Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan: South Coast Air Quality Management District

Federal Register: December 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 235)

Rules and Regulations

Page 74027-74029

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr05de08-9

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52

EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0788; FRL-8745-4

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South

Coast Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the

California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions from large water heaters and small boilers and process heaters. We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on February 3, 2009 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 5, 2009. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the

Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number [EPA-R09-OAR- 2008-0788], by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an

``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If

EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and

``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

1. The State's Submittal

   1. What rule did the State submit?

   2. Are there other versions of this rule?

   3. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?

2. EPA's Evaluation and Action

   1. How is EPA evaluating the rule?

   2. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?

   3. Public Comment and Final Action

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

1. The State's Submittal

   1. What rule did the State submit?

      Table 1 lists the rule we are approving with the dates that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air

      Resources Board (CARB).

      Page 74028

      Table 1--Submitted Rules

      Local agency

      Rule No.

      Rule title

      Adopted

      Submitted

      SCAQMD.............................

      1146.2 Emissions of Oxides of

      05/05/06

      03/07/08

      Nitrogen From Large Water

      Heaters and Small Boilers and Process Heaters.

      On April 17, 2008, this rule submittal was found to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

   2. Are there other versions of this rule?

      We approved a version of Rule 1146.2 into the SIP on April 8, 2002.

      The SCAQMD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on January 7, 2005 and CARB submitted them to us on March 7, 2008. While we can act on only the most recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials provided with previous submittals.

   3. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?

      NOXhelps produce ground-level ozone, smog and particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.

      Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control NOXemissions. Rule 1146.2 regulates emissions of oxides of nitrogen from large water heaters and small boilers and process heaters. The amendment of the rule extends the NOX emissions limits to smaller units, extended the compliance date for units to meet NOXemissions and made a more stringent emission limit for new units in the future. EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about this rule.

2. EPA's Evaluation and Action

   1. How is EPA evaluating the rule?

      Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the

      Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines

      (CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see sections 182(a)(2) and 182(f)), and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). The South Coast Air Quality

      Management District regulates an ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81), so Rule 1146.2 must fulfill RACT.

      Guidance and policy documents that we use to help evaluate enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the

      General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of

      Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOXSupplement), 57 FR 55620,

      November 25, 1992. 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and

      Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule

      Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 4. ``State Implementation Plans for Serious PM-10 Nonattainment

      Areas, and Attainment Date Waivers for PM-10 Nonattainment Areas

      Generally; Addendum to the General Preamble for the Implementation of

      Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994). 5. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the

      Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57

      FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 6. ``PM-10 Guideline Document,'' EPA 452/R-93-008, April 1993. 7. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX

      Emissions from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers,''

      EPA, March 1994. 8. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and

      Best Available Retrofit Control for Industrial, Institutional, and

      Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters,'' CARB, July 18, 1991.

   2. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?

      We believe this rule is consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSD has more information on our evaluation.

   3. Public Comment and Final Action

      As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.

      However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule. If we receive adverse comments by January 5, 2009, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on February 3, 2009. This will incorporate this rule into the federally enforceable SIP.

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

   Under the Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable

   Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

   Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

   Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

   Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory

   Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

   Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded

   Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);

   Does not have Federalism implications as specified in

   Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

   Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

   Is not a significant regulatory action subject to

   Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

   Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the

   National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because

   Page 74029

   application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Act; and

   Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under

   Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

   In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

   The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the

   Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the

   United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

   Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal

   Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

   Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 3, 2009. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

   Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,

   Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

   Dated: November 6, 2008.

   Laura Yoshii,

   Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 0

   Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

   PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

   Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(354)(i)(A)(4) to read as follows:

   Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.

   * * * * *

   (c) * * *

   (354) * * *

   (i) * * *

   (A) * * *

   (4) Rule 1146.2, ``Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen From Large Water

   Heaters and Small Boilers and Process Heaters,'' adopted on January 8, 1998 and amended on May 5, 2006.

   * * * * *

   FR Doc. E8-28725 Filed 12-4-08; 8:45 am

   BILLING CODE 6560-50-P