Safety Zone; Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, GU

Published date08 March 2019
Citation84 FR 8489
Record Number2019-04218
SectionProposed rules
CourtCoast Guard,Homeland Security Department
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 46 (Friday, March 8, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 46 (Friday, March 8, 2019)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 8489-8490]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-04218]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
                Coast Guard
                33 CFR Part 165
                [Docket Number USCG-2018-1084]
                RIN 1625-AA00
                Safety Zone; Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, GU
                AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
                ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
                zone for navigable waters within Cocos Lagoon. This safety zone will
                encompass the designated swim course for the Cocos Crossing swim event
                in the waters of Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, Guam. We invite your comments on
                this proposed rulemaking.
                DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
                Guard on or before April 8, 2019.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
                2018-1084 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
                Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
                instructions on submitting comments.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
                proposed rulemaking, call or email Chief Petty Officer Todd Wheeler,
                Sector Guam, U.S. Coast Guard, by telephone at (671) 355-4866, or email
                at [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Table of Abbreviations
                CFR Code of Federal Regulations
                DHS Department of Homeland Security
                FR Federal Register
                NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
                Sec. Section
                U.S.C. United States Code
                II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
                 The Cocos Crossing swim event is a recurring annual event that
                occurs one day either at the end of May or the beginning of June. We
                have established safety zones for this swim event in past years.
                 The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety of the
                participants and the navigable waters in the safety zone before,
                during, and after the scheduled swim event. The Coast Guard is
                proposing this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
                III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
                 The Captain of the Port (COTP) is proposing to establish a safety
                zone from 6 a.m. to 1 p.m. on a day to be determined to host the Cocos
                Crossing swimming event either during the last two weeks of May or the
                first two weeks of June. This safety zone is necessary to protect all
                persons and vessels participating in this marine event from potential
                safety hazards associated with vessel traffic in the area. Race
                participants, chase boats, and organizers of the event will be exempt
                from the safety zone. Entry of persons or vessels into this safety zone
                is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP. The regulatory text we are
                proposing appears at the end of this document.
                IV. Regulatory Analyses
                 We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
                and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
                analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
                we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
                A. Regulatory Planning and Review
                 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
                costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
                regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
                net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
                regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
                designated a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
                12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
                Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
                from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
                 This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
                location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
                will be able to safely transit around this safety zone, which will
                impact a small designated area of the Cocos Lagoon for approximately 7
                hours. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to
                Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
                allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
                B. Impact on Small Entities
                 The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
                amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
                regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
                entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
                that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
                fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
                50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
                proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
                substantial number of small entities.
                 While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
                safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
                IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
                impact on any vessel owner or operator.
                 If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
                jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
                a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
                ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies, and how and to what
                degree this rule would economically affect it.
                 Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
                Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
                entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
                your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction, and
                you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
                please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
                question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
                of the Coast Guard.
                C. Collection of Information
                 This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
                information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
                3520).
                D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
                 A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
                Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
                relationship between the national government and
                [[Page 8490]]
                the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
                the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule
                under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the
                fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described
                in Executive Order 13132.
                 Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
                Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
                Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
                one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
                Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
                responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
                you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
                Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section.
                E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
                requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
                regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
                result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
                the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
                inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
                result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
                elsewhere in this preamble.
                F. Environment
                 We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
                Security Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
                guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
                Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
                determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
                not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
                environment. This proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting
                approximately 7 hours that would prohibit entry within 100-yards of
                swim participants. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
                from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
                DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
                Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
                in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
                information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
                environmental impact from this proposed rule.
                G. Protest Activities
                 The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
                Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
                your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
                security of people, places, or vessels.
                V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
                 We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
                and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
                period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
                you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
                rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
                each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
                recommendation.
                 We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
                Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
                submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
                instructions.
                 We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
                without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
                personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
                docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
                 Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
                and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
                instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
                for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or when
                a final rule is published.
                List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
                 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
                recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
                 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
                proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
                PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
                6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
                0170.1.
                0
                2. Add Sec. 165.T14-1084 to read as follows:
                Sec. 165.T14-1084 Safety Zone; Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, GU.
                 (a) Location. The following area, within the Guam Captain of the
                Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-15), all navigable waters within a
                100-yard radius of race participants in Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, Guam.
                Race participants, chase boats and organizers of the event will be
                exempt from the safety zone.
                 (b) Enforcement dates. This rule will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 1
                p.m. on a specified day during either the last two weeks of May or the
                first two weeks of June.
                 (c) Enforcement. All persons are required to comply with the
                general regulations governing safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
                Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by
                the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Guam. Persons desiring to transit
                the area of the safety zone must first request authorization from the
                Captain of the Port Guam or his designated representative. To seek
                permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Guam and his
                designated representatives can be contacted at telephone number (671)
                355-4821 or on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Any
                Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, and any other COTP
                representative permitted by law, may enforce this safety zone.
                 (d) Waiver. The COTP may waive any of the requirements of this rule
                for any person, vessel, or class of vessel upon finding that
                application of the safety zone is unnecessary or impractical for the
                purpose of maritime security.
                 (e) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
                to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
                 Dated: March 4, 2019.
                Christopher M. Chase,
                Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Guam.
                [FR Doc. 2019-04218 Filed 3-7-19; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT