Safety Zone; Columbia River, Bonneville, OR

Citation84 FR 49194
Record Number2019-20164
Published date19 September 2019
SectionRules and Regulations
CourtCoast Guard
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2019)]
                [Rules and Regulations]
                [Pages 49194-49195]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-20164]
                [[Page 49194]]
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
                Coast Guard
                33 CFR Part 165
                [Docket Number USCG-2019-0781]
                RIN 1625-AA00
                Safety Zone; Columbia River, Bonneville, OR
                AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
                ACTION: Temporary final rule.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
                navigable waters of the Columbia River between river mile 142 and 143
                in vicinity of Bonneville, Oregon. The safety zone is needed to protect
                personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards
                created by salvage operations of the tug DIANE. Entry of vessels or
                persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
                the Captain of the Port Columbia River.
                DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 9:00 a.m.
                until 11:59 p.m. on September 19, 2019. For the purposes of
                enforcement, actual notice will be used from September 13, 2019 until
                8:59 a.m. on September 19, 2019.
                ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
                available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
                2019-0781 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
                Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
                call or email LCDR Dixon Whitley, Waterways Management Division, Marine
                Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email
                [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Table of Abbreviations
                CFR Code of Federal Regulations
                DHS Department of Homeland Security
                FR Federal Register
                NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
                Sec. Section
                U.S.C. United States Code
                II. Background Information and Regulatory History
                 The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
                and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
                the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
                provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
                opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
                procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
                interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
                cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
                with respect to this rule because to do so would be impracticable and
                delayed promulgation may result in injury or damage to the maritime
                public and/or the marine environment on the Columbia River due to the
                safety hazards associated with associated diving and vessel recovery
                operations.
                 Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
                exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
                publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
                this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
                respond to the potential safety hazards associated with diving, and
                vessel recovery operations.
                III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
                 The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
                70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Columbia
                River (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with
                diving and vessel recovery operations will be a safety concern for
                anyone transiting between Columbia River Mile 142 and 143 in vicinity
                of Bonneville, Oregon. This rule is needed to protect personnel,
                vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the
                safety zone while salvage operations are occurring.
                IV. Discussion of the Rule
                 This rule establishes a safety zone from September 13, 2019 through
                September 19, 2019. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters on
                the Columbia River between river mile 142 and 143. The duration of the
                zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
                environment in these navigable waters while salvage operations are
                occurring. Due to the unpredictable and potentially dangerous nature of
                diving and vessel recovery operations, the Coast Guard determined that
                the best to way to ensure public safety is to exclude all non-related
                vessel activity traffic around all vessels engaged in diving and vessel
                recovery operations from the area. No vessel or person will be
                permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
                the COTP or a designated representative.
                V. Regulatory Analyses
                 We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
                Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
                based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
                discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
                A. Regulatory Planning and Review
                 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
                costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
                regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
                net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
                regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
                designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
                12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
                Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
                from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
                 This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
                location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. The Coast
                Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel
                16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to
                enter the zone.
                B. Impact on Small Entities
                 The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
                amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
                regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
                entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
                that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
                fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
                50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
                will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
                small entities.
                 While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
                safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
                V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
                vessel owner or operator.
                 Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
                Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
                entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
                small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
                questions concerning its provisions or options for
                [[Page 49195]]
                compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section.
                 Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
                employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
                regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
                Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
                Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
                rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
                comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
                (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
                entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
                action of the Coast Guard.
                C. Collection of Information
                 This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
                the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
                D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
                 A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
                Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
                relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
                distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
                government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
                determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
                principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
                13132.
                 Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
                Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
                Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
                one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
                Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
                responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
                you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
                please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
                section above.
                E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
                requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
                regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
                result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
                the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
                inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
                such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
                in this preamble.
                F. Environment
                 We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
                Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
                which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
                Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
                determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
                individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
                environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting 7 days that will
                prohibit vessel traffic to transit between Columbia River Mile 142 and
                143 during diving and vessel recovery operations. It is categorically
                excluded from further review under paragraph L60(c) in Table 3-1 of
                U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1.
                G. Protest Activities
                 The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
                Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
                your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
                security of people, places or vessels.
                List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
                 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
                recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
                 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
                33 CFR part 165 as follows:
                PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
                6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
                0
                2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0781 to read as follows:
                Sec. 165.T13-0781 Safety Zone; Columbia River, Tug Diane Salvage.
                 (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
                waters of the Columbia River, Bonneville, OR from surface to bottom,
                between river mile 142 and 143.
                 (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
                means any Coast commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
                authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia River (COTP) to act on
                his behalf, or a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
                assisting the Captain of the Port Columbia River in the enforcement of
                the safety zone.
                 (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
                subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
                paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
                COTP's designated representative.
                 (2) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate with the safety
                zone may contact the COTP's on-scene designated representative by
                calling (503) 209-2468 or the Sector Columbia River Command Center on
                Channel 16 VHF-FM. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful
                orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
                representative.
                 (d) Enforcement period. This safety zone is in effect from
                September 13, 2019 through September 19, 2019. It will be subject to
                enforcement this entire period unless the Captain of the Port, Columbia
                River determines it is no longer needed. The Coast Guard will inform
                mariners of any change to this period of enforcement via Broadcast
                Notice to Mariners.
                 Dated: September 12, 2019.
                J.C. Smith,
                Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Columbia River.
                [FR Doc. 2019-20164 Filed 9-18-19; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT