Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2013-2014

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 234 (Monday, December 7, 2015)

Federal Register Volume 80, Number 234 (Monday, December 7, 2015)

Notices

Pages 75968-75971

From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov

FR Doc No: 2015-30792

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-570-964

Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is conducting the fourth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), covering the period November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014. The Department preliminarily determines that, during the period of review (``POR''), respondent Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc., Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd., and Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd. and eight affiliated producers that comprise the GD Single

Page 75969

Entity \1\ have made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ The GD Single Entity includes the following companies: (1) Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.; (2) Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (3) Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd.; (4) Shanghai Longyang Precise Copper Compound Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiangsu Canghuan Copper Industry Co., Ltd.; (6) Guangdong Longfeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (7) Wuxi Jinlong Chuancun Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (8) Longkou Longpeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (9) Xinxiang Longxiang Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (10) Coaxian Ailun Metal Processing Co., Ltd.; and (11) Chonqing Longyu Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd. (the ``GD Single Entity'') See section entitled, ``Preliminary Affiliation and Single Entity Determination,'' below.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Drew Jackson, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 482-4406.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

The merchandise subject to the order is seamless refined copper pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') item numbers 7411.10.1030 and 7411.10.1090. Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS item numbers 7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order remains dispositive.\2\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, regarding ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2013-2014 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic of China,'' dated November 30, 2015, for a complete description of the scope of the order (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extension of Deadlines for Preliminary Results

On July 15, 2015, the Department extended the time period for issuing the preliminary results of this review until November 30, 2015.\3\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through Abdelali Elouaradia, Office Director, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office 4, regarding ``Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' (July 15, 2015).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The Department initiated this review on December 23, 2014.\4\ On March 23, 2015, interested parties timely withdrew all review requests for the following companies: (1) Shanghai Hailiang Copper Co., Ltd.; (2) Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd.; (3) China Hailiang Metal Trading; (4) Foshan Hua Hong Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (5) Guilin Lijia Metals Co., Ltd.; (6) Hong Kong Hailiang Metal; (7) Ningbo Jintian Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (8) Shanghai Hailiang Metal Trading Limited; (9) Sinochem Ningbo Ltd.; (10) Sinochem Ningbo Import & Export Co., Ltd.; (11) Taicang City Jinxin Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (12) Zhejiang Jiahe Pipes Inc.; and (13) Zhejiang Naile Copper Co., Ltd. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this review with respect to these 13 companies. The Golden Dragon Group Companies \5\ did not withdraw their request for administrative review; therefore we are not rescinding the review of the GD Single Entity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 76956 (December 23, 2014).

\5\ Respondent's submissions in this administrative review are filed on behalf of Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc., Hong Kong GD, Trading Co., Ltd., GD Copper Cooperatief UA, Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd., and GD Copper (U.S.A.) (``Golden Dragon Group Companies'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Affiliation and Single Entity Determination

Based on record evidence, the Department preliminarily finds that the following companies are affiliated pursuant to section 771(33)(F) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''): (1) Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.; (2) Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (3) Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd.; (4) Shanghai Longyang Precise Copper Compound Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiangsu Canghuan Copper Industry Co., Ltd.; (6) Guangdong Longfeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (7) Wuxi Jinlong Chuancun Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (8) Longkou Longpeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (9) Xinxiang Longxiang Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; (10) Coaxian Ailun Metal Processing Co., Ltd.; and (11) Chonqing Longyu Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.

In addition, based on the information presented in this review, we preliminarily find that these companies should be treated as a single entity for the purposes of this review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f). For additional information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ See also Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations, through Robert Bolling, Program Manager, AD/

CVD Operations Office IV, regarding ``Affiliation and Single Entity Status of Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.; Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International Co., Ltd.; Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Longyang Precise Copper Compound Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Canghuan Copper Industry Co., Ltd.; Guangdong Longfeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; Wuxi Jinlong Chuancun Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; Longkou Longpeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; Xinxiang Longxiang Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.; Coaxian Ailun Metal Processing Co., Ltd.; and Chonqing Longyu Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd.,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum, for a full discussion of the proprietary details of the Department's single-entity analysis.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, the Department verified constructed export price (``CEP'') sales information provided by the Golden Dragon Group Companies. The Department conducted the verification using standard verification procedures including the examination of relevant sales and financial records and the selection and review of original documentation containing relevant information. Further, after the issuance of these preliminary results of review, the Department will verify the remaining sales and production information submitted by the Golden Dragon Group Companies, in the PRC.

The verification reports will be on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department's Central Records Unit, located in room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building.

Methodology

The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The Department calculated export prices and constructed export prices in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is an non-market economy country, within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, the Department calculated normal value in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act.

Page 75970

For a full description of the methodology underlying the preliminary results of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via ACCESS. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Preliminary Results of Review

The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted-average

Exporter dumping margin

(percent)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc./Golden 5.89

Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International Co., Ltd./

Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd./Shanghai Longyang

Precise Copper Compound Copper Tube Co., Ltd./

Jiangsu Canghuan Copper Industry Co., Ltd./Guangdong

Longfeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd./Wuxi Jinlong

Chuancun Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd./Longkou

Longpeng Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd./Xinxiang

Longxiang Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd./Coaxian

Ailun Metal Processing Co., Ltd./Chonqing Longyu

Precise Copper Tube Co., Ltd........................

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

The Department intends to disclose to parties the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than seven days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in this proceeding.\7\ Rebuttal briefs may be filed no later than five days after case briefs are due and may respond only to arguments raised in the case briefs.\8\ A table of contents, list of authorities used, and an executive summary of issues should accompany any briefs submitted to the Department. The summary should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).

\8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral argument presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).

\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed electronically using ACCESS.\11\ An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (``ET'') on the due date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.\12\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.

\12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\13\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. In the event that the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for the GD Single Entity (the only individually examined respondent in this segment of the proceeding) in the final results of review is above de minimis (i.e., greater than or equal to 0.5 percent), the Department intends to calculate importer- (or customer)-

specific assessment rates, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\14\ Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, the Department intends to calculate importer- (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to the importer- (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to the importer- (or customer).\15\ Where the Department calculates an importer- (or customer)-specific weighted-

average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to the importer- (or customer) by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer)-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.\16\ Where an importer- (or customer)- specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\17\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).

\14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (``Final Modification'').

\15\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).

\16\ Id.

\17\ See Final Modification at 8103.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME antidumping duty cases.\18\ Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, pursuant

Page 75971

to this refinement, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\18\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion of this practice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.

Cash Deposit Requirements

The Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the weighted-average amount by which the normal value exceeds U.S. price. The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero for that exporter); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.

Dated: November 30, 2015.

Christian Marsh,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

  1. Summary

  2. Background

  3. Scope of the Order

  4. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

  5. Discussion of the Methodology

    1. Non-Market Economy Country Status

    2. Separate Rate

    3. Surrogate Country

    4. Date of Sale

    5. Fair Value Comparisons

    6. Determination of Comparison Method

    7. Export Price

    8. Constructed Export Price

  6. Normal Value

    1. Factor Valuations

    2. Currency Conversion

  7. Recommendation

    FR Doc. 2015-30792 Filed 12-4-15; 8:45 am

    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT