Stamp Act. Popularly known
                as the Duck Stamp Act, it required all waterfowl hunters 16 years or
                older to buy a stamp annually. The revenue generated was originally
                earmarked for the Department of Agriculture, but 5 years later was
                transferred to the Department of the Interior and the Service.
                 In the years since its enactment, the Federal Duck Stamp Program
                has become one of the most popular and successful conservation programs
                ever initiated. Today, some 1.5 million stamps are sold each year, and
                as of 2018, Federal Duck Stamps have generated more than $1 billion for
                the conservation of more than 6 million acres of waterfowl habitat in
                the United States. Numerous other birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, and
                amphibians have similarly prospered because of habitat protection made
                possible by the program. An estimated one-third of the Nation's
                endangered and threatened species find food or shelter in refuges
                conserved by Duck Stamp funds. Moreover, healthy wetlands help
                dissipate storms, purify water supplies, store flood water, and nourish
                fish hatchlings important for sport and commercial fishermen.
                History of the Duck Stamp Contest
                 The first Federal Duck Stamp was designed at President Roosevelt's
                request by Jay N. ``Ding'' Darling, a nationally known political
                cartoonist for the Des Moines Register and a noted hunter and wildlife
                conservationist. In subsequent years, noted wildlife artists were asked
                to submit designs for the stamp. The first Federal Duck Stamp Contest
                was opened in 1949 to any U.S. artist who wished to enter; 65 artists
                submitted a total of 88 design entries. Since then, the Contest has
                attracted large numbers of entrants, and it remains the only art
                competition of its kind sponsored by the U.S. Government. The Secretary
                of the Interior appoints a panel of noted art, waterfowl, and
                philatelic authorities to select each year's winning design. Winners
                receive no compensation for the work, except a pane of their stamps,
                but winners may sell prints of their designs, which are sought by
                hunters, conservationists, and art collectors.
                 Throughout the history of the Federal Duck Stamp, there has been an
                effort to increase its messaging capabilities. For example, in 1959,
                the theme of the Contest was ``Retrievers Save Game,'' and artists were
                required to produce a design which illustrated this theme. The
                resulting 1959-1960 stamp, the ``King Buck,'' featuring a black
                Labrador Retriever and a mallard, is arguably among the most
                identifiable Federal Duck Stamps. With the 1998-1999 stamp, the
                pressure-sensitive adhesive dollar-bill sized carrier was introduced.
                This gave stamp designers more area to work with to produce both visual
                and verbal messages. Additional opportunities exist for messages on the
                back of the carrier as well as on the appreciation certificates that
                are available to customers interested in the Duck Stamp Program.
                 As the only ones required to purchase a Federal Duck Stamp,
                waterfowl hunters have been the primary supporters of the Federal Duck
                Stamp program and have enabled the purchase of wetland habitats that
                support both hunted and nonhunted species, assist in flood control and
                water purification, and provide communities with an economic stimulus.
                To address Executive Order 13443 (Facilitation of Hunting Heritage and
                Wildlife Conservation; 72 FR 46537, August 20, 2007) and Secretarial
                Order 3356 (Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife
                Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and
                Territories; September 15, 2017), it was determined that the theme of
                the 2019-2020 Federal Duck Stamp would be ``celebrating our waterfowl
                hunting heritage.'' To accomplish this, the 2018 Contest regulations
                required the mandatory inclusion of ``appropriate hunting-related
                accessories and/or scenes.'' An image of a drake wood duck with an old
                decoy was chosen as the winner of the 2018 Federal Duck Stamp Contest,
                and that image appears on the 2019-2020 Federal Duck Stamp. Text and
                special stamp products were developed to highlight the theme and to
                provide visual and verbal recognition to the contributions waterfowl
                hunters make to habitat conservation. By celebrating our waterfowl
                hunting heritage and showing hunters in a positive light as active
                wildlife conservationists on the 2019-2020 stamp, we celebrate their
                contributions to providing public lands and robust wildlife
                populations.
                Proposed Changes to the Regulations at 50 CFR Part 91
                 The regulations governing the Contest are at 50 CFR part 91. On
                March 21, 2018, we published a final rule (83 FR 12275) that revised
                the regulations at 50 CFR part 91 governing the annual Federal Duck
                Stamp Contest. Of specific interest to this proposal, we set forth the
                2018 Contest regulations regarding the theme, the mandatory elements,
                and an additional requirement for judges which we stated we would
                remove at a later date. In this proposed rule, we propose to specify a
                permanent ``celebrating our waterfowl hunting heritage'' theme and the
                mandatory inclusion of an appropriate hunting element beginning with
                the 2020 Contest, make a permanent change to the qualifications of the
                judging panel, and remove references to the 2018 Contest.
                [[Page 5184]]
                Removing Language Specific to 2018 Contest and Instituting a Permanent
                Theme and Mandatory Hunting Element Requirement
                 Currently, Sec. 91.14 explains that a live portrayal of any
                bird(s) of the five or fewer identified eligible waterfowl species must
                be the dominant feature of the design, but that the design may depict
                other appropriate elements, such as hunting dogs, as long as an
                eligible waterfowl species is in the foreground and clearly the focus
                of attention. In the March 21, 2018, final rule, we added Sec.
                91.14(b) with additional requirements specified for the 2018 Contest
                only. In this proposed rule, we propose to make it a permanent
                requirement that Contest entries must include one or more elements that
                reflect the theme ``celebrating our waterfowl hunting heritage.''
                 Section 91.21(b) outlines the qualification of the judging panel.
                In the March 21, 2018, final rule, we added Sec. 91.21(b)(2) with
                additional requirements specified for the 2018 Contest only. In this
                proposed rule, we propose to revise Sec. 91.21(b) to remove reference
                to the 2018 Contest and make it a permanent requirement that all
                selected contest judges have an understanding and appreciation of the
                waterfowl hunting heritage and be able to recognize waterfowl hunting
                accessories.
                 Finally, Sec. 91.23 sets forth the scoring criteria for the
                contest. In the March 21, 2018, final rule, we added Sec. 91.23(b)
                with an additional scoring criterion specified for the 2018 Contest
                only. In this proposed rule, we propose to revise Sec. 91.23 to remove
                reference to the 2018 Contest and specify that entries will also be
                judged on how well they illustrate the theme of ``celebrating our
                waterfowl hunting heritage.''
                Public Comments Procedures
                 To ensure that any final action resulting from this proposed rule
                will be as accurate and as effective as possible, we request that you
                send relevant information for our consideration. We will accept public
                comments we receive on or before the date listed above in DATES. We are
                striving to ensure that any final rule resulting from this proposed
                rule would be in effect with sufficient time for artists to prepare
                submissions by the June opening of the 2020 Contest. The comments that
                will be most useful are those that you support by quantitative
                information or studies and those that include citations to, and
                analyses of, the applicable laws and regulations. Please make your
                comments as specific as possible and explain the basis for them. In
                addition, please include sufficient information with your comments to
                allow us to authenticate any scientific or commercial data you include.
                 You must submit your comments and materials concerning this
                proposed rule by one of the methods listed above in ADDRESSES. We will
                not accept comments sent by email or fax or to an address not listed in
                ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment via http://www.regulations.gov, your
                entire comment--including any personal identifying information, such as
                your address, telephone number, or email address--will be posted on the
                website. Please note that comments submitted to this website are not
                immediately viewable. When you submit a comment, the system receives it
                immediately. However, the comment will not be publically viewable until
                we post it, which might not occur until several days after submission.
                 If you mail or hand-carry a hardcopy comment directly to us that
                includes personal information, you may request at the top of your
                document that we withhold this information from public review. However,
                we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. To ensure that the
                electronic docket for this rulemaking is complete and all comments we
                receive are publicly available, we will post all hardcopy comments on
                http://www.regulations.gov.
                 In addition, comments and materials we receive, as well as
                supporting documentation used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
                available for public inspection in two ways:
                 (1) You can view them on http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search
                box, enter FWS-HQ-MB-2019-0105, which is the docket number for this
                rulemaking. Then, in the Search panel on the left side of the screen,
                select the type of documents you want to view under the Document Type
                heading.
                 (2) You can make an appointment, during normal business hours, to
                view the comments and materials in person by contacting the person
                listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
                Public Availability of Comments
                 As stated above in more detail, before including your address,
                phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information
                in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment,
                including your personal identifying information, may be made publically
                available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold
                your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
                guarantee that we will be able to do so.
                Required Determinations
                National Environmental Policy Act
                 This proposed rule is categorically excluded. It reflects an
                administrative modification of procedures and the impacts are limited
                to administrative effects (516 DM 8.5(a)(3)). A detailed statement
                under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
                seq.) is therefore not required.
                Endangered Species Act (ESA) Consideration
                 Of the species on our List of Eligible Species, only two species
                are currently listed as endangered or threatened under section 4 of the
                ESA of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). No legal
                complications arise from the dual listing, as the two lists are
                developed under separate authorities and for different purposes.
                Because this proposed rule is strictly administrative in nature, it has
                no effect on endangered or threatened species. Thus, it does not
                require consultation under section 7 of the ESA.
                Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
                 Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
                Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has
                determined that this proposed rule is not significant.
                 Executive Order (E.O.) 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866
                while calling for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to
                promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
                most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
                ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
                approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
                choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
                and consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
                further that regulations must be based on the best available science
                and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and
                an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner
                consistent with these requirements.
                Regulatory Flexibility Act
                 Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (as amended by the Small
                Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996),
                whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a notice of
                [[Page 5185]]
                rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make
                available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that
                describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small
                businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions) (5
                U.S.C. 601 et seq.). However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is
                required if the head of an agency certifies that the rule would not
                have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
                entities. Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis to be required,
                impacts must exceed a threshold for ``significant impact'' and a
                threshold for a ``substantial number of small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C.
                605(b). SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require
                Federal agencies to provide a statement of the factual basis for
                certifying that a rule would not have a significant economic impact on
                a substantial number of small entities. The changes we propose are
                intended primarily to clarify the requirements for the Contest. These
                changes would affect individuals, not businesses or other small
                entities as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Currently, stamp
                sales average approximately 1.5 million each year. Active waterfowl
                hunters, the only people required to purchase an annual stamp, number
                approximately 1.1 million each year. Stamps are also purchased by stamp
                and wildlife art collectors, bird watchers, and other conservationists,
                and a current stamp can be used for access at any of the national
                wildlife refuges that have an entry fee. Many hunters also purchase
                multiple stamps for different purposes. We are currently unable to
                quantify numbers of stamps purchased by each user group; we do not
                anticipate being able to attribute any increase or decrease in sales
                due to the proposed changes. In recent years, we have received an
                average of 200 entries per year to our annual contest. We received
                approximately 190 Contest entries in 2019; in the 2018 Contest, we had
                approximately 150 eligible entries under the temporary mandatory
                hunting theme rule. We do not believe that the number of entries in
                2020 or beyond will fall below 150 entries.
                 We therefore certify that, if adopted, this proposed rule would not
                have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
                entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A Regulatory
                Flexibility Analysis is not required. Accordingly, a Small Entity
                Compliance Guide is not required.
                Clarity of This Rule
                 We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
                Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
                language. This means that each rule we publish must:
                 (a) Be logically organized;
                 (b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
                 (c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
                 (d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
                 (e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
                 If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
                comments by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To better help us
                revise the rulemaking, your comments should be as specific as possible.
                For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or
                paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences are
                too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
                etc.
                Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
                 This rulemaking is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
                Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
                 a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
                or more.
                 b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
                consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
                agencies; or geographic regions.
                 c. Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
                employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
                U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
                Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
                 This rule does not contain any new collections of information that
                require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
                Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB has
                previously approved the information collection requirements associated
                with the Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp (Duck
                Stamp) Contest and assigned OMB Control Number 1018-0172. You may view
                the information collection request(s) at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
                required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
                a currently valid OMB control number.
                Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                 This proposed rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
                local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
                million per year. The rulemaking does not have a significant or unique
                effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A
                statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
                Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
                Civil Justice Reform
                 In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
                determined that this proposed rule does not unduly burden the judicial
                system and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
                of the Order.
                Takings
                 In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule does not have
                significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is
                not required.
                Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
                 On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 on
                regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or
                use. This proposed rule would revise the current regulations at 50 CFR
                part 91 that govern the Federal Duck Stamp Contest. This rule would not
                significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
                this action is a not a significant energy action and no Statement of
                Energy Effects is required.
                Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
                 Under the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, ``Government-
                to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments'' (59
                FR 22951), and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated possible effects on
                federally recognized Indian Tribes and have determined that there are
                no effects. Individual tribal members must meet the same regulatory
                requirements as other individuals who enter the Federal Duck Stamp
                Contest.
                Federalism
                 These proposed revisions to part 91 do not contain significant
                Federalism implications. A federalism summary impact statement under
                Executive Order 13132 is not required.
                Executive Order 13771
                 This rule is not an Executive Order (E.O.) 13771 (82 FR 9339,
                February 3, 2017) regulatory action because this rule is not
                significant under E.O. 12866.
                [[Page 5186]]
                List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 91
                 Hunting, Wildlife.
                Proposed Regulation Promulgation
                 Accordingly, we propose to amend part 91, subchapter G of chapter
                I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
                PART 91--MIGRATORY BIRD HUNTING AND CONSERVATION STAMP CONTEST
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 718j; 31 U.S.C. 9701.
                0
                2. Revise Sec. 91.14(b) to read as follows:
                Sec. 91.14 Restrictions on subject matter for entry.
                * * * * *
                 (b) Mandatory waterfowl hunting components. In addition to the
                restrictions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, designs will
                also be required to include appropriate waterfowl hunting-related
                accessories or elements celebrating the Federal Duck Stamp's long-
                standing connection as part of our Nation's waterfowl hunting heritage
                and the contributions to conservation made by waterfowl hunters.
                Designs may include, but are not limited to, hunting dogs, hunting
                scenes, hunting equipment, waterfowl decoys, managed waterfowl areas as
                the background of habitat scenes, or other designs that represent our
                waterfowl hunting heritage. The design chosen will clearly meet the
                theme of ``celebrating our waterfowl hunting heritage.''
                0
                3. Revise Sec. 91.21(b) to read as follows:
                Sec. 91.21 Selection and qualification of contest judges.
                * * * * *
                 (b) Qualifications. The panel of five judges will be made up of
                individuals, all of whom have one or more of the following
                prerequisites: Recognized art credentials, knowledge of the anatomical
                makeup and the natural habitat of the eligible waterfowl species, an
                understanding of the wildlife sporting world in which the Duck Stamp is
                used, an awareness of philately and the role the Duck Stamp plays in
                stamp collecting, demonstrated support for the conservation of
                waterfowl and wetlands through active involvement in the conservation
                community, an understanding and appreciation of waterfowl hunting
                heritage, and the ability to recognize waterfowl hunting accessories.
                * * * * *
                0
                4. Revise Sec. 91.23 to read as follows:
                Sec. 91.23 Scoring criteria for contest.
                 Entries will be judged on the basis of anatomical accuracy,
                artistic composition, suitability for reduction in the production of a
                stamp, and how well they illustrate the theme of ``celebrating our
                waterfowl hunting heritage.''
                 Dated: January 6, 2020.
                Rob Wallace,
                Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
                [FR Doc. 2020-01497 Filed 1-28-20; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT