Section 209 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act: Initial Guidance

Published date14 February 2019
Citation84 FR 4097
Record Number2019-02359
SectionNotices
CourtHousing And Urban Development Department
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)]
                [Notices]
                [Pages 4097-4099]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2019-02359]
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
                [Docket No. FR-6115-N-01]
                Section 209 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
                Consumer Protection Act: Initial Guidance
                AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing
                and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
                Commissioner, HUD.
                ACTION: Notice.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: On May 24, 2018, President Trump signed into law the Economic
                Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the ``Economic
                Growth Act''). Section 209 of the Economic Growth Act added section 38
                to the United States Housing Act of 1937 and makes several amendments
                pertaining to small public housing agencies (PHAs) that administer 550
                or fewer combined public housing units and vouchers under section 8(o)
                that predominantly operate in a rural area. Section 209 also requires
                HUD to develop new information systems for public housing consortia,
                and to make shared waiting list software available for voluntary use by
                multiple PHAs and owners of multifamily properties (hereinafter
                referred to in this Notice as, owners) receiving HUD assistance.
                Certain statutory amendments made by section 209 became effective 60
                days after enactment (July 23, 2018). However, while effective, the
                provisions require rulemaking or guidance for implementation. The
                guidance in this Notice, read together with the statutory language, is
                intended to aid HUD program participants and the public generally in
                understanding the reasons for deferred action with respect to specific
                statutory provisions. In addition, HUD seeks comment from the public on
                appropriate implementation of the section 209 provisions.
                DATES: Comments Due Date: April 15, 2019.
                ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
                this Notice. All comments must refer to the proposal by name and docket
                number. There are two methods for submitting public comments:
                 1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
                mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
                of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 10276,
                Washington, DC 20410-0500.
                 2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may also
                submit comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
                at www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
                comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
                commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
                receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
                the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
                www.regulations.gov website can be viewed by other commenters and
                interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
                instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
                 Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must be
                submitted through one of the methods specified above. Again, all
                submissions must refer to the docket number and title of this Notice.
                 No Facsimiled Comments. Facsimiled (faxed) comments are not
                acceptable.
                 Public Inspection of Public Comments. Copies of all comments
                submitted are available for inspection and downloading at
                www.regulations.gov. In addition, all properly submitted comments and
                communications submitted to HUD will be available for public inspection
                and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the above address.
                Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, an advance
                appointment to review the public comments must be scheduled by calling
                the Regulations Division at 202-708-3055 (this is not a toll-free
                number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments may access this
                number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339
                (this is a toll-free number).
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold Katsura, Program Analyst,
                Office of Policy, Program, and Legislative Initiatives, Office of
                Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
                451 7th Street SW, Room 3178, Washington, DC 20410; telephone number
                202-402-3042 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or
                speech impairments may access these numbers via TTY by calling the
                Federal Relay Service, toll-free, at 800-877-8339.
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Introduction
                 On May 24, 2018, President Trump signed the Economic Growth Act
                into law (Pub. L. 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296).\1\ The Economic Growth Act
                amends the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.)
                (1937 Act) and other housing laws to modify multiple HUD programs. The
                purpose of the statutory amendments is to promote economic growth,
                provide tailored regulatory relief, and enhance consumer protections.
                Section 209 of the Economic Growth Act amends Title I of the 1937 Act
                by adding several provisions pertaining to small PHAs that
                predominantly operate in a rural area as described in 12 CFR
                1026.35(b)(2)(iv)(A), including
                [[Page 4098]]
                streamlining certain requirements related to program inspections and
                evaluations, corrective action requirements, environmental reviews, and
                energy conservation funding and financing requirements. Section 209
                also requires HUD to develop new information systems for public housing
                consortia, and to make shared waiting list software available for
                voluntary use by multiple PHAs and owners receiving HUD assistance.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \1\ The text of the Economic Growth Act, along with a summary
                prepared by the Congressional Research Service, can be found at
                https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/2155.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Certain statutory amendments made by section 209 of the Economic
                Growth Act became effective 60 days after enactment (July 23, 2018).
                However, while effective, the provisions require rulemaking or guidance
                for implementation. PHAs and owners may not use the provisions of the
                Economic Growth Act until HUD issues a rule or appropriate guidance.
                Further, existing HUD policies and procedures continue to apply until
                such time as HUD issues the necessary final implementing regulations or
                guidance.
                 The guidance in this Notice, read together with the statutory
                language, is intended to aid HUD program participants and the public
                generally in understanding the reasons for deferred action with respect
                to specific statutory provisions. In addition, HUD seeks comment from
                the public on the implementation of the section 209 provisions. HUD
                welcomes comment on all of the provisions discussed in this Notice and,
                specifically, on the topics identified for comment below. All timely
                comments will be considered in the development of the required rule or
                guidance. HUD is committed to working closely with its program
                participants to see that the changes made by section 209 of the
                Economic Growth Act are successfully implemented and that these
                programs are significantly improved to provide assistance to the
                families HUD serves.
                II. Implementation Guidance and Specific Requests for Comments
                A. Section 209(a). Small PHAs
                 Section 209(a) of the Economic Growth Act amends Title I of the
                1937 Act by adding a new section 38 that defines small PHAs (i.e., PHAs
                that administer 550 or fewer combined public housing units and vouchers
                under section 8(o) that predominantly operate in a rural areas, as
                described in 12 CFR 1026.35(b)(2)(iv)(A)). New section 38 also
                streamlines certain requirements related to program inspections and
                evaluations.
                 1. Section 38(a) of the 1937 Act--Definitions. New section 38(a)
                establishes the definitions applicable to the other provisions of
                section 38. Specifically, section 38(a) provides definitions for
                ``Housing Voucher Program,'' ``Small Public Housing Agency,'' and
                ``Troubled Small Public Housing Agency.''
                 Implementation action: The definitions require further
                clarification via rulemaking for implementation. For example, the
                definition of ``Small Public Housing Agency'' includes PHAs that
                administer no more than 550 dwelling units and vouchers under section
                8(o) of the 1937 Act and ``predominantly operate in a rural area,'' as
                described in 12 CFR 1026.35(b)(2)(iv)(A).\2\ This phrase
                ``predominately operate in a rural area'' requires further
                clarification and interpretation by HUD. Further, the definitions apply
                to statutory provisions that, as discussed below, require notice and
                comment rulemaking for implementation. HUD is undertaking rulemaking to
                implement these provisions and will address the definitions in the
                broader context of the rules implementing the related provisions.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \2\ The referenced regulations are the Truth in Lending
                (Regulation Z) regulations issued by the Bureau of Consumer
                Financial Protection and codified at 12 CFR part 1026. The
                regulations setting forth the definition of rural area can be found
                at: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=2af425fb88e5aca2c09e0b4adc8a50a6&mc=true&n=pt12.9.1026&r=PART&ty=HTML#se12.9.1026_135.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Specific Topics for Comment
                 (i) How should HUD interpret the words ``predominantly operates''
                in the phrase ``predominantly operates in a rural area''? For example,
                a PHA could be deemed to predominantly operate in a rural area if one
                or more of the following conditions apply: (1) The PHA's physical
                address is in a rural area (a PHA-based definition); (2) more than 50
                percent of the buildings occupied by Housing Choice Voucher
                beneficiaries and public housing residents are in rural areas (a
                building-based definition); or (3) more than 50 percent of the tenants
                served live in rural areas (a household-based definition). Please note
                that HUD is not seeking comment on the definition of ``rural area'' as
                this is provided in statute.
                 (ii) How often should HUD reassess the rural nature of each PHA?
                For example, should HUD reclassify PHAs every time the Office of
                Management and Budget, the U.S. Census Bureau, or the U.S. Department
                of Agriculture's Economic Research Service updates data used in the
                definition of rural areas? Also, the ``predominately operates''
                component may change when buildings are added or lost, or when tenants
                move under a household-based definition.
                 (iii) Are there other factors or approaches that HUD should
                consider in determining whether a PHA predominantly operates in a rural
                area?
                 (iv) Are there factors that HUD should consider in determining
                whether a PHA meets the criteria of administering 550 or fewer combined
                public housing and section 8(o) units?
                 2. Sections 38(c)(1) and (c)(2) of the 1937 Act--Program
                Inspections and Evaluations for Public Housing and Section 8 Voucher
                Units. Section 38(c)(1) as inserted by the Economic Growth Act requires
                HUD to inspect small PHA projects no less than every 3 years. Section
                38(c)(1) also applies existing physical inspection standards for
                projects assisted under section 8 of the 1937 Act to small PHAs.
                Section 38(c)(2) requires small PHAs administering section 8 voucher
                rental assistance to make periodic physical inspections of dwelling
                units at least once every 3 years.\3\
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \3\ Sections 38(c)(1) (for public housing) and (c)(2) (for
                Section 8 voucher units) also clarify that HUD or the PHA must
                continue conducting lead safety inspections when applicable in
                accordance with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42
                U.S.C. 4822). These provisions emphasize following existing
                requirements and therefore do not require further action for
                implementation. Safety inspection requirements under the Lead-Based
                Paint Poisoning Prevention Act can be found at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2009-title42/html/USCODE-2009-title42-chap63-subchapIII-sec4822.htm.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Implementation action: This provision requires further review and
                interpretation by HUD. HUD is considering the appropriate scope of the
                term ``projects assisted under section 8'' as used in section 38(c)(1)
                and will address the subject more fully in future rulemaking. Further,
                as noted above, the definition of small PHA requires further
                consideration and implementation through rulemaking.
                 3. Section 38(c)(3) of the 1937 Act--Troubled Small PHAs. Section
                38(c)(3) as inserted by the Economic Growth Act identifies criteria for
                troubled small PHAs and establishes an appeals process under which a
                small PHA may dispute a designation as a troubled small PHA. The new
                section also establishes requirements for Corrective Action Agreements
                under which designated troubled small PHAs shall undertake actions to
                correct identified deficiencies.
                 Implementation action: Section 38(c)(3) of the 1937 Act requires
                HUD to issue regulations to establish the appeals process and determine
                how Corrective Action Agreements may be tailored for individual
                troubled
                [[Page 4099]]
                properties. HUD is developing these regulations.
                 4. Section 38(d) of the 1937 Act--Reduction of Administrative
                Burdens. Section 38(d)(1) as inserted by the Economic Growth Act
                exempts small PHAs from any environmental review requirements with
                respect to development or modernization projects costing no more than
                $100,000. Section 38(d)(2) requires HUD, by regulation, to streamline
                procedures for environmental reviews for those small PHAs with
                development or modernization projects costing more than $100,000.
                 Implementation action: Section 38(d)(2) requires HUD to issue
                regulations to determine criteria for applicable development and
                modernization projects. By statute, section 38(d)(2) requires HUD to
                issue regulations to establish streamlined procedures for environmental
                reviews. HUD is developing these regulations.
                Specific Topic for Comment
                 How should HUD define the $100,000 total cost threshold for
                development or modernization project costs? For example, what types of
                costs should be included? Should costs associated with disposition and
                conversion actions be treated as development or modernization costs?
                B. Section 209(b). Energy Conservation
                 Section 209(b) of the Economic Growth Act amends the Operating Fund
                requirements in section 9(e)(2) of the 1937 Act to authorize a small
                PHA (as defined in the new section 38(a), discussed above) to elect to
                be paid for utility and waste management costs for a period of not more
                than 20 years based on its average annual consumption during the
                preceding 3-year period.
                 Implementation action: Section 209(b) requires rulemaking to modify
                existing procedures in a manner that is least disruptive to the
                existing Operating Fund formula funding cycle, as well as to the
                policies and procedures that currently govern utility reimbursements,
                savings, third party agreements and financing, while at the same time
                enabling small PHAs to utilize the additional flexibility provided by
                section 209. For these provisions, PHAs and owners may not use the
                provisions of the Economic Growth Act until HUD issues a rule. Further,
                and as discussed above, the new definition of small PHA necessitates
                further consideration by HUD and implementation through rulemaking.
                Specific Topics for Comment
                 (i) The statute states that: ``The Secretary shall make an initial
                one-time adjustment in the consumption base level to account for
                differences in the heating degree day average over the most recent 20-
                year period compared to the average in the consumption base level.''
                What are good sources for obtaining 20 years of heating degree day
                data? What resources, computer analysis programs, databases, or
                websites could HUD consult to determine utility consumption adjustments
                to account for temperature variations relative to the most recent 20
                years?
                 (ii) The statute permits PHAs to use savings for either Capital
                Fund or Operating Fund eligible expenses. PHAs with less than 250 units
                can follow PIH Notice 2016-18 \4\ or a successor notice on the flexible
                use of operating funds. To the extent that PHAs with more than 250
                units use this flexibility to expend operating funds for capital
                purposes, they will need to document the savings, and track the
                expenditure of the funds. What methods for tracking and reporting on
                the expenditure of such operating funds would enable monitoring, but
                limit burden to PHAs?
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \4\ Available at: https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/PIH-2016-18.PDF.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                C. Section 209(c). Reporting by Agencies Operating in Consortia
                 Section 209(c) of the Economic Growth Act requires HUD to develop
                and deploy electronic information systems to accommodate full
                consolidated reporting by PHAs electing to act in consortia.
                 Implementation action: This provision requires HUD to develop and
                deploy electronic information systems no later than 180 days after
                enactment of the Economic Growth Act (November 20, 2018). HUD is
                developing such electronic information systems and will keep program
                participants updated as necessary to facilitate transition to the new
                systems.
                 Specific topics for comment: What are the current limitations with
                HUD's systems that prevent full consolidated reporting by PHAs engaged
                in consortia? What improvements to HUD's systems should HUD consider
                for such reporting?
                D. Section 209(e). Shared Waiting Lists
                 As discussed above, section 209(e) of the Economic Growth Act
                requires HUD to make available one or more software programs that will
                facilitate the voluntary use of shared waiting lists by PHAs and owners
                receiving HUD assistance. While the requirement that HUD make available
                software programs is self-implementing, HUD is also required to publish
                guidance for implementing such lists.
                 Implementation action: This provision requires HUD to make
                available software and publish guidance no later than one year after
                enactment of the Economic Growth Act (May 24, 2019). HUD is exploring
                options for implementing the required software and will publish
                required guidance accordingly.
                Specific Topics for Comment
                 (i) Because the statute refers to software that supports the use of
                ``shared waiting lists'' by PHAs and owners receiving HUD assistance,
                HUD seeks public input on the definition of a ``shared waiting list.''
                HUD is considering defining ``shared waiting list software'' as
                software that enables a household to submit a single application to get
                on multiple waiting lists. One of the most commonly cited examples of a
                shared waiting list is the Massachusetts Section 8 Housing Choice
                Voucher Centralized Waiting List that serves about 100 PHAs. Despite
                its name, the Centralized Waiting List is not a single waiting list
                used by the participating PHAs. Instead, this is a single application
                system that generates a unique waiting list for each PHA by sorting all
                applicants based on the PHA's preferences, which typically include a
                local preference for households living or working in the PHA's
                jurisdiction.
                 (ii) What types of PHAs and owners might be the best candidates for
                a shared waiting list?
                 (iii) Do owners receiving HUD assistance have unique needs that may
                make it difficult for them to use a shared waiting list?
                 (iv) Would there be a need for additional software security in
                providing access to, and using, a shared waiting list?
                 (v) HUD also encourages the submission of examples where PHAs or
                owners have used shared waiting lists and seeks opinions regarding the
                need for HUD to provide software support for this function and what
                form this support might take.
                 Dated: February 11, 2019.
                Dominique G. Blom,
                General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
                Brian D. Montgomery,
                Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner.
                [FR Doc. 2019-02359 Filed 2-13-19; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT